Israelis Unnerved By Trump's Vow To Save Netanyahu From Corruption Trials
President Donald Trump's call for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's corruption trial to be thrown out has plunged the American leader into one of Israel's most heated debates, unnerving some in its political class just days after they unanimously praised his strikes on Iran.
Trump's social media post condemning the trial as a "WITCH HUNT," and his vow that the United States will be the one who "saves" Netanyahu from serious corruption charges, came just two days after he called off an Israeli bombing raid in Iran to preserve a ceasefire.
Both were dramatic interventions in the affairs of an ally that previous U.S. administrations had always insisted was a sovereign nation that made its own decisions. Now the one leader nearly all Israelis seem to support has fully embraced the one who most divides them.
"With all due respect for Trump, he is not supposed to interfere in a legal process in an independent country," opposition leader Yair Lapid told Israeli media.
Trump says trial should be cancelled
In an extended post on his Truth Social site, Trump condemned Netanyahu's trial in the same language that both he and Netanyahu have long used to describe their legal problems. Both contend they are the victims of witch hunts by hostile media, crooked law enforcement and political opponents.
"I was shocked to hear that the State of Israel, which has just had one of its Greatest Moments in History, and is strongly led by Bibi Netanyahu, is continuing its ridiculous Witch Hunt against their Great War Time Prime Minister!" Trump wrote, using a common nickname for Netanyahu.
"Bibi Netanyahu's trial should be CANCELLED, IMMEDIATELY, or a Pardon given to a Great Hero, who has done so much for the State. ... It was the United States of America that saved Israel, and now it is going to be the United States of America that saves Bibi Netanyahu," Trump wrote.
Netanyahu's allies took to social media Thursday to praise Trump and a spokesperson from Netanyahu's Likud party translated the post into Hebrew.
Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, a former rival who once challenged Netanyahu over the corruption charges, only to join his Cabinet last year, said the trial was harming the state: "When the president of the United States calls for an annulment of the trial or for a pardon - can anyone say that he is wrong?"
Netanyahu himself said in a post addressed to Trump that he was "deeply moved by your heartfelt support for me and your incredible support for Israel and the Jewish people."
Netanyahu is a polarizing figure in Israel
Netanyahu became the only sitting prime minister in Israeli history to be indicted when he was charged with fraud, breach of trust and accepting bribes in three separate cases after yearslong investigations accusing him of exchanging favors with wealthy political supporters.
He took the witness stand for the first time late last year and his cross-examination began earlier this month. Several hearings have been postponed as he has dealt with the wars and unrest stemming from Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack out of the Gaza Strip.
Netanyahu portrays himself as a towering statesman fighting for Israel's very survival and accuses his political opponents of trying to achieve in the courtroom what they failed to do at the ballot box during his nearly unbroken 16 years in power - the longest of any Israeli leader.
His critics accuse him of prolonging the war in Gaza and of leaving dozens of hostages languishing in Hamas captivity to cling to power and more effectively battle the allegations. Massive weekly protests against Netanyahu have been held for years.
Trump seen as Israel's greatest US friend
Trump is seen by Netanyahu - and many Israelis - as the greatest friend they have ever had in the White House. He has lent unprecedented support to Israel's claims to territories seized in war, he brokered the Abraham Accords with four Arab nations in his first term and over the weekend he ordered direct strikes on Iran's nuclear program, which Israel views as an existential threat.
Still, even some staunch supporters of Netanyahu and Trump seemed a bit unnerved.
Simcha Rotman, a lawmaker from the far-right Religious Zionist party and one of the architects of Netanyahu's controversial judicial overhaul, wrote on X that Netanyahu's trial "may be an example of an accumulation of many faults" of the justice system.
"Still, it is not the place of the president of the United States to interfere in legal proceedings in Israel."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
India's economy resilient, but global risks rising: Finance Ministry
New Delhi: India's economy remains on firm footing, but persistent global headwinds, ranging from trade frictions and policy uncertainty to ongoing geopolitical tensions, could weigh on future growth, the Finance Ministry said in its latest Monthly Economic Review released on Friday. "These external challenges could potentially impact India's growth trajectory and warrant close and continuous monitoring," added the May edition of the review. Despite these risks, the ministry maintained a largely optimistic tone. 'Overall, the outlook for the Indian economy remains positive, demonstrating resilience amid a turbulent global environment, supported by robust domestic demand, easing inflationary pressures, a resilient external sector, and a steady employment situation,' it added. Despite the external volatility, the ministry said that robust domestic demand, particularly a rebound in rural consumption, steady investment activity, and a positive shift in net exports, underpinned the economy's resilience. On the supply side, it added that the services sector continued to be the main driver of growth, while industrial output expanded on the back of 'strong growth in construction and a stable performance in manufacturing.' The report also noted a revival in agriculture, with the sector rebounding bolstered by favourable monsoon conditions and record food grain production. To be sure, in May, tensions between India-Pakistan escalated along the Line of Control following an earlier terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir, injecting fresh uncertainty into the regional security environment. India accused Pakistan of backing militants, while Islamabad alleged unprovoked firing by Indian forces. The flare-up reignited diplomatic friction, though it stopped short of a wider conflict. Meanwhile, global geopolitical risks remained elevated. The war in Ukraine intensified, with renewed Russian offensives drawing international concern, while tensions in the Middle East simmered, particularly in Gaza and southern Lebanon, where cross-border exchanges between Israeli forces and Hezbollah added to fears of a broader conflict. These developments continued to cloud the global economic outlook, adding pressure to supply chains and investor sentiment. Looking ahead, the government maintains its growth outlook for 2025–26 at 6.3% to 6.8%, supported by rising private consumption, especially in rural areas, and continued expansion in services exports. Independent forecasts by various agencies also fall within a similar range, projecting India's growth between 6.3% and 6.7% for the fiscal year. While domestic indicators have remained largely positive, the finance ministry noted that financial markets experienced volatility due to external developments. 'The significant escalation of trade tensions in early 2025, followed by a partial de-escalation in the second quarter, contributed to considerable volatility in the financial markets,' the review said. However, it said that the Indian government bond market exhibited stability and certainty in May, driven by factors such as the announcement of a record surplus dividend by the RBI and a robust growth reading of Q4 FY25. As a result, the risk premium on India's government bonds declined to 182 basis points as of May 30 (2025), it added.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
Supreme Court hands Trump major win by curbing nationwide Injunctions
In a 6-3 ruling stemming from Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship, the court said nationwide injunctions issued by lower court judges 'likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts.' read more A US Supreme Court police officer stands watch as anti-abortion protesters rally outside of the Supreme Court, on Thursday in Washington. AP The US Supreme Court on Friday backed President Donald Trump in his bid to limit the reach of lower court rulings that have repeatedly stalled key parts of his policy agenda. In a 6-3 ruling stemming from Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship, the court said nationwide injunctions issued by lower court judges 'likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts.' The top court did not immediately rule on the constitutionality of Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship. These broad court orders have been central to the president's ongoing clashes with the judiciary over his efforts to reshape immigration policy, cut government spending, and assert greater control over independent agencies. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On his first day back in office, Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to refuse to recognise the citizenship of children born in the United States who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also called a 'green card' holder. More than 150,000 newborns would be denied citizenship annually under Trump's directive, according to the plaintiffs who challenged it, including the Democratic attorneys general of 22 states as well as immigrant rights advocates and pregnant immigrants. The case before the Supreme Court was unusual in that the administration used it to argue that federal judges lack the authority to issue nationwide, or 'universal,' injunctions, and asked the justices to rule that way and enforce the president's directive even without weighing its legal merits. Federal judges have taken steps including issuing nationwide orders impeding Trump's aggressive use of executive action to advance his agenda. The plaintiffs argued that Trump's directive ran afoul of the 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 in the aftermath of the Civil War of 1861-1865 that ended slavery in the United States. The 14th Amendment's citizenship clause states that all 'persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.' The ruling could have lasting consequences — not just for the remainder of Trump's presidency, but for future administrations across both political parties, reported CNN. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, President Trump's final appointee to the Supreme Court, authored the sweeping majority opinion. '(F)ederal courts do not exercise general oversight of the executive branch; they resolve cases and controversies consistent with the authority Congress has given them,' CNN quoted Barrett as writing for the majority. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'When a court concludes that the executive branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too,' Barrett added. Meanwhile, US Attorney General Pam Bondi responded to the court's ruling backing President Trump's effort to curtail lower court orders that have hampered his agenda for months. 'Today, the Supreme Court instructed district courts to STOP the endless barrage of nationwide injunctions against President Trump. This would not have been possible without tireless work from our excellent lawyers @TheJusticeDept and our Solicitor General John Sauer,' Bondi wrote on X. 'This Department of Justice will continue to zealously defend @POTUS's policies and his authority to implement them.' With inputs from agencies
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
31 minutes ago
- First Post
US Supreme Court allows partial enforcement of Trump's birthright citizenship order
The US Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a major victory on Friday by curbing the power of lone federal judges to block executive actions. read more A group of women pray outside the US Supreme Court, on the final day of the Court's term, in Washington, DC, on June 27, 2025. Image- AFP The US Supreme Court allowed the partial implementation of President Donald Trump's executive order aimed at limiting birthright citizenship. In a 6-3 ruling stemming from Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship, the court said nationwide injunctions issued by lower court judges 'likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts.' The ruling, split along ideological lines did not weigh in on the order's constitutionality but significantly limited the reach of federal judges to block presidential policies nationwide. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The court held that sweeping nationwide injunctions issued by lower courts which had previously blocked Trump's order 'likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts.' This paves the way for the executive order to be enforced in regions where such injunctions are not currently in place. Trump signed the controversial order shortly after taking office on January 20, seeking to end the automatic granting of US citizenship to children born on American soil to undocumented immigrant mothers. The policy marked a sharp departure from the long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which has guaranteed birthright citizenship since its ratification in 1868. The executive order was swiftly challenged in court, prompting federal judges in Maryland, Massachusetts, and Washington to block its enforcement, citing constitutional concerns. Legal scholars and civil rights groups have argued that the president lacks the unilateral authority to override constitutional provisions or established law through executive action. Although the Supreme Court's ruling permits limited enforcement of the order, it stops short of making a final judgment on whether the measure is constitutional. The broader legal battle over birthright citizenship and the limits of executive power is expected to continue.
