SF-based AI startup proposes plan to give U.S. government partial TikTok ownership
SAN FRANCISCO - An artificial intelligence startup is proposing a plan to TikTok's parent company ByteDance that would grant the U.S. government to own up to 50% of the social media platform.
Perplexity AI, a San Franciso-based company, released a proposal that would allow the U.S. government to own half of TikTok once Perplexity makes an initial public offering of at least $300 billion, a person, who was not authorized to speak about the proposal, told the Associated Press. The individual tells the AP Perplexity's proposal was revised based on feedback from the Trump administration.
Additionally, the shares owned by the U.S. government would not have voting power, and the government also would not get a seat on the new company's board, the person told the AP.
RELATED:Who would miss TikTok more? See the most obsessed states
Moreover, ByteDance would not have to sever ties with TikTok, but it would have to allow a "full U.S. board control," the person explained to the AP.
The plan also states that the China-based tech company would contribute to TikTok's U.S. business without the proprietary algorithm that fuels what users see on the app, the AP reported, citing a document. In exchange, ByteDance's existing investors will get equity in the new structure that arises.
This latest plan from Perplexity follows an initial proposal the company introduced that called for the formation of a new structure that would merge Perplexity with TikTok's U.S. business and include investments from other investors.
RELATED: TikTok restoring service after Trump's statement, company says
The artificial intelligence company introduced the plan to ByteDance on Jan. 18, the day before the law banning TikTok in the U.S. took effect.
What they're saying
President Donald Trump told the Associated Press late Saturday that he expects a deal will be made in as soon as 30 days. "Numerous people are talking to me. Very substantial people," Trump said. "We have a lot of interest in it, and the United States will be a big beneficiary. ... I'd only do it if the United States benefits."
The backstory
TikTok was to be banned in the United States by Jan. 19 if it did not cut ties with ByteDance. The Supreme Court upheld the law, but President Donald Trump then issued an executive order to halt enforcement of the law for 75 days. TikTok briefly shut down in the U.S. a week ago but went back online after Trump said he would postpone the ban.
RELATED:Trump signs order to keep TikTok open for 75 days
The federal law required ByteDance to sever ties with TikTok by Jan. 19 or face a nationwide ban. The law was passed by Congress in April 2024 after it was included as part of a high-priority $95 billion package that provided foreign aid to Ukraine and Israel. President Joe Biden signed it, and then TikTok and ByteDance quickly sued on First Amendment grounds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2 Dividend Stocks to Hold for the Next 2 Years
Dividend stocks can generate reliable passive income. The key is to find companies that have a strong track record of paying and increasing their dividends. Investors also want to be sure that they are picking companies that can generate enough earnings and free cash flow to cover and raise their dividends in the future. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Since the pandemic began, the stock market has proven to be erratic, plunging at times only to quickly recover and launch into fresh bull markets. Today, with plenty of new uncertainty due to issues including President Donald Trump's trade wars, U.S. fiscal concerns, and the concerning trajectory of the U.S. economy, more volatility is certainly on the docket. That's why investors may want to check out some dividend stocks, which can provide reliable passive income. The returns of dividend stocks can be much more dependable than those of non-payers, especially if you choose ones with good track records and the ability to grow their earnings and free cash flows so they can keep regularly increasing their payouts. Here are two dividend stocks that meet those criteria that investors can feel comfortable buying and holding for the next two years. The iconic footwear and apparel company Nike (NYSE: NKE) has been less than iconic as a stock lately. It's now down by about 39% over the last five years (as of June 4). Intensifying competition in the footwear and apparel space, struggles with the brand, and an excessive focus on digital promotions and sales have resulted in the company underperforming in recent years. To change its trajectory, the board hired longtime Nike veteran Elliot Hill out of retirement to take the helm, and Nike is now deeply entrenched in his turnaround plan. Hill is focused on getting the company back to what it does best -- renewing its intense focus on the brand, leading the way on product innovation, and reactivating and improving its sales relationships with wholesalers. Hill also said earlier this year that Nike will be focused on five product areas -- running, basketball, football, training, and sportswear -- and three markets: the U.S., the United Kingdom, and China. But as some analysts have pointed out, Nike's turnaround could take longer than expected, especially if the global trade war continues or if the U.S. economy tips into a recession. A longer turnaround could make it difficult to entice investors to buy and hold the stock, which is why Nike is likely to make paying and raising its dividend a priority. Its yield of about 2.6% at the current share price isn't bad, but it trails most Treasury yields right now and over the past few years. In November, Nike increased its quarterly dividend by 8%, marking the 23rd consecutive year the company has hiked the payout. In a couple more years, Nike is likely to join an exclusive club -- the Dividend Aristocrats®, which are S&P 500 companies that have increased their payouts for a minimum of 25 straight years. (The term Dividend Aristocrats® is a registered trademark of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC.) Its ascension into that group will give Nike added some credibility among dividend investors. Nike also has a trailing 12-month free cash flow yield of 5.66%, more than double its current dividend yield. Nike has a good dividend track record and clear incentives to keep raising its payouts to reward shareholders for their patience. If its turnaround is successful, that should also enable the company to grow earnings and free cash flow, which will also bolster its capacity to pay higher dividends. If you've followed Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC), then you know that the bank has been on a bumpy ride over the last decade. In 2016, it came to light that large numbers of employees at the bank had been opening banking and credit card accounts in customers' names without those customers' authorization. The scandal evolved into a reputational nightmare for Wells Fargo and cost it billions of dollars in fines and lost profits. Regulators put various restrictions and consent orders on the bank to monitor its actions. In addition, the Federal Reserve in 2018 put an asset cap on it, preventing it from growing its balance sheet above $1.95 trillion -- limiting its ability to expand, pursue acquisitions, and make more money. In 2019, the bank brought on Charlie Scharf to take over as CEO, and he did a tremendous amount of work to overhaul the bank's regulatory infrastructure and leadership team. Scharf also significantly cut expenses, sold off non-core assets, and ramped up higher-returning businesses like investment banking and credit card lending. This year, after Trump returned to the White House, banking regulators under his administration quickly terminated the consent orders that were put in place to monitor its behavior in the wake of the scandal, and just recently lifted the asset cap. That's a massive deal for the bank, which can now begin to grow its balance sheet again and go on the offensive in the financial services market. During the pandemic, Wells Fargo was one of the few banks forced to cut its dividend due to regulations put into place by the Federal Reserve. While the bank has been able to regrow its payout, its yield still sits in the bottom half of its peer group. Furthermore, broader deregulation of the banking sector from Trump and his administrators is likely on the way. I suspect the largest banks will eventually have much lower regulatory capital requirements than they have now, which will allow them to return more capital to shareholders. Furthermore, Wall Street analysts on average currently expect Wells Fargo to grow its diluted earnings per share by about 8% this year and by close to 14% next year, according to data provided by Visible Alpha. Over the last 12 months, Wells Fargo's dividends only consumed about 31% of earnings, so it should have plenty of opportunities to keep growing its payouts in the coming years. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $363,030!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,088!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $674,395!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Wells Fargo is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Bram Berkowitz has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nike. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 Dividend Stocks to Hold for the Next 2 Years was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Musk's feud with Trump could jeopardize his business empire
Elon Musk, the world's richest man, may have made himself an enemy of the world's most powerful leader. The public blowout between Musk and President Trump is threatening the tech billionaire's businesses, some of which have billions of dollars' worth of federal contracts. Musk's aerospace company SpaceX alone reportedly has at least $22 billion in federal contracts — which Trump had threatened to revoke at the peak of his feud with his former adviser. 'Trump goes after people, companies and organizations he doesn't like,' said Peter Loge, a professor at George Washington University and former senior FDA adviser during the Obama administration. 'As a real estate developer, politician and president, he has used every tool at his disposal to punish people he thinks have wronged him,' Loge added. 'Unless Musk expresses contrition, Trump is likely to hurt him in every way he can think of. If Musk is contrite, he can be welcomed back into the Trump tent.' While the two could reconcile in the future, observers agree the dramatic turn of events leaves Musk's business empire vulnerable to Trump's wrath. Trump, at one point during Thursday's back-and-forth, threatened to cut Musk's government contracts as he called his former adviser 'crazy.' 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. Musk, in turn, said he would decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which is responsible for ferrying astronauts and cargo to and from the International Space Station. He later backed off, after an X user urged him to 'cool off and take a step back.' The exchange underscored how Musk's business ventures could get caught in the crosshairs of any feud with the president, who is known to have a proclivity for retribution. 'If this turns into a hot war, certainly, the consequences for Musk's business relationship with the federal government could be in peril, or at least significantly complicated,' said GOP strategist and Trump campaign alum Brian Seitchik. The tech billionaire officially departed the White House last week after a four-month stint in government in which he seemed to rarely leave Trump's side, becoming a near constant presence at Mar-a-Lago, Cabinet meetings and the Oval Office. He exited the administration seemingly on good terms with Trump despite his pushback against the president's sweeping tax and spending bill — the centerpiece of Trump's domestic policy agenda, which is projected to add trillions of dollars to the deficit. Trump presented Musk with a golden key to the White House during a Friday farewell ceremony in Oval Office, during which the duo downplayed their differences and spoke highly of each other's work. However, Musk sharpened his criticism of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' soon after, as he slammed the legislation as a 'disgusting abomination.' The president responded Thursday, saying he was 'very surprised' and 'disappointed' by Musk's comments and cast doubt on the future of their relationship. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said during an Oval Office appearance alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. The situation quickly devolved into personal attacks. Musk fired back on his social platform X, suggesting the president would have lost the 2024 election without him, linking Trump to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein and backing calls for the president's impeachment. As the feud dragged on Thursday, Tesla's stock plunged 14 percent Thursday, costing the electric vehicle maker more than $150 billion. The company was still trying to fully recover from the fallout of Musk's highly controversial role in the Trump administration, leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Tesla's stock is down 20 percent since the start of the year. 'The social media and war of words back and forth is not good for anyone and put massive pressure on Tesla shares with fears that Trump will turn from friend to foe and create a tough regulatory environment for Musk in the Beltway,' Wedbush Securities analysts wrote in a note Friday. 'Musk needs Trump and Trump needs Musk for many reasons, and these two becoming friends again will be a huge relief for Tesla shares,' they added. Ross Gerber, a longtime Tesla investor and CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management, slammed Musk for the ripple effects his comments may have had on Tesla's stock. 'Trump is an angry and vindictive man who doesn't forget when slighted. This doesn't get solved other than Elon groveling back and publicly apologizing,' Gerber wrote on X Friday, adding in an earlier post, 'So Tesla investors are down $140 billion over this break up. About how much Musk claimed to saving for the US government.' As the back-and-forth unfolded Thursday, Gerber quipped, 'Can someone please take the phone away from him [Musk].' When pressed on the feud, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Musk has a right to speak for his companies. 'So the only difference between Friday and today is Elon went back to his companies. And, as a businessman, he has a right to speak for his companies. But as president, President Trump has a responsibility to fight for this country,' she said Thursday on FOX News Channel's 'Hannity.' While Trump could pose new risks to Musk's business outlooks, analysts say the fight could also impede the president's ability to run the government. SpaceX held federal contracts with agencies like NASA and the Pentagon long before Trump's presidency, becoming a crucial partner to the federal government as it phased out the space shuttle program. If Musk reverses on his decision to keep Dragon in commission, experts say it could debilitate the U.S. space program 'If such threats were carried out, it would be catastrophic,' said space policy expert Mark Whittington, adding later, 'Without SpaceX, we're back to being dependent on the Russians.' NASA has increasingly relied on SpaceX for its infrastructure, including the Dragon capsule, which is the only U.S. system capable of getting crews to the International Space Station. Russia's Souyuz capsules, the Associated Press reported, are the only other way to get crews to the space station. While both Trump and Musk have much to lose from a war, some Republicans veterans aren't ruling out the chance of a reconciliation. 'There's always the possibility that Trump is serious about this, but I think if you take the 'Art of the Deal' seriously, he is often maximally negotiating,' said GOP strategist Chris Johnson. The feud appeared to cool slightly Friday morning, as Musk seemingly agreed with a post from hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, who suggested the pair 'should make peace for the benefit of our great country.' But Trump has shown no desire to talk to Musk despite reports the two might speak on the phone. 'I won't be speaking to him for a while, I guess, but I wish him well,' Trump told CNN's Dana Bash on Friday. Tesla's stock partially recovered amid hopes of a détente, rising 5 percent. 'If Musk is able to sue for peace and the onus is on him to make peace with Trump, then it'll be a blip in the screen and their bromance will be restored,' Seitchik told The Hill. However, he added, 'If this call goes poorly and this continues to escalate, then certainly Trump will look for every bit of leverage to inflict pain on Elon Musk and his businesses.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Corporate support for Pride is dwindling nationwide. In NC, it's a mixed bag
Pride Month has long been an occasion for companies and institutions to display their support for the LGBTQ+ community, whether it be for profit or for principle. It's often a trivial gesture, but it can have a meaningful impact for a community that had long been relegated to the shadows of society. But more recently, that support has waned amid a regressive political climate that has made many companies rethink their commitments to diversity, equity and inclusion. A survey conducted by the national risk management firm Gravity Research found that around 39% of companies said they would reduce their engagement around Pride Month this year. Some of the top reasons for the change were the Trump administration, conservative activists and conservative policymakers, the survey found. Major corporations, including Mastercard and Pepsi, have pulled their sponsorship of major Pride events or avoided the topic on social media. In North Carolina, the results are mixed. Take Lowe's, which is based in Mooresville. Lowe's hasn't yet acknowledged Pride Month on its social media — a marked difference from past years when it openly embraced the occasion. That's not unexpected, given that Lowe's has already announced an end to many of its DEI initiatives. Last year, the company said it would no longer participate in surveys conducted by LGBTQ+ groups and ended its support of outside events like festivals, parades and fairs. (Lowe's had previously been a longtime supporter of Charlotte's annual Pride festival.) But surprising or not, it's reflective of a growing trend away from publicly embracing the LGBTQ+ community. Charlotte-based Bank of America also has remained quiet about Pride so far. In past years, Bank of America has been vocal about celebrating the occasion on social media and honoring its LGBTQ+ employees with the hashtag #BofAPride, but that support has been absent this year. Compare that with Truist, which posted in celebration of Pride on its Facebook and Instagram accounts. For North Carolina's professional sports teams, the results are mixed, too. While the Carolina Panthers and Charlotte Hornets both celebrated the start of Pride on social media, the Carolina Hurricanes have not. In fact, the team has remained largely silent about Pride since 2023 — the Hurricanes are one of just a handful NHL teams to not acknowledge it this year — a decision that has disappointed many fans who feel a simple acknowledgment of the occasion is not too much to ask. The same goes for the state's largest cities. The city of Charlotte posted on its social media accounts at the beginning of Pride, in addition to updating its profile picture to a rainbow version of the city's crown logo. The cities of Raleigh and Greensboro, however, did not. This move toward silence comes at a time when things like Pride celebrations and flags are under attack from lawmakers across the state. Legislation has been introduced at the state level that would effectively ban the display of Pride flags in government buildings, while some counties have passed ordinances governing public events that some interpret as targeting Pride events or drag performances. Of course, a social media post is just that: a social media post. It's not going to defeat anti-LGBTQ legislation, or save gay kids from being bullied, or change the country's attitude towards transgender people — at least not on its own. From some companies, it's just a lot of empty words or glorified virtue signaling. But public support for any marginalized group can be meaningful, especially when it happens on a large scale. And when institutions cower in the face of political pressure to stay silent, they're just letting the bullies win. It makes real change all the more difficult. Ultimately, it's not the silence that is the problem. It's the fact that the silence is new — a sudden absence of the public support and acceptance that existed before. It feels like another step backward during a time when progress feels like it's constantly stuck in reverse.
