Ramaphosa says ‘Kill the farmer' song not a call to murder
President Cyril Ramaphosa was involved in tense talks with US leader Donald Trump last week. (EPA Images pic)
JOHANNESBURG : A chant that US leader Donald Trump used to back claims of white genocide in South Africa is an apartheid-era slogan that did not really mean for farmers to be killed, the president said today.
Trump showed clips of an opposition politician chanting 'Kill the Boer, kill the farmer' at tense talks with president Cyril Ramaphosa last week where he repeated unfounded claims of an orchestrated campaign of violence against white farmers.
He also asked why the opposition politician seen making the chant, opposition firebrand Julius Malema – whom Trump mistakenly said was in government – had not been arrested.
Ramaphosa told journalists the government accepted court rulings that the controversial slogan should be considered in the context of the liberation struggle against the brutal system of white-minority rule called apartheid.
'It's not meant to be a message that elicits or calls upon anyone to be killed,' Ramaphosa said.
'We are a country where freedom of expression is in the bedrock of our constitutional arrangements,' he said, brushing aside the suggestion that Malema should be arrested.
Malema's continued use of the chant after the end of apartheid in 1994 infuriates many in South Africa and some groups have attempted to have it banned as hate speech.
Malema, the vocal leader of the populist, Marxist-inspired Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) party, is also seen in the video shown at the White House as claiming, 'We are going to occupy land, we require no permission.'
This fuels claims repeated by Trump that a revised land expropriation act will allow the government to seize white farmland.
The law contains a 'nil compensation' clause but the government says this would only be in exceptional circumstances and after efforts to seek a 'just and equitable' settlement.
The revised law brings the judiciary directly into decisions about expropriation, Ramaphosa said.
Scenarios of the government taking property without compensation could include situations where the owners could not be traced or were heavily indebted and the property was required for the public interest, he said.
The Democratic Alliance, the second-largest party in the government of national unity, has gone to court to challenge the 'nil compensation' provision, which they say is open to abuse.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Palantir defies tech gloom as Trump momentum powers stellar share gains
FILE PHOTO: A banner featuring the logo of Palantir Technologies (PLTR) is hung at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on the day of their initial public offering (IPO) in Manhattan, New York City, U.S., September 30, 2020. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo (Reuters) -Palantir Technologies has succeeded where most tech stocks have struggled this year: staying hot in a cooling market. The company's military-grade AI tools along with its deep defense ties and high-level government connections at a time when the U.S. is boosting spending on defense software have helped investors raise the bets on the stock. It has surged more than 70% this year and is the S&P 500's second-best performer - a standout in an otherwise sluggish tech market roiled by investor worries over U.S. tariffs and economic uncertainty. Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel was an early backer of President Donald Trump and has close ties with key Washington lawmakers, including Vice President JD Vance, whom he supported in a 2022 U.S. Senate race. "The relationships that Palantir's with senior members of the Trump administration are helpful for business," D.A. Davidson analyst Gil Luria said. Palantir in April won a $30 million contract from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to develop an operating system that identifies undocumented immigrants and tracks self-deportations, its largest single award from the agency among 46 federal contract actions since 2011. "They probably benefit a little bit more with Trump because of the impetus on security, border and immigration," said Francisco Bido, senior portfolio manager at Palantir investor F/m Investments. "They're going to get a lot of work out of that." Palantir, however, downplayed the impact of political goodwill. "The politics around it change, so it gets increased visibility but we've been working with ICE since 2010," the company's communications head, Lisa Gordon, told Reuters. Founded in 2003 and listed in 2020, Palantir, which was initially backed by the CIA, has drawn investor interest in its growing AI platform that allows companies to simulate AI-related scenarios, debug code and test large language models. "No other large software company can currently combine that level of growth with high profitability and unique offering," Luria said. But its growth has largely been driven by U.S. government contracts which made up for more than 42% of its revenue in the March quarter. Sales to U.S. businesses accounted for 29%, while commercial sales outside the U.S. were down 5% from a year ago - a slide that some analysts point to Palantir's polarizing political profile and America-first stance. The rally in its stock builds on a 12-fold surge over the past two years that outpaced gains in red-hot companies such as Nvidia and brings with it a valuation premium. Palantir trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 200.47, compared with Nvidia's 27.96. (Reporting by Arsheeya Bajwa in Bengaluru; Editing by Aditya Soni and Arun Koyyur)
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Rivals Meloni and Macron seek to mend fences in Rome talks
French President Emmanuel Macron presents himself as the EU's go-to man on the issue of Ukraine. (AP pic) ROME : Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and France's President Emmanuel Macron will aim to reconcile their difference in talks in Rome today, with both sides seeking to cope with US tariffs and the conflict in Ukraine. The European rivals are meeting in the Italian capital from 6pm for talks and then dinner, an encounter Macron said he had initiated. The centrist president and nationalist far-right Meloni are not natural political allies. But as the leaders of the EU's second and third-largest economies, they face similar challenges in the Ukraine war and US President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs against the bloc. Meloni on Friday acknowledged 'divergences' with Macron but denied she had any 'personal problems' with him, and said she was 'very happy' with the visit. An Italian government source said Rome and Paris hoped to 'lay the foundations for a further strengthening of relations' between two nations 'on the front line of the various fronts of international politics'. Macron's office said Italy was 'an important partner' with 'a crucial role to play in European decisions', particularly in the Ukrainian conflict. Despite their political rivalry, the French presidency said the two leaders were showing they were 'capable of moving forward together on the essentials'. Their cooperation has been sorely tested by Trump, with the pair disagreeing over how to deal with the US president on both tariffs and Ukraine. Meloni and Macron have and 'undeniable rivalry', said Marc Lazar, a professor at Sciences Po university in Paris. He said the pair were following different strategies with Meloni seeking 'mediation and compromise' with the US president and Macron favouring 'unwavering firmness'. Rome 'believes that because it is ideologically close to the US administration… it will be able to force it to back down on trade tariffs', he told AFP. But while Paris says it has 'respect' for those who can 'maintain the best possible relationship with President Trump', it insists trade negotiations are the responsibility of the European Commission – effectively sidelining Meloni as a would-be mediator. On Ukraine, Macron presents himself as the EU's go-to man on the issue, speaking to Trump regularly and invoking the relationship developed during the billionaire's first term. And he has seriously ruffled feathers in Rome with his attempts to put together a 'coalition of the willing' ready to provide 'security guarantees' to Ukraine. In recent weeks, the French president's meetings on the Russian invasion with the British, German and Polish leaders – but without Meloni – have ratcheted up tensions. Paris says that 'between Europeans, the issue of formats must be arranged to achieve the best impact we can under the circumstances'. It says that Italy has always insisted the US take part. But Lazar notes that as a nuclear power with a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, France sees itself as less dependent on the US. The mood was not helped when an adviser to Macron dismissed Italy's proposal to grant Ukraine protection under Article 5 of the Nato treaty without Kyiv joining the military alliance itself. The article stipulates that if one member is attacked all the others must act as if they too were attacked. While that idea 'deserves discussion', it would in practice be very hard to implement, Lazar said, not least 'because if the Trump administration refuses Ukraine's accession, it is precisely because it does not want to implement Article 5 for Ukraine's benefit'.
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Dutch govt falls as far-right leader Wilders quits coalition
Geert Wilders is known for his anti-immigrant views and instantly recognisable bouffant hairstyle. (AP pic) THE HAGUE : Far-right Dutch leader Geert Wilders withdrew his party from the government today in a row over immigration, bringing down a shaky coalition and likely ushering in snap elections. Wilders has been frustrated with what he saw as the slow pace of introducing the 'strictest-ever immigration policy', agreed with coalition partners after his shock election win in November 2023. 'No signature for our asylum plans… PVV leaves the coalition,' said Wilders on X, formerly Twitter, referring to his far-right Freedom Party. The withdrawal opens up a period of political uncertainty in the European Union's fifth-largest economy and major exporter, as far-right parties make gains across the continent. The latest government crisis also comes just weeks before the Netherlands is due to host world leaders for a Nato summit. Last-ditch crisis talks this morning lasted barely half an hour before the leaders of the four coalition parties came out in a testy mood. 'I have just informed the prime minister that I will withdraw the PVV ministers from the cabinet and that we can no longer bear responsibility for this,' said Wilders. 'I signed up for the strictest asylum policy, not for the downfall of the Netherlands and that our responsibility for this cabinet therefore ends at this moment,' he added. Eighteen months after his surprise election win sent shockwaves through Europe, polls suggest his PVV is still the strongest. However, the gap to his nearest rivals has narrowed, with the left-wing Green/Left party of former European Commission vice-president Frans Timmermans following close behind. The liberal VVD party, a traditional powerhouse in Dutch politics, are also running near the top two, meaning any election would likely be closely fought. VVD leader Dilan Yesilgoz, visibly angry, described Wilders' move as 'super irresponsible', adding she was afraid it would open the door to left-wing parties. 'How can you do this to the Netherlands?' she told reporters. 'Patience was up' In late May, Wilders called an impromptu press conference to announce his 'patience was up' with the government of prime minister Dick Schoof. He threatened to torpedo the coalition if a new 10-point plan to crimp immigration was not implemented within a few weeks. His plan included border closures for asylum seekers, tougher border controls and deporting dual nationals convicted of a crime. Summarising his demands, he said: 'Close the borders for asylum seekers and family reunifications. No more asylum centres opened. Close them.' Political and legal experts criticised the plans as unworkable or illegal, with some suggesting Wilders was creating a crisis to collapse the government. The far-right leader has often been called the 'Dutch Trump' for his anti-immigrant views – and instantly recognisable bouffant hairstyle. His ambitions to lead his country were frustrated after his election win, as his coalition partners blocked his premiership bid, settling instead on Schoof as a compromise candidate. The leaders of the four coalition partners agreed not to take up cabinet positions, instead running their parties as parliamentary chiefs. Wilders has been an uncompromising figure in parliament, his quick-witted jousting with Timmermans being a highlight of debates. He has frequently said that the only way to implement his anti-immigrant policies is for him to become prime minister. However, in the fractured Dutch political system, no party can win an absolute majority in the 150-seat parliament and Wilders will need partners. He can count on the support of the BBB farmers' party. The backing of the VVD – currently an uneasy coalition partner – is less certain. The fourth party in the current coalition – the anti-corruption New Social Contract – has seen support collapse since charismatic leader Pieter Omtzigt stepped down. Far-right parties have been on the rise across Europe. In May, the far-right Chega ('Enough') party took second place in Portuguese elections. In Germany, the anti-immigration far-right AfD doubled its score in legislative elections in February, reaching 20.8%. And in Britain, polls show the anti-immigration, hard-right Reform UK party of Nigel Farage is making significant gains following a breakthrough in local elections.
