‘Natural that voters want it all': Why specific estate plans still mattered in GE2025
The results of GE2025 show that a considered town plan and municipal management chops have become baseline expectations for many voters here. ST PHOTO: NG SOR LUAN
News analysis 'Natural that voters want it all': Why specific estate plans still mattered in GE2025
SINGAPORE – More sheltered walkways and cleaner estates may appear as rather provincial concerns, but the results of the 2025 General Election show that a considered town plan and municipal management chops have become baseline expectations for many voters here.
Much has been written about how the Singaporean voter has become more discerning in assessing the calibre, credibility and ground presence of candidates seeking election, but understated is his desire for his neighbourhood to continue being improved, with a well-run town council being a given.
While the national swing towards the PAP can broadly be seen as an endorsement of its call to assemble a strong leadership team in the face of external challenges, analysts noted how the ruling party got down to brass tacks when it came to constituency-level report cards, in terms of specific projects delivered and those to come.
Conversely, political parties that glossed over municipal plans or were perceived to have a credibility gap in carrying out said plans suffered at the polls.
Associate Professor Walter Theseira noted that while all opposition candidates would claim the ability and willingness to confront the PAP in Parliament, the emphasis on town council matters during the campaign reminded the public to consider the credibility and quality of each candidate in delivering on the basics.
'It is natural that voters want it all: They want quality representation of their views in Parliament as well as effective ground management,' said the Singapore University of Social Sciences economist.
He added: 'Town council management can't be separated from the overall quality of the candidate as well as the party backing them.'
Contributing factor in SMC outcomes
Singapore Management University (SMU) law don Eugene Tan said municipal issues will continue to feature at the local level of each general election, even if in the grander scheme they do not weigh as heavily on voters' decisions as other issues.
This was why the PAP took pains during – and even before – the hustings to tell residents in the six new single-member constituencies created ahead of the election that their estates would continue to be well taken care of.
For instance, under this group representation constituency-plus-one narrative, residents in Jalan Kayu SMC continue to be part of Ang Mo Kio's 'extended family' while those in Queenstown SMC are 'part of our team of brothers and sisters' in Tanjong Pagar GRC, according to PAP candidates.
This narrative was most clearly articulated when Health Minister Ong Ye Kung urged voters to keep Ms Poh Li San part of the 'Sembawang family' by voting for her over Singapore Democratic Party chief Chee Soon Juan.
During campaigning, Mr Ong – who anchors neighbouring Sembawang GRC – said Dr Chee did not want Sembawang West SMC to be part of the bigger Sembawang family, as this would be politically disadvantageous for Dr Chee.
This came after Dr Chee criticised Mr Ong's plan to assign Woodlands Galaxy Community Club – which falls just outside Sembawang West's boundaries – to the new SMC.
'Better for him that Sembawang West, you become a lonely island, cut off from the rest of Sembawang Town,' Mr Ong said at a PAP rally. Ms Poh edged out Dr Chee with 53.19 per cent of the vote.
Professor Tan said that having an SMC pegged to a GRC is meant to assure voters that estate management and improvement will be properly taken care of. This is a plus point but not a game changer, and the election results validated MPs who had walked and worked the ground over the past electoral cycle, he added.
This was most evident in the new Queenstown and Jurong Central SMCs, where the vote shares of the two incumbent PAP MPs – Mr Eric Chua and Mr Xie Yao Quan repectively – exceeded 80 per cent, albeit against smaller opposition parties.
Another example was the rematch in Bukit Panjang SMC, where PAP stalwart Liang Eng Hwa bettered his result compared with the close fight in 2020 when he first stepped into the single seat. Mr Liang took 61.41 per cent of the vote this round, against SDP chairman Paul Tambyah.
Dr Tambyah said during the hustings that estate projects and services would continue even if SDP candidates prevailed over their PAP opponents.
This drew a response from Mr Liang who said Dr Tambyah was 'naive' to think that constituency projects would continue on 'autopilot' under a new MP.
This was as MPs play an important role in advocating for residents as well as working with the Government to bring needed projects to the constituency, he argued.
Municipal record helped WP fend off jabs
Meanwhile, the WP's ability to consolidate and improve its position this election suggests that voters agreed it was doing a good job in town council management, as well as politically, said Prof Theseira.
The WP made sure to highlight its performance in recent town council report cards to tell voters it had overcome the difficulties it faced in Aljunied after 2011 – which resulted in long-running civil suits that were settled in 2024 – and that towns under its charge were as competently managed as those under the PAP.
During the campaign, the WP's He Ting Ru had said Sengkang Town Council, which she chairs, achieved the top (green) banding for estate cleanliness in the Ministry of National Development's town council management report since the WP took over management of the town.
A day later, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong remarked at a doorstop in the WP-held Aljunied that 'yes, all the markers are green, but some markers are greener than others'. In later rally speeches, the PAP took aim at the WP's estate management in Sengkang GRC, alleging that basic standards had slipped.
Prof Theseira said the WP's vote share showed that it was able to shrug off the narrative that it was not able to competently and transparently manage town councils.
Conversely, voters appeared to have penalised opposition parties that did not put enough emphasis on competent town management.
PSP chief Leong Mun Wai, who was one of five candidates who lost in West Coast-Jurong West GRC, said the main role of an MP is to debate national policies and not be estate managers who are interested only in local issues.
He was responding to a comment by his PAP opponent, Minister for National Development Desmond Lee, who said residents should ask contesting parties about their plans for the constituency.
SMU's Prof Tan called the PSP's approach 'untenable' and that its lack of sensitivity to municipal concerns may have contributed to its poor showing.
'(PSP) seemed to have ignored voters' concerns about estate management and improvement… For the voters, if the MPs are not going to take care of their estates, who will?' he asked.
Mr Leong's PSP team lost to Mr Lee's PAP slate, which polled 60.01 per cent of the vote this round, up from 51.68 per cent in 2020.
Ground knowledge may have also been why Mr Darryl Lo, an independent candidate and unknown before the election, managed to secure 23.47 per cent of the vote in Radin Mas SMC, compared with People's Alliance for Reform's Kumar Appavoo's 7.36 per cent.
While it was Mr Kumar's fourth general election, Mr Lo grew up and lived in Radin Mas, and ran a campaign that had both policy ideas and estate-level suggestions, including cleanliness issues in the Bukit Purmei area and to have a dog run in the constituency.
Mr Lo's vote share beat out the performance of many of the smaller opposition parties in single seats, and contributed to independent candidates turning in their best election results here in over five decades.
'One can read much into how voters preferred a young but well-qualified, on paper, candidate in Radin Mas to an opposition candidate who had contested the area multiple times prior,' said Prof Theseira.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Eldercare staff fined $10k each after elderly man in wheelchair died from fall off van platform
Myanmar national Moe Thadar, then 49, was a healthcare assistant at the time, while Singaporean Kwa Kim Seng, then 67, was employed as a van driver. Eldercare staff fined $10k each after elderly man in wheelchair died from fall off van platform Shaffiq Alkhatib The Straits Times June 3, 2025 Two employees of an eldercare services provider were helping clients board its van when one of the senior citizens fell off the vehicle's wheelchair lift platform and his head struck the ground. Mr Hassan Mohamed Karchi Arsan Osman, 76, was unconscious when he was taken to the National University Hospital on Feb 3, 2021, and died of a head injury at 9.35pm that day. On June 3, Active Global Respite Care was fined $7,000 after it was convicted of an offence under the Workplace Safety and Health (Risk Management) Regulations. Court documents stated that it failed to implement safety control measures and safe work procedures governing the use of the wheelchair lift at the rear of the van. Two people, who were working for the company when the incident took place, were each fined $10,000 in December 2023. Myanmar national Moe Thadar, then 49, was a healthcare assistant at the time, while Singaporean Kwa Kim Seng, then 67, was employed as a van driver. They failed to ensure that the brakes of Mr Hassan's wheelchair were engaged, causing his death. For the current case, Ministry of Manpower prosecutor Kimberly Boo told the court that Active Global Respite Care owned two vans used for transporting elderly clients between their homes and a senior care centre at Block 31A Ghim Moh Link. A healthcare assistant would be present in each van to assist with the transportation. Each van was installed with a wheelchair lift, allowing wheelchair users to get into the vehicle through a platform that could be raised. At around 4.40pm on Feb 3, 2021, Moe Thadar and Kwa were helping the clients to board one of the vans at the senior care centre's pickup point. Ms Boo said: "When Moe wheeled (Mr Hassan) from the pickup point onto the wheelchair lift platform, she failed to engage the brakes of (his) wheelchair. "As Moe was walking away, she told Kwa, 'uncle, hold', in order to inform him that (Mr Hassan) was ready to be lifted. Kwa proceeded to raise the wheelchair lift platform while chatting with a colleague." As the platform was reaching the top of the lift, in line with the van, Kwa did not wait for a healthcare assistant inside the van to grab hold of the wheelchair. Kwa released his grip on Mr Hassan's wheelchair, which rolled backwards and off the platform. Mr Hassan's head struck the ground when he fell. He was pronounced dead later that day. Ms Boo told the court that prior to the incident, Active Global Respite Care had no documented risk assessment on the transportation of its clients using a van with a wheelchair lift. She added that on the day of the incident, multiple control measures to minimise safety risks to Mr Hassan were not implemented. These included ensuring that wheelchair brakes were engaged before activating the wheelchair lift. Defence lawyers Gloria James-Civetta and Noelle Teoh, who represented Active Global Respite Care, on June 3 pleaded for their client to be given a fine of not more than $5,000. The pair from Gloria James-Civetta & Co added: "The incident was an isolated and unprecedented occurrence that tragically resulted in the passing of the late Mr Hassan. "Prior to the incident on Feb 3, 2021, Active Global had operated in Singapore for several years without any record of similar serious incidents or accidents. It is also noted that the late Mr Hassan had successfully completed nearly 500 rides with Active Global over the course of his engagement, without issue." The lawyers stated in court documents that since the incident, their client has taken immediate and proactive measures to address any gaps in its safety protocols. This includes updating its standard operating procedure in June 2021 to further enhance clients' safety during transportation. It also deployed additional manpower to act as traffic marshals at the drop-off and pickup points of its centres, the court heard. Click here to contribute a story or submit it to our WhatsApp Get more of Stomp's latest updates by following us on:
Business Times
a day ago
- Business Times
Malaysia to fully enforce VEP for foreign vehicles from Jul 1
[KUALA LUMPUR] Malaysia will begin full enforcement of its Vehicle Entry Permit (VEP) system from Jul 1, 2025. The move will require all foreign-registered vehicles entering the country at Malaysia-Singapore land border to have an activated VEP tag, the Transport Ministry announced on Wednesday (Jun 4). Upon its enforcement, foreign vehicle owners who fail to register or activate their VEP will face legal action, with summonses issued in accordance with Section 66H(7) of the Road Transport Act 1987. This provision makes it an offence to operate a foreign-registered motor vehicle in Malaysia without a valid permit. The VEP enforcement, which applies primarily to Singapore-registered vehicles crossing the land border into Johor, began in October 2024 through a phased rollout. Initially, Malaysian authorities adopted an advocacy approach, issuing reminder notices instead of penalties to non-compliant vehicle owners. During this first phase, 52,012 Singaporean vehicles were randomly inspected, with 2,245 or 4.3 per cent found without valid VEPs and issued reminder notices. As at Jun 2, 2025, a total of 233,678 radio frequency identification (RFID) tags have been issued under the VEP programme, covering both private individuals and companies. Of this, 194,507 have been installed and activated, while 36,511 tags remain inactive or uninstalled. Foreign drivers who are issued summonses must settle their fines before exiting the country. Payments can be made via cashless methods at Road Transport Department (JPJ) counters, JPJ Mobile units, or through the MyEG online platform. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up 'JPJ urges all foreign motor vehicle owners to promptly register, install, and activate their RFID VEP tags to avoid any inconvenience when entering or leaving Malaysia in the future,' the Transport Ministry said in the statement. The move marks the end of a long-delayed enforcement process following widespread teething issues when the VEP system was introduced last year. The rollout in October last year was marred by technical problems and overwhelmed service providers, leading to long queues at installation centres, registration delays and mounting frustration among Singaporean motorists and cross-border commuters. To ease the disruption, authorities had opted to issue only reminders at the border while addressing the system's shortcomings. The government said the staggered enforcement gave vehicle owners more time to comply and allowed officials to improve infrastructure and vendor capacity. According to estimates from Malaysia's Transport Ministry, an average of 16,107 vehicles from Singapore crossed the Johor-Singapore border daily in 2024. This rate suggests an annual total of over 5.8 million vehicle entries into Johor and Singapore.
CNA
a day ago
- CNA
Analysis: Are fines the most effective punishment for train disruptions?
SINGAPORE: Public transport operator SMRT faces a S$3 million (US$2.3 million) fine over a major incident on its East-West Line last year. But experts told CNA that in Singapore's context, it would be more crucial to relook the dynamic between operators and the Land Transport Authority (LTA). For example, a question that needs to be asked is who should be responsible for making decisions on the trade-off between reliability and cost effectiveness, said one observer. Their comments came after the LTA and the Transport Safety Investigation Bureau (TSIB) released reports on Tuesday (Jun 3) detailing the factors that contributed to the six-day disruption in September 2024. These included the maintenance schedule for the incident train being extended beyond stipulated intervals. 'I think the more important thing is not the fine, but what will be done at SMRT as well as at LTA to implement improved processes for evaluating maintenance decisions and monitoring reliability,' said Associate Professor Walter Theseira of the Singapore University of Social Sciences' business school. Transport fares and public funds go towards the running of Singapore's trains, and hence "it is not wrong" to seek more cost-effective ways of maintenance, he said. 'But there may need to be more oversight and collaboration between the operator and LTA in making these decisions.' The authority said on Tuesday that since the September incident, it has strengthened oversight of areas such as operators' internal procedures to adjust maintenance schedules. Assoc Prof Theseira added that he did not think operators and their management were motivated by trying to avoid fines. When deciding how big a fine to impose, LTA said it took into consideration the costs that SMRT bore for repairs and providing free bridging buses, regular bus services and shuttle train services. These came up to more than S$10 million. An estimated 500,000 out of 2.8 million train journeys were affected on each day of the disruption. Services were disrupted along nine stations from Boon Lay to Queenstown. Associate Professor Raymond Ong, a transport infrastructure researcher at the National University of Singapore (NUS), said the S$3 million fine was appropriate given the number of stations affected. He noted that a bigger fine was given for an incident in 2015 that took down the entire North-South Line and East-West Line for hours. Past fines for train disruptions and incidents In 2018, SMRT was fined a total of S$1.9 million over the Bishan Tunnel flooding incident in 2017 as well as a separate accident near Pasir Ris station in 2016, which left two SMRT trainees dead. In 2015, SMRT was fined S$5.4 million for Singapore's worst train disruption at the time, which affected 413,000 commuters. This remains the largest fine to date. SMRT was found to be fully responsible for the incident and to have fallen short in maintenance – failing to address water seepage in the tunnel between Tanjong Pagar and Raffles Place stations, for example. In 2014, SMRT was fined S$1.6 million for four incidents that took place over 2013 and 2014, which included SMRT train drivers running red light signals. SBS Transit was fined S$50,000 in 2014 for a 40-minute disruption caused by carelessness during maintenance works at Potong Pasir station. In 2013, both SMRT and SBS Transit were fined a total of S$1.1 million for incidents over 2012 and 2013. SMRT was fined S$860,000 for rail defects on the Circle Line, a safety breach at Ulu Pandan depot, its handling of a trackside fire at Newton Station (which incurred the highest fine of S$300,000) and for launching only three trains –instead of the scheduled four – from Bukit Panjang LRT Depot. SBS Transit was fined S$250,000 for a service disruption on the NEL which led to stranded commuters having to wait in the haze for shuttle bus services. In 2012, SMRT was fined S$2 million for two disruptions in Dec 2011 that affected 221,000 commuters. The effort spent to quickly and safely recover service while minimising disruption to commuters is a key mitigating factor, said Assoc Prof Ong. He said a fine was a 'logical and handy tool' that could be used, but also stressed it was more important for the operator and regulator to learn from the incident and improve maintenance regimes. Electrical engineering expert Teo Chor Kok however said the fine could be higher since there were multiple lapses, though he acknowledged that financial penalties were ineffective in leading to change. Noting that the stipulated overhaul interval for trains was 500,000 km, he questioned SMRT's decision to increase this twice and up to 750,000km a month before the incident. An overhaul refers to a complete tear-down and rebuild to restore a train to an "as-good-as-new" condition. By the time of the incident, the train had logged 690,000km since its last overhaul in 2018. 'We can give (an) engineering error of 10 per cent, but 690,000km is (a gross) management lapse,' said Mr Teo. The extent of damage to the tracks – 46 rail breaks along a 2.55km stretch – signals that the operator did not stop the train when something was wrong, he added. TSIB noted in its report that this was due to staff believing that a high temperature warning was a false one, due to a system error not detecting which train was experiencing the issue. CNA also asked experts whether Singapore could consider Hong Kong's approach, where its train operator was made to give commuters a 50 per cent fare concession for a day due to three separate service disruptions this year. This was on top of a HK$19.2 million (S$3.2 million) fine. Assoc Prof Theseira pointed out that SMRT's S$3 million fine could be used to provide blanket concessions, but in Singapore's case, LTA has already announced that it will go towards helping needy commuters. He added that in Singapore, fare revenues alone do not cover the operating and maintenance costs for public transport operators. 'Reducing their fare revenue directly would just have the effect of later requiring more public funding to ensure operations are sustainable,' he said. This is why proposals to cut fares or stop fare increases don't produce the effect of "punishing" the operator, said Assoc Prof Theseira. 'In the end, public subsidies are required, so it is actually punishing the taxpayer.' ON THE OVERHAUL REGIME Assoc Prof Theseira said the findings on the causes of the incident pointed to a failure to fully understand the risks of adjusting the maintenance and overhaul regime of the train's axle boxes. One of these boxes had failed and dropped from the train and onto the tracks. LTA gives operators flexibility to make tweaks according to operation experience and engineering analysis because operating conditions differ, and the manufacturer's recommendations may not necessarily be appropriate, he said. Assoc Prof Ong noted that SMRT was in the process of overhauling its first-generation trains when the incident took place. 'It's unfortunate ... because they are already overhauling, and they are all queuing up to be overhauled.' President of SMRT Trains Lam Sheau Kai said on Tuesday that the operator's overhaul regime had served it well over the past 38 years. 'What may have caught us off-guard this time was the convergence of factors - delays in new train deliveries due to COVID-19, our efforts to balance and adjust overhaul schedules, and the lag in receiving critical spare parts.' He added that for 'rare, black swan events like COVID-19', it was important that SMRT and LTA come together to 'reassess collectively'. LTA has said that going forward, it will require rail operators to inform them of extensions to overhaul intervals. Assoc Prof Theseira said LTA might have been in a better position to question and oversee SMRT's decisions on maintenance schedules, though he acknowledged that the relationship was complex - because of the operator's need to, again, be both reliable and cost-effective. The operator is expected to take steps to manage costs, but it may be that LTA has more expertise and responsibility to make the decision together with SMRT, he said. 'We should certainly look at whether there was open communication between the operator and LTA on the operating constraints given the pandemic supply chain shortages and (the) need to keep operating the (first-generation) KHI trains,' he said. If SMRT had shortened the overhaul interval for the defective axle box, it could have prevented the entire incident - but there would have been costs involved, and not just monetary ones, said Assoc Prof Theseira. Fewer trains would be available for operations due to maintenance, meaning reduce capacity during peak periods. 'Decisions that would have avoided this would have had consequences of their own, that would also affect the public," he noted.
