logo
Almost half of Britain cannot browse internet because of poor mobile signal

Almost half of Britain cannot browse internet because of poor mobile signal

Yahoo01-04-2025

Britain's mobile coverage is so patchy that almost half the country struggles to browse the internet, data have revealed.
The four mobile network operators have 'acceptable' coverage across just 55pc of the country's landmass on average, leaving large swathes of the population with sluggish connections, according to figures compiled by mobile data firm Streetwave.
The research appears to underscore concerns among Britons that shoddy mobile signal is frustrating consumers and damaging productivity.
Kester Mann, an analyst at CCS Insight, said the analysis 'highlights, once again, the disappointing performance of UK mobile networks'.
He added: 'This is a combination of several factors, including a lack of investment from the industry, the mandated swap-out of equipment from Huawei, environmental push-back against the deployment of new masts and burdensome planning restrictions.'
The research found significant disparity between the performance of the UK's four mobile networks.
EE's coverage levels were the highest at 69pc, followed by Vodafone at 61pc. O2's acceptable coverage reached just 50pc, while Three lagged well behind on 38pc.
Overall, however, the results for all providers are below the official data compiled by regulator Ofcom in September stating geographic 4G coverage is in the range of 88pc to 89pc.
Sir Terry Matthews, the Welsh billionaire and an investor in Streetwave, said the data were 'enabling the industry to have a candid conversation around how coverage can be improved in the UK, while empowering consumers to make informed choices about which mobile network best meets their needs'.
An operator is considered to have 'acceptable' coverage where their network provides users with 5 Mbps download speeds, 2 Mbps upload speeds, and latency below 40ms on any connection ranging from 2G to 5G.
These are the speeds at which most mobile functions including browsing the internet, streaming videos and joining conference calls can be carried out. Any drop below this level would be likely to result in a compromised user experience, such as videos buffering and images taking time to load.
The survey was conducted in 113 councils across the UK, representing 37pc of the UK's geography and around 19m people. It was carried out by attaching signal readers to rubbish collection lorries, measuring mobile performance outside virtually every home and business in each council area.
Mobile UK, which represents mobile network operators, said it disputed the findings of the research.
A spokesman said: 'While we acknowledge that all models, including our own, involve predictive elements, Streetwave's conclusions are based on an extremely limited dataset, derived from just a third of councils across four nations, and are heavily skewed towards rural, low-population density areas. This significantly restricts its applicability to the broader UK mobile landscape.
'While we do not agree with these findings it once again puts in sharp focus the need for the Government to better prioritise mobile deployment in its policy making.'
An Ofcom spokesman said: 'Streetwave's coverage data isn't directly comparable to ours, which comes from mobile network operators' predictions and may not always match people's real-world experience at a very local level.
'We're working hard to improve the data we use, and we will relaunch our mobile coverage checker later this year with new and improved information to better reflect what people can expect.'
Poor mobile connectivity has become a major political issue, with MPs lining up to bemoan patchy coverage, especially in rural areas.
The first stage of a £1bn government-backed project to stamp out so-called 'not spots' in rural areas has now been completed and a target of reaching 95pc of the UK's landmass with at least one provider by the end of the year has already been met.
However, ministers are now discussing watering down the second stage of the programme, the Shared Rural Network, in a move that is likely to anger mobile companies.
Vodafone and Three are in the process of combining in a £15bn merger that will create the UK's largest mobile network. The companies have long argued that the tie-up was necessary to upgrade the country's sluggish 5G connectivity.
Angus Hay, the chief executive of Streetwave, said: 'A collaborative approach is needed to improve mobile connectivity across the UK. This includes continued private and public investment into the networks, as well as local efforts by councils and planning authorities to support infrastructure investments.
'Our findings raise significant questions around whether there is need for an extension to the Shared Rural Network programme to further support rural communities.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cash to make coal tips safe 'scratching the surface'
Cash to make coal tips safe 'scratching the surface'

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Cash to make coal tips safe 'scratching the surface'

The amount of public money available to make Welsh coal tips safe "only scratches the surface", according to evidence heard by a parliamentary committee. The Welsh Affairs Select Committee was told there was a "disparity between the scale of the challenge and available funds" to remediate high risk coal tips. Representatives from four local authorities explained some of the challenges they face in dealing with the legacy of Wales' industrial past. Chancellor Rachel Reeves, announced £118m in her spending review on Wednesday to "keep coal tips safe in Wales". £34m to help keep people safe from coal tips Coal tips moved to 'most at risk' list since 2022 Earlier this year, the Welsh government said it had invested more than £100m in coal tip safety during the current Senedd term as a result of its own spending and money from the UK government. A new mining remediation authority has also been established to inspect coal tips identified as posing the highest risk to communities. Nicola Pearce from Neath Port Talbot council said the Disused Mine and Quarry Tips (Wales) Bill will "not be effective until there is sufficient public money in place to enable continuous monitoring or regular monitoring as well as being able to access those funds to undertake remediation work where it's necessary". However, Ms Pearce said the council had received £14.4m from the Welsh government since 2020 to carry out "significant work" on one large coal tip within its ownership. She added about £12m will have been spent on making one coal tip safe and there were 617 tips across the Neath Port Talbot area. A shortage of the appropriate skills to manage coal tip safety and remediation was also highlighted as a concern. Mark Williams of Caerphilly council said: "My authority has received just shy of £3m for the year 2025-26 - and it only scratches the surface. "The money will be spent on a range of maintenance tasks. We have 205 tips in Caerphilly borough - 89 of which are in local authority ownership." He said the cost of inspecting these tips is about £15,000 a year and that more money from UK government was needed. "Money that's being passported is really helpful but it's really only useful for monitoring and routine maintenance, it won't really address any remediation costs." He also reiterated concerns around a shortage of engineers with the necessary skills for the work needed to make coal tips safe, although said he believed the Welsh government had recognised this and was trying to address these challenges. The Welsh government said: "We want to ensure our communities are safe both now and in the future, which is why we have introduced modern, first of its kind in the UK, legislation to prevent disused tips from being a threat to human life. "We are pleased the UK government has continued to match our investment in coal tip safety, providing an additional £118m over three years to support people living in the shadow of tips. "Taken together with the over £100m we have provided this Senedd term, our joint UK and Welsh government investment in coal tip safety now stands at over £220m." Coal tip activist's guarded welcome for £25m New maps reveal 350 old coal tips most at risk Illegal riding 'could cause coal tip landslides'

Government's £445m for railways in Wales branded ‘peanuts' by Tories
Government's £445m for railways in Wales branded ‘peanuts' by Tories

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Government's £445m for railways in Wales branded ‘peanuts' by Tories

The Government's £445 million funding for rail projects in Wales has been branded 'peanuts' by Shadow Wales Secretary Mims Davies. The investment in Welsh rail announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in her spending review on Wednesday will be spent on new stations and upgraded railway lines, and delivered through both direct funding and additional money for the Welsh Government. However, Ms Davies branded the sum 'paltry' and said the Government was 'short-changing' Wales. The Conservative frontbencher asked Wales Secretary Jo Stevens: 'Does the minister prefer peanuts, cashew nuts, or simply scraps for Wales? 'The fabled two Labour governments in lockstep is simply a myth for voters. 'Changing rail classifications and short-changing Welsh communities is a true reality. 'Is the minister concerned by today's reported peanuts, because when did she become aware of just over £400 million, the paltry settlement to come to Wales? 'How will it be split to Welsh Government? How does she think it compares to our Government's £740 million on rail alone?' Responding, Ms Stevens said: 'Her party was in government for 14 years when Wales got 1% of the rail enhancement budget, when it has 11% of the whole UK network. 'Her party are responsible for the historic underfunding of the Welsh rail and we'll hear from the Chancellor this afternoon about what this Government is going to do about it.' Liz Saville-Roberts, Plaid Cymru's leader in Westminster, also accused the Government of reclassifying the Oxford-Cambridge line as an England and Wales project, rather than England only. She said: 'The Secretary of State for Wales joined Plaid Cymru in condemning the Conservatives for denying Wales £4.6 billion in rail funding. 'Now she's in government, she's waxing lyrical about 10% of that, and content with moving the goalpost to deny Wales a further £300 million by recently classifying the Oxford-Cambridge line as benefiting Wales. I don't know how they make this up. 'Does she oppose this new injustice? Or was she ignored? Or is it her mission to see Wales short-changed?' Ms Stevens reiterated her previous response to this accusation that the Government had only been correcting a publishing error and that the Oxford-Cambridge line was always considered an England and Wales development. She said: 'I listened very carefully to the question, and I'm sure she would not wish to unintentionally mislead the House. 'This was an error on the Oxford-Cambridge line. This was an error by the Conservative government in the 2021 spending review. 'And as she knows, heavy rail infrastructure is reserved, not devolved. Like every heavy rail project in England, Barnet consequentials do not apply. 'The UK Government fund from which East West Rail is being funded is also directing funding projects in Wales, like the redevelopment of Wales's busiest station, Cardiff central, improvements to level crossings in north Wales and upgrading the South Wales Relief Link.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store