
Booking.com targeted as hotels plan Dutch damages claims over price clauses
BRUSSELS, May 28 (Reuters) - Booking.com could face Dutch damages claims running into millions of euros after 26 hotel associations across Europe teamed up to sue the company following an EU court judgment last year over its price curbs on hotels.
Europe's top court ruled that Booking.com's restrictions against hotels offering lower rates on their websites or on rival sites are unnecessary and could reduce competition, but also that such clauses are not anti-competitive under EU laws.
Such parity clauses, which are included in contracts between online booking sites and hotels, have triggered complaints from competitors and scrutiny from regulators across Europe concerned about fewer choices for consumers.
The case came before the European Court of Justice after Booking.com applied for a declaration in a Dutch court on whether parity clauses are valid, prompting the latter to seek guidance from the top court.
HOTREC, which represents 47 member associations in the hospitality sector in 36 European countries, said it was backing the hotel associations' damages claims.
"European hoteliers have long endured unfair conditions and inflated costs. Now is the time to stand together and seek redress," HOTREC president Alexandros Vassilikos said in a statement.
Booking.com said it had not been informed of any European-wide legal action taken by the hotels and that their conclusions about the court ruling are incorrect.
"The ECJ judgement relates specifically to questions asked by the Amsterdam District Court in relation to litigation between Booking.com and some German hotels disputing the legality of price parity clauses in Germany between 2006 and 2016," a Booking.com spokesperson said.
"The court did not conclude that Booking.com's German parity price clauses were anti-competitive or had an effect on competition. The Amsterdam Court will now need to make a decision specifically on German parity clauses only."
Hotels have until July 31 to sign up to the damages litigation.
The hotel associations endorsing the action are in Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Switzerland.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
10 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trade war: UK exemption from 50% steel tariffs is conditional, Trump warns
The UK's exemption from a doubling of duties on most US steel and aluminium imports is dependent on the ratification of May's trade pact between the two countries, the White House has warned. Tariffs of 50% were imposed on all shipments from early on Wednesday morning, except those arriving from UK shores which will still be subject to a 25% rate. Donald Trump decided to "provide different treatment" to the UK as he doubled down on the rates that had been in place since March as part of his early trade war salvoes which are designed to encourage more domestic production. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said of the move: "We started at 25 and then after studying the data more, realised that it was a big help, but more help is needed and so that is why the 50 is starting." The decision to spare UK products from the hike currently amounts to a reprieve of just over a month, however, as the clock ticks down to a US deadline of 9 July when wider tariff pauses for US trading partners could be applied. President Trump's executive order said of the UK situation: "On or after July 9, 2025, the Secretary may adjust the applicable rates of duty and construct import quotas for steel and aluminium consistent with the terms of the EPD [economic prosperity deal], or he may increase the applicable rates of duty to 50 percent if he determines that the United Kingdom has not complied with relevant aspects of the EPD". 2:45 Even if the trade pact agreed with the UK was to be fully enacted by that time, quotas within that agreement could still technically mean that a higher rate will apply in future. The government of Sir Keir Starmer has said it is continuing to work with US officials to agree the terms. A spokesperson said: "The UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US earlier this month and we remain committed to protecting British business and jobs across key sectors, including steel as part of our Plan for Change. "We're pleased that as a result of our agreement with the US, UK steel will not be subject to these additional tariffs. We will continue to work with the US to implement our agreement, which will see the 25% US tariffs on steel removed." The UK steel industry was cautious in its own response, while welcoming the reprieve. 2:42 Gareth Stace, the director general of UK Steel, said: "Continued 25% tariffs will benefit shipments already on the water that we were concerned would fall under a tax hike. "However, uncertainty remains over timings and final tariff rates, and now US customers will be dubious over whether they should even risk making UK orders. "The US and UK must urgently turn the May deal into reality to remove the tariffs completely."


Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
Remy Cointreau withdraws its mid-term goals and posts lower annual profits
PARIS, June 4 (Reuters) - French spirits group Remy Cointreau ( opens new tab reported a smaller-than-expected 30.5% drop in annual organic operating profit, withdrew its mid-term goals and said sales would return to mid-to-single-digit growth during the next financial year. The maker of Remy Martin cognac and Cointreau liqueur said on Wednesday that the lower profits reflected weak sales in its key markets of China and the United States, where the group also faces tariff threats. Remy Cointreau, which last week named luxury goods veteran Franck Marilly as its new chief executive, said it had decided to withdraw its objectives for 2029-30, citing continued uncertainty tariffs. Its group operating profit fell 30.5 percent on an organic basis to 217 million euros ($246.7 million) for the full year ended March 31, 2025, which compared with analysts' expectations of a 31.7% fall in a company-compiled consensus of 15 analysts. ($1 = 0.8796 euros)


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Reeves could be forced to face down cabinet over ‘manifesto-breaking' spending plans
Political Editor Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces a cabinet revolt over her spending review, with concerns that departmental cuts will lead to the abandonment of key manifesto promises. Reeves is being pushed to consider wealth taxes as an alternative to cuts, amid fears that austerity measures could boost Nigel Farage's Reform party. The government may U-turn on cancelling winter fuel payments and ending the two-child benefit cap, potentially costing Reeves up to £5bn. The OECD has downgraded its economic growth estimates for the UK, further limiting the chancellor's room for manoeuvre. Nato's call for member states to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP adds further pressure, with the government struggling to explain how it will be funded.