
Analysis: A telling judicial rebuke of Trump's tariffs – from another Trump appointee
The biggest story of President Donald Trump's second term thus far is his going to great lengths to expand his own power – and daring Congress, the courts and anyone else to stand in his way. Those who do so are labeled usurpers.
But the sheer brazenness of Trump's power grabs has steadily come into focus via a stream of major judicial rebukes.
And it's not just the language of the decisions that looms large; it's also the sources. Even several judges appointed by Trump himself have now ruled he and his administration have gone too far, too fast. It's a list that keeps growing.
That makes it increasingly difficult for the administration to continue arguing that the adverse rulings are truly about the judiciary's overreach – as opposed to its own.
A case in point is Wednesday's ruling by the US Court of International Trade striking down many of Trump's most significant tariffs. The ruling is one of the most significant yet, halting a centerpiece of both Trump's economic and foreign policy agendas.
The unanimous three-judge panel ruled that Trump exceeded his authority by effectively treating Congress's granting of certain tariff authorities as carte blanche to do whatever he wanted. (The administration quickly appealed, and the issue could be headed to the Supreme Court.)
And some of the language is pretty stark.
The case deals with Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. The act allows the president to levy tariffs 'to deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat' emanating from outside the country 'to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.'
Trump has declared national emergencies related to drugs and crime, as well as persistent trade deficits with other countries. He has sought to use those declarations to justify tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico, as well as the global tariffs he announced on what the administration deemed 'Liberation Day' last month.
But the three-judge panel said the IEEPA 'does not authorize anything as unbounded as the Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariffs.' It said that 'such a reading would create an unconstitutional delegation of power.'
The panel said tariffs were not a valid method to 'deal with' the threats Trump cited, because creating leverage over other countries doesn't directly address drug trafficking.
(In a rather dryly worded footnote, the judges noted that the tariffs 'do not change the effective rate of duty' – i.e. 0 percent – 'for smuggled drugs themselves.')
And it rejected the administration's argument that the courts couldn't question Trump's emergency declarations, saying a provision in the law that limits a president's tariff authority 'is not a symbolic festoon.'
The White House responded to the major setback with familiar talking points. They took aim at the actions of 'unelected judges,' asserting they shouldn't be able to question Trump's foreign policy actions. Top White House adviser Stephen Miller added on X: 'The judicial coup is out of control.'
But yet again, the ruling included none other than a judge appointed by Trump.
Trump first nominated Timothy Reif to the federal trade court back in 2018. Reif joined in the unanimous opinion – along with judges appointed by former Presidents Barack Obama and Ronald Reagan.
There is some nuance here. Trump allies note that Reif was a Democrat who served in the Obama administration. (Trump had to nominate a Democrat, given the court is capped at five appointees from one party or another.)
But Reif was also a political appointee in the Trump administration, serving as a senior advisor under then-U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer before his nomination to the federal trade court. Indeed, his decision to serve in the Trump administration reportedly caught allies off guard, as the Daily Beast reported in 2017.
The Wall Street Journal described Reif as 'a Democrat with a reputation as a protectionist,' which would suggest he could be sympathetic to Trump's trade policies and tariffs. (One of Trump's top trade advisers, Peter Navarro, is also a protectionist former Democrat.)
In sum, this is a vote that the administration would certainly prefer not to lose – especially given his vote wasn't even necessary for the court's majority.
But this is becoming a familiar tale. Repeatedly and increasingly, Trump-appointed judges have said the administration is grabbing too much power.
Earlier this week, a Trump-appointed US district judge in New York, Lewis J. Liman, blocked the administration's attempts to thwart New York City's congestion pricing program. He said the administration's policy 'undermines the authority of a sovereign state to authorize policy decided on by its elected representatives.'
Last month, another Trump-appointed US district judge, Stephanie A. Gallagher, ruled the administration had wrongly deported a man and had to 'facilitate' his return.
Another, Trevor McFadden, ruled the administration had unconstitutionally retaliated against the Associated Press by barring it from White House events, calling US officials' actions 'brazen.'
Yet another, Fernando Rodriguez Jr., in recent weeks became the first district judge to fully reject the administration's use of the Alien Enemies Act for rapid deportations.
Another, Stephanie Haines, said the administration could use the Alien Enemies Act. But she sharply undercut its utility by saying the administration hadn't provided migrants enough time to challenge their deportations. The judge required they give 21 days.
And then there is, of course, the Supreme Court. Each of Trump's three appointees to that court – Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett – has declined to dissent when the court sought to check Trump's deportation powers. It's actually been the other conservative justices, the ones appointed by Republican presidents before Trump, who have been more amenable to the administration's actions. (The Supreme Court sometimes issues rapid orders that don't denote who voted which way, but justices can note when they dissent.)
It's somewhat fraught to focus too intensely on which president nominated a judge who issues a major decision. Federal judges, with the insulation of a lifetime appointment, are supposed to interpret the law without regard to politics.
But it says a lot that the people Trump has seen fit to appoint to such important roles have increasingly thwarted some of his boldest moves. That speaks to just how far he's pushed the envelope in challenging the limits of his power.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
24 minutes ago
- Forbes
Do You Need An Accountant For Your Small Business?
By Levi King An accountant brings expertise, efficiency, and strategic value to your business. My first year of business was one of the more interesting experiences of my life. I was still in my early twenties and had taken what I thought was a pretty significant leap of faith by dropping out of college in order to start my own company. When it was time for me to hire an accountant I asked my dad for a recommendation. He had used a local CPA for years, and since I was busy as hell with a million other things, I figured this was a good enough recommendation for me. During my first conversation with the CPA, he advised that I remain a sole proprietor rather than incorporate. I was just a kid in his eyes and therefore unlikely to make the kinds of profits my first year that would have justified changing my status for tax purposes. Nine months later, we met again. He studied my numbers in silence. He was a big dude, physically, so that when he started giggling, his whole desk shook. He proceeded to explain that if I'd rejected his advice and incorporated, I'd have saved an extra $20,000 in taxes. Writing that check took an unbelievably painful bite out of the operating capital I'd managed to build to that point. I fired the guy immediately and found a new CPA. The main point here is that even though I'd had a bad experience with my first CPA, I didn't let that stop me from doing some due diligence and hiring a better one right away Running a small business is a demanding endeavor, requiring owners to juggle numerous responsibilities—from sales and marketing to customer service and operations. Amid these daily challenges, financial management often becomes an overwhelming task, especially as the business grows. Hiring an accountant as soon as possible is not just a matter of convenience; it is a strategic decision that can profoundly impact the success, stability, and growth potential of your business. Many small business owners initially believe they can manage their own finances, especially with the abundance of accounting software available today. However, an accountant brings a level of expertise and specialized knowledge that goes far beyond basic bookkeeping. Accountants are trained to interpret complex financial data, stay current on ever-changing tax laws, and provide tailored advice that aligns with your business goals. Their insights can help you make better decisions about budgeting, forecasting, and risk management, ensuring your business remains compliant and financially healthy. Time is one of the most valuable resources for any business owner. Managing payroll, tracking expenses, preparing invoices, and reconciling accounts can consume countless hours each week. By hiring an accountant, you free yourself from these time-consuming tasks, allowing you to focus on what you do best—growing your business and serving your customers. Delegating financial responsibilities to a professional also reduces stress, as you can trust that your records are accurate, your tax filings are correct, and your financial statements are up to date. Financial errors can have serious consequences for small businesses. Simple mistakes, such as missing a tax deadline or misclassifying an expense, can result in penalties, audits, or lost deductions. Accountants are meticulous about compliance and accuracy, ensuring that your financial records are error-free and audit-ready. Their attention to detail helps you avoid costly pitfalls and provides peace of mind that your business is operating within the bounds of the law. Tax season is often a source of anxiety for small business owners, particularly those unfamiliar with the complexities of business tax codes. An accountant's expertise is invaluable in this area. They know which deductions and credits your business is eligible for, how to structure your finances to minimize your tax burden, and how to file all necessary forms correctly and on time. By optimizing your tax strategy, an accountant can save your business significant amounts of money—funds that can be reinvested into growth and innovation. As your business expands, so do its financial needs and challenges. Growth often brings increased revenue, but it also leads to more complex expenses, payroll, and reporting requirements. An accountant can help you navigate this complexity by providing financial projections, analyzing investment opportunities, and updating your business plan as needed. Their guidance ensures you make informed decisions about scaling your operations, hiring new employees, or pursuing new markets, all while maintaining a strong financial foundation. Accurate, timely financial reporting is essential for understanding your business's performance and making strategic decisions. Accountants provide detailed financial reports that offer clarity on profitability, cash flow, and expense management. These reports are not just numbers on a page—they are tools that help you identify trends, spot opportunities for cost savings, and set realistic financial goals. With an accountant's analysis, you gain a deeper understanding of your business's strengths and weaknesses, empowering you to make data-driven decisions. Regulatory compliance is a critical aspect of running a business, especially as laws and requirements evolve. Accountants stay up-to-date on changes in tax regulations, labor laws, and industry standards, ensuring your business remains compliant at all times. Their vigilance protects you from legal issues, fines, and reputational damage. In the event of an audit or financial review, having an accountant on your team provides invaluable support and documentation, making the process smoother and less stressful. Beyond day-to-day financial management, accountants serve as strategic advisors. They can assist with business planning, investment strategies, and succession planning, helping you set and achieve long-term goals. Whether you are seeking funding, preparing for expansion, or considering a business transition, an accountant's perspective is crucial for evaluating options and mitigating risks. Perhaps the greatest benefit of hiring an accountant early is the freedom it provides. With a trusted financial expert managing your accounts, you can devote your energy to innovation, customer relationships, and building your brand. This focus not only enhances your business's chances of success but also improves your quality of life as an entrepreneur. More from AllBusiness: In conclusion, hiring an accountant as soon as possible is one of the smartest investments a small business owner can make. An accountant brings expertise, efficiency, and strategic value to your business, helping you avoid mistakes, save money, and achieve your goals. Rather than viewing your accountant as an expense, consider him or her a partnership that empowers you to build a stronger, more resilient, and more successful business from day one. You own your business; the buck stops with you. Never take anyone's advice at face value, regardless of how pitifully you stack up in terms of time in the trenches. You believed in yourself enough to risk everything for a dream—honor that trust by seeking a wide range of opinions before making momentous decisions.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures slip as investors assess easing trade tensions
US stock futures slipped as Wall Street assessed easing tensions between the US and key trading partners as well as softening inflation. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F) dipped 0.1%. Futures attached to the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F) and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) fell 0.2%. On Wednesday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Congress it is "highly likely" that countries engaging in trade negotiations with the US would see an extension of a tariff pause that is already in place on President Trump's most sweeping duties. Bessent's comment came after he returned from London on Tuesday, where representatives from US and China announced the countries had agreed to a proposal that would address critical trade disputes. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs Stocks wobbled during the day Wednesday amid the evolving trade news as well as the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) report, which showed easing inflation pressures. The data puts the Federal Reserve in a tight spot ahead of its policy meeting next week, though analysts expect officials to maintain their wait-and-see approach to interest rate cuts as tariff uncertainty lingers. On Thursday, investors will receive fresh data on wholesale inflation with the release of the Producer Price Index (PPI) report. As earnings season wraps up, Adobe (ADBE) will also share its results.


Bloomberg
29 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trumponomics: Why China Can Afford to Wait on a Trade Deal
On this episode of Trumponomics, host Stephanie Flanders, Bloomberg's Head of Government and Economics, leads a panel from the Hong Kong Invest conference to unpack the latest round of high-stakes trade talks between the US and China, exploring why Beijing may still have the upper hand and how far any decoupling of the two economies will go. She's joined by Robin Xing, Chief China Economist at Morgan Stanley, Lotus Asset Management Chief Investment Officer Hao Hong, and Bloomberg reporter Rebecca Choong Wilkins.