
SiCarrier-Huawei partner in chips seeks $2.8 billion in funds, sources say
SiCarrier, a Chinese chip equipment maker with close links to Huawei, is seeking $2.8 billion in its maiden fundraising round, two people familiar with the plans said, as the startup chases more clients and clout.
SiCarrier was until recently little known, but it has become the most talked-about company in Chinese semiconductor circles this year as the breadth of its planned product range and ambitions emerges.
Founded in 2021 and owned by the Shenzhen city government, SiCarrier is largely seen as a Huawei supplier. But it wants to become the leading domestic provider of chipmaking equipment in China, surpassing Naura and Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment China (AMEC), according to four people with knowledge of its goals.
It is a prime example of how US restrictions on exports of chipmaking gear and advanced semiconductors to China, while curbing tech progress in the world's second-largest economy in some ways, have spurred Chinese firms to take up President Xi Jinping's call to evolve into a self-sufficient domestic chip industry. The government of Shenzhen, a tech metropolis in southern China, is looking to sell roughly 25% of a SiCarrier unit and is after an 80 billion yuan ($11 billion) valuation, said one of the sources, adding the fundraising could conclude in the coming weeks.
The source also said the unit does not include SiCarrier's lithography assets. Reuters was not able to learn the name of the unit.
The proceeds will mostly go towards research, and Chinese state-owned firms, state funds, as well as domestic venture capital and private equity funds have expressed interest in investing, said two sources. It will likely be one of the largest yuan-denominated fundraisings by a Chinese company this year. Reuters spoke to 10 people with knowledge of SiCarrier's business for this article. All declined to be identified as the company has not publicly disclosed its plans. SiCarrier, which was slapped with U.S. export controls late last year due to its close ties to Huawei, did not respond to requests for comment. Huawei said it was not affiliated with SiCarrier. The Shenzhen government also did not respond to requests for comment.
Big splash SiCarrier spent its initial years largely silent about its plans but made a splash at this year's Semicon China trade fair in March, drawing large crowds with a catalogue of 30 machines ranging from etching tools to inspection equipment named after Chinese mountains. Its lithography systems were, however, not on display. While executives at the time did not go into detail about the readiness of its products, two sources said most of SiCarrier's line-up is still under development and is not production-ready. Chipmaking equipment usually undergoes long testing and validation processes before being adopted by customers. "Considering the brief period since their establishment, it seems nearly impossible for them to have developed such complex machinery and completed the extensive verification process required," Bernstein analysts also wrote in a March client note. Even if SiCarrier makes rapid progress over the next couple of years, it is likely to take far longer before Chinese chip equipment providers make a serious dent in foreign dominance of the field. Last year, domestically made wafer fabrication equipment accounted for just 11.3% of total purchases by China, according to data from consultancy TechInsights. China has spent $128 billion on such equipment since 2020, when the U.S. started curbing chip sector exports, the data shows.
Lofty ambitions A Reuters review of 92 Chinese patents filed by Shenzhen SiCarrier Industry Machines and its parent company Shenzhen SiCarrier Technologies between October 2022 and March this year shows the group wants to be a one-stop shop for all equipment to make a chip, preparing a far more ambitious product line-up than Naura or AMEC. The patents, searched with U.S. firm Anaqua's AcclaimIP database and verified by Reuters, range from wafer measurement devices to etching systems to deposition systems that layer thin films on wafers to give them electrical characteristics. That puts SiCarrier into competition with firms such as KLA, Lam Research from the U.S. and Tokyo Electron. SiCarrier is also investing in AI-driven wafer defect recognition, cutting-edge tech that aims to improve chip yields. Measurement and inspection tools hold the most potential for SiCarrier to make its mark because no dominant player in these areas has emerged in China, according to two of the sources. Other patents include components for deep ultraviolet technology (DUV) lithography systems and multi-patterning chip-making techniques that SiCarrier has touted as a solution to solving China's lack of access to top-end extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography tools. But multi-patterning, which replaces optical lithography with various atomic-layer etching and deposition steps, has its sceptics. The technique, introduced by U.S. chip giant Intel in the 2010s and used by Taiwan's TSMC for its first generation of 7-nanometre chips, is prone to errors and lower yields due to increased manufacturing steps, according to Dan Hutcheson, vice chair at TechInsights.
Wary of Huawei links According to industry executives, SiCarrier was formed out of a Huawei unit that made semiconductor tools. And while some Chinese foundries have purchased SiCarrier equipment to show support for the government venture, there has also been reluctance to use the products due to concerns that trade secrets could be leaked to Huawei, three of the sources said. Chip equipment manufacturers work closely with foundries to test, validate and improve their products, and customer reticence could impede how quickly SiCarrier makes progress. The companies' ties run deep with Huawei seconding several staff members to SiCarrier from its HiSilicon chip design unit, according to one source. "The biggest problem is not the product, but that when customers use its equipment, Huawei might know their process parameters," said another source. "If it wants to grow big, it needs to separate from Huawei completely, but even so, it will still take several years to validate and iterate the products."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
20 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Rupee sticks to muted price action, implied volatility retreats
The Indian rupee ended slightly higher on Wednesday, sticking to rangebound price action for a third consecutive session on two-sided client flows and the absence of cues to firm a directional bias on the currency. ADVERTISEMENT The dollar-rupee pair's implied volatility, a gauge of future expectations, has receded on the back of muted moves in the currency. The 1-month gauge eased to about 4.4%, the lowest in over one month. On the day, the rupee closed at 85.51 against the U.S. dollar, up slightly from its close of 85.6025 in the previous session. Asian currencies were largely steady as well while the dollar index was hovering sideways around the 99-handle. Mild dollar sales from foreign banks helped the rupee tick higher in early trading but routine corporate dollar demand stood in the way of the local currency extending its rise, a trader at a state-run bank said. India's benchmark equity indexes, the BSE Sensex and Nifty 50, ended slightly in the green, tracking a rise in regional equities as markets gave a guarded welcome to the latest signs of progress in trade talks between the United States and China. ADVERTISEMENT "The dollar remains one of the best gauges of trade sentiment. While it has held up generally well early this week, it hasn't built on the late-week momentum following the US-China meeting announcement," ING Bank said in a note. Worries about the impact of wide-ranging U.S. tariffs have weighed on the dollar this year and left it nursing losses of more than 8.5% against major peers. ADVERTISEMENT The focus now turns to U.S. consumer price inflation data, due later on Wednesday, which is expected to show month-on-month core consumer prices rose 0.3% in May, according to a Reuters poll, slightly higher than the 0.2% rise in the previous month. (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
U.S. states would struggle to administer food stamp benefits under Republican tax bill
A Republican tax bill proposal could shift $22 billion in SNAP costs to states, potentially forcing them to cut eligibility or leave the program. State officials express concerns about absorbing these costs, which could impact millions of recipients. The bill also expands work requirements, potentially removing millions more from SNAP. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads States would struggle Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads U.S. states will not be able to fully administer food stamp benefits for millions of the nation's poor if a proposal in the Republican tax bill forcing them to shoulder billions of dollars in new costs is signed into law, according to state officials, local government associations and policy than 41 million people receive benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the nation's largest food aid program, which cost about $100 billion in 2024. The tax bill passed on May 22 by the U.S. House of Representatives and backed by President Donald Trump would shift some $22 billion in administrative and benefit costs to state and local governments, according to a Reuters of the move say it will promote accountability and reduce waste in the program. But states fear it will backfire."No state is going to be able to simply absorb that," Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, a Democrat, told from North Carolina, Oregon and Michigan also said their states did not have the resources to easily take on the spending requirements in the proposal, which is now before the states could be forced to shrink SNAP eligibility or to leave the program altogether, according to letters sent in May to Congressional and agriculture committee leadership from state and county legislatures and health officials."Shifting the financial burden of SNAP onto states is fiscally unsustainable and risks harming the very individuals and families the program is designed to support," said one letter from the National Conference of State letters were sent by the National Association of Counties, National Association of County Human Services Administrators and the American Public Human Services Association. USDA spokesperson said that Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins supports Trump's agenda and that the agency will continue to provide technical assistance to have long supported reduced spending on SNAP, arguing that the program creates a dependence on federal support and should be more narrowly targeted to the most could not reach a representative from the Republican Governors Association or from Texas, Florida or Georgia, the Republican-led states facing the highest SNAP costs The House bill would require states for the first time to pay for a portion of SNAP benefits beginning in 2028, with their payment share from 5% to 25% tied to the state's error rate, a USDA measure of how accurately states determine eligibility and benefit that would amount to more than $20 billion in spending, according to a Reuters analysis of data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The bill would also require states to immediately pay 75% of the cost of administering the SNAP program, up from their existing 50% obligation, adding another $2 billion to the sum, according to USDA states facing the most new spending would be California ($3.7 billion), New York ($2.1 billion), Florida ($1.7 billion) and Texas ($1.2 billion).The state spending requirements would push 1.3 million people off of SNAP in an average month, because some states would modify eligibility requirements or stop administering SNAP, according to a May 22 letter from the Congressional Budget Office to House and Senate agriculture committee does not have the ability to support $850 million in new SNAP spending and may need to restrict eligibility or reduce benefits if the House bill passes, said Elizabeth Hertel, director of the state Department of Health and Human would struggle to absorb more than $477 million and the state is planning for what they would do if forced to take on the spending, said Claire Seguin, director of the division of the Oregon Department of Human Services that administers Carolina is already budget constrained and "there isn't really a way to backfill" more than $650 million in new SNAP spending, said Department of Health and Human Services secretary Dev Sangvai, who did not provide details on what steps the state would take if the provision York also cannot absorb its projected costs, Barbara Guinn, Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, told Senators during a June 4 forum on the SNAP most states must balance their budgets and cannot accrue debt to offset new spending like the federal government can, shifting SNAP spending to states risks drawing down resources from other public programs like Medicaid, said Eric Mitchell, president of the Alliance to End Hunger. The bill would also expand work requirements for some SNAP recipients and restrict states' ability to waive those requirements when unemployment ticks up, which together would push another 3.2 million people off of SNAP in an average month, according to the CBO.


Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
US importers turn to brokers to navigate Trump-era tariffs, at a cost
U.S. importers are increasingly relying on customs brokers to keep up with President Donald Trump 's ever-changing trade policies. But booming demand for help in processing foreign goods has made these services more expensive, adding another cost to the tariff burden, industry players told Reuters. Customs brokerages, until recently an anonymous branch of the import ecosystem, handle the paperwork needed to process shipments and calculate tariff bills. Mom-and-pop brokers interviewed by Reuters say they are raising fees, while major logistics firms like Memphis, Tennessee-based FedEx and Germany-based DHL are also adding staff to their customs compliance teams. Market research firms ballpark customs brokering as a roughly $5 billion industry in the United States. Hiring a broker is optional, but the increasing complexities of U.S. tariffs and customs regulations are leading more importers to shell out the cash. Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villa For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search ads Learn More Undo Independent brokers like Laredo, Texas-based JD Gonzalez are fielding dozens of questions daily from concerned clients struggling to understand what they may owe to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and whether to go ahead with shipments or hold off. Brokers are also spending more time and labor on customs forms than ever, and have in some cases implemented new IT systems. Live Events "With all the new information we have to process, some of the automation we've used has been thrown out, so there's more work to do," said JD Gonzalez, who is also president of custom brokerage trade group NCBFAA. The trend is part of a broader wave of corporate efforts to bolster trade compliance operations. Major companies, from Nike to Amazon to Lowe's, had published job postings as of Wednesday for trade and customs professionals. Nike was seeking a "lead" for trade and customs, who would "play a pivotal role in shaping the future of our trade compliance framework," according to the post on Nike's careers website. Amazon, meanwhile, had at least 10 U.S. customs brokerage jobs listed on its careers website. Lowe's had three. Nike, Amazon and Lowe's did not respond to requests for comment. HIGHER FEES Independent brokers often base their fees on the number of codes they must enter to classify the contents of a given shipment. Known as harmonized tariff schedule codes, these line items help border officials distinguish car parts from children's toys, and determine proper tariff rates. Prior to Trump's frenetic tariff policies, fees ranged from around $4 to $7 per code. But Gonzalez said the extra costs brokers have incurred as they ramp up systems to handle the tariff changes have led some to increase fees by $1 to $5 per code. Gonzalez said he has raised fees "nominally," while Steve Bozicevic, CEO of A&A Customs Brokers headquartered in Seattle and Vancouver, said his company added $3 per product type being imported into the U.S. because of merchandise facing "tariff stacking," a phrase used when an item faces multiple tariffs. "We raised the rates for the U.S. because of the new and added complexity," Bozicevic said. The company has not raised rates for imports into Canada because there's "no new complexity," he said. United Parcel Service raised brokerage rates in December between $3.75 and $50 per import entry, depending on the country of origin. The move was part of general rate increases and unrelated to changes in tariffs, a UPS spokesperson told Reuters. FedEx's logistics arm increased its base customs brokerage rates by 4% in January, according to a company spokesperson. These bigger logistics companies, which include brokerage services in their broader shipping offerings, are also beefing up staff. DHL has upped headcount on its U.S. customs entry team by 30% since February, according to a spokesperson for the company's DHL Express shipping unit. FedEx had more than 40 open job postings on its customs and trade teams as of Tuesday, mainly based in the U.S., according to its LinkedIn jobs page. UPS had 10 similar U.S. positions open, according to its jobs website. FedEx is "adjusting our network to meet demand" in an evolving tariff landscape, which "includes hiring additional customs brokerage roles," the spokesperson said. UPS declined to comment on the job postings. Historically, tariff changes have been less frequent, say brokers, trade lawyers and other trade professionals, and they have come with weeks of lead time, allowing brokers to prepare for the change and provide logistical feedback to CBP. Compare that to last week's doubling of steel and aluminum tariffs to 50%, which Trump announced abruptly, forcing the U.S. customs department to quickly publish official guidance just hours ahead of a midnight change. "Many brokers clear shipments ahead of time, so then you have to come back and retroactively redo it and fix it," said Miami-based customs broker Ralph De La Rosa, whose company, Imperial Freight Brokers, was founded by his father 54 years ago. Even brokers who have not raised fees said their services have become inherently more expensive as the number of HTS codes has spiked. Importers slowed shipments into the United States after Trump's massive tariff announcement on April 2, after having frontloaded purchases earlier in the year to get ahead of an expected rise in duties. Imports of consumer goods, which include cell phones and other household items, decreased $68.9 billion to $277.9 billion in April from a month before, according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Trump announced additional tariffs on steel and aluminum in June and in May threatened to impose 50% tariffs on the European Union. Adding to the uncertainty, a federal appellate court on Tuesday ruled that sweeping tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, after a trade court ruled that the U.S. president overstepped his executive powers and blocked the duties. The appellate scheduled arguments for July 31.