Uganda's President Museveni confirms bid to extend nearly 40-year rule
Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni has confirmed he will contest next year's presidential election, setting the stage for a potential extension of his nearly 40-year rule.
The 80-year-old announced late on Saturday that he had expressed his interest 'in running for … the position of presidential flag bearer' for his National Resistance Movement (NRM) party.
Museveni seized power in 1986 after a five-year civil war and has ruled ever since.
The NRM has altered the constitution twice to remove term and age limits, clearing the way for Museveni to extend his tenure.
Rights groups accused him of using security forces and state patronage to suppress dissent and entrench his power – claims he denies.
Museveni said he seeks re-election to transform Uganda into a '$500bn economy in the next five years'. According to government data, the country's current gross domestic product stands at just under $66bn.
Ugandans are due to vote in January to choose a president and members of parliament.
Opposition leader Bobi Wine, a pop star-turned-politician whose real name is Robert Kyagulanyi, has confirmed he will run again. Wine rejected the 2021 results, alleging widespread fraud, ballot tampering and intimidation by security forces.
Tensions have risen in recent months after parliament passed a law allowing military courts to try civilians, a practice the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional in January.
The government insisted the change is necessary to tackle threats to national security, but rights organisations and opposition figures argued it is a tool to intimidate and silence critics.
Uganda for years has used military courts to prosecute opposition politicians and government critics.
In 2018, Wine was charged in a military court with illegal possession of firearms. The charges were later dropped.
Human Rights Watch (HRW) has criticised Uganda's military courts for failing to meet international standards of judicial independence and fairness.
Oryem Nyeko, senior Africa researcher at HRW, said this year: 'The Ugandan authorities have for years misused military courts to crack down on opponents and critics.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
Secretary Rubio – It's Not Too Late To Prioritize Human Rights
HONG KONG - JUNE 04: Participants take part at the candlelight vigil as they hold candles at ... More Victoria Park on June 4, 2015 in Causeway Bay, Hong Kong. Hong Kong residents held a candlelight vigil as it marks 26th anniversary of 1989 student-led Tiananmen Square protest. (Photo by) Pending the legal fall-out, last week marked a turning point in U.S. foreign policy away from safeguarding and defending human rights. As part of a planned reorganization, approximately 80 percent of employees in the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor at the U.S. Department of State are expected to be put on administrative leave and democracy and human rights organizations in the U.S. and around the globe began receiving notifications that all but two previously awarded grants for this year have been cancelled. These drastic cuts, if carried out, lack strategy and foresight, and contrary to public messaging, the vast majority of these programs have nothing to do with any 'woke' agenda. Instead, many of these programs are designed to protect fundamental freedoms. These cuts would put America on its back foot as it faces challenges from rights-violating countries like China, North Korea, Russia, and Iran. Many Americans want to eliminate wasteful spending. But a mandate to cut waste is not a directive to compromise national security. Ordinary Americans deserve to know that the types of programs being cut weaken America and undermine our ability to counter emboldened adversaries. I have just returned from a trip to South Korea where I met with incredible leaders in civil society devoted to defending human rights in North Korea and holding the Kim regime accountable. Many of the grants fund cost-effective and life-saving information access efforts that educate ordinary North Koreans on the goodness of the U.S. and the truth about the outside world. North Koreans who have left North Korea universally acknowledge that access to information was what motivated them to escape in the first place. The U.S. has already degraded critical information access efforts conducted by Radio Free Asia which ended radio broadcasts into North Korea at the end of April. That information void is being backfilled by the Chinese Communist Party and flooding North Korea with pro-China information through other means. Other grants fund research on the Kim regime's forced labor programs. Forced labor serves as a critical funding source that lines the private coffers of the regime and may even be used for the regime's development of weapons — including weapons that can be used to strike the continental U.S. In other words, these grants advanced U.S. national security. Without essential support, many of these organizations will not exist by the end of the year. Similarly, some of the most important human rights organizations countering the malign influence of the CCP will also be severely hit. Bethany Allen at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute covered this topic in great detail when 'stop work orders' were issued and grants were temporarily suspended earlier this year, warning that many groups may face extinction if cuts proceed. Suffice it to say that some of the most important organizations advocating for basic freedoms for Hong Kongers, Uyghurs, Tibetans, and others persecuted by the CCP will be diminished in capacity if not outright shuttered if things proceed as planned. Among other valuable reasons, these groups are often a critical source of information to the U.S. government and civil society about the CCP. Losing access to these resources at the same time the U.S. is increasing efforts to counter the CCP is counter-productive and potentially crippling to U.S. foreign policy. It's fair to ask why these organizations do not have more diversified funding streams. But to put it simply, the private sector has too often found funding for human rights programs to be at odds with its financial interests and desire for market access, particularly when it comes to China. And that's where the US has historically come in. The US is the only country in the globe with the technical skills and capacity, historical involvement, and funding to support human rights efforts at scale. This is to say nothing of the loss of institutional capacity. Many of the State Department staff who may be cut have saved innumerable lives. They have burned the midnight oil to secure the release of political prisoners, rescued and provided safe haven to political dissidents in closed societies, all while advancing U.S. interests. These individuals deserve promotions and to be honored for their public service, not put on leave and removed from careers devoted to the American people and advancing the cause of freedom. If cuts to these critical programs in Asia are any indicator, these measures will not just hamstring global civil society efforts to safeguard and defend human rights, they may downright end them, at least as we know them. Apart from a swift change in course, generations of people around the globe will feel the reverberations and impacts of these decisions for years to come. So what can be done? First, Secretary Rubio has the authority to change course at any time. His congressional legacy of advancing human rights and freedom hangs in the balance and that legacy risks being permanently tarnished. The Trump administration's own legacy of advancing human rights through its promotion of religious freedom in the first term similarly hangs in the balance. At minimum, grant funding for 2025 should be restored as organizations were counting on these budgets to continue their operations through the end of the year. Critical staff at DRL should also be retained. Some programs at DRL, no doubt, can and should be cut strategically, but dropping nearly all pre-existing human rights programming is like cutting off a limb and expecting US foreign policy to be able to function. Second, Congress must act. As a conservative administration, a decision to pivot away from Reagan's peace through strength policy paradigm which recognizes the essential values of possessing both a strong national defense as well as a strong arsenal of tools to defend human rights, merits serious questioning. The legacy and success of peace through strength stands on its own and a pivot from those successful policies requires justification. Furthermore, Congress has historically led on human rights and that means that many programs administered by DRL are congressionally mandated and appropriated. Congress must stand its ground in ensuring the continuation of those programs and work tirelessly to appropriate funding next year to try to at least mitigate some of the damage from proposed cuts. Finally, individuals and the private sector must step up to fill in the void. Now, not next year, is the time to give generously to support civil society organizations in need. Their continued existence may depend on it. I have faith in the resilience of civil society's ability to weather this storm. But leaving so many groups in the lurch without funding and technical support from the U.S. is incredibly consequential. As Ronald Reagan aptly said, 'Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.' May that not happen on our watch.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Congo Wants M23 Peace Agreement Before July Meeting with Trump
The Democratic Republic of Congo wants a peace agreement with Rwanda-backed M23 rebels before a planned summit next month between the leaders of the two nations and US President Donald Trump. The countries signed a deal Friday in Washington where they pledged to support ongoing negotiations in Qatar between Congo and the M23, which occupies a large swath of mineral-rich eastern Congo including its two largest cities. While the rebels wouldn't necessarily need to withdraw before the presidential meeting, Congo wants 'an agreement' in place that they will, Foreign Minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner told Bloomberg in an interview on Saturday.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Congo gold miner says M23 rebels force staff to work without pay
(Reuters) -Gold miner Twangiza Mining SA has accused Rwanda-backed M23 rebels of forcing its employees to work against their will and without pay after seizing its mine in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. M23 staged a lightning advance earlier this year in eastern Congo, taking control of more land than ever before in North and South Kivu provinces. The Twangiza Mining site is located in South Kivu province. In May, the company said it had been ordered to suspend operations at the mine after M23 accused it of not paying taxes. In a new statement dated Friday, Twangiza Mining, which is headquartered in Congo and describes itself as a Chinese firm, said its workers were being "held in captivity, forced to work in inhuman conditions, without any security measure, remuneration or medical coverage." Reuters could not independently verify the company's assertions. M23 and Congo's government did not respond to requests for comment. The statement from Twangiza Mining also said production had been "paralyzed" and that the site was "entirely controlled" by a group of Rwandan nationals who, working with M23 and claiming to be new investors, have been exploiting the mine "for their own profit by treating our employees like slaves deprived of all protection". Congo, the United Nations and Western powers say Rwanda is supporting M23 by sending troops and arms. Rwanda has long denied helping M23, saying its forces were acting in self-defence against Congo's army and ethnic Hutu militiamen linked to the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Yolande Makolo, Rwanda government spokesperson, said on Monday that Rwanda had nothing to do with the dispute with Twangiza Mining. "Rwanda is not involved in this situation, and the accusations against Rwandan citizens are without basis - there is no record or information of any Rwanda citizens involved in such activities," Makolo said. "This is a local issue that should be taken up with the authorities in the area." On Friday, the foreign ministers of Rwanda and Congo signed a U.S.-brokered peace deal, raising hopes for an end to fighting that has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands more so far this year. U.S. President Donald Trump's administration aims to attract billions of dollars in Western investment to Congo, which is rich in tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper and lithium. Qatar has been hosting talks between Congo and M23.
