
Windies frustrated after inconsistent decisions in 1st WI vs AUS Test, what happened?
The first Test between the West Indies and Australia in Bridgetown, Barbados, has sparked considerable controversy regarding umpiring decisions. Two days into the game, there have already been five decisions that have raised eyebrows.
Incident 1: Travis Head survives
On Day 1 of the Test match, Travis Head edged one of Shamar Joseph and Shai Hope behind the stumps, have claimed to take the catch. However, as the decision was sent upstairs and Adrian Holdstock, who is the third umpire for the game, decided it was not out, citing a lack of clear evidence if the catch from Hope was taken cleanly.
Incident 2: West Indian skipper gets lucky
In the first over of Day 2, a delivery from Josh Hazlewood to Roston Chase appeared to hit the pad first, which the Australians appealed for an LBW shout. And once given, not out on the field, it was sent upstairs, and there would be a small spike as the ball passes the front pad and then takes the edge of the bat, the Australian would celebrate; however, to their dismay, Holdstock asks for onfield umpires to stay with their decision of not out
Incident 3: West Indian skipper gets unlucky
Australian skipper Pat Cummins appeals for an LBW, and this time, on-field umpire Richard Kettleborough raised his finger. Chase has a glance at his inside edge and sends the decision upstairs. While there was no spike on Ultraedge, the ball seemed to have deflected when close to the bat. However, Holdstock deemed as there was clear gap between bat and ball and judged Chase LBW.
Incident 4: Role and fate reversal for Hope
This time it would be Shai hope who edged Beau Webster's delivery and Alex Carey makes a stunning attempt diving to his left. Kettleborough not convinced with the catch sends it upstairs and although there was evidence of ball brushing the ground before reaching the hands of Carey Holdstock surpringlsy gives it out.
Incident 5: Fortune favours Green
A delivery from Justin Greaves to Green was sent upstairs for review by by Chase after on-field umpire Nitin Menon gave it not out for LBW. Compared to the other decisions made this was rather a difficult one but yet ended up controversial. There was an edge from Green however, it was unclear if the ball has brushed the pad before and Holdstock declared it was not out.
Australian fast bowler Mitchell Starc: 'There's been some interesting ones. A couple more (DRS calls) have gone against the West Indies than us. As players, you can only ask a question, we don't use the technology to make the decision. It's a grey area so it comes down to the perception of the officials.'
West Indian head coach Darren Sammy: 'I just had a chat with the match referee trying to find some understanding of what the process is. We only hope for consistency in the decision making. When there's doubt in something, just be consistent across the board. From the images that we're seeing, the decisions are not fair enough for both teams. I've asked the match referee for a sit down. We're all humans, mistakes will be made, I just want fairness.'
Reactions on commentary
Ian Bishop: 'Officiating is low-hanging fruit. What needs to happen here, when I put my emotions aside, the umpires perhaps need, and they probably do have a meeting after the day's play, they will review these decisions and I think we may get better interpretations … you have to get that going forward. I think they would probably have learned a few things [by] looking at that.'
Carlos Brathwaite: 'There are not many fans of [third umpire] Adrian Holdstock in the West Indies at the moment,'
Samuel Badree: 'It's unfortunate, it really is unfortunate. It feels as though everything has gone against the West Indians.'
Greg Blewett: 'I felt like the third umpire had some really tough decisions to make. A lot of them weren't really clear decisions; it was down to a bit of interpretations. I think Australia got on the right end of the decisions.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
'To win in England, they've got to play Kuldeep Yadav': Michael Clarke warns Team India
Kuldeep Yadav (ICC Photo) NEW DELHI: Former Australian captain Michael Clarke and ex-England cricketer Nick Knight have called for spinner Kuldeep Yadav 's inclusion in India's bowling attack after the pacers underwhelmed in the first Test at Headingley. Apart from Jasprit Bumrah, who stood out, the rest of the Indian bowlers struggled on a placid surface that offered little help. The pace unit looked ineffective, with Mohammed Siraj delivering a below-par performance and Prasidh Krishna failing to find the right length. Shardul Thakur couldn't make his usual impact, while Ravindra Jadeja managed to extract some turn but lacked adequate support from the other end. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! "Bowling-wise, I do not want to be hard on any individual, but I think they've got to play Kuldeep Yadav. I think it is an absolute no-brainer. I think he's a wicket-taker and would have offered a lot more than what he saw the attack do in this Test," Clarke said on the Beyond23 Podcast. Clarke also criticised India's selection mindset. "India have done this for a while. They care so much about extra batting or stacking the batting deep, and they are willing to risk picking the number one spinner to do that. I think to win in England, you've got to look to pick 20 wickets," Clarke said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo Why Team India will practice behind closed doors in Birmingham, details of bonding session and more Knight echoed similar sentiments, especially considering the dry English summer. "I would be looking for every opportunity to play Kuldeep Yadav. England will find it hard against Kuldeep. If Kuldeep is on top of his game, that could be a defining moment in the series, or moments, because England likes to be aggressive. When you want to be aggressive, you have to be certain about which way the ball is turning. If there is a little bit of assistance from the pitch, Kuldeep will be able to bowl all his varieties," he said. The second Test between India and England is scheduled to be played at Edgbaston in Birmingham from July 2. Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
WI vs AUS: All third umpire controversies from Barbados Test between West Indies and Australia
From fine UltraEdge spikes to disputed low catches, the first Test between West Indies and Australia in Barbados has seen a string of third umpire controversies. Here's a breakdown of the key DRS flashpoints causing frustration: Roston Chase – Day 2, First Over Decision: Not out (TV umpire Adrian Holdstock ruled ball hit bat, not pad). Controversy: A small murmur appeared on UltraEdge before the ball reached the bat, suggesting possible pad contact, but umpire deemed it an inside edge. Impact: Chase survived; went on to score 44 before being given out later. Roston Chase – Later Dismissal (LBW) Decision: Out (on-field umpire said out; third umpire upheld it). Controversy: Slight spike appeared on RTS a frame before the ball reached the bat. Chase insisted he hit it. TV umpire Holdstock adjudged the ball was too far from the bat. Impact: Chase was dismissed despite seeming evidence of bat contact. Cameron Green – LBW Appeal Decision: Not out (umpire said not out; third umpire agreed). Controversy: A tiny spike on UltraEdge as the bat got caught in the pad flap. Ball-tracking (not used since not out) later showed three reds — meaning would have been out if no bat was involved. Impact: Green survived a very close call that, on later evidence, would have been out. Shai Hope – Caught Behind Decision: Out (TV umpire Holdstock ruled clean catch by Alex Carey). Controversy: Ball was very close to the ground as Carey completed the one-handed dive. Critics say it resembled Mitchell Starc's grounded catch vs Duckett in 2023 Ashes that was not given. Impact: Hope was dismissed on a low-percentage call. Caught or did the ball touch the ground? 🫣 Windies are furious with that decision. What's your call? ☝️ or ❌# — FanCode (@FanCode) June 26, 2025 Travis Head – Edge Not Carried Decision: Not out (review said not enough evidence that under-edge carried to keeper Shai Hope). Controversy: West Indies believed it carried. Australians (including Starc) thought it was out. Impact: Head survived; was not dismissed.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
ICC introduces new powerplay rules for shortened men's T20 matches
In a significant overhaul of its playing conditions, the International Cricket Council (ICC) has unveiled a host of changes across formats, with new powerplay rules for shortened T20 matches grabbing the spotlight. These rules, set to come into effect from July 2, will now bring a standardised calculation to powerplay overs depending on the reduced innings length. For instance, in an eight-over innings, only 2.2 overs will be powerplay, with just two fielders allowed outside the 30-yard circle. The changes are aimed at making reduced-overs matches fairer while also eliminating ambiguities around fielding restrictions. Several of the new white-ball rules will debut during the upcoming T20I series post the World Cup, while select regulations have already been implemented in the 2025–27 World Test Championship cycle. Powerplay adjustments for shorter T20s To bring clarity during rain-affected or time-shortened games, the ICC has introduced precise powerplay durations based on innings length. A five-over innings will now feature 1.3 overs of powerplay, while a six-over game will allow 1.5 overs. The powerplay will increase incrementally as overs go up — 2.1 overs for seven overs, 2.2 for eight, and 2.4 for nine. A full 10-over innings will continue to have three overs of fielding restrictions. The pattern continues up to 16-over games, which will now include 4.5 powerplay overs. These specific allocations are expected to provide better balance between bat and ball in curtailed matches. Stop clock makes its way to Test cricket In a bid to tackle slow over rates, the ICC will now use a stop clock in Test matches as well. Already a feature in limited-overs formats, the rule requires the fielding team to begin a new over within 60 seconds of the previous one ending. Teams will get two warnings before a five-run penalty is enforced. The clock resets every 80 overs, aligning with traditional ball changes. Saliva ban no longer forces ball change While the ban on saliva use remains, umpires will now have discretion on whether to change the ball. If a player applies saliva, the ball will only be replaced if its condition is visibly altered. This update prevents teams from exploiting the rule to gain a ball change. DRS updates and fairness in combined reviews Significant changes have been made to Decision Review System (DRS) protocols. If a batter is initially given out caught and the review finds no edge, the same review will now assess LBW possibilities with the 'original decision' marked as 'out', even if the dismissal type changes. In cases involving multiple appeals — like LBW and run-out — the TV umpire will now assess incidents in the order they occurred. Fair catch review even on no-balls A new clause requires TV umpires to check the fairness of a catch even if the delivery was a no-ball. If the catch is clean, only the no-ball run is awarded. If not, the batting side retains any additional runs completed. Tougher stance on deliberate short runs Deliberate short runs will now carry strategic consequences. Along with the existing five-run penalty, the fielding team can now choose which batter stays on strike following the infringement. This gives the fielding side a tactical edge in punishing unfair attempts to steal runs. Full-time injury replacements in domestic cricket In a move to safeguard teams during serious injuries, the ICC has recommended full-time player replacements in domestic first-class competitions. Much like concussion substitutes, the replacement must be like-for-like, and the injury must be externally visible to officials. Soft tissue injuries like cramps or pulls won't qualify.