
Bronx judge Jeffrey Zimmerman resigns after misconduct commission investigation for ‘discourteous behavior'
An outspoken Bronx judge has agreed to resign — and never return to the bench — following complaints that he criticized a jury's verdict and engaged in a 'pattern of discourteous behavior' including blasting a fellow judge, the Daily News has learned.
Acting Supreme Court Judge Jeffrey Zimmerman in a Feb. 19 letter to Chief Administrative Judge Joseph Zayas said he was stepping down effective April 3. In return, the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct dropped the investigation.
In agreeing to step down, Zimmerman stipulated that he would not try to return to the bench. The commission said there have been 148 such stipulations since the process was started in 2003.
The last time a city judge agreed to a stipulation was in 2023, when a Family Court judge resigned while under investigation for long absences from work and a Surrogate Court judge resigned amid charges of misconduct.
Zimmerman could not be reached for comment. But his lawyer, Deborah Scalise, noted that there were 'no findings of wrongdoing.'
She also pointed out his 41 years of service as a federal and state prosecutor, criminal justice policy expert, private sector lawyer and his 'encore career' — seven years as a judge.
According to the commission on Judicial Conduct, Zimmerman was accused of misconduct in January.
Zimmerman at a criminal court arraignment 'interfered in the attorney-client relationship between a defendant and his attorney, repeatedly disparaged the defendant's attorney and appeared to prejudge the defendant's guilt.'
Zimmerman was also accused of privately talking to the jury following a criminal trial 'and conveyed information to the jury that could be interpreted as implicitly criticizing its verdict,' according to documents posted by the commission.
In two other cases, the commission said in the documents, Zimmerman 'disparaged a fellow judge who authored an opinion with which he disagreed.' In that instance, and at another time, Zimmerman 'failed to be patient, dignified and courteous to attorneys appearing before him.'
Specifics about the cases were not released.
The commission noted that Zimmerman, who has no prior disciplinary history, cooperated with its investigation 'and apologized for his conduct.'
'Judges are obliged to be patient, dignified and courteous with all whom they see in their professional capacity,' said Commissioner Administrator Robert Tembeckjian, 'and to afford all litigants and their lawyers the opportunity to be heard.'
'They must also refrain from praising or criticizing a jury for its verdict.'
Zimmerman said in the letter that it has been 'an honor and a privilege to serve in this position.'
Zimmerman had been a staunch critic of the 2020 bail reform laws. In a 2022 op-ed piece for The News, Zimmerman wrote that the public debate about bail reform 'has become completely divorced from the purpose of the statute.'
'If our elected officials believe that bail should be set only to ensure return to court — and if they believe New Yorkers are willing to accept that — they should then stop defining 'bail-eligible' offenses in terms of violence, absent any evidence that those accused of such crimes are less likely to return to court,' he added. 'And if they're not prepared to do this, then they should allow judges to consider the safety of the community when setting bail, as do most other jurisdictions.'
In 2021, Zimmerman raised eyebrows when it came to light that he and a federal judge had required two defendants entering into plea deals to get a COVID-19 vaccine.
Zimmerman had argued that while the defendant in his case, William Gregory — charged with drug possession, criminal trespass and shoplifting— had clearly acted out of self-interest and that the vaccine was for the societal good and indicative of Gregory's rehabilitation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Judge rules Trump's firings at federal product safety agency illegal
A federal judge on Friday ruled that President Trump's firings of three Biden-nominated Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) members were illegal, enabling them to return to their posts. U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox, an appointee of former President Biden who serves in Maryland, ordered the administration restore the commissioners' pay as well as their access to office spaces, computers and email accounts. The three commissioners — Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric and Richard Trumka Jr. — sued the administration after Trump fired them last month. Maddox is the latest district judge to block Trump's efforts to fire Democratic appointees at independent agencies across the federal bureaucracy despite federal law providing them with for-cause removal protections. The president did not purport to have cause in firing the CPSC members or at the other agencies. His administration seeks to invalidate the protections as unconstitutional by intruding on the president's authority to oversee the executive branch. The Supreme Court's conservative majority has signaled a willingness to agree with that view, but it has not yet formally overruled the court's 90-year-old precedent that has paved the way for Congress to provide the removal protections. In its latest signal, the nation's highest court last month lifted lower injunctions blocking Trump's firings at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), saying the agency leaders could be terminated until any appeals are resolved. Maddox acknowledged that decision on Friday but distinguished it from his case. He stressed the Supreme Court rooted its decision in how the NLRB and MSPB leaders faced a whiplash of removals and reinstatements throughout the lower court proceedings, insisting the decision did not eviscerate the constitutionality of removal protections. 'Disruption might have resulted in the instant case if Plaintiffs had been reinstated while this case was in its preliminary posture, only to have the Court later deny relief in its final judgment and subject Plaintiffs to removal again,' the judge wrote. 'The risk of such disruption is no longer a factor now that the Court is granting permanent injunctive relief as a final judgment.' The Hill has reached out to the Justice Department for comment. 'Today's opinion reaffirms that the President is not above the law,' Nick Sansone, the commissioners' lead counsel who works for consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said in a statement. 'Congress structured the CPSC as an independent agency so that the safety of American consumers wouldn't be subject to political whims and industry pressure,' Sansone continued. 'The court's ruling upholds that sound legislative choice.' He added, 'We are thrilled that our clients can get back to work keeping us safe from hazardous products.'

Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mamdani, Lander cross-endorse each other for NYC mayor in bid to block Cuomo
NEW YORK — Zohran Mamdani and Brad Lander, the leading progressive candidates running for mayor in this month's Democratic primary, are cross-endorsing each other, urging their respective supporters to rank the other candidate second on their ballots. In a joint statement Friday, the Mamdani and Lander campaigns said they're making the move because it has 'become increasingly clear' they are the two left-wing candidates in the race who can 'defeat disgraced Andrew Cuomo,' the ex-governor who's polling as the favorite to win the primary. 'As Brad and I exposed the ex-governor's record of corruption and scandal on last night's debate stage, New Yorkers could see Cuomo for what he really is: a relic of the broken politics of the past,' Mamdani said in a statement, referring to Thursday's second and final Democratic mayoral primary debate. 'His campaign has always been a house of cards, and with Brad and I cross endorsing on the eve of early voting, we will topple it together.' Cross-endorsements have become increasingly common in New York, given the ranked-choice voting system the city adopted for the first time during the 2021 local elections. Under that system, candidates who trail after the first round of vote tabulations could eventually prevail if they are ranked on ballots featuring other candidates in the No. 1 slot. 'I'm proud to cross-endorse Zohran because of his strong commitment to a more affordable New York, and to stop the corrupt, morally bankrupt, unacceptable Andrew Cuomo from becoming mayor of a city he doesn't even like,' Lander added in his own statement. Cuomo, who resigned as governor in 2021 amid sexual harassment and pandemic mismanagement accusations he denies, netted a surprise cross-endorsement last week from Jessica Ramos, a progressive mayoral candidate who used to be one of his harshest critics. Whitney Tilson, an ex-hedge fund manager running on a centrist platform, offered Cuomo a surprise cross-endorsement during Thursday night's debate, too. A spokesman for Cuomo — who hasn't returned the favor by cross-endorsing either Ramos or Tilson — said it's 'no surprise' Mamdani and Lander are ganging up on him. 'The two have been attached at the hip for months, but it won't move the needle,' spokesman Rich Azzopardi said, adding that voters 'know Andrew Cuomo is the only one with the experience and the record to get the city back on the right track.' A Lander campaign official told the Daily News he and Mamdani decided to cross-endorse after speaking following Thursday night's debate. The official said the decision was made by the candidates alone and not influenced by progressive powerbrokers like the Working Families Party or New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The official explained a key factor behind the move was a recent poll projecting Mamdani and Lander just 3% apart from each other — within the margin of error — in a ranked-choice voting simulation of the primary. Their announcement came just as New Yorkers gear up to head to the polls for the first day of early voting Saturday. New Yorkers will then be able to cast early ballots every day through June 22 before polls open for the final round of voting on the June 24 primary day. Mamdani and Lander had since previously urged their supporters to rank the other candidate somewhere on their ballots after they were both endorsed by the Working Families Party as part of an anti-Cuomo slate. The direct cross-endorsement further indicates the progressive duo believe they have a better shot at beating Cuomo if they team up against him. Mamdani, a democratic socialist running on a populist platform that includes promises to freeze rent on stabilized tenants and drastically expand fully subsidized child care, has consistently polled as the runner-up to Cuomo and one recent survey even showed him overtaking the ex-gov for the first time. Lander has typically ranked in the No. 3 or 4 spot in most polls. On Thursday, he netted the endorsement of an opinion panel convened by the New York Times editorial board, and he has said he expects that to give him a boost. _____
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Returned Salvadoran migrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia arraigned on federal human trafficking charges in Tennessee
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadorian migrant who was erroneously deported to El Salvador before being returned to the U.S. to face federal prosecution last week, pleaded not guilty on Friday to charges of human trafficking and conspiracy charges. Garcia's legal team told U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes on Friday that they have had time to review the indictment, and Garcia understands what he is accused of, before he formally entered the plea, which stems from a 2022 traffic stop. Abrego Garcia is charged with the trafficking of undocumented migrants, and conspiring with others to do so. The criminal case against Abrego Garcia, an alleged MS-13 member, comes after a high-profile, protracted legal fight over his deportation and the Trump administration's efforts to delay his return to the U.S., even after the Supreme Court ordered the administration to "facilitate" his release earlier this year. Us Judge Blasts Trump Lawyers For 11Th-hour Tactics In Ms-13 Deportation Case The indictment alleges that Abrego Garica was part of a smuggling ring that helped bring immigrants to the U.S. illegally and smuggle them across the country. According to the indictment, Abrego Garcia and his co-conspirators made at least 100 trips between Texas and Maryland between 2016 and 2025, when he was deported. Read On The Fox News App Special Agent Peter T. Joseph told prosecutors on Friday that he was first assigned to Abrego Garcia's case in April 2025, when he was still detained in El Salvador. Since then, Joseph said, he has reviewed footage from Abrego Garcia's 2022 traffic stop, which has emerged as the basis of the human smuggling charges. At the time, Joseph told prosecutors, Abrego Garcia had been driving a vehicle with nine passengers and was pulled over while driving from St. Louis to Maryland with an expired license. Six of the nine passengers in the vehicle have since been identified as being in the U.S. illegally, Joseph said, adding that one passenger in the van told officers that he was born in 2007, which would have made him just 15 at the time. Abrego Garcia's legal team has vehemently disputed his alleged status as an MS-13 member, and are expected to contest the effort by U.S. prosecutors to have him detained pending trial. Trump's Remarks Could Come Back To Bite Him In Abrego Garcia Deportation Battle His case has become a national flashpoint in the broader fight over Trump's hard-line immigration policies in his second White House term. In a court filing Wednesday night, lawyers for Abrego Garcia urged U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes in Tennessee to release their client from custody while awaiting trial, arguing that the government's grounds for a detention hearing – and his alleged status as an MS-13 gang member – are meritless. "Mr. Abrego Garcia asks the Court for what he has been denied the past several months – due process," his lawyers said, adding that there is no evidence their client is a flight risk, or that he has "systematically engaged in international travel in the recent past." Abrego Garcia's attorneys have also disputed his status as a member of MS-13, which was based on allegations made by a confidential informant, according to court documents. The informant had alleged Abrego Garcia belonged to an MS-13 chapter in New York, where he had never lived. Speaking at a press conference in Nashville before the arraignment, Abrego Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, told reporters that yesterday marked three months since her husband was "abducted and disappeared" by the Trump administration. She said the two were able to speak for the first time on Thursday. "Kilmar wants you to have faith," Sura said. "He says to continue fighting, and I will be victorious because God is with us.'" Sura noted that their son, Kilmar Jr., was currently attending his kindergarten graduation ceremony in Maryland. "My heart is in Maryland with my kids," she said, her voice breaking with emotion. "But I'm here fighting for my husband, for his dad to come back home." Federal prosecutors disputed that and have urged the judge to keep him in custody, saying in a filing of their own that Abrego Garcia "would have enormous reason to flee" if he were not immediately detained by ICE. 100 Days Of Injunctions, Trials And 'Teflon Don': Trump Second Term Meets Its Biggest Tests In Court Court documents show the Justice Department filed the charges against Abrego Garcia on May 21 – prompting a flurry of questions as to when the investigation and impaneling of a grand jury would have taken place. Abrego Garcia's arraignment in Tennessee comes after his legal team asked a federal judge in Maryland late Wednesday to impose sanctions on the Trump administration for the administration's "egregious" and "repeated violations" of discovery obligations, according to the filing. "The Government's defiance has not been subtle," his attorneys told U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis, who had been presiding over a civil case to determine whether the Trump administration complied with her order to "facilitate" Abrego Garcia's return from El Salvador. "It has been vocal and sustained and flagrant." In the filing, Abrego Garica's legal team asked Xinis to impose fines based on a finding of civil contempt, and to compel the government to compel the production of information that they say the administration has improperly withheld, as well as "investigate the extent of the government's willful noncompliance." Xinis has yet to rule on the motion. Earlier this week, lawyers for the Trump administration told the court that they planned to file a motion to dismiss the case by Monday on "mootness grounds," since Abrego Garcia is now on U.S. soil. "The lengths the government has gone to resist discovery relating to these core questions raises a strong inference that the government is trying to hide its conduct from the scrutiny of this court, the plaintiffs, and the public," Abrego Garcia's team told Xinis on Wednesday. "What the government improperly seeks to hide must be exposed for all to see." Abrego Garcia's family sued the Trump administration in March after the Salvadoran man, who entered the country illegally around 2012 and was living in Maryland, was abruptly deported to El Salvador in March. An immigration judge ruled in 2019 that he could be deported, just not to El Salvador. Upon being returned to the U.S. last week, Abrego Garcia was immediately sent to Tennessee to face federal charges related to transporting undocumented immigrants. This is a developing news story. Check back for article source: Returned Salvadoran migrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia arraigned on federal human trafficking charges in Tennessee