
Marx critical of YNHH plan to end visiting nurse progams
State Sen. Martha Marx, D-New London, on Monday decried Yale New Haven Health's plan to end certain visiting nurse programs in southeastern Connecticut, saying the decision 'is one seeking short-term gain at the expense of long-term community pain.'
Yale New Haven Health informed employees Friday that it will end its wellness and Nurse Family Partnership programs in seven towns at the end of June, when current contracts expire.
The move will displace eight employees, including six union nurses (four full-timers, one part-timer and one working on a per diem basis), a manager and an administrative employee, according to Fiona Phelan, a YNHH spokeswoman.
'YNHH has taken away some very important services that don't just provide unique benefits but are directly vital in the towns they're offered,' Marx said in a statement. 'In addition to the potential layoffs this decision will bring for nurses, these programs will leave vital services unfulfilled in our communities, leaving patients and community needs unmet and in some instances sharply reducing the quality of care homebound and disabled patients will receive.'
'The federal government working to slash important programs is bad enough,' she said. For Yale to cut them further in our backyard is going to worsen already severe impacts.'
Marx, Senate vice chairwoman of the legislature's Public Health Committee, is a member and past president of Local 5119 of the American Federation of Teachers, the union representing members of the organization formerly known as the Visiting Nurse Association of Southeastern Connecticut. Yale New Haven Health renamed the association Yale New Haven Health-Health at Home–Southeast.
The Health at Home wellness program provides nursing services at municipal locations, such as senior centers, in East Lyme, Groton, New London, Old Lyme, Old Saybrook, Stonington and Waterford, according to Phelan. Under a contract with the Connecticut Office of Early Childhood, the Nurse Family Partnership program sends nurses into the homes of at-risk pregnant mothers and follows the mother and baby from pregnancy to delivery through three years of age.
'Any decision to change a service that is being provided to the community and involves employees is extremely difficult, but we need to focus on our core mission of caring for our patients in hospital and home settings,' Phelan said. 'We are making the announcement approximately five months prior to the end of the program in order to allow our Human Resources staff to support each of the eight employees impacted in finding a new position within our health system or elsewhere. Providing this amount of time will also allow our communities to develop a plan for the future with as much time as possible.'
In an unrelated matter, Phelan said YNHH is transitioning oncology care from the Smilow Cancer Hospital at Westerly to the Smilow Cancer Hospital at Waterford. Current and new cancer patients who see their doctor in Westerly for routine appointments and consultations will continue to do so in Westerly.
The move has no impact on staffing at either location, Phelan said.
b.hallenbeck@theday.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Magazine
05-06-2025
- Time Magazine
Should You Take a Fiber Supplement?
Getting enough fiber is crucial for optimal health, yet more than 90% of Americans don't. Federal dietary guidelines recommend 25–34 grams of fiber per day for adults, depending on age and gender—but the average American adult eats only about 8 grams a day, 'which is far below recommended intake regardless of age or sex,' says Dr. Michelle Hughes, medical chief of quality and safety for digestive health at Yale New Haven Health and Smilow Cancer Hospital. Should people seek to fill that gap with fiber supplements? Here's what experts say you should know about supplementing this essential nutrient. What is fiber, anyway? Fiber is a type of carbohydrate that your body can't digest. It's found in plant foods, and 'instead of being broken down and absorbed like other carbs, fiber moves through the digestive system, adding bulk to stool, feeding beneficial gut bacteria, and slowing the absorption of sugar into the bloodstream,' says Bree Phillips, a registered dietitian at University of California, San Francisco Health. Eating too little can slow down the colon, says Dr. Omar Khokhar, gastroenterologist at OSF HealthCare, based in Illinois and Michigan. That may lead to diverticulosis and hemorrhoids. A low-fiber diet can also contribute to constipation, weight gain, obesity, bloating, and gas, and an increased risk of chronic diseases like diabetes, heart disease, and colorectal cancer. Should you take a fiber supplement? It's best to get fiber from your diet. 'Whole-food sources of fiber are ideal because they provide additional nutrients,' says Phillips. Whole foods also tend to contain a combination of both soluble and insoluble fiber. Soluble fiber, like the kind found in fruit and vegetables, dissolves in water to form a gel, while insoluble fiber—which comes from sources like grains—doesn't dissolve. But experts agree that some people who struggle to meet their daily fiber needs through food may benefit from supplementation. 'This may help with GI function, and also with health benefits outside the GI tract, such as lowered cholesterol and regulation of blood sugar levels,' Khokhar says. Psyllium husk, found in powdered products such as Metamucil, and methylcellulose, found in Citrucel and its generic counterparts, generally have the most data supporting them, he adds. Read More: Why Your Breakfast Should Start With a Vegetable Some fiber supplements, such as psyllium husk and beta-glucans, have been shown to support health by improving cholesterol, digestion, and blood sugar levels, says Phillips. But the source and dose both matter. 'Not all fiber supplements, even if they contain the same type of fiber, are created equal," cautions Phillips. 'Some may not contain the effective amount shown in research, and added ingredients like sugars or artificial sweeteners can impact tolerance and effectiveness.' For instance, taking supplemental inulin—a type of soluble fiber found in plants—has been shown to cause gastrointestinal distress in some people and did 'not consistently demonstrate protective effects' against colorectal cancer, says Hughes. Consult with a health care provider to choose the best supplement for you and to ensure it doesn't interact with any medications you take. What to look for in a fiber supplement From gummies to powders, there's a dizzying array of fiber supplements—in part, because there is no one 'perfect' fiber supplement, says Dr. Anne Mongiu, co-director of the colorectal cancer program at Yale School of Medicine's department of surgery. Considerations include taste, texture preferences, and tolerance, she says. If a doctor advises you to take a fiber supplement, they can likely recommend an exact type and brand. In general, here's how to pick the right fiber supplement, Mongiu says—and what to avoid. Evaluate the type of fiber: Fiber supplements are either derived from plants—such as psyllium, inulin, guar gum, flaxseed, or wheat dextrin—or from a synthetic source, such as methylcellulose. Plant-based or naturally-derived fiber is usually soluble fiber, which serves as a prebiotic and can support the health of gut bacteria and the microbiome. However, these can cause bloating and gassiness in some, so methylcellulose-based supplements can be a better option for some people. Consider the content: Look for fiber supplements that have at least 3 to 5 grams of the nutrient per serving. Some may have a lower content and therefore need to be taken multiple times a day, and others have a higher content for once-daily dosing. If you only plan to take a supplement once a day, it is probably best to select one with a higher amount of fiber to get the best effect. Scan the ingredients: Avoid supplements with extra sugars or other additives. There are many forms of fiber supplements, including powders, gummies, crackers, and cookies, and these sometimes contain unnecessary ingredients that can be harmful to your colon or overall health. Look for proof of quality control: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not regulate supplements as rigorously as they do medications. However, third-party certifications can help classify these products. Look for United States Pharmacopeia (USP) or NSF seals to ensure purity and quality. Is it better to take a powder or a pill? Many experts lean toward the powder form. 'Fiber powders tend to be more versatile since they can be mixed into water, smoothies, or food, making it easier to consume a larger amount at once,' says Phillips. 'They also often contain soluble fiber, which helps regulate digestion and support gut health.' Fiber pills can be more convenient for some but may contain smaller amounts of the nutrient per dose, meaning multiple pills may be needed to reach the same benefit as a scoop of powder. Powdered formulations also allow for flexible dosing, so you can control exactly how much you're getting and if you're consuming it in one or more doses, Mongiu says. Above all, 'I tell my patients that the best fiber supplement is the one that they are willing to take.'
Yahoo
04-06-2025
- Yahoo
Guam barracks conditions spur Navy-wide housing inspection
Mold-infested walls, exposed electrical wiring and other subpar living conditions at Andersen Air Force Base's military barracks in Guam prompted a recent Navy-wide review of all unaccompanied housing, according to a new investigative report from an independent government watchdog. After Navy Secretary John Phelan saw Andersen's Palau Hall barracks during a May 2 visit, he immediately ordered sailors and Marines to be moved out within 10 days, according to a report published by the Project on Government Oversight, or POGO, last week. Photos of Palau Hall barracks obtained by POGO show exposed wires, walls with mold that had been painted over and damaged plumbing. 'I actually thought the buildings were condemned,' Phelan told POGO. 'When we pulled up to them and saw what shape they're in, I was shocked.' By May 22, three weeks after Phelan's visit, 25 Marines and 48 sailors had left the barracks. About 21,000 people affiliated with the U.S. military live in Guam, a U.S. territory that houses Andersen Air Force Base, Naval Base Guam and Marine Corps Base Camp Blaz. The report claims Phelan's move to open new barracks at Camp Blaz ahead of schedule last month was, in part, a response to the lackluster conditions he witnessed at Andersen. After Phelan's visit, Vice Adm. Scott Gray, commander of Navy Installations Command, sent a scathing email to Navy leaders May 5, describing 'clearly unacceptable living conditions' at the barracks, according to an email obtained by POGO. Gray's email ordered inspections of all barracks housing sailors to be conducted no later than May 27 and demanded service members be moved to more livable quarters if their barracks were found to be poorly maintained. In the email, Gray instructed inspectors to use the 'Washington Post' test, in which those looking at living conditions should ask themselves whether they could defend the state of the barracks if a report in the legacy paper were published, according to the report. In an interview with POGO, Gray acknowledged some Navy barracks could be classified as being in poor condition and pledged a 'colossal effort' to improve sailors' quality of life. 'I'm not going to let up until we get to where we need to be,' Gray told POGO. 'Where I can say I am proud of every barracks that we have.' Conditions in other barracks at Andersen were not markedly different from those of Palau Hall, according to an Air Force spokesperson who spoke to POGO. There are five permanent party dormitory facilities at the Guam base, according to the Air Force. When reached for comment, the Air Force reiterated its commitment to providing safe and adequate living conditions for airmen. Barracks 2030 isn't a 'fix it and forget it' effort, USMC leaders say 'We prioritize permanent party unaccompanied housing requirements with dedicated facility sustainment, restoration, and modernization funds in accordance with our 4-year Dorm Master Plan,' an Air Force spokesperson told Military Times in an emailed statement. Dorm leaders inspect facilities daily, and if degraded conditions are observed, immediate repairs, as well as long-term investments, are provided, according to the spokesperson. The spokesperson identified damage from Typhoon Mawar in May 2023 as a contributing factor to barracks conditions and said the service was prioritizing funds for renovating dorms and providing alternate housing options to service members. The Navy also pledged its unwavering dedication to service members. 'Sailors' well-being is a priority for the Navy and it's critical to their wellness to have a safe, comfortable place to call home, whether they're staying on a Navy base or in barracks belonging to another Service, such as with Andersen Air Force Base,' said Destiny Sibert, a Navy spokesperson. POGO interviewed a Naval officer, who spoke under the condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation, about their experience being stationed on the island. 'Anybody that's been to Guam can tell you … if you're living on base, you're going to be in crappy quarters,' the officer told POGO, according to the report. Subpar living conditions in military barracks have long been a problem for many junior service members, and the services have taken steps in recent years to address them. The Marine Corps has pledged nearly $11 billion to overhaul its barracks as part of a massive housing renovation effort dubbed Barracks 2030. The program, which Marine Corps leaders said won't officially start until 2026, will add new furniture to housing and repair rooms. Meanwhile, the Trump administration's recently introduced 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which passed the House on May 22 and is awaiting confirmation in the Senate, includes $1 billion in barracks maintenance for the Army, Navy, Air Force and Space Force, the report said. The report's author, René Kladzyk, told Military Times over the phone that she was still receiving anonymous tips regarding the Guam base's poor conditions after the report's publication. While sailors and Marines had been moved out of the barracks, 430 airmen and soldiers remained, according to Kladzyk. 'I think that it's important to emphasize that although we saw a pretty sweeping response from Navy officials to learning about these conditions at Andersen Air Force Base, we didn't see the same response from Air Force officials who I reached out to over email,' Kladzyk said.
Yahoo
03-06-2025
- Yahoo
Cats and Dogs Will No Longer Be Used in Navy Research, Secretary Says
The Navy will end all research studies that involve testing on dogs and cats after an intense campaign by activists, influencers and congressional members. Navy Secretary John Phelan announced last week that the service would halt the animal experiments and ordered a review of all medical research to ensure the studies align with ethical guidelines and "scientific necessity." "Today, it gives me great pleasure to terminate all Department of the Navy's testing on cats and dogs, ending these inhumane practices and saving taxpayer dollars," Phelan said in a statement on the social media platform X. Read Next: Hegseth Orders Navy to Strip Name of Gay Rights Icon Harvey Milk from Ship The announcement follows a yearslong campaign by White Coat Waste Project, a nonprofit whose aim is to stop the U.S. government from using animals or funding research that harms animals, and to end several Defense Department studies, including Navy research on erectile dysfunction, constipation and incontinence in humans that used cats as subjects. As recently as last year, the Defense Department funded a research initiative using beagles to test an experimental drug, according to the group. The DoD banned the use of dogs in trauma training and weapons testing in the late 1980s but has used them in limited medical research. White Coat Waste estimates that the federal government spends $20 billion each year on research studies that involve dogs and cats. "We applaud Secretary Phelan, Secretary Hegseth and President Trump for first slashing the U.S. government's largest dog lab and now sending the Pentagon's cat and dog abuse to the litterbox of history. Defunding dog and cat labs has been our top priority for Trump 47," the group's founder and president, Anthony Bellotti, said in a statement. White Coat Waste announced in mid-May that the Pentagon halted funding for the Navy's $10.8 million medical research project on cats. The group credited conservative influencer Laura Loomer, who has called attention to the issue on her "Loomer Unleashed" podcast and social media platforms, and billionaire and presidential adviser Elon Musk for lobbying for change. "We exposed animal testing contracts at the Department of Defense, and @PeteHegseth and Secretary Phelan took immediate action to end these cruel and abusive taxpayer-funded experiments on innocent animals," Loomer wrote on X on May 28. "This is such an amazing victory toward the end of taxpayer-funded animal testing!" Last year, Congress signed legislation to end research at the Department of Veterans Affairs that used cats, dogs and primates. White Coat Waste began lobbying lawmakers to end the VA's use of live animals for experiments in 2017. After Phelan's announcement, the animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals wrote the Navy secretary and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth thanking them for the change. But they asked that the ban be expanded to include the use of live animals for non-medical research, such as trauma training and weapons experiments. For example, according to PETA, the Navy continues to use mammals for decompression sickness and oxygen tests, while the Army is allowed to use mammals, including primates and marine mammals, in weapons testing. "Pigs, rats and other animals feel pain and fear just as dogs and cats do, and their torment in gruesome military experiments must end," PETA Vice President Shalin Gala said in a statement. "PETA appreciates the Trump administration's decision to stop the Navy's torture tests on dogs and cats, and we urge a broader ban across the Pentagon." PETA also has pressed the Pentagon to halt funding for research that involves animals at foreign institutions. Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, and Rep. Lisa McClain, R-Mich., reintroduced a bill last month that would end U.S. government funding of research that involves animals in China, including Hong Kong; Iran; North Korea; and Russia. "American taxpayer dollars should never fund dangerous, cruel experiments in animal research labs -- much less in China or other adversarial countries," McClain said in a statement. "This common-sense legislation ensures taxpayer dollars are not wasted on reckless research." "Hard-working taxpayers in eastern North Carolina and across America should not pay for risky experimentation in countries not subject to regular oversight and accountability," Democratic co-sponsor Rep. Don Davis of North Carolina, said in a news release. -- Pentagon reporter Konstantin Toropin contributed to this report. Related: Military Trauma Training on Live Pigs, Goats Sparks New Lawsuit Seeking Details