Deported Albanian drug dealer who returned illegally can stay in UK
An Albanian drug dealer who returned to the UK after being deported for drug offences has been allowed to remain in Britain despite having committed further crimes.
Stiljano Ziu was jailed for nine months after being convicted of producing cannabis but was released early on condition that he agreed not to return after being deported.
In breach of his deportation, he returned and married a Greek national resident in the UK, on the basis of which he claimed the right to remain in the UK.
He was backed by a lower and upper immigration tribunal, on the basis that he was not a threat to the public, despite an appeal by the Home Office who said he had shown 'blatant disregard' for the immigration controls.
However, Ziu was subsequently convicted of drug dealing, which means he faces the prospect of deportation for a second time.
The case, disclosed in court papers, is the latest example uncovered by The Telegraph where illegal migrants or convicted foreign criminals have been able to remain in the UK or halt their deportations on human rights grounds.
Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, has announced plans to curb judges' powers to block deportations with new legally-enforced 'common sense' rules to clarify how judges interpret human rights laws and strengthen the public interest test.
The court was told Ziu entered the UK unlawfully in 2017 or 2018. In November 2018 he was convicted of offences involving the production of cannabis and sentenced to nine months' imprisonment. He was deported the following month.
However, he illegally re-entered Britain in early 2019 and just before Christmas 2020 he applied for a residence card as the spouse of a Greek national exercising treaty rights to stay in the UK. They married in April 2021.
The application was refused but he successfully appealed to a first tier tribunal which noted that his unlawful entry to the UK was four years ago.
It found in his favour on the basis that it could not 'be satisfied that there is a 'present' threat to the integrity of the immigration system in the circumstances.'
The Home Office appealed, arguing that he posed a 'genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat' to the public and that deportation was proportionate.
It noted that his period of residence in the UK was limited and he had started a relationship with his wife at a time when he had entered the UK in breach of a deportation order.
'His familial links were insufficient to establish integration in the UK and his ability to reintegrate into Albania, his country of origin, was realistic,' the Home Office told the court.
Ziu was, at the time of the appeal, facing trial for drug producing and dealing but the court said an impending prosecution did not automatically disqualify him from the right to stay as he could be proved innocent.
The upper tribunal dismissed the Home Office appeal. 'We find that the Secretary of State has failed to show that the first-tier tribunal erred in law and we dismiss the Secretary of State's appeal,' the judge declared.
However, Ziu was convicted in November and jailed for four-and-a-half years for two counts of conspiring to supply Class B drugs.
The judge said: 'What happens next is of course a matter for the Secretary of State. However, the claimant must understand that his recent conviction has resulted in a sentence that may require his deportation from the United Kingdom and that is something the Secretary of State will consider. It may be that this case has been an academic exercise.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Travel Weekly
21 minutes ago
- Travel Weekly
Trump issues travel ban and restrictions on 19 countries, to take effect Monday
WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Trump on Wednesday resurrected a hallmark policy of his first term, announcing that citizens of 12 countries would be banned from visiting the United States and those from seven others would face restrictions. The ban takes effect Monday at 12:01 a.m., a cushion that avoids the chaos that unfolded at airports nationwide when a similar measure took effect with virtually no notice in 2017. Trump, who signaled plans for a new ban upon taking office in January, appears to be on firmer ground this time after the Supreme Court sided with him. Some, but not all, of the 12 countries also appeared on the list of banned countries in Trump's first term. The new ban includes Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. There will be heightened restrictions on visitors from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. In a video released on social media, Trump tied the new ban to Sunday's terror attack in Boulder, Colo., saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The suspect in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. The Department of Homeland Security says he overstayed a tourist visa. This report was published by the Associated Press.


New York Times
29 minutes ago
- New York Times
World Cup Athletes Are Among the Exceptions to Trump's New Travel Ban
President Trump signed a travel ban on Wednesday that prohibits citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States. The primarily targets nations in Africa and the Middle East. The ban, which goes into effect on Monday, bars travel to the United States by citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. And it limits travel from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. But there were some exceptions to the expansive order: Green card holders People with green cards — individuals who have a pathway to U.S. citizenship — are exempted from the ban. When a travel ban was introduced by Mr. Trump during his first term in 2017, chaos and confusion ensued at airports. The Department of Homeland Security had to put out a statement clarifying that green card holders could enter the country. This time, the administration is making that exemption clear in the order itself. Dual citizens People who are American citizens but also hold citizenship with a banned country will not be effected by the order. Those who seek visas through connections to an American family member Immigrants from the banned countries who seek visas through connections to their spouses, children, or parents who are American citizens will still be able to apply for them. Certain athletes Athletes and coaches traveling to the United States to play in major sporting events, along with their families, will still be allowed into the country, despite the ban. The United States is one of the hosts of the World Cup in 2026, and Los Angeles is the site of the Summer Olympics in 2028. This exception will allow soccer players from targeted countries, like Iran, to enter the United States for the World Cup. Refugees granted asylum Those who have been admitted as refugees or were granted asylum are exempted under the order. Afghans who helped the U.S. The order exempts Afghans who seek to enter the U.S. under a special visa program for those helped the U.S. government during the two decades of war after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. Iranians fleeing religious persecution Iranians who are escaping the country because they belong to a religious minority, like Christianity, are also exempted.


Bloomberg
35 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
President Trump Signs Travel Ban for 12 Countries
President Donald Trump has signed a proclamation that bans individuals from 12 countries from entering the US. Bloomberg's John Harney reports on the latest from Washington. (Source: Bloomberg)