Brown bears to become legal source of meat in bid to stop attacks on humans
Slovakia's Prime Minister Robert Fico approved plans to shoot 350 of the country's 1,300 brown bears in response to some fatal attacks. The meat will be sold for human consumption
Controversial plans to slaughter brown bears and sell the meat for human consumption will cause "immense suffering", according to leading animal groups. Slovakia's Prime Minister Robert Fico approved plans to shoot 350 of the country's 1,300 brown bears in response to some recent fatal attacks.
Brown bears, which are a protected species under EU law, will be sold to the public in a bid to "prevent waste", according to State Minister Filip Kuffa. 'We will supply every captured individual [bear] that meets the conditions for consumption,' he said this week in a social media post. "Because bear meat can be eaten', the ministry will 'offer caught specimens for sale,' he added.
Despite the brown bear being listed as a "near threatened" species in the EU by the World Conservation Union, the move state-authoritised slaughter has been approved.
After a man was mauled to death while working in a forest in Slovakia, Prime Minister Robert Fico said: "We can't live in a country where people are afraid to go into the woods."
Slovakia reported a total of 54 bear attacks from 2000-2020, with the average number of attacks rising to around ten a year, according to the latest figures.
PETA's Vice President of Programmes, Elisa Allen, criticised the move and said killing the bears will cause "immense suffering"
She told The Mirror: "No one needs to eat bears, and bears don't wish to be eaten - they simply want to be left in peace. Humane, non-lethal solutions – including habitat management, bear-proof rubbish bins, and public education about bear-safe behaviours – have proven effective in addressing perceived wildlife issues, and authorities owe it to these sensitive, majestic animals to use them.
"Killing bears risks orphaning cubs, causing immense suffering, and destabilising ecosystems. Rather than destroying and consuming the natural world, we must learn to live compatibly with other species."
However, State Minister Mr Kuffa claimed it was "wasteful" the animals were being to a carcass disposal facilities, as he attempted to justify the meat sale.
But the decision to cull the bears and sell them for human consumption been slammed by conservationists and opposition politicians.
The World Wide Fund for Nature Slovakia called the culling and sale of meat "unacceptable."
A spokesperson told The Mirror: "We are deeply concerned by the Slovak government's latest steps regarding the management of the brown bear population, including the recent approval of a mass cull and the reported allowance for the public sale of bear meat.
'WWF Slovakia underlines that brown bear is a protected species under EU Habitats Directive, Bern Convention, as well as CITES. The latest management measures are not only unacceptable from an ethical and environmental point of view, but they are also in direct conflict with European law and international treaties.
'The brown bear is a strictly protected species in Slovakia. Yet, we saw a record 144 bears killed in 2023 — the highest number in over 100 years. Despite this unprecedented culling, the number of human-bear conflicts has not decreased. This further confirms what science has already made clear: indiscriminate, large-scale culling does not reduce human-bear dangerous encounters.
'The Ministry of Environment, under the current government led by Prime Minister Robert Fico, continues to propose non-systemic, short-sighted solutions that fail to address the root causes of the issues. The proposal to kill another 350 bears could mean losing almost half of Slovakia's bear population in just two years – with no guarantee that this will make people safer.
"Instead of turning Slovakia's protected wildlife into a menu item, the government should prioritize evidence-based prevention measures, such as: Better waste and food management in towns and villages near bear habitats, Removing baiting sites near settlements and hiking trails, Supporting measures to prevent bear attacks on livestock, supporting emergency response teams to deal with problematic bears, Placing warning signs in areas inhabited by bears and Educating people on how to behave safely in the wild.
"We ask the Slovak government to stop these harmful measures and focus on long-term, responsible wildlife management. Allowing the sale of meat from a protected species like the brown bear is an unprecedented and concerning decision, which could lead to even more damage to wildlife being treated as products."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
16 hours ago
- Scotsman
Mainstreaming of far-right ideas in UK politics shows why John Swinney was right to raise alarm
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Received wisdom at Westminster has it that the far-right has never made it into UK politics. Coupled with that theory is then the debate by the same commentators around what constitutes the 'far-right'. However using the measurement of policies pursued, which is, after all, the very essence of a political movement or party, the far-right has most certainly arrived in UK politics. UK parties, across the political spectrum, now embrace the hardest of hard Brexit, unthinkable even in the aftermath of the referendum in June 2016, and a policy that has done untold damage to the economy and our rights. We also had a government that promoted the sending of asylum seekers to Rwanda and MPs who openly campaign on leaving the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which has underpinned our rights since the end of the Second World War. Were the UK to leave, it would be joining Russia and Belarus in doing so, hardly polite company. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Brexit, leaving the ECHR, and the Rwanda scheme are or were mainstream policy proposals in the UK yet they are policies that far-right parties elsewhere in Europe would baulk at. Even the hardest of hard-right parties in other parts of Europe such as the National Rally in France, the Vlaams Belaang in Belgium or Alternative fur Deutschland in Germany have abandoned plans to leave the EU, given the UK's Brexit debacle. John Swinney's stances on the EU, Donald Trump and migration, among others, have won plaudits (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell) | Getty Images An attack on justice Yet despite these policy failures, the mainstreaming of the far-right has become all too common in our politics along with their tactics. Over the past few days alone, Conservative Shadow Justice Secretary, Robert Jenrick, attacked the Labour Attorney General for doing his job and defending his clients. His remarks were described by former Conservative Attorney General Dominic Grieve 'as a direct attack on our principles of justice'. As we saw in this week's Hamilton by-election, we in Scotland are certainly not immune. Nigel Farage's attack on Anas Sarwar, which he doubled down on when challenged by the press, should act as a warning to us all. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Such remarks are unacceptable and whereas I may have legitimate policy differences with the Scottish Labour leader, they should have no place in our political discourse. For all the heat of the campaign in the run-up to what was a hard-fought by-election, it was good to see SNP and Labour leaders call out these disgraceful comments. Zia Yusuf's resignation as chair of Reform on Thursday and his concerns around Reform in the Commons should also act as a warning. Calling out bigotry That is why the First Minister was right to bring together colleagues from across the political spectrum in a summit seeking to 'lock out' Reform from Holyrood earlier this year. John Swinney is right to call out their policies and the 'bigotry' that they represent and to call out Farage as 'an accomplice of the Russian agenda'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Fair play to the politicians and representatives of civil society who put any political differences aside and joined the First Minister. That meeting was criticised at the time by the Conservatives and a range of commentators. Given Reform's tactics and language over the course of the by-election campaign, we have seen just how badly needed that stance was and remains. Labour will be pleased with Thursday's win, and I congratulate them on it, however, no party can afford to be complacent about Reform. One of the lessons from Hamilton must be that the key to taking on the far-right is to challenge them on their ideas. Nigel Farage's track record is not a particularly good one. He has been a driving force campaigning to leave the EU for decades. That was a decision that has exacerbated the cost-of-living crisis, removed rights from UK citizens, damaged business, especially small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs) and ultimately made us all poorer. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He backed Donald Trump whose presidency has destabilised the world, seen tariffs introduced that have damaged the global economy, and undermined efforts to support Ukraine against Russian aggression. 'Island of Strangers' The Reform policy platform is weak. For their opponents, that should provide ample targets. Yet, in the Westminster bubble their policies are given far too much credibility. There is an omertà around discussing the glaring failure of the Brexit experiment and the less said about Keir Starmer's 'Island of Strangers' speech on migration frankly the better. John Swinney would be the first to admit that the Scottish Government haven't got everything right. However, on the big calls around our relationship with the EU, the impact of Donald Trump's presidency, migration, child poverty and the rights we should enjoy as citizens, the SNP leader has maintained credibility for his stances, winning plaudits at Westminster and further afield. Politics is about ideas and Reform's are simply not good ones. The Conservatives and Reform are increasingly aligning on a range of policies and a pact or even merger is not out of the question. This is to be expected, given that Reform draws its politicians and many voters from the Conservatives. They have, in turn, turned their backs on One Nation conservatism, and instead the party is dominated by the Johnson/Truss populist wing, which is not so different from Farage and Reform. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This week's by-election and the preceding campaign must act as a wake-up call. During the run-up to the Holyrood elections, there is an opportunity for all parties to set out their vision for Scotland. On the one hand, there is an inclusive, outward-looking and internationalist vision represented by John Swinney, on the other is Reform's inward and exclusive offering. I know which one I'm backing.
Reuters
18 hours ago
- Reuters
Indonesia expects to conclude free trade talks with EU by end of June
JAKARTA, June 7 (Reuters) - Indonesia said on Saturday that free trade negotiations with the European Union, which have been going on for nine years, are expected to finish by the end of June. Airlangga Hartarto, the chief economic minister for Southeast Asia's biggest economy, met with EU Commissioner for Trade Maros Sefcovic in Brussels on Friday. "Indonesia and the European Union have agreed to conclude outstanding issues and we are ready to announce a conclusion of substantial negotiations by the end of June 2025," Airlangga Hartarto said in a statement. He did not disclose details about what agreements may have been reached. Representatives for the EU in Jakarta did not respond to a request for comment. The EU is Indonesia's fifth biggest trade partner, with total trade between the two reaching $30.1 billion last year. Indonesia had a $4.5 billion trade surplus, Airlangga said. Indonesia and the EU have previously disagreed on the EU's trade rules for products with potential links to deforestation which could affect Indonesian palm oil, as well as Jakarta's ban on exports of raw minerals. Indonesian officials have been motivated to accelerate talks on free trade agreements, keen to diversify the country's export destinations as they deal with U.S. tariff challenges. Seeking to end U.S. trade deficits worldwide, U.S. President Donald Trump announced sweeping "reciprocal" tariffs that have since been paused until July. Indonesia is facing a 32% tariff rate.
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Musk bombshell fears grow for Prince Andrew after Trump feud Epstein 'bomb'
Fears are growing over Elon Musk's next possible move after he claimed Trump was named in the Epstein files - There is no suggestion Trump knew of any crimes or participated in any criminal behaviour Donald Trump declared open war on Elon Musk, branding the billionaire "a man who's lost his mind". The outburst came less than 24 hours after the world's richest man claimed the US leader's name appears in the FBI's Jeffrey Epstein files, adding it was the reason they had not been made public. Any hopes of reconciliation between the two former allies were obliterated today after Musk hinted at a truce, only for Trump to respond with full-scale personal attacks. "I'm not even thinking about Elon," the president said. "He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem. I won't be speaking to him for a while, I guess, but I wish him well." When asked if he would accept Musk's call, Trump shot back, "You mean the man who has lost his mind?" The explosion follows Musk's nuclear accusation he posted directly to his own platform, X, on Thursday, that the US leader is named in the secret Epstein files. "Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files," Musk wrote. "That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" The claim sent shockwaves through Washington and plunged the White House into emergency crisis mode. There is no suggestion Donald Trump knew of any crimes or participated in any criminal behaviour. Today, fears emerged that Musk could publicly name Prince Andrew, who has vehemently and repeatedly denied any wrongdoing during his friendship with Epstein, as one of the powerful men identified in the files, dragging him once more into the spotlight regarding his friendship with the disgraced financier. The Mirror has learnt Musk has been privately telling associates he has "direct knowledge" of the classified Epstein evidence from his four months working in the White House. He claims that "dozens of powerful men" are named, including the Duke of York, who was pictured with his late pal on numerous occasions. There is no suggestion Prince Andrew knew of any crimes or participated in any criminal behaviour. During their friendship, Andrew was a guest of Epstein at his home throughout the States, while the royal hosted Epstein at the royal palaces. The Duke also flew on the American's private jet, according to court-released flight logs. Insiders say Epstein's entire inner circle - from Mar-a-Lago to Manhattan - is now in full-blown panic. "If Elon's willing to drop Trump, no one is safe, not even royalty," said one senior Washington DC source. "While he had close ties to the Trump administration, Musk had eyes and ears everywhere. He knows exactly who was connected to Epstein and how deep it goes. No one could do more damage to Trump world than Elon right now, and the President's aides know it." Musk's erratic behaviour, amid reports of heavy ketamine and drug use, has made him a volatile and unpredictable threat. Another insider warned: "You've got the world's richest man with access to explosive material, a platform to drop it on 185 million people, and if the allegations are true, whose mind is not always thinking clearly. That's not just dangerous. It's a nightmare." The Trump administration is reportedly watching Musk "like a hawk," with some MAGA allies trying to broker a peace deal to stop Musk from making more incendiary claims about his former boss. "If that means Elon throws other people under the bus and not him, then Trump will be all for it," added the source. In February, Attorney General Pam Bondi released a heavily redacted tranche of Epstein files, including partial flight logs and blurred-out names. She has since released a small amount of papers that the FBI has handed over, though thousands more still remain unreleased. A former national security aide added: "If Musk dumps what he knows, it won't just shake politics. It'll shatter the global elite." Tensions between Trump and his former 'First Buddy' Musk, are so high that the president is now moving to sever every remaining tie with the man who bankrolled his return to the White House. He's ditching the Tesla he bought in a very public show of support. In March, Trump paid full price for a red Tesla, telling aides he wanted to "support Elon" amid a wave of anti-Tesla protests and attacks across America. The vehicle is currently parked at the White House and is intended for staff use. Now, a senior official confirmed to The Mirror that Trump plans to sell it or give it away. "He doesn't want anything to do with Musk," the official said. "Not even the car." The fallout is deeply personal. Last year, Musk pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into Trump's re-election. He restored his X account and helped engineer the property mogul's digital resurrection. Back then, Trump talked about transparency and pledged to reveal the names in the Epstein files if re-elected. During an appearance on the Lex Fridman Podcast last year, he said: "I never went to his island, fortunately. But a lot of people did." Asked why so many powerful figures were drawn to Epstein, Trump said: "He was a good salesman, a hailing, hardy guy, and he had some nice assets that he'd throw around like islands. But a lot of big people went to that island. But fortunately, I was not one of them." Fridman pressed further on why the client list hadn't been released. Trump replied: "Yeah, it's very interesting, isn't it? It probably will be, by the way. I'd certainly take a look at it. But yeah, I'd be inclined to do the Epstein." Musk was rewarded for his support of Trump. The president appointed him head of the newly created and powerful Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a role that saw him slash tens of thousands of federal jobs - a move hailed by MAGA loyalists but condemned across America. However, their alliance began to collapse after Trump's "Big, Beautiful" £980 billion spending bill gutted electric vehicle tax credits, wiping nearly £22 billion off Tesla's market value. Musk was livid. Tesla stock nosedived. He blamed Trump. Now, insiders say the president has a new strategy: cut Musk off completely and neutralise him before he can do more damage. The White House is watching the tech mogul "like a hawk," said one source, terrified of what he might reveal next. "You've got the world's richest man, reportedly using ketamine and other drugs, in possession of a platform that can broadcast to billions of people and allegedly sitting on a file that could blow up the global elite," they added. "That's not a red flag. That's a five-alarm fire." Trump's attorney general, Pam Bondi, has so far only released a partial dump of the Epstein materials - a limp, heavily redacted batch of flight logs and contact pages in February. She's demanded thousands more pages from the FBI's New York field office but has offered no timeline or reason for the delay. And with Musk now threatening to take matters into his own hands, the pressure is exploding inside the highest levels of government. "If he dumps what he knows," said a former national security advisor, "it won't just shake politics. It'll detonate the global elite." On Thursday, after Musk claimed Trump's name was contained in the Epstein files, he doubled down on his attack. Among a barrage of social media posts attacking the president, he threatened to decommission a spacecraft contracted to NASA and needed to return astronauts from the International Space Station. Although he later retracted the threat, the Tesla CEO agreed with another post, saying that Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him. He also followed up his original tweet by asking his followers to "Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out." He then posted: "The Trump tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year." Steve Bannon, one of Musk's most vocal critics for months, said he advised the president to cancel all of Musk's government contracts and launch several investigations into the world's richest man "They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately," he said.
