Two Britons to challenge UK's ‘weak' response to climate crisis in European court
Two men who say they are being failed by the UK's flawed response to climate breakdown are taking their case to Europe's top human rights court.
Doug Paulley and Kevin Jordan say their lives have been ruined by the rising temperatures and extreme weather caused by the climate crisis, and that the government's response fails to respect their human rights.
UK courts have so far rejected their efforts at forcing the government to rethink its approach, and so they are taking their case to the European court of human rights (ECHR), where they will try to convince judges that their fundamental rights are being violated.
Paulley, who has multiple disabilities exacerbated by rising temperatures, and Jordan, whose seaside home was demolished after severe storms and rising sea level put it at risk of being washed away, say the UK's approach to the changing climate is flawed.
Adopted in 2023, the UK's third national adaptation programme (Nap3) sets out the government's climate adaptation objectives, along with its plans and policies for protecting communities in the UK from the impacts of climate change such as extreme heat, flooding and coastal erosion.
Paulley and Jordan, along with Friends of the Earth, the third claimant in the case, argue that it fails to consider the impact of climate change on marginalised groups, set out lawful 'adaptation objectives' or adequately assess risks to the delivery of its plans.
They launched a judicial review of Nap3, but last year the high court rejected their arguments and, in March, the court of appeal refused their application to challenge the ruling. Now they are turning to the ECHR.
In their submission to the ECHR, they will argue that the UK is out of compliance with human rights requirements in how it currently plans for and implements climate adaptation under the Climate Change Act.
In a move that may bolster their case, last week the UK's statutory climate watchdog, the Climate Change Committee, issued a scathing assessment of the UK's climate change preparedness.
It judged current plans to protect people, land and infrastructure against extreme weather to be inadequate in the face of the increasingly severe flooding, droughts and heatwaves now affecting the country.
Paulley said: 'I'm very hopeful that the ECHR will now take up this important case. Disabled people, who are disproportionately threatened by the impacts of climate change, have been badly let down by this weak and ineffective adaptation programme.'
Jordan said: 'Millions of homes across the country are already under threat from the impacts of climate change, and without an adaptation plan that's fit for purpose many, many more will be put at risk.
'I know what it's like to lose your home to climate change and will continue to campaign for a vastly improved set of adaptation policies that offers proper protection to our lives and communities.'
The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said it could not comment on ongoing legal proceedings.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Badenoch launches review into possible ECHR exit
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch is to set up a commission to examine whether the UK should withdraw from a series of international legal agreements and overturn some domestic legislation which she fears may be binding the hands of British the agreements being looked into is the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).Badenoch is expected to appoint Tory peer and former justice minister Lord Wolfson of Tredegar to chair the commission, which is expected to report by autumn, when the party meets for its annual month, the government announced plans to bring forward legislation to "clarify" the extent to which ECHR would impact UK immigration cases. The ECHR was established in 1950 and sets out the rights and freedoms people are entitled to in the 46 signatory treaty is a central part of UK human rights law and has been used to halt attempts to deport migrants who are deemed to be in the UK treaty was also recently cited in a case that allowed a Palestinian family the right to live in the UK, after they originally applied through a scheme designed for the Conservative leadership election, the ECHR became a key dividing line between candidates, with Badenoch telling her party leaving the treaty would not be a "silver bullet" to tackling nearest rival Robert Jenrick, now shadow justice secretary, argued his party would "die' unless it left the ECHR. But in February, Badenoch hardened her stance, claiming the UK would "probably have to leave" the treaty it continued to stop the government acting in the country's national interest. The impact of the ECHR on asylum claims and the deportation of foreign criminals will be examined as part of the Wolfson review, the BBC understands - as will the Refugee law such as the Climate Change Act, the Equality Act and the Human Rights Act are also likely to be looked party leadership is worried about what is seen as a creeping sense of "lawfare", which senior figures believe contributes to a feeling of stasis and a lack of ability for governments to make substantive month when the government set out its plans for tackling illegal immigration in a White Paper, ministers said they would bring forward legislation to "make it clear that Parliament needs to be able to control our borders and take back control on who comes to and stays in the UK".The White Paper specifically referred to Article 8 of the ECHR, the right to a family life, and said there was a need to "strike a balance between individual family rights and the wider public interest".Badenoch will set out her plans in a speech on Friday, just over a month on from local elections in England where the Conservatives were crushed – and a series of opinion polls where support for the party had tumbled into the Tories secured 24% of the vote in last year's general election, when they won the fewest seats in their is growing concern within the party about the resilience of support for Reform UK and the existential threat this poses to the Conservatives."It is a make or break summer," one former Conservative cabinet minister told me."We are a resilient brand but we have to stay alive. And that's far from certain at the moment." Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Spectator
3 hours ago
- Spectator
Why corporate wokery refuses to die
Everyone thinks they know what the Blob is. A great wobbly blancmange of Sir Humphreys and (these days) Lady Tamaras: a public sector elite, slow to action but quick to push its ideological agenda in all manner of insidious ways. Wrong. Or rather, this is only the half of it. Whatever the gargantuan size of the state compared with pre-pandemic, what few people realise is the extent to which the private sector has been incubating its own Blob for years. To illustrate how Blob PLC can achieve its ends and – crucially – why people have gone along with it, we must follow its successful campaign to make British business bow to the diversity gods, and how it started at the very top – with the boards. The trouble began with Lord Davies, affectionately known in his banking career as 'Merv the Swerve' after the Welsh rugby no. 8 of the same name, ennobled by Gordon Brown and made a minister for business. In 2011, Vince Cable, business secretary in the coalition, published a report from Lord Davies called Women on Boards. It asserted: 'Research has shown that strong stock market growth among European companies is most likely to occur where there is a higher proportion of women in senior management teams.' The basis of this claim was a 2007 report by an American organisation called Catalyst, set up to 'expand opportunities for women and business'. Not an entirely disinterested party, then. These reports, amplified later by two McKinsey studies, became the go-to texts which formed the foundation myth of Blob PLC's diversity dogmatism. As Alex Edmans and Ross Clark have written in this magazine, drawing on research by John Hand and Jeremiah Green in the US S&P 500 index, there is actually no evidence of a link between more diversity in a company and better stock performance.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Battle lines drawn over immigration: Keir plans legal crackdown on migrants exploiting 'right to family life' as Kemi pledges to revive Rwanda-style scheme
Labour is set to bring in new laws curtailing use of the European human rights convention by foreign criminals. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is drawing up legislation to make it easier to deport overseas offenders as well as failed asylum seekers, the Daily Mail can reveal. A new bill will contain measures designed to restrict the use of the 'right to private and family life' under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). It comes as Tory leader Kemi Badenoch will unveil tough plans to revive a Rwanda-style deportation scheme - and vow to withdraw Britain from any international treaties that stand in the way. In a major speech, the Tory leader will declare that a future Conservative government would reintroduce measures to bar illegal migrants from claiming asylum in this country and deport them to a third country. The competition between Tories and Labour for tough-sounding immigration policies comes as both parties are coming under pressure at the polls from Nigel Farage 's Reform. Labour's proposals are designed to address escalating numbers of foreign nationals - including killers and rapists - bringing successful legal challenges against deportation from Britain. A Home Office source said: 'This is about Parliament taking back control of who's allowed to stay here and who isn't, rather than judges. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, pictured giving evidence to the Commons' home affairs select committee on Tuesday, is set to propose restrictions on use of human rights laws in immigration cases Jamaican national Ernesto Elliott, a foreign national offender who brought a successful claim under Article 8 - the right to family life - and committed a murder six months later 'We want to make sure those who break our laws don't get to stay here.' The measures are expected to be promised in the next King's Speech. Ms Cooper believes the new crackdown will have to work in tandem with her plan to set up overseas 'return hubs' for foreign nationals who have no right to be in the UK, sources said. The Foreign Office is in talks with a number of countries in the Balkans about hosting the hubs, which would house criminals and asylum seekers who have exhausted their appeal rights. Kosovo and Moldova are the current front-runners to host the centres, the Mail understands. Labour's new legislation to restrict Article 8 claims will 'strengthen the public interest test', insiders said. This means courts would have to place more weight on a foreign national's criminal record and the risk they pose to the public, and less weight on the individual's family life claim. The Home Office's role in maintaining proper border controls would also be given extra weight. Ms Cooper's new law is also likely to set out how Article 8 should be applied in different types of claims - for example, foreign criminals could face broader exclusions than other individuals. In her speech on Friday Mrs Badenoch will announce a new commission to examine the impact of the ECHR and other related treaties like the 1951 UN Refugee Convention. A Tory source said the last government's Rwanda scheme had been stymied by 'activist judges' interpreting law based on treaties like the ECHR. Mrs Badenoch was prepared to withdraw from both treaties if they frustrated efforts to deal with the Channel migrant crisis, the source added. The commission, led by Tory barrister Lord Wolfson, will also look at whether changes are needed to other sweeping pieces of legislation including the Equality Act and the Climate Change Act. One insider said: 'We need to look again at all these well-meaning pieces of legislation which have been used by activist judges to tie government in knots for years. 'We need to and get back to a situation where elected politicians are taking decisions in the interests of the public.' Mrs Badenoch will contrast her new approach with that of Labour, whose controversial attorney general Lord Hermer has vowed to 'rebuild our reputation as a leader in the field of international law'. Lord Hermer, a close friend of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, has said Labour will never quit the ECHR. Last week he was forced to apologise for 'clumsy' remarks in which he compared those calling for the UK to leave the treaty to the Nazis. On Tuesday Ms Cooper told MPs that although Article 8 claims are supposed to be granted only in 'exceptional' circumstances, judges are now allowing 30 per cent of such cases. The Home Secretary's ability to impose Article 8 restrictions would be set out in principle in the Bill, it is thought, with specific exclusions detailed in secondary legislation. This would allow the Home Office to continually add to the exclusions if immigration lawyers attempted new legal tactics to get around the rules, or if judges failed to take full account of Parliament's wishes. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said of Labour's proposals: 'This is just pathetic tinkering. 'Immigration lawyers and judges will still be able to exploit Article 8 claims. 'The only way to fix this is to repeal the Human Rights Act in its entirety for all immigration matters. 'The Conservatives proposed this and put it to a vote in Parliament just a few weeks ago but Labour voted it down.' The Mail revealed in 2023 how a Jamaican prolific offender used the 'right to family life' to dodge deportation before going on to commit murder. Ernesto Elliott, then 45, had 17 crimes on his rap sheet including knife crime and possession of an imitation firearm. He was due to be aboard a Home Office removals flight in December 2020 but his lawyers lodged a last-minute challenge against deportation citing Article 8. But in June 2021 - six months after he was supposed to have been removed from Britain - Elliott murdered 35-year-old Nathaniel Eyewu-Ago in a horrific knife fight. The bloody, eight-minute knife fight which took place in broad daylight in Greenwich, south-east London, was caught on video by traumatised neighbours. Mr Eyewu-Ago collapsed after being stabbed through the heart and died in hospital six days later. As a result, Elliott, from Walthamstow, east London, was jailed for at least 26 years. It was a crime that would never have taken place if Elliott had been sent back to his birth country. The victim's father Godfrey Ago, 79, from south-east London, told the Mail at the time: 'He should not have been in the UK. If he had not been here, he wouldn't have murdered my son. 'He is a criminal, and should not be free to walk amongst men.'
