Police officer whistleblowers would get more protection under Colorado bill
State Rep. Jennifer Bacon speaks at an event hosted by Colorado's Black Democratic Legislative Caucus to provide a 2023 legislative preview at Cleo Parker Robinson Dance in Denver, Jan. 25, 2023. (Kevin Mohatt for Colorado Newsline)
A bill that would give Colorado police officers who report misconduct in their office more protection from retaliation passed a House committee on Tuesday, nearly a year after a similar bill failed in the face of law enforcement opposition.
House Bill 25-1031 would allow officers to sue their employers if they face retaliation for reporting a danger to public safety or an alleged crime by another officer. It would clarify that there is whistleblower protection for local law enforcement.
'If someone wants to come forward because there has been a violation of law or policy, they should be protected in doing so,' said Rep. Jennifer Bacon, a Denver Democrat sponsoring the bill.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The bill passed the House Judiciary Committee on a 9-2 vote. Republican Reps. Ryan Armagost of Berthoud and Jarvis Caldwell of Colorado Springs voted against it.
Bacon also ran last year's bill alongside former Rep. Leslie Herod, another Denver Democrat. That bill would have required investigations of reported misconduct and criminalized a failure to report, and was inspired by a former Edgewater police officer who told lawmakers she was retaliated against after she reported a supervising sergeant for sexual assault.
That bill, which was introduced and debated in the final weeks of the legislative session, faced heated opposition from Republicans and law enforcement groups, and failed on its final vote in the House.
Bacon and Rep. Chad Clifford, a Littleton Democrat also on the current bill, leaned on working groups of officers, legislators, legal experts and whistleblowers during the interim to come up with this year's version of legislation. It has the support of the Colorado Fraternal Order of Police.
I'll have a client call. They're aware of something that has happened, but they don't know what to do. They are concerned of the ramifications they will feel if they speak out. Every one of those officers feel that they should speak out.
– Sean McCauley, general counsel for the Colorado Fraternal Order of Police
Some officers have 'very deep, robust civil servant protections from a place like Denver, where they have an entire department to deal with this stuff,' Clifford said. 'Not everybody has a department, so we were able to bring the experts together who understand the right way to do it.'
'Everything that's in the four corners of this bill is related to a police officer having the protections that they need to do their job effectively and not get jammed up in their careers,' he said.
The bill expands the definition of retaliation from discharge and demotion to also include actions like suspension, creation of a hostile work environment, work hour reduction, and issuing a rating that could adversely affect an officer's future employment.
Sean McCauley, general counsel for the CFOP, said the issue of whether to report misconduct comes up 'monthly.'
'I'll have a client call. They're aware of something that has happened, but they don't know what to do. They are concerned of the ramifications they will feel if they speak out. Every one of those officers feel that they should speak out,' he said. 'But if you really value your career and you want to move through the organization, you have to decide if this is something that you want to speak out about.'
Under the bill, whistleblowing officers could be awarded damages for financial loss, emotional pain, mental anguish and inconvenience. They could also be reinstated to their agency with back pay. Caldwell said he might be able to support the bill if there's a cap set on those potential lawsuit payouts.
The bill would set a statute of limitations for whistleblower cases of two years.
It would also create an affirmative defense for law enforcement agencies if their actions are determined to not have been retaliatory.
'Affirmative defense would say 'We did cut your hours, but for a different reason,'' Bacon said. 'We see that in other places in employment law, especially in government.'
The bill now heads to the full House chamber for consideration.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
House GOP advances first 2026 funding bill out of committee
House Republicans early Wednesday morning advanced legislation that calls for more than $450 billion to fund the Department of Veterans Affairs, military construction and other programs for fiscal year 2026. The bill advanced out of the GOP-led House Appropriations Committee along party lines, as Democrats came out in strong opposition to the plan. It marks the first of the 12 annual funding bills House GOP appropriators are hoping to move out of committee before Congress leaves for its August recess. The bill calls for about $152 billion in discretionary funding for fiscal 2026, marking a 3 percent increase compared to current levels. Overall, the bill would provide about $453 billion for the VA, including $300 billion for mandatory programs. Among the increases Republicans have highlighted in the measure are boosts to the VA, military construction and family housing, and funding for a new homelessness program. In his opening remarks on Tuesday, Rep. John Carter (R-Texas), the head of the subcommittee that crafts the annual funding bill, said the bill ensures 'veterans get the benefits and care they've earned.' 'The bill does that while also addressing other issues affecting veterans, including homelessness, mental health services and taking care of our women veterans,' he said. 'The bill also makes crucial investments totaling nearly $18 billion in the infrastructure of our service members need to work on to live.' Democrats, however, have railed against the plan, needling Republicans for not including advanced funding for the Toxic Exposure Fund in the proposal, which they also said falls nearly $1 billion short of the funding needed for military construction. Democrats have also accused Republicans of seeking to privatize medical care for veterans. 'This bill hurdles us towards VA privatization, a top project 2025, priority that undercuts what veterans consistently ask for, which is the high quality medical care at VA, by transferring record funding from VA medical services to community care,' Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Fla.), the top Democrat on the veterans' funding subcommittee, said. House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) has emphasized as the committee ramps up its funding work that the legislation currently being considered will look different when eventual bipartisan spending talks begin. Senior GOP appropriators have also acknowledged that further changes are possible during the annual process as they await more information from the Trump administration about the president's vision for government funding for fiscal 2026 and beyond. 'As this process moves forward and we receive further documentation on the OMB budget, we will take it under consideration, put forward a product that best addresses the needs of our service members and veterans,' Carter said during the meeting on Tuesday, referring to the Office of Management and Budget. The bill comes about a week after hardline conservatives urged top appropriators to write bills 'consistent' with President Trump's budget request and to 'include adjustments initiated' by his Department of Government Efficiency. In a slim budget request released earlier this year, Trump called for cutting funding for domestic programs by more than $160 billion for fiscal 2026. As appropriators await more details from the administration, the committee also approved interim subcommittee allocations for a third of the annual funding bills. 'These interim allocations will allow us to begin our work. As we move forward, this committee is prepared to do the hard work – line by line – to uphold fiscal discipline and effective governance,' Cole said. However, Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, criticized Republicans over the process, saying negotiators are 'beginning the appropriations process without a total funding level.' 'We are flying blind and handcuffed into the critical work of providing discretionary funding for programs and services across the government that help to grow the middle class, protect the working class, support small businesses, and grow our economy – this is important business that cannot be done responsibly without a complete vision for how we plan to fund the government.'
Axios
41 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump-y ad blitz launched to sway the president on energy credits
A new business-backed group with GOP ties just launched a $2 million, three-week ad blitz to preserve IRA tax credits — and the framing is very Trump-y. Why it matters: It comes during crunch time for hundreds of billions of dollars of tax incentives on the chopping block in the budget reconciliation fight. The big picture: Built for America is placing ads on Fox, Truth Social, Rumble, podcasts and beyond. "Unlike other efforts focused on Congress, Built for America is the only campaign speaking directly to the president and making the case that these energy tax credits are a cornerstone of his pro-worker, pro-growth agenda," the rollout states. State of play: It's not disclosing specific donors, but backers include players in nuclear, carbon capture, hydrogen, critical minerals, storage and more, it said. The executive director is Mitch Carmichael, a Republican who previously served as West Virginia's lieutenant governor and economic development secretary. Republican strategist and former Trump campaign adviser Bryan Lanza is advising the new effort. Driving the news: "Trump country is booming. We're building, hiring and winning in America, because energy tax credits put America first," one of the ads states, touting new jobs and manufacturing. "President Trump, keep what works," it states. Catch up quick: More business interests are pressing the Senate to soften House GOP budget plans that scuttle or restrict IRA energy tax credits. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, in a new post, is urging preservation of what it calls "pro-growth" credits around hydrogen and clean electricity production. The bottom line: Low-carbon energy industries are increasingly framing their message more around "energy dominance" and less — a lot less — around green goals.
Axios
41 minutes ago
- Axios
Anti-ICE demonstrations expand to Colorado
Demonstrations against federal immigration enforcement are spreading across the country — including in metro Denver. The latest: Activists in Denver and Aurora this week joined a wave of national protests against recent U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids — and the increasingly militarized response in Los Angeles and beyond. The big picture: The unrest in LA — where President Trump deployed thousands of National Guard troops and hundreds of Marines — has become a flashpoint. Cities like New York and Austin, where protests have broken out in solidarity with LA demonstrators, have been met with mass arrests and tear gas. Why it matters: Backlash is growing against the Trump administration's hardline immigration agenda, which has sent shockwaves through Colorado — from large-scale ICE raids to lawsuits targeting Denver's defiance. Zoom in: At least three demonstrations have taken place across metro Denver this week. On Tuesday, an "ICE Out!" protest at the Colorado State Capitol that started peacefully ended with Denver police in tactical gear using smoke and pepper balls to order protesters to disperse on Broadway. Police said 17 arrests were made for vandalism, obstruction and assaulting officers, CPR reports. Protesters on Monday marched to the ICE detention center in Aurora, led by leftist and immigrant rights groups like the Denver Party for Socialism and Liberation and Casa de Paz. The same day, the local SEIU chapter rallied in downtown Denver, standing behind SEIU California president David Huerta, who was arrested in LA Friday, and slamming Gov. Jared Polis for cooperating with ICE. What they're saying: "What is happening in Los Angeles … makes me both furious and proud," state Sen. Julie Gonzales (D-Denver) said at the Denver protest Monday. "There is nothing more patriotic than seeing so many Americans … exercising their First Amendment rights … against unjust enforcement, racial terror and fascist displays of power," she added. State of play: A bill signed into law last month by Polis, a Democrat, explicitly restricts the deployment of military forces from outside Colorado in the state unless the governor permits it. "We have done everything that we can do — but what we have seen is that Donald Trump is willing to overrule local governments and state governments in order to exercise his will," said Gonzales, the bill's lead sponsor. Between the lines: Nearly half of American adults disapprove of the Trump administration's deployment of the National Guard and Marines in response to the LA protests, the latest YouGov polling shows. The other side: In a statement on X, the Colorado Republican Party said Monday that it "stands firmly with President Trump and … law enforcement as they work to restore order in Los Angeles amid the violent riots." "Their commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting our communities is commendable," the party added. What's next: More protests are planned in Colorado as part of a " nationwide day of defiance" in response to Trump's multimillion-dollar military parade in D.C. on Saturday. What we're watching: How demonstrations develop across metro Denver and whether the violent clashes seen between protesters and police in other cities happen here. Activists say they're preparing for that possibility.
