Overlooking sexual harassment against health staff ‘risks patient safety'
Healthcare staff who 'turn a blind eye' to colleagues being sexually harassed at work face putting patient safety at risk, doctors have warned.
Medics claim that overlooking these incidents allows other toxic behaviours 'to perpetuate'.
It comes as members of the British Medical Association (BMA) called for NHS trusts to include active bystander training – which aims to equip people with the skills to challenge unacceptable conduct – in mandatory training programmes.
Delegates at the union's annual representative meeting (ARM) in Liverpool also voted for the BMA to lobby for a national anonymous reporting system for victims of sexual harassment.
Dr Helen Neary, co-chairwoman of the BMA consultants committee, said: 'People are bystanders at all levels, and a working culture that turns a blind eye to this behaviour is also a risk to patient safety, enabling other poor behaviours to perpetuate.'
The motion urged NHS organisations to probe allegations of sexual misconduct using trained investigators external to the trust.
Dr Neary added: 'No one should feel unsafe at work. Yet the appalling truth is that doctors, disproportionately women, are still subject to sexual harassment, abuse and assault in the workplace – often by their fellow doctors. This has to stop.
'Not only is it obviously completely unacceptable and has a devastating impact on victims, but also affects the quality of care and workforce capacity as poor behaviours will do nothing to retain staff in the NHS.'
In March, the latest NHS staff survey found one in 12 (8.82%) of workers were the target of unwanted sexual behaviour such as offensive comments, touching and assaults.
The proportion was similar to that reported in 2023 (8.79%) when the question was first asked as part of the survey.
Last October, NHS England launched a new national sexual misconduct policy framework to ensure trusts had robust policies in place for staff to report incidents.
Speaking to delegates at the BMA ARM in Liverpool, Professor Bhairavi Sapra said that while the framework is a 'very welcome first step', it is not mandatory.
'It is up to individual employers to adopt it, and even then, perpetrators can simply move on from one employer to another without accountability for those in positions of power to prevent this behaviour,' she added.
'Worse still, there is no national reporting mechanism. That means if someone wants to report an incident months later in a different workplace, they face an uphill battle, often alone.
'Survivors have told us why they don't come forward. They fear being told they're overreacting.
'They fear retaliation or reputational damage. They fear nothing will change, and sadly, they are not wrong.
'Investigations, when they do happen, are rarely trauma informed, often the process itself can feel like another form of harm.'
Dr Neary said: 'As the trade union and professional association for all doctors in the UK – from those beginning their careers as medical students to retirement and beyond – the BMA welcomes the legal obligation placed on the NHS to protect employees from sexual harassment.
'This vote makes some excellent suggestions on how this work can go further, including anonymous reporting, that will encourage those concerned about coming forward to do so, and better equipping doctors on how they can support colleagues when they witness sexual harassment at work.'
Prof Sapra also claimed the 'power imbalance' in the medical profession is 'stark', adding: 'Junior staff rely on senior medical staff for training, for references and for their very careers.
'That dependency makes them especially vulnerable and often silent.'
An NHS England spokesperson said: 'It is totally unacceptable that NHS staff experience sexual misconduct or harassment at work – this behaviour has no place in the health service, and all organisations must take robust and compassionate action to prevent it.
'The NHS Sexual Safety Charter has been adopted by every Integrated Care Board and NHS Trust in England, which encourages consideration of external, independent investigators in complex or sensitive cases – and all NHS organisations should ensure that those leading these processes are properly trained to handle them with the seriousness and sensitivity they require.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
Most UK Doctors Lack Confidence in GMC, Survey Finds
Most doctors surveyed by the British Medical Association (BMA) this month expressed lack of confidence in the General Medical Council's (GMC) ability to protect the public. Four-fifths of those polled backed creating a replacement body. Following years of scandals and disputes involving the GMC, the poll reflects growing dissatisfaction within the profession regarding the regulator's performance. Out of 1404 respondents, only 16.1% agreed the GMC was fulfilling its statutory duty of public protection. A majority of 61.2% disagreed or strongly disagreed. When asked whether a new regulator should be established dedicated solely to doctors, 82.2% supported the idea. Only 5.6% opposed it. Regulation of PAs and AAs Cited as a Major Issue The survey, conducted between 13 and 16 June, attracted 1539 BMA member responses. Professor Philip Banfield Highlighting the results on Monday at the association's annual representative meeting, chair of council Professor Philip Banfield said that a prominent source of dissatisfaction lay in the GMC's approach to regulating physician associates (PAs) and anaesthesia associates (AAs). Banfield said there is no national scope of practice or clear limits on what associates can do. The BMA had collected more than 600 'shocking examples' of unsafe practices by associates. These included the widespread prescribing of medicines, inappropriate referrals for ionising radiation, and cases of avoidable patient harm and death. "But in the face of mounting evidence, coroners' reports, and legal challenges, the NHS continues to bury its head in the sand and refuses to introduce the most rudimentary safety measures,' he said. In a scathing critique of the GMC's role as professional regulator, Banfield asked, 'Who the hell is charge?' In place of accountability, there is "just a dangerous game of pass the parcel where the music never stops', he told delegates. Banfield compared the blurring of lines between doctors and PAs to the failings of the Horizon IT system at the Post Office. He called for a public inquiry into the issue, with full statutory powers to hold those responsible to account. Joint Regulation Spurs Professional Boundary Concerns The BMA opposed the GMC becoming the joint statutory regulator for doctors and associates. This arrangement took effect in December 2024 despite opposition from many medical organisations. In April, the BMA lost a High Court challenge against the GMC's decision to issue a single set of professional standards for doctors and associates. The court ruled that the arrangement was 'logical and lawful'. The BMA branded it "irrational and misleading". The GMC duly updated its Fitness to Practise Rules to embrace doctors under the same standards as associates. Banfield told conference delegates that the result of joint regulation had been "incessant and unsafe blurring of professional boundaries that threaten the very foundations of practising medicine". BMA Calls for New Doctor-only Regulator The GMC has failed doctors and patients for too long, he said. The BMA is calling for a new independent regulator solely for doctors that is 'unburdened by the abject failure of what the GMC has become'. The new body must regain the profession's confidence, protect patients, treat doctors fairly, and place them at the heart of its decisions, he said. Banfield also urged the government to address doctor unemployment in the NHS 10-year plan. He highlighted ongoing issues with specialty bottlenecks causing resident doctor unemployment. This is "another debacle that the NHS and its paymasters have been aware of for years, but haven't lifted a finger to resolve, let alone taken any responsibility for", he said. GMC Response to Criticism A GMC spokesperson said: "We take our role working with doctors to support good, safe patient care very seriously. Our aim is to deliver effective, relevant and compassionate regulation.' The GMC welcomed the "much-needed" reform of the regulatory framework. "Making further changes to the way we work will continue to benefit patient safety and ensure the public has confidence in the doctors we regulate," the spokesperson added. Historical Criticisms of GMC's Performance Calls to replace the GMC as medical regulator are not new. A BMJ opinion article from November 2022 described it as " failing patients and doctors for 30 years ". Professor Aneez Esmail and Dr Sam Everington called the GMC a dysfunctional organisation that 'serves only itself". They criticised the GMC's handling of criticism as a ' performative masterclass ,' involving denial, citing lack of evidence, commissioning predictable research, and producing 'an endless series of reports so that it can wring its hands in false contrition and promise that change will come'. In a follow up opinion article Dr Kamran Abbasi, BMJ editor in chief, noted that despite repeated promises, past GMC leadership had failed to implement recommendations from multiple reviews and inquiries.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
From ageing faster to early death, how nightmares really affect you according to a dream expert
Waking up in a cold sweat, with your heart pounding and your thoughts racing can be an unsettling experience. Anyone that has experienced regular nightmares will know that a night of bad dreams can rattle you for hours after you wake, leaving an eerie feeling that lingers well into the next day. But it's not just your breakfast that a chaotic dream episode might ruin, as a major study has now linked a higher frequency of nightmares to faster biological ageing and earlier death in humans. New findings from scientists at London's Imperial College reveal that adults who report weekly nightmares are more than three times likely to die before the age of 70, compared to those who rarely or never experience them. As unpleasant as bad dreams can be, leading dream psychologist Ian Wallace believes that nightmares are nothing for us to fear. In fact, he reckons they hold vital clues to our deepest emotional states, allowing us to pinpoint anxieties and stresses in our waking life that we need to resolve. We all know that dreaming about contentedly lazing on a desert island feels vastly different from being chased by a predator on the loose, but Wallace says that dreams and nightmares are cut from the same cerebral cloth. "The reality is that a nightmare is still a dream. It's still part of the dreaming process, but it tends to be more vivid, intense, scary and emotional," he explains. "The fundamental reason why we dream, neurologically speaking, is to process emotions. So if you are experiencing powerful, unresolved emotions in waking life, then you will typically generate more nightmares," he adds. "People think that nightmares are happening to them, but in reality, you happen to the dream – and you create everything that you experience in it. In this way, a nightmare is just a sign of a powerful emotion that you are experiencing in waking life, that your brain is trying to resolve." Ongoing chronic stress in waking life is one of the most common triggers for night terrors, but there are other factors at play too. "Poor sleep quality is another key culprit," Wallace notes. "People often go on holiday and experience lots of nightmares, and that's usually because their brains are adjusting to a different time zone. They might also be drinking more alcohol, which can further disrupt sleep rhythms during the night." If you often nod off on your commute and wake up in a panic, there's a reason why shorter naps can be more nightmarish than a lengthy sleep in bed. "When we take a brief nap, we experience these things called 'hypnogogic hallucinations', which is when dream imagery comes into our mind, but we're not yet processing it in dream sleep," Wallace explains. "Those can be quite unsettling and a bit nightmarish feeling, as we're essentially not tipping over into a deeper type of rest.' Existing unresolved trauma, substance abuse and certain medications, such as antidepressants and beta-blockers, can also trigger a higher frequency of nightmares. Wallace says it's not cheese itself, but instead the effect certain foods can have on the body that can cause strange dreams and nightmares. "The more digestible a food, the more relaxed your body will be when you are asleep," he explains. "Like most other fatty foods, cheese takes quite a bit of effort to digest so it causes our sleep to be restless, making us more likely to drift in and out of wakefulness. "This makes us far more aware of our dream content and, because our body isn't fully relaxed, our dream content is often less than relaxing as well. Other foods, such as hot curries or anything particularly spicy, can also cause similar levels of restlessness, as will any heavy meal eaten just before you go to sleep." Not according to Wallace. He sees nightmares as a symptom of chronic stress, rather than the cause. "If you have unresolved emotions or you're physically tense in some way, then I would imagine that could lead to acceleration in the ageing process, as found in the new research from Imperial College," he notes. As studies have previously revealed, chronic stress can have a seriously negative effect on our health, leading to high blood pressure, a weakened immune system, digestive problems and depression. "But this is why nightmares can actually be useful experiences," Wallace remarks, "as they're your brain alerting you to the fact you're stressed and that you need to take action to resolve it. "What people always say about nightmares is that they feel out of control," he continues. "And if you're in a place where you can't manage your emotions in waking life, you're likely to feel that same helplessness in dreams." Psychologists like Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung have long theorised that the symbols in our dreams hold deeper meaning, but Wallace suggests we should analyse them with more of an abstract lens. "People tend to take dream imagery quite literally, but because it's imaginal, it's more like an analogy for something in waking life," he notes. Dreaming about death doesn't mean someone will die. Instead, Wallace says, it often symbolises an ending of one way of life and the start of a new one. "The death in your dream indicates that an aspect of your life that no longer serves you is being transformed in some way," he explains. "This transformation is often the result of a major change in your waking life where you have the opportunity to let go of old habits and welcome new ways of doing things into your life." He says a death dream is "reassuring" as you are reaching the end of a particular period of activity in your life. "By releasing yourself from your past, you have the freedom to step into a new future," he adds. Take nightmares about intruders, for instance. "If you dream about someone breaking into your house, you're not necessarily dreaming about a real break-in," Wallace says. "In dream language, the house often symbolises the self, because, just like us, it has an inside and an outside." Burglars or attackers in this context can represent internalised fear or emotional violation. "Dreaming of someone entering your home could reflect a sense of being emotionally intruded upon or feeling that your boundaries are being crossed in real life," explains Wallace. Being chased is another common scenario that tends to plague our sleep, he says. "If you're having a nightmare where you're being followed, it usually means there's something you're pursuing in waking life, like an ambition, a goal, something you're striving for. And the figure chasing you symbolises the challenge or pressure you're personally feeling in that pursuit." Finally, the classic nightmare scenario of your teeth falling out might not necessarily mean you've been neglecting the dentist. "In waking life, you tend to show your teeth in two key situations: when you're smiling and feeling confident, or when you're being assertive, like a snarl," Wallace says. "So teeth in dreams often represent personal power and confidence. "When people describe this dream, they often say their teeth are 'crumbling', and that's the same language we use when confidence starts to collapse," he elaborates. "So, dreaming your teeth are falling out could reflect a fear of losing your ability to 'chew over' or handle a situation." Read more about dreams: Dreams more vivid than usual right now? Here's why, and what they could mean (Yahoo Life UK, 8-min read) 12 common dreams and what they could mean, according to experts (Yahoo News UK, 5-min read) Dreaming about your ex? Sleep expert explains what it really means (Yahoo Life UK, 7-min read)
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Give doctors work phones to tackle burnout and abuse, medics say
All doctors should be given work phones to help tackle burnout and protect medics from abuse, according to members of the British Medical Association (BMA). It comes as one doctor described using six apps on her personal device to do her job 'safely', and revealed the trust she works at relies on WhatsApp to fill locum shifts. Currently, there is no national NHS England policy that requires trusts to provide work phones to doctors or other staff. Delegates at the BMA's annual representative meeting in Liverpool voted for the union to demand employer-funded mobile phones for all medical staff to carry out NHS or university work, while rejecting any expectation that medics should use personal devices for professional communication. Dr Latifa Patel, chairwoman of the BMA's representative body and workforce lead, said: 'Many workplaces offer devices for professional communication, and the NHS should be no different. 'Doctors often work across the hospital site and in the community, including home visits, and need to be contactable. 'In recent years, we have seen an increasing reliance on doctors' own personal mobile phones.' BMA members also called for 'robust' safeguards to protect doctors from inappropriate contact, including sexual harassment, while advocating for clear boundaries between work life and personal life to reduce burnout. Dr Patel added: 'Using a work device, like a mobile phone, can help to define boundaries between work and home life, and significantly reduce burnout – something we know many doctors experience, and which is undoubtedly contributing to them either reducing their hours or leaving the NHS altogether. 'We also know some doctors are impacted by inappropriate contact, such as abuse or sexual harassment, sometimes in the form of unwanted messages and communication outside of work. 'Removing the reliance on personal devices is an action employers can take to mitigate these risks. 'We invite the Government to work with us to see how these devices can be introduced in the NHS as part of efforts to improve doctor wellbeing.' Emma Andrews told delegates she uses six different apps on her personal phone to do her job 'safely and to do it well'. She spoke of one incident where a medical team would not have been able to locate a patient in an 'obscure' room without using WhatsApp, with locum shifts in her trust also filled using the app. 'Before medicine, I was a civil servant, and I was provided with a phone, a laptop, because I needed it to do my job. 'It also provided security to the departments I worked in, so that government business only happened on government devices. 'Albeit it's not unreasonable to expect an employer to provide the tools I need to do my job. 'We shouldn't be subsidising the NHS with our data, with our battery life or with our work-life balance.'
