Plans to develop Melton Cattle Market given green light
A plan to turn part of a historic cattle market into a potential cultural destination for food lovers has been given the go ahead. Melton Borough Council's planning committee has granted permission for redevelopment of The Stockyard at Melton's Cattle Market. The work will include the addition of a new events space and four new buildings. The council has said the scheme would create 110 permanent jobs, attract an estimated 50,000 extra visitors and support the growth of the food production sector in the town.
Three of the new buildings in the scheme are open plan hubs where businesses can produce food and sell it fresh to visitors.The fourth will be the new three-storey anchor building, which planning documents say will be for manufacturing, production and educational uses.A new car park and toilets will also be built and the existing trader hall will be improved.The council said work was planned to begin in the spring and it is taking inquiries from potential occupiers of the new units.It is part of a wider project with Rutland County Council under the Rural Innovation in Action scheme, which received combined UK Government Funding of £22.95m.Council leader Pip Allnatt said: "The scheme is a transformational development that enhances the existing site."We will be able to increase and improve the food manufacturing and education aspects on site, and we'll also be adding new public toilets with a changing places area – a facility the local community has voiced the need for."The planning approval represents a significant milestone, and we'll be keeping stakeholders up to date on progress."The site hosts events including the East Midlands Food Festival, Piefest and the Artisan Cheese Fair.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Belfast Telegraph
an hour ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Irish Government ‘willing to consider helping further' on Casement, Harris says
It comes after a UK Government pledge of £50 million for the development of the west Belfast GAA stadium was included in Chancellor Rachel Reeves' spending review. However, that pledge still leaves the project far from its funding target under current plans. Mr Harris said it is up to the Northern Ireland Executive to decide how to proceed but said the Irish Government would be 'very helpful' in getting the stadium built. Plans for a 34,000-capacity stadium at the site have been mired in uncertainty because of a major funding gap. Stormont ministers committed £62.5 million to Casement in 2011, as part of a strategy to revamp it along with football's Windsor Park and the rugby ground at Ravenhill. While the two other Belfast-based projects went ahead, the redevelopment of Casement was delayed for several years because of legal challenges by local residents. The estimated cost spiralled in the interim. Last September the UK Government ended hopes that the west Belfast venue would host Euro 2028 games, when it said it would not bridge a funding gap to deliver the redevelopment in time. As well as the Stormont contribution of £62.5 million, the Irish Government has offered 50 million euro (roughly £42 million) and the GAA has pledged to contribute at least £15 million. It has been reported that the cost of the project has fallen to £270 million since it was confirmed the ground would not host Euros matches. Under current plans and including the £50 million from Wednesday's announcement along with the other commitments, the funding shortfall stands at roughly £100 million. Asked on Friday whether the Irish Government would give an increased contribution, Mr Harris said: 'We're certainly willing to consider helping further, but I should say the Irish Government has already made a very significant willingness to contribute in relation to Casement. 'I welcome the fact that the British Government has joined us in that effort this week, as of course has the GAA. 'The Northern Ireland Executive – and I would have made this point to the First and deputy First Minister today – they obviously now need to decide how they wish to pursue and of course, the Irish Government will want to be very helpful in getting this built.' He told RTE's News At One radio programme: 'This is really, really, really important for the provision of sports facilities, and we will continue to engage constructively.' Speaking at the British Irish Council in Northern Ireland, Taoiseach Micheal Martin said Ireland had already made an 'unprecedented contribution' to the project through the Shared Island Fund. He added a 'realistic' framework for the project was needed. 'Now is the time really to try and reach an agreement in terms of how we proceed with the stadium, having a realistic sort of sense of the framework that would govern the construction of the stadium here because it's been idle for far too long, and I think there's an opportunity now to get a stadium built.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
We will pay a high price for nuclear power we do not need
Nuclear power is expensive and almost always delivered late and over budget. Hinkley Point C has recently had its start-up delayed from 2027 to 2030 and its cost increased from £34bn to £46bn. As Sizewell C uses the same design, its costs will be similar. Notably, the Government has no partner who will commit to these costs. The taxpayer will pick up most of the bill. The electricity produced is likely to cost at least £220/MWh – around three times the cost per MWh of wind and solar. If these electricity costs are charged across the whole of GB, Scotland will be lumbered with additional bills when it produces far cheaper energy and will never need nuclear power again. READ MORE: Israel launches second wave of major strikes on Iran The introduction of zonal pricing of electricity would ensure Scotland pays for electricity at what it costs here and exclude the cost of nuclear plants in the south of England which will produce electricity never used in Scotland. I leave the environmental arguments to others to make. Gordon Morgan via email KEIR Starmer, the British establishment's latest useful idiot, announced that the UK Government would 'invest' another £14.2bn of public money into the Sizewell C nuclear power plant white elephant whose price tag is £40bn and counting. Proponents will tell you that nuclear is required for 'baseload' supply because renewable energy can't be stored. Wrong. It can be stored using several technologies, some of which have been around since the 19th century. And some renewable energy sources, such as tidal, don't need to be stored because they are constantly available. Apart from being far more expensive to develop and operate than renewable energy, nuclear power's Achilles' heel is that no-one knows what to do with the waste. Scotland's land and water are already contaminated with toxic radioactive waste from nuclear power plants, submarines and munitions dumps. So why do Westminster and Unionist politicians love this flawed and dangerous technology? First, the nuclear industry funds them to promote it. Rachel Reeves has just raided £2.5bn from the £8.3bn GB Energy budget to develop small modular reactors that are not commercially viable anywhere in the world. Second, the technology used to enrich uranium for nuclear power plants is the same technology for enriching uranium for nuclear weapons. Nuclear power is a national virility symbol to show that the flaccid and failing UK is still a 'great power'. And Scotland is a convenient dumping ground for the poisonous waste. The 1976 Flowers Report concluded the pursuit of nuclear power was morally wrong. By failing to accept its findings, the failing UK exposes its moral bankruptcy. Leah Gunn Barrett Edinburgh READING last Saturday's letters pages, with Councillor Gordon Murray's call for united action for independence and Peter Macari's denunciation of Starmer's war cries, was a morale booster. If John Swinney is not listening to his own activists, then he is not going to be listening to the wider Yes movement, which is apparently polling at 54%. So what can we do to develop action for our next crack at indy in 2026? (Image: Jeff J Mitchell) Councillor Murray's call for unity and a citizens' convention makes good sense and has been reiterated across the Yes movement including Alba. Gordon refers to the SNP 2023 promise but clearly it has fallen on deaf ears within the SNP leadership. Perhaps what is required is a pincer movement around the block to independence. How to bring this about? Should we bring together the councillors, MSPs, MPs (current and former) who support a citizens' convention on independence and bring in trade unions, civic, voluntary organisations and religious representatives as happened under Canon Kenyon Wright? As the evidence of Scotland's colonial status has been collected for the United Nations Decolonisation Committee, It has been shown that we need evidence of representative democratic organisations calling for independence. Peter Macari's timely letter about Starmer's militarisation of the UK economy highlights an issue of singular importance. It would be an economic and political disaster for Scotland already teetering on the brink of the disappearance of civic shipbuilding. Starmer's values do not align with Scottish aspirations and cultural values of equality and community as Peter so wisely sets out. The very existence of BAE on the Clyde and the 2014 Westminster promises of warships and submarines to sustain shipbuilding expose the reality of a coloniser getting the colonised to build its war machine. If the current leadership of the SNP refuses to call a citizens' convention, we must surely do so with those of some democratic standing who are prepared to move forward. Maggie Chetty Glasgow
BBC News
7 hours ago
- BBC News
Scottish couple lose legal challenge of winter fuel payment cuts
A couple have lost a bid to sue the UK and Scottish governments over the decision to cut winter fuel Peter and Flo Fanning, from Coatbridge in North Lanarkshire, took their case to the Court of Session in Edinburgh in March, alleging that both governments failed to adequately consult with those of pension age and did not release an equality impact assessment on the Court of Session ruled to refuse the petition on couple's lawyers have said they have no doubt the Fanning's litigation had been influential in securing U-turns by both governments. A spokesperson from the Govan Law Centre told BBC Scotland News: "While our clients have lost their case at first instance, we have no doubt that this litigation has been influential in securing the partial U-turn made by the Scottish government last November and the major policy U-turn confirmed by the UK government earlier this week."We hope that the Scottish government will now follow suit and restore the winter fuel payment in full for people such as our clients."Earlier this week, the UK government abandoned plans to withdraw the payments from all but the poorest pensioners after the scheme drew widespread Scottish government had already launched its own winter fuel benefit in response to the original cuts which included extra support for those less well-off, but also a universal payment which is unaffected by Govan Law Centre added the legal challenge "was always one of process" and the fact the UK government has already reconsidered the cuts "vindicates" their said that an appeal would have "reasonable prospects of success" but added it is unlikely that legal aid would be provided for this. What's happening with winter fuel payments? About 10 million pensioners in England and Wales lost their allowance under new measures announced by chancellor Rachel Reeves in July last on pension credit or certain other means-tested benefits retained the annual payments, worth between £100 and £ Scotland, the payment was devolved to Holyrood in April 2024, but the Scottish government followed the actions of their counterparts in Westminster in terminating it in August 2024, arguing £160m had been taken from its budget.A new alternative, called the Pension Age Winter Heating Payment (PAWHP), was due to be introduced the following month, but that has since been pushed back to winter will also be means-tested, despite ministers claiming it would not Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville recently said the universal approach of the devolved Scottish scheme was important - but that wealthier pensioners would be made aware that they could opt current plan is for all pensioner households to receive at least £100 regardless of income, while those on pension credit will receive up to £305 depending on the devolved government in Northern Ireland also followed suit, but affected pensioners were given a one-off £100 payment from Stormont in November.
