Northeye: Taxpayers paid 'steep price' for former prison
The purchase of a derelict prison for £15.4m to house asylum seekers was an "unacceptable waste" of public money, a report has warned.The Public Accounts Committee found the Home Office "rushed" to spend public money to cut costs for supporting asylum seekers, but has "very little to show for its efforts".The cross-party committee said the government body ignored expert advice available at the time during its bid to buy former HMP Northeye in efforts to secure 1,400 bed spaces, and bypassed processes to protect public money.A Home Office spokesperson said: "The contents of this report relate to the previous government's purchase of the Northeye site for asylum accommodation, but we have decided against progressing the site to ensure value for money for the taxpayer."
The Home Office completed the sale in September 2023 under the previous Conservative government, paying more than double what had been paid for the site 12 months earlier.Now the site, in Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex, remains in need of significant work - and the Home Office plans to transfer it to another government department or sell it, the report added.It criticised the Home Office's "dysfunctional culture" where value for money was "a secondary concern".The publication from MPs, released on Wednesday, read: "The Home Office repeatedly emphasised that it was working at pace to reduce its reliance on costly hotel accommodation for asylum seekers, but this does not excuse it from its responsibility to safeguard taxpayers' money."As we have previously found, in some cases these programmes have cost more than the alternative of using hotels."
'Series of poor decisions'
The report also said the Northeye sale was among purchases of large accommodation sites for asylum seekers that has gone "drastically wrong" and come at a high cost to the taxpayer.Bibby Stockholm was one example detailed after £34m was spent on the barge which housed fewer migrants than expected before its contract ended in January, while £60m was spent on a site at RAF Scampton in Lincolnshire which was scrapped before it opened.The findings come after a Whitehall spending watchdog, the National Audit Office, also said the Home Office's attempt to acquire the Northeye site in a few months led to cut corners and a "series of poor decisions".The latest report on Wednesday said while the Home Office identified "over 1,000" lessons from its acquisitions of large asylum accommodation sites, committee members remain to be convinced it can put learning into practice.
The report said: "Given that some of these 'lessons' should have been evident at the time, we are concerned about the Home Office's ability to put that learning into practice and prevent such an unacceptable waste of public money from happening again."MPs also flagged concerns that the Home Office's bid to cut the reliance of hotels to house asylum seekers may lead to increased costs elsewhere, such as increased homelessness and pressure on local councils by driving up rental prices.But the committee also praised work from the Home Office to boost engagement with local authorities and plans to work with the Ministry of Justice on more funding to ease the growing number of asylum appeals.The Home Office spokesperson added: "As part of our overall effort to cut the astronomical cost of asylum accommodation, including ending the use of asylum hotels... [and] removing more than 16,400 people with no right to be in the UK, restarted asylum processing, established the new border security command, and prioritised the acquisition of more sustainable dispersal accommodation."The Conservative Party has been approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
14 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Primary school pupils using screens for tests is ‘normalising' use, Tories claim
Shadow education secretary Laura Trott said the Government was instilling screen usage for children as young as four, as the Government came under pressure to ban smartphones in schools. Ms Trott said the policy was supported by teachers, health professionals and parents. She said: 'Every day we have new evidence of the harm screens are doing. So why is the Education Secretary (Bridget Phillipson) ignoring this, and still pressing ahead with screen-based assessments for children as young as four from September? 'Does she accept that this is normalising screen time for young people, which is the opposite of what we should be doing?' Education minister Stephen Morgan said: 'Is this all she can go on? Frankly, after 14 years, they broke the education system. As I said, there's guidance already in place for schools, the majority of schools already have a ban in place on mobile phone use.' Earlier in the Commons, Mr Morgan had told MPs mobile phones had 'no place' in schools. He said Government guidance said schools should ban the use of smartphones during the school day. However ,he said it was up to schools to use their powers to take them off pupils. Conservative MPs raised the links between mobile phone usage and violent behaviour, as well as schools with bans having better grades on average. Conservative MP Sarah Bool (South Northamptonshire) said: 'Schools with smartphone bans were rated higher by Ofsted, and their students achieved better GCSE results. So all the evidence shows the benefit of banning smartphones in schools. 'But the Government is simply issuing non-statutory guidance and passing the buck. So does the minister not understand the evidence, need more evidence, or do you not trust the Government to be able to implement a ban on smartphones in schools?' Meanwhile, John Lamont (Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) said: 'Mobile phones in classrooms are linked to disruptive and violent behaviour. So does the minister agree with me that mobile phones should be banned in all schools, so the children are focused on their education and not glued to Instagram and TikTok?' While in government, the then Conservative education secretary, Gillian Keegan, sent guidance to schools that told headteachers they could ban mobile phones during the school day. However, this was short of an out-and-out ban. Since their election defeat last year, the Conservatives have pushed for Labour to introduce a full ban. In March, it tried to amend Labour's flagship education policy to legally prohibit smartphone usage. A Government spokesperson said the existing guidance meant about 97% of schools restrict mobile phone use in some way. Studies are unclear on the impact of a smartphone ban. One by the University of Birmingham, published in the Lancet earlier this year, suggested there was no link. Replying to Ms Bool, Mr Morgan said: 'I'll take no lectures from the benches opposite on this. When in government, they exclaimed the same guidance meant a consistent approach across all schools. So you have to ask, were they wrong then, are they wrong now?'
North Wales Chronicle
14 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Grooming gangs review to be unveiled as PM's inquiry plan gets mixed reaction
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is to address Parliament over the review, which prompted the Prime Minister to implement a full probe after months of resistance. The rapid national audit looking at the scale of grooming gangs across the country was first announced in January as part of a series of measures to tackle the issue. Earlier this year, the Government dismissed calls for a public inquiry, saying its focus was on putting in place the outstanding recommendations made in a seven-year national inquiry by Professor Alexis Jay. The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA), led by Prof Jay, found institutional failings and tens of thousands of victims across England and Wales. On Monday, a No 10 spokesman did not say how much the inquiry would cost and the timeframe, saying the Home Secretary would set out details in the afternoon. The spokesman said: 'It will be a full statutory inquiry. What this inquiry will do is build on the work carried out by Alexis Jay and her independent inquiry to child sexual abuse, but look specifically at how young girls were failed so badly by different agencies on a local level, strengthening the commitment we made at the start of this year to carry out locally led inquiries.' The Home Office has also said the National Crime Agency (NCA) will carry out a nationwide operation targeting people who have sexually exploited children, and follow up on more than 800 cold cases. According to the Home Office, the NCA will work in partnership with police forces to investigate cases that 'were not progressed through the criminal justice system' in the past. Meanwhile, the Times reported the review by Baroness Casey is expected to explicitly link the grooming gang issue to men of Pakistani origin and say that people were ignored for the fear of racism. The BBC also understands one of the review's recommendations is expected to order police forces in England to improve their data collection on ethnicity around child sexual abuse and exploitation cases. The MP for Rotherham said she was initially reluctant about another 'grooming gangs' inquiry but supported it after listening to the public. Sarah Champion told the Today Programme on BBC Radio 4: 'The thought of having another filled me with horror, and I was reluctant, but when I realised the overwhelming public concern, there's a real sense justice has not been handed out fairly and there has been a cover-up and intense frustration that there are still victims and survivors who haven't received justice.' She added that the biggest failing was that 'no-one has joined the dots up' when it came to grooming gangs of a Pakistani heritage. 'Are there any links between those different groups and gangs? Personally, I think it's highly likely that there will be,' she said. However Nazir Afzal, who was chief crown prosecutor for the North West from 2011 to 2015, told the Today programme he had 'pragmatic doubts' about the new national inquiry. 'Only criminal investigations can bring real accountability. That's what needs to happen. Not just for those who offended, but also those who stood by and didn't do what they were meant to do,' he said. 'Unfortunately my experience with national inquiries is that they take forever and don't deliver accountability.' The Casey review comes after a row on the issue was ignited earlier this year, when Sir Keir became embroiled in a row with tech billionaire Elon Musk over calls for a national investigation. In January, the Prime Minister hit out at politicians 'calling for inquiries because they want to jump on the bandwagon of the far right' but, on Sunday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves said Sir Keir had been focused on 'victims' rather than 'grandstanding'. A children's charity has said that the Government must not wait until the end of the inquiry to implement the recommendations from existing reports such as IICSA. Lynn Perry, chief executive of Barnardo's, said: 'Children and survivors of abuse have already been waiting many years for action, so it's vital the Government doesn't wait for the outcome of this new inquiry to implement recommendations from previous ones. 'That includes upskilling social workers and other professionals to spot the signs of abuse, as well as investing in vital support services to help children experiencing life-changing consequences of abuse and to keep them safe from further harm.'
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer insists he will not ‘massage the figures' as he vows to shut all migrant hotels properly
Keir Starmer has insisted that the Home Office will not be buying up hotels and changing their use to 'accommodation centres' in a bid to ensure he keeps his pledge to end the use of asylum hotels by 2029. Speaking to journalists accompanying him to the G7 in Canada, Sir Keir insisted that there would be no attempt to 'massage the figures' on the pledge to stop using taxpayer-funded hotels to house asylum seekers. The issue was raised after the promise to stop paying for hotels was made in the spending review by chancellor Rachel Reeves. It comes as the prime minister held talks with his Italian counterpart Giorgia Meloni to discuss imposing sanctions on people smugglers. Despite increasing numbers of asylum seekers making the dangerous journey across the Channel in small boats, the move to ban migrant hotels is expected to save at least £1bn, according to Treasury estimates. Sir Keir said: 'On the question of hotels, what I want to do is to reduce the number of hotels and get rid of the use of hotels. 'I'm absolutely clear why we're in this problem – it's because the last government didn't process the claims. So it left people in limbo where they couldn't be removed because they hadn't been processed, so they couldn't leave the country or be removed from the country. There were tens of thousands of people in a pool that was ever-expanding. 'That's not good – certainly not good for the taxpayer – and I intend to change that. And that's why we're working so hard on processing the claims as quickly as we can. Because when you process the claims you can then remove people who shouldn't be here hence the 30,000 that have been removed which is the highest number for the best part of a decade now. That's the way to drive this down.' He went on: 'We are determined to get those hotels shut, and properly shut, and not massaging the figures. I'm not interested in that. Shutting the hotels is what I'm absolutely focused on.' The prime minister also revealed that he planned an unofficial mini-summit at the G7 with French president Emmanuel Macron, German chancellor Friedrich Mertz and Ms Meloni over the continued issue of illegal migration across Europe. A readout from his Sunday evening meeting with Ms Meloni noted: 'They had a lengthy discussion on migration, confirming that they would continue working together on innovative solutions to break the criminal model of irregular migration. 'The Prime Minister raised the UK's world-leading work on people smuggling sanctions, adding that he looked forward to working with other European countries on this approach.' On the flight over he insisted that he was not frustrated with the French over their failure to prevent thousands of migrants from getting into small boats to cross the Channel. This comes despite anger expressed on the issue by defence secretary John Healey over French inaction despite the UK paying £400m to France to help tackle the problem. Sir Keir said: 'One of the things we've worked hard at is improving the relations with the French in relation to the work we both need to do to stop these boat crossings, which I'm determined we will absolutely bear down on. Nobody should be making that journey. 'As a result of that we are seeing a much greater cooperation in northern France - I want to see more cooperation in northern France, and it's an issue that I have raised and will raise again with President Macron. We have good relations between the Home Secretary and the Interior Minister now that we're working on jointly. 'It's one of the issues I'll be discussing - not just with Macron, actually, but discussing it with Georgia Meloni, Freidrich Merz, and others.'
