MP welcomes new memorial honouring RAF's reconnaissance heroes
THE Labour MP for Carlisle and North Cumbria Julie Minns has said that she is 'delighted' after plans to celebrate the RAF's unsung heroes of the Photographic Reconnaissance Units (PRU).
Julie Minns MP has welcomed the news that plans to recognise the RAF's unsung heroes of the Photographic Reconnaissance Units (PRU) have progressed to the planning stage.
Announced by Veterans Minister Al Carns MP, this marks the culmination of a campaign with broad political support, with more than 200 MPs from eight parties uniting to back the call for a PRU memorial.
The monument currently stands to commemorate 2,370 individuals. While research continues into their nationalities, four men from Carlisle — Rae Armstrong, Ivan Cooke, William Johnston, and Charles Ross – are known to be among them.
Julie Minns MP said: "I am delighted to see my support for the campaign to commemorate those who served in the Photographic Reconnaissance Unit has helped to bring this memorial one step closer.
"Due to the clandestine nature of their operations – flying solo operations, unarmed and unarmoured – the PRU death rate was nearly fifty percent. As a result, these brave men and women had one of the lowest survival rates of the war, around two and a half months.
"Four Carlisle men served under these exceptionally challenging conditions: Rae Armstrong, Ivan Cooke, William Johnston, and Charles Ross.
"I remain committed to supporting the Spitfire AA810 Project in establishing this memorial and look forward to paying my respects to these local men and their colleagues from all Photographic Reconnaissance Units when it is completed."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Entrepreneur
an hour ago
- Entrepreneur
How London Built the World's Best Legal AI Ecosystem
Self-flagellation feels part of the British psyche these days. It has become fashionable to beat down on the UK, be that tech bros calling the country a 'museum' bereft of growth and innovation, Brits en masse recently voting against the status quo, or pro-Europe Londoners watching this all play out while mouthing 'I told you so'. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur United Kingdom, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. Business optimism is also plummeting. When the Financial Times reported that Shein had plans to ditch London for its IPO, they wrote that the real surprise was "that Shein had even entertained London in the first place." To compound matters, British fintech - the jewel in London's crown - was dealt a huge blow this month when UK payments darling Wise also chose to avoid listing on London's beleaguered stock market. Amidst this malaise, though, there remains one stalwart of the British economy: legal services. And not only is London's legal sector flourishing, it's leading the way in legaltech and AI. It's no secret that AI is uprooting every industry, and professional services sit squarely in its non-sentient crosshairs. Within white collar jobs, lawyers - with their repeated document creation and need for reviewing extensive reams of information - are likely to see some of the most radical change. This isn't just about efficiencies, this is a near-trillion-dollar industry in which AI could generate $100,000 in additional billable time annually per lawyer (Thomson Reuters Future of Professionals Report, 2024). So what put London in the driving seat here? Why do law firms in NYC and even investors in the Bay Area concede that London is still streaks ahead in this vertical? The answer reveals the blueprint for winning any AI transformation race. The starting point is fierce competition. In the early years of the 2010s software explosion, law firms in the City of London were large but rarely bloated. With so many great competing practices all within a mile of each other, competition was relentless. Senior Partners were already used to having to prioritise efficiency, productivity and flexibility over headcount. Then, when more serious technology solutions came onto the scene around the early 2010s (think document creation software and legal workflow tools), these same law firms were nimble enough to capitalise. Dedicated legal innovation departments were set up to try to work out how SaaS and Cloud technologies could be woven into legal work. London-headquartered, international law firm, Addleshaw Goddard, as just one example, quickly built a team of 40 legal engineers and operations staff to keep the firm cutting edge. And all this was happening while US counterparts continued with their paper and office stamps. This might seem surprising, given America's reputation as innovator-in-chief. Why did Britain get the jump here ahead of its Transatlantic cousins, who were 'moving fast and breaking things'? Crucially, the institutional players and incumbents were keen to come along for the ride. Allen & Overy (now A&O Shearman) and Mishcon de Reya, two of Britain's most established firms, both built incubator programs for startups. I vividly remember entrepreneurs from places like Singapore and Latin America moving to London to be part of FUSE, Allen & Overy's program. The Law Society of England and Wales created events and roundtables on legaltech and even partnered with startups looking to disrupt the industry. Not only did this start fostering entrepreneurial and digital talent in the London legal sector, but it also signalled to the rest of the industry that innovation was the direction of travel, whether people liked it or not. It's also worth mentioning that the regulators helped too. The UK's laws on alternative legal services providers (ALSPs) allowed for firms to be owned by non-lawyers, a practice banned in most jurisdictions, such as the US and Germany. By allowing firms to list publicly or be bought by private equity, more business minds were brought into UK law firms. This, in turn, drove innovation acceptance. The final factor for London leading the legaltech race is the company you can keep in this brilliant city. When we at BRYTER were deciding on our first international market to expand to, our core axiom was that we needed to follow our customers. London, with its parade of skyscrapers packed with lawyers, was the obvious choice. But importantly, and unlike in other European professional services hubs, we knew that just down the road in Mayfair was Europe's most mature venture capital ecosystem. London was already home to brilliant British-born funds like Balderton and Atomico, but also flourishing outposts from the American behemoths like Accel and Index Ventures, who had noticed that European startups were attractive (and cheaper) to invest in. This meshing of established law firms and venture capital led to a legal tech boom and significant exits such as HighQ (acquired by Thomson Reuters), Tessian (Proofpoint), Della (WoltersKluwer), Onfido (Entrust) and more. And, each of these liquidity moments forged a next generation of entrepreneurs and angel investors within the London ecosystem. This confluence of factors and attitudes is what London's legaltech dominance is built on. The combination of deep specialist knowledge going back centuries, open-minded institutional players, and the mixing of lawyers and VCs has set the city up to lead our industry for decades. But there's also a cautionary tale baked into this story. A warning for all the tech bros out there who see the AI-ification of professional services as the next gold rush. London's legaltech flourished because tools were built hand-in-glove with the traditional legal industry. It was always the law first, and then workflows, software and automation. For those of us looking to design the next era of the legal industry, we need to be spending as much time in the pubs of Lincoln's Inn as the boardrooms of Silicon Valley.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Nigel Farage Says Elon Musk 'Needs To Get Himself Straightened Out' After Trump Bust-Up
Nigel Farage has said Elon Musk 'needs to get himself straightened out pretty quickly' following his public bust-up with Donald Trump. The Reform UK leader said it was 'painful to watch' the pair's feud play out in public. Musk has launched a series of outspoken attacks on Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' cutting taxes for the wealthy, claiming it will send the US deficit soaring. The tech billionaire has also faced claims that he used drugs while campaigning for Trump during the US election campaign – something he has denied. Asked about the ongoing row by ITV News, Farage said: 'I find it painful to watch, painful to watch. Sad. Sad to leave government on those terms, to have the struggle he's got with Tesla. 'I think Elon needs to get himself straightened out pretty quickly.' 'Elon needs to get himself straightened out pretty quickly'@Nigel_Farage responds to the row last week between Elon Musk and Donald Trump 'I found it painful to watch', he told @harry_horton — ITVPolitics (@ITVNewsPolitics) June 9, 2025 Farage had his own fall out with Musk after the X owner called for him to be replaced as the leader of Reform. Posting on his social media platform, he said: 'The Reform Party needs a new leader. Farage doesn't have what it takes.' His comments were particularly embarrassing for Farage because he had described Musk as 'a hero' just hours earlier. The split also put paid to Reform's hopes that the multi-billionaire might donate money to the party. Zia Yusuf Says Reform Would Deport All Illegal Immigrants – But Nigel Farage Has Said That's 'Impossible' Kemi Badenoch Claims Nigel Farage's Reform UK Is 'Another Left-Wing Party' Trump: Musk Faces 'Serious Consequences' If He Backs Dems Over Budget Bill
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Campaigners use Kendal as backdrop for pro-Palestine march
Peace campaigners walked silently through the centre of Kendal last weekend to maintain their support for the people of Palestine. Following their weekly vigil outside Kendal town hall, the South Lakeland and Lancaster District Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) walked up Stricklandgate to protest against Israel's attacks on Gaza. They were led by Maria Gardner, who has now been sitting outside the town hall every Saturday for over 19 months as part of the campaign. READ MORE: Kendal campaigners continue their support for Palestine | The Westmorland Gazette Spokesperson, Philip Gilligan said: 'More than 18,000 children have now been killed in Israel's relentless and brutal attacks in Gaza. "It is time for our local and national politicians to act - Gaza's children need more than empty platitudes, they need decisive and meaningful action. "The UK Government needs to stop the supply of arms and components for arms used by Israel and needs to help bring Israel's current government to account for its many war crimes.' The group is calling on local MPs to urge the UK Government to recognise the Palestinian state. READ MORE: Cumbrians join 4000-mile trek for people of Palestine | The Westmorland Gazette They have argued that the people of Westmorland have 'long been horrified' by what they have witnessed on television during the conflict. Their banners highlighted the case of Hind Rajab, after the six-year-old was found dead last year alongside relatives and two paramedics from the ambulance sent to treat her. Mr Gilligan added: "Hind's case illustrates all too well the callousness with which the lives of innocent children have been taken by Israel. "We know from the news reports, at the time, that the ambulance sent to treat Hind's injuries was targeted and bombed, despite the Red Crescent having informed the Israeli forces of its mission. "Israel has killed yet more children in Gaza during the past few days, while others are dying daily from starvation and preventable disease as a direct result of Israel's cynical blockade of humanitarian aid."
