Allegations of a 'turf war' arise in debate over regulating kratom in NC
A laptop displays the website of an online kratom retailer. (Photo: Alexander Castro/Rhode Island Current)
North Carolina legislators are once again looking to put restrictions on kratom, which is currently unregulated in the state.
The House Regulatory Reform Committee on Tuesday advanced House Bill 468, which would require retailers to obtain licenses to sell kratom and prohibit sales to or purchases by people younger than 21. The bill now heads to the House Finance Committee.
According to the federal Drug Enforcement Agency, kratom is a stimulant at low doses and a sedative at high doses. It is derived from a southeast Asian tree leaf and sold in the United States as tea, powered in capsules, or as liquid.
The DEA sought to temporarily ban kratom in 2016, but backed off after a public outcry. That year, North Carolina legislators sought in separate bills to ban kratom or limit sales to people over age 18. Neither of those bills became law.
Last session, a proposal to regulate kratom died in the battle between the state House and Senate over legalizing medical marijuana.
Kratom has been a factor in hundreds of fatal overdoses since 2020, according to the Washington Post and the Tamp Bay Times. A handful of states have banned it.
The committee debate Tuesday centered on provisions in the bill that would ban synthetic versions of the compounds that produce psychoactive effects. The argument centered on the compound known as 7-OH.
'At the time, we choose not to have any synthetic products on the market in North Carolina,' said Rep. Jeff McNeely (R-Iredell), the bill's sponsor.
Isaac Montanya, CEO of 7-OH producer Charlotte Extraction Labs, said the bill inserted itself into a turf war. He called its prohibition on synthetics 'a sly way to regulate 7-OH out of the market.'
His company manufactures an ethical product, Montanya said.
Jeff Smith, national policy director for Holistic Alternative Recovery Trust, told the committee that people use 7-OH to ease opioid withdrawal.
'Banning 7-OH would turn patients into criminals,' he said.
Sheldon Bradshaw, a former chief counsel with the FDA representing the industry group Botanicals for Better Health and Wellness, called 7-OH 'dangerous' and deceptively marketed.
'It has no business being on store shelves and in products that are being labeled as natural kratom and marketed as herbal supplements,' he said.
McNeely said the ban on synthetics addresses the part of the plant that's going to be the most abused.
'We should have had kratom and cannabis regulated two years ago if not four years ago,' he said. 'Because it's been unregulated, we've allowed things to happen — good, bad, indifferent.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
China Makes It Clear: Trump Begged for Phone Call With Xi
Trump finally got his call with China. After Trump repeatedly told Americans that it was China who was so desperate to get him on the phone to discuss a trade deal, a recent post from the Chinese embassy all but confirms the opposite. It is Trump, not President Xi Jinping, who was sitting by the phone waiting day and night for a call that didn't come for months. 'Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday held phone talks with U.S. President Donald Trump at the latter's request,' China's U.S. Embassy posted from its X account on Thursday. The 'at the latter's request' is certainly intentional. Since 'Liberation Day,' Trump has insisted that he has the leverage, that countries far and wide will be lining up, eager to kiss the ring and make a deal with us. But still, China, the Asian powerhouse that faced the most aggressive tariffs from Trump, has shirked a potential deal-making phone call with the president, halting his visions of a sweeping agreement on trade, TikTok, and fentanyl export. The administration has nudged China to initiate the call since April, but to no avail until today. If you have to call someone just to tell them to call you, who really has the leverage? 'I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi, of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, Trade Deal. The call lasted approximately one and a half hours, and resulted in a very positive conclusion for both Countries.... Our respective teams will be meeting shortly at a location to be determined,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Thursday. 'During the conversation, President Xi graciously invited the First Lady and me to visit China, and I reciprocated. As Presidents of two Great Nations, this is something that we both look forward to doing. The conversation was focused almost entirely on TRADE. Nothing was discussed concerning Russia/Ukraine, or Iran. We will inform the Media as to scheduling and location of the soon to be meeting. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Trump's own summary of the conversation made no mention of who requested it.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
European markets mixed as investors digest ECB interest rate decision
As of 16:12 CEST, Germany's Dax fell 0.19%, France's CAC 40 declined 0.46%, the STOXX 600 dropped 0.28%, while Spain's IBEX 35 rose 0.23% after the European Central Bank (ECB) once again cut interest rates. The ECB, as widely expected by the markets, opted to cut its key deposit rate by 25 basis points to 2%, its lowest level in more than two years. Meanwhile, the interest rates on its main refinancing operations and the marginal lending facility will also be lowered to 2.15% and 2.40% respectively, taking effect from 11 June 2025. The latest decision comes as inflation in the euro area cooled more than expected in May. Annual consumer price growth slowed to 1.9% in May, down from 2.2% in April, according to a flash estimate from Eurostat this week. The figure came in below economists' forecast of 2%, and marks the first time inflation has dipped below the ECB's 2% target since September 2024. The decline in headline inflation suggests that business uncertainty, partly driven by renewed global trade tensions and soft consumer demand, is weighing on pricing power across sectors. Core inflation, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, also showed signs of easing. It slowed to 2.4% in May, from 2.7% in April, falling below expectations of 2.5%. On a monthly basis, core prices rose by just 0.1%. Related Eurozone inflation falls below ECB 2% target in May: Rate cut in sight Meanwhile, Asian shares were mixed on Thursday, as Wall Street's big recent rally lost some momentum following a pair of potentially discouraging reports on the American economy. Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 shed 0.2% to 37,658.46, while Australia's S&P/ASX 200 declined nearly 0.1% to 8,535.10. In South Korea, the Kospi jumped 2.1% to 2,829.48 after the country's new president and leading liberal politician Lee Jae-myung began his term, vowing to restart talks with North Korea and beef up a trilateral partnership with the US and Japan. Hong Kong's Hang Seng gained 0.9% to 23,856.54, while the Shanghai Composite was little changed, inching down less than 0.1% to 3,374.30. In the US, the S&P 500 was 0.3% lower in US morning trading, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 162 points, or 0.4%. The tech-heavy Nasdaq composite was also lower, down 0.2%. In other dealings, benchmark US crude fell 8 cents to $62.77 a barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, edged up 1 cent to $64.87 a barrel. The US dollar rose to 142.87 Japanese yen from 142.78 yen. The euro cost $1.1413, little changed from $1.1418. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
New week sees ocean container rates soar
The pause in the tariff fight that amounted to a trade embargo between China and the United States has seen a marked increase in container shipping rates, particularly on trans-Pacific routes. The Freightos Baltic Index this past week saw Asia-U.S. West Coast rates fall 1% to $2,767 per forty-foot equivalent unit. While Asia-U.S. East Coast prices declined 6% to $3,979 per FEU, container rates on the Asia to North America route have again soared amid rising tensions between Washington and Beijing. This surge can be attributed to the looming deadline for a trade agreement, set for Aug. 14, and the potential for increased tariffs if negotiations falter. The anticipation of heightened tariffs has led to a rush among shippers to import goods before the deadline, consequently driving up rates sharply this week. General rate increases and peak season surcharges by carriers that went into effect June 1 saw prices to the West Coast spike by 72% to $4,765 per FEU, while East Coast prices climbed by 44%, reaching $5,721 per steep rise highlights the urgency among shippers to expedite deliveries, opting for shorter transit times amid uncertainty, said Freightos research chief Judah Levine, in a note. This urgency is further compounded by the strategic scheduling of additional capacity by carriers to the West Coast, aiming to accommodate the increased demand. Indeed, carriers have scheduled record capacity levels, extending through July, to cater to the augmented demand on this route. SONAR data for June 1-4 correlated the increases, as spot rates from Yantian to Los Angeles rose from $5,610 to $6,000 per FEU, while prices from Ningbo to LA moved from $5,151 to $5,431. Moreover, the swelling demand for trans-Pacific capacity has induced congestion at major Asian ports, including in China and Singapore. This congestion presents a bottleneck, testing the resiliency of supply chains. However, officials at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach have assured stakeholders that they are equipped to manage the increased cargo volumes without significant delays. On the Asia-Europe route, a similar trend in rising rates is observed, albeit driven by different for containers destined for Northern Europe have increased by $300, to $2,650 per FEU, while those bound for the Mediterranean saw a rise of about $600, reaching $3,575 per FEU. The fluctuations here are partially due to some carriers rerouting vessels to meet the heightened trans-Pacific demand, said Levine. That has inadvertently reduced capacity on the Asia-Europe routes. This shift has exerted upward pressure on prices, exacerbated by congestion at European ports. Despite the clear upward trajectory, market skepticism remains as to whether these increased rates are sustainable, given the relatively flat overall demand on these routes. Even so, the rates hold firm at double their 2019 levels, buoyed by constraints such as capacity limitations from Red Sea route diversions. Missile attacks on Israel by Houthi rebels in Yemen continue to make the Suez Canal route too unstable for most major container carriers. CMA CGM of France is the exception and recently announced additional scheduled services in the region. The American battle group led by the aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman recently exited the Red Sea after an intense month of bombing campaigns against Houthi targets. Find more articles by Stuart Chirls ports will hurt jobs, US maritime revival: AAPA Texas port completes $625M ship channel deepening project'Fear and uncertainty' driving up China-US container rates The post New week sees ocean container rates soar appeared first on FreightWaves.