logo
MIT captures first image of free-range atoms, can help visualize quantum phenomena

MIT captures first image of free-range atoms, can help visualize quantum phenomena

Yahoo06-05-2025

Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
Scientists from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the U.S. have made a groundbreaking achievement after they captured the first images of individual atoms freely interacting in space.
The images, which show interactions between free-range particles that had only been theorized until now, will reportedly allow the scientists to directly observe quantum phenomena in real space.
To capture detailed images of the atomic interactions, the team, led by Martin Zwierlein, PhD, an MIT physicist and lead author of the study, developed a novel technique that allows the atoms to move freely before briefly freezing and illuminating them to capture their positions.
The team used the technique to observe clouds of various atom types, capturing several groundbreaking images for the first time.
"We are able to see single atoms in these interesting clouds of atoms and what they are doing in relation to each other, which is beautiful," Zwierlein said.
Exploring the cloud
Atoms are among the tiniest building blocks of the universe, each just one-tenth of a nanometer wide or roughly a million times thinner than a strand of human hair. They additionally follow the strange rules of quantum mechanics making their behavior incredibly difficult to observe and understand.
It's impossible to know both an atom's exact position and its speed at the same time - a fundamental principle of quantum physics known as the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
This uncertainty has long challenged scientists trying to observe atomic behavior directly, however, traditional imaging methods, such as absorption imaging, provide only a blurry view, capturing the overall shape of an atom cloud but not the atoms themselves.
Now, to overcome the challenge, the team developed a new approach called atom-resolved microscopy, which begins by allowing a cloud of atoms to move and interact freely within a loose laser trap.
Bottom: Images show a ²³Na condensate, single-spin ⁶Li, and paired fermions in a Fermi mixture.
Credit:
Top: Atoms are frozen by an optical lattice and imaged with Raman cooling.Bottom: Images show a ²³Na condensate, single-spin ⁶Li, and paired fermions in a Fermi mixture.Credit: MIT / Courtesy of the researchers
The researchers then switch on a lattice of light to freeze the atoms in place and use a finely tuned laser to illuminate them, causing the atoms to fluoresce - a state when an atom or molecules relaxes through vibrational relaxation to its ground state after being electrically excited - and reveal their exact positions.
Capturing this light without disturbing the delicate system was no small feat. "You can imagine if you took a flamethrower to these atoms, they would not like that," Zwierlein explained. "So, we've learned some tricks through the years on how to do this."
According to the physicist, what truly makes the technique more powerful than previous methods is that it's the first time they've done it in situ by freezing atoms' motion as they strongly interact and observing them one after another.
Quantum snapshots
Zwierlein and his colleagues used their new imaging technique to capture quantum interactions between two fundamental types of particles: bosons and fermions.
Bosons - among which photons, gluons, the Higgs boson, and the W and Z bosons - which tend to attract, were observed bunching together in a cloud of sodium atoms at low temperatures, forming a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) where all particles share the same quantum state.
This confirmed a long-standing prediction based on Louis de Broglie's theory that boson bunching is a direct result of their ability to share one quantum wave - a hypothesis known as the de Broglie wave, which helped spark the rise of modern quantum mechanics.
"We understand so much more about the world from this wave-like nature," Zwierlein stated. "But it's really tough to observe these quantum, wave-like effects. However, in our new microscope, we can visualize this wave directly."
The researchers also imaged a cloud with two types of lithium atoms, each a fermion that typically repels others of its kind but can strongly interact with specific other fermion types. They then captured these opposite fermions pairing up, revealing a key mechanism behind superconductivity.
They now plan to apply the technique to explore more complex and less investigated quantum states, including the puzzling behaviors seen in quantum Hall physics. These include scenarios where interacting electrons exhibit unusual correlated behaviors under the influence of a magnetic field.
'That's where theory gets really hairy - where people start drawing pictures instead of being able to write down a full-fledged theory because they can't fully solve it," Zwierlein concludes in a press release. "Now we can verify whether these cartoons of quantum Hall states are actually real. Because they are pretty bizarre states."
The study has been published in the journal Physical Review Letters.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is Everyone Ditching Alcohol for Shrooms?
Is Everyone Ditching Alcohol for Shrooms?

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Is Everyone Ditching Alcohol for Shrooms?

"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." I'd sunk into the leather couch after work for our usual 'wine' down with my girlfriends. It was the type of gathering where we'd typically share a bottle (or two) of our favorite red, but instead on her vintage coffee table next to a glowing Trudon candle, I saw a ziploc baggie filled with magic mushrooms (slender gray stems with rust-colored caps) and a rainbow Willy Wonka-like shroom chocolate bar. Under nutritional info the label read, 'INGREDIENTS: GOOD TIMES & LAUGHTER.' I offered to pass the bottle of wine, but my friends declined and skipped the nightcap for a mushroom cap, assuring me they were 'super mellow' if I wanted to try one. I wanted to be the cool girl who could 'shroom on a whim, but I'm a pragmatic researcher at heart (hence my job as a reporter). Amused by the chocolate bar packaging, I snapped a pic and shared it to my Instagram stories. Within minutes, my DMs lit up with hearts and messages. 'Ze best! I've been microdosing mushrooms for the last year. Life changing,' one message read. 'When I go out, I take them instead of drinking. I have more fun, I'm more giggly, there's no hangover and I wake up feeling happier and more energized—never anxious and the opposite of depressed. I've gotten probably 15 of my friends on it and they all agree, it's an easy way to cut down or cut out drinking altogether.' Had morel support become the new aperol spritz? Back in 2015, the Global Drug Survey found that 8.6 percent of respondents had used magic mushrooms. By 2021, this number had jumped to 16.1 percent. But most aren't going on full-on hallucinogenic trips, rather they are microdosing mushrooms to lift their mood and energy levels, and many see it as a healthier vice than booze. 'They just make you happy and you have a good time—it's not like alcohol where you're always needing more and chasing the buzz,' says a West coast hair stylist who started selling mushrooms about a year ago. 'Most of my customers are young, female, working professionals like me,' she adds. While the fungus may be trending now, our fascination with them is anything but new. Indigenous cultures around the world have been using magic mushrooms and other psychedelics for thousands of years for emotional, physical, and spiritual healing. Westerners began exploring their medical potential back in the 1950s, but were forced to abandon psychedelic research in the 60s—partly due to reckless use in young people and a backlash against the counterculture movement. Forty years later, research is finally making a comeback and the results are promising. The FDA officially designated psilocybin (the hallucinogenic compound in magic mushrooms) as a 'breakthrough therapy' for severe depression in 2018. Many scientists today see the drug as a new path forward in what's been a frustrating dead end for mental health. 'Treatment has been in a crisis for decades,' says Matthew Wayne Johnson, Ph.D. a professor in psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Johns Hopkins. 'Lifespan is decreasing and the two big reasons for that are suicide and addiction—and when you step back and ask what areas psychedelic therapy, like psilocybin, has promising effects for early on, it's things like depression, PTSD, alcohol, and tobacco.' Doses given in therapeutic settings (aka macrodoses) are much larger than a typical recreational dose, and are closely monitored to make the patient feel safe and reassure them if anxiety comes up—which does occur in about a third of cases, says Dr. Johnson. The lasting effects from these sessions are hard to ignore: Talk therapy paired with two macrodoses of psilocybin may reduce heavy drinking by 83 percent, according to new research out of New York University. Another study in the Journal of Psychopharmacology found two macrodoses of the drug relieved major depressive disorder symptoms in adults for up to an entire year. And a smoking cessation study with psilocybin out of John Hopkins found a 67 percent abstinence rate after 12 months. A theory as to why: Mushrooms stimulate neuroplasticity in the brain. 'Psilocybin seems to make the brain more flexible and what you experience—your consciousness or what you're thinking and feeling—more flexible,' says Dr. Johnson. 'Regions in the brain that normally talk a lot will communicate less on psilocybin in favor of communicating with their distant neighbors more.' Meaning the brain makes connections and associations it doesn't normally make. This causes a perspective shift that appears to reduce excessive rumination and self-focus, which may allow people to escape unhealthy thought patterns and behaviors. If these macrodoses have such potential, it seems reasonable to wonder whether microdoses could have perks too. The growing wellness trend involves ingesting very small amounts of psychedelics (roughly 0.1 to 0.5 g), like magic mushrooms or LSD which won't trigger hallucinations, but can give a burst of energy, creativity, and make the world feel like it's in 'high-def' in a way that benefits mood. That said, scientific research on the benefits of microdosing remains limited and results have been mixed. 'At this time, there is no strong empirical support for [microdosing's] effectiveness,' says Harriet De Wit, Ph.D. professor of psychiatry and behavioral neuroscience at the University of Chicago. 'It is quite possible that the drug(s) have therapeutic potential, but currently most of our information comes from uncontrolled user reports.' Studies of microdosers that have shown improvements in mood, attention, and creativity are all self-reported—which means they can't eliminate the placebo effect (i.e. the bias or expectation the person had that microdosing would make them feel better). Julie Holland, MD a psychopharmacologist and author of Good Chemistry, says when compared to alcohol, the benefits are clear: mushrooms are anti-inflammatory, promote neuroplasticity, are non-toxic to the liver and brain (aka no hangovers), not particularly addictive, and because they don't cause the munchies, there's no added calories. But of course, she also notes that mushrooms are still illegal in 49 of 50 states, experiences can be heavily influenced by the setting or one's mood, and it could be harder to stay safe in an altered state when you are 'distracted by beautiful traffic lights.' Although adverse effects do appear to be rare, reports indicate there is evidence that microdosing can damage the heart over time. According to the 2021 Global Drug Survey, more than 77 percent of respondents who had microdosed mushrooms in the last year reported no unwanted effects. The survey also found that people taking magic mushrooms needed less emergency medical treatment than those using other recreational drugs, including alcohol and cannabis. As of January 1st, Oregon became the first state in the U.S. to legalize the adult use of psilocybin; a similar law goes into effect in Colorado in 2024. That said, don't expect to see 'shroom dispensaries any time soon. These new laws don't allow for retail sales of magic mushrooms, only onsite consumption (for those over 21) in a supervised setting with 'certified mushroom facilitators.' (Those interested in other states do have the option of signing up for psilocybin clinical trials at In the meantime, the mushroom black market is happy to fill in the voids. In addition to gummies and chocolates, you can find 'shrooms freeze-dried, as teas, truffles, and capsules. Even venture capital firms have taken notice and are funneling money into startups developing psychedelic treatments—that aren't even legal yet—for everything from PTSD and smoking cessation to headaches, traumatic brain injury, eating disorders and Alzheimer's disease. 'I often take it before the gym because it gives me energy,' says a micro-dosing business owner and mother of two in San Diego. She says before shrooms, alcohol was 'the biggest crutch,' her go-to after a hard day. 'Now with mushrooms my mind doesn't even go there. Okay, I've a hard day? I'm gonna go home and take a bath and like go to bed early so I can wake up and go to the gym.' And there are other perks, she says with a laugh: 'I swear, if my kids ask 'do you wanna craft?' I'm like 'no.' But then I'll eat some mushrooms and suddenly I'm Martha fucking Stewart.' A version of this story appears in the April 2023 issue of ELLE. Shop Now You Might Also Like The 15 Best Organic And Clean Shampoos For Any And All Hair Types 100 Gifts That Are $50 Or Under (And Look Way More Expensive Than They Actually Are)

I Am Very Curious To See What The Mad Men Will Do To Attract Agents
I Am Very Curious To See What The Mad Men Will Do To Attract Agents

Forbes

timea day ago

  • Forbes

I Am Very Curious To See What The Mad Men Will Do To Attract Agents

USA - 2011: Jennifer Pritchard illustration of "Mad Men" character Don Draper. (Tribune News Service ... More via Getty Images) When I stopped by MIT's Dome at Davos this year, I sat in on a very interesting panel about international AI development that included Sir Demis Hassabis, the Nobel-prize winning co-founder of DeepMind, discussing (amongst other things) the dangers of 'rogue' AI. Sir Demis said that he was 'cautiously optimistic' about the future, which actually left me feeling pretty good as I wandered back out into the Swiss mountain air. So if agents aren't going to kill us, what are they going to do for us? In a recent podcast discussion with the New York Times, Sir Demis talked about the near future for AI. Naturally, as the guy is a genius, it is all worth listening to. But one thing he said in particular caught my attention. He was talking about what truly useful AI assistants might look like and he said that if a personal agent knows you well then you could teach it to "protect your attention'. He went on to explain what this means, by talking about how social media is vying for your attention and how an AI could defend your attention from "being assaulted by other algorithms' that want to capture (and, indeed, overrun) it. To protect your attention. What a succinct and evocative phrase to describe what AI can do for you. When it comes down to it, your attention is a very valuable resource, so protecting and managing that resource is really important. This is such an interesting way of thinking and just one example of why he has a Nobel prize and I do not. His vision of a digital assistant that could pan the media to get what you need, to get the 'nuggets' (as he calls them), so that you could avoid polluting your mind and your mood by dipping into the raging torrent to find the valuable piece of information that you wanted. I rather like the metaphor of my agent diligently exploring for gold in a raging river of lies, nonsense, manipulative tripe and propaganda while I get on with other things. Now, as Joe Marhese notes, our entire online economy is built on top of systems trying to capture and optimize our time and attention. Advertising promises to deliver a message in return for this attention. Performance marketing promises outcomes, which has an entirely different meaning when it comes to agents and the models behind them. This makes me reflect further on something that Ken Mandel wrote about how marketing is going to be disrupted because while humans are the target of advertisements, in the near future the kind of agents that Sir Demis is predicting will filter everything including the advertisements. He talks about the emerging 'AdTech' world where brands, agencies and agents will use structured data to communicate and to exchange data about wants, needs, preferences and offers. Or, as he rather neatly puts it, the future of advertising is 'code, not copy'. Bot motivation. This is where financial services are going. When my agent wants to open a savings account, it will negotiate with the agents of financial services providers. But how will it choose which one to select? Assuming that it is going choose on something more than price, that is. Service providers may need to start thinking about reshaping some surfaces towards agent preferences, which might differ from human preferences. I can imagine that agents might prioritise factors like the speed of response, uptime, data accuracy and so on. Optimising for these non-human factors could provide banks a competitive edge, so they should probably begin to assess their strategies for the medium term. (But I can also imagine asking my agent about some softer factors. That is, agents might be programmed to optimise for value, not just cost. They might weigh a variety of other factors such as long-term reliability, risk-adjusted returns, compliance and alignment with ethical frameworks. For example, an agent might recommend a slightly more expensive investment product if it offers superior risk management or aligns better with a user's ethical preferencesI might choose a Gretabot that prioritises 'green' investments or I might choose an Elonbot that invests in space or a Dimonbot or whatever else. That is, different people will be panning for different nuggets in the same stream.) When it comes to choosing between two similarly-ranked choices though, I rather suspect that Ken is right to point to what he calls 'trust signals" as the key because agents will prioritise trusted brands not based on our human and emotional version of trust but on a more measured version based on reputation, verified reviews and sustainability metrics instead of traditional advertising. This reinforces my view about the priority of establishing standard ways for extend identification, authentication and authorisation services to agents. I actually see this within Sir Demis' cautiously optimistic context, because I think that it will be much harder to 'game' trust in an AI world. Imagine, for example, that when your AI pays the bill at a restaurant, the restaurant bot gives your bot a cryptographic token, some form of zero-knowledge or blinded proof that you ate at the restaurant. Then in order to submit a review of the restaurant on some online service your agent would have to provide that proof. The restaurant would not know who you are, but it would know for sure that you had dined there. As it happens, I am organising a trip to Boston in a few weeks time. For such a trip, I don't want to presented with 30 different hotel options: even the most rudimentary agents ought to be able to narrow that down to three to show. I do not have time to search restaurant reviews or go back through my calendar to see where I invited guests last time, my agent can do that and show me three it chooses for me. I don't know whether to book a midweek supersaver fare or a roundtrip Wednesdays only carry on bag fare, I'll the agent choose - it already knows I prioritise punctuality over online meal choices. It was impossible to escape AI at Davos this year, since every conversation touched on the shift toward agentic AI. To be honest, I'm looking forward to this new life. While the agents work tirelessly to protest my attention from data assault and battery—ranging from impossible to assess offers to sell me hotel points to endless solicitation for new credit cards—I can get on and carry out more useful (and certainly more creative) activities.

What grads need to know as AI transforms the job market
What grads need to know as AI transforms the job market

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

What grads need to know as AI transforms the job market

Recent graduates are facing a tougher job market, and many are being forced to rethink how their skills align with a world increasingly shaped by artificial intelligence (AI). Sinan Aral, director of the MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy, joins Market Domination Overtime to explain how students and employers can adapt to the changing landscape. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store