Aussie mum reveals $160,000 superannuation ‘shock' impacting millions at retirement
An Australian mum has shared the common superannuation mistake that has left her $160,000 worse off at retirement. More than one million Aussies are sole traders and therefore don't need to pay themselves superannuation.
Fiona Campbell started her own virtual assistant business in 2013 after being made redundant from her previous full-time job as an executive assistant. The Newcastle mum-of-three told Yahoo Finance she was so excited to land her first client and build her own business that superannuation wasn't even on her radar.
'There was an element of not caring about super and there was this weird belief that I thought I was going to be making so much more money running my business than my super fund would earn,' she said.
RELATED
$3,000 superannuation boost Aussies urged to cash in on: 'More money to retire on'
Aussie 'dream' falls apart four months after young expat's arrival with $20,000: 'In Canada everything's free'
Centrelink announces $1,000 disaster payments for more Aussies: 'Now available'
'I thought my real goal was to earn enough money in my job and super would be a bonus."
Campbell said her "highly optimistic" ended up being to her detriment.
'I feel so stupid saying this, but at the time, I thought super was something that old people thought about," she said.
Campbell said she was charging clients an hourly rate of $40 through her business, Thought Penny.
While this was more than her previously net take-home rate of pay as an employee, she said she didn't take into account the trade-offs of working as a sole trader contractor.
That included a lack of annual leave, sick leave entitlements and superannuation payments.It wasn't until Campbell had been running her business for six years that she realised how much her decision not to pay herself superannuation was costing her.
She was watching a program about superannuation and retirement and realised she was hugely behind.
'I worked out it was hundreds of thousands of dollars that I've missed out on earning in super. It was devastating because I can't go back and regain six years of compounding interest,' she told Yahoo Finance.
'That ship has sailed, which was a shock.'
According to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA), a single person would need $595,000 in superannuation at 67 to have a comfortable retirement, while couples would need $690,000.
Campbell calculated that she missed out on at least $30,000 worth of superannuation payments over the six-year period where she wasn't paying herself.
Based on that amount growing at an average return of 7 per cent for 25 years and the power of compound interest, Campbell said that amount could have grown into $160,000 by her retirement.
'I realised just how much [superannuation] we'd need to continue the lifestyle we have now when we retire and it was quite shocking,' she said.
'I realised my lifestyle is gonna have to change, or I'm really going to have to get my butt into gear and start planning now.'
Campbell changed her business from a sole trader to a company structure, which means she now legally has to pay herself super.
She has also started actively making extra contributions to top up her balance.
'I'm being more aggressive about putting money towards my super but realising that past decisions mean it can't be my only strategy to prepare for retirement,' she said.
While Campbell has since increased her rates and is charging "three times the amount" she used to, she said she would still have to work 'so many hours' to earn back the money she has lost over those years.
'It would have been a lot easier if I had been diligent. Even if it was just a fraction of the super that I'd be earning as an employee, putting aside something would have made such a big difference,' she said.
Campbell said she is fortunate her husband earns enough through his full-time job that her family is able to live comfortably while still being able to save and invest for their retirement.
She has also founded the VA Lead Network, which connects virtual assistants and online business managers, and hopes to build it into an asset that she can sell in the future.
Campbell now employs a team of virtual assistants through her company.
When she engages contractors on an hourly rate, she said she pays them super in line with employee entitlements.
For those working on deliverables-based contracts who aren't required to be paid super, she works to find a rate that means they can afford to pay themselves super.
Campbell said she wants to make sure other sole traders and contractors don't fall into the same superannuation trap she did.
'I think it's so important and there's a moral obligation to make sure everyone on your team, whether they are an employee or a contractor, is earning a fair income and is in a position to be able to make super contributions,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Company's play for Coles, Woolworths, Aldi sparks warning for millions: 'Very concerned'
Afterpay is keen on getting into the Australian supermarket sector now that buy-now, pay-later (BNPL) services are more regulated. Under the revised law, these platforms have to follow the same rules and practices as credit card companies and lenders. Afterpay's co-founder Nick Molnar believes this update will give Woolworths, Coles and Aldi the confidence to accept BNPL as payment. But UNSW finance expert Andrew Grant told Yahoo Finance allowing shoppers to pay for their everyday shopping in instalments could be a slippery slope. "It is very easy to get in a hole if you are frequently buying things outside your budget," he said. "When it comes to groceries, am I going to spend more at the supermarket if you're offering Afterpay? That's something to be a little bit worried about." Afterpay, Klarna, Zip warning for Aussie users as major BNPL overhaul arrives Rare $1 coin worth 10 times more due to 'unfortunate' detail Woolworths shopper reveals little-known price tag trick Afterpay is already accepted at certain IGA and Drakes supermarkets. Grant said the majority of BNPL users keep on top of their repayments without a hassle. However, Domenique Meyrick, co-CEO of Financial Counselling Australia, believed a line needs to be drawn in the sand to prevent people from going into unnecessary debt. "We're very concerned about the possibility of these products being used in supermarkets," she told Yahoo Finance. 'Using credit to make ends meet is often a recipe for disaster — BNPL providers and retailers should not encourage people to do so." She added that financial counsellors have seen many people struggle to manage their finances because they're juggling multiple "unaffordable" BNPL loans and late these services have been used for big purchases, with shoppers more comfortable spreading out a $1,000 TV over four instalments. However, the cost-of-living crisis has pushed some into using BNPL to pay for much smaller items because they don't have the money to cover bare essentials. Before today, Aussies who wanted to use a BNPL service faced little opposition. They only had to fill in a few details before the cash advance was in their accounts. However, now providers will assess your ability to repay this money before approving your request. They will follow the same rules as credit card companies and lenders by looking at your income, expenses, and existing debts. BNPL platforms will also forward your payment history, whether it's good or bad, to credit reporting firms, which could harm your ability to get a credit card, personal loan, or mortgage in the future. Molnar believes having this type of regulation means BNPL services will be viewed more legitimately by the big supermarkets. 'Some of the biggest industries in [Australia] have been holding out to offer Afterpay until a date that we are regulated. We are now starting to scale into more everyday spend," he told the Australian Financial Review. Coles and Aldi told Yahoo Finance they had no plans to introduce Afterpay as a payment option in the future. Woolworths was a slightly vaguer, with a spokesperson telling us they had nothing to add. Grant told Yahoo Finance while the answer might be no right now, he believed they would consider it if they could negotiate with Afterpay the cost of acceptance. At the moment, it costs the merchant 2 to 8 per cent to take a BNPL payment, which is far higher than the 0.5 to 2 per cent they pay to accept debit and credit cards. The UNSW finance associate professor also highlighted that supermarkets might be be reticent in jumping on BNPL services because they could take a "reputational hit" if they're seen to be inadvertently plunging shoppers into debt. While these big supermarket giants don't technically allow people to pay with BNPL services, there is a loophole used by many. You can buy a Coles, Woolies, or Aldi gift card on several BNPL platforms and then use that card to purchase your groceries. Compare Club found nearly 31 per cent of Aussies surveyed had been using BNPL for essentials like groceries and fuel. However, the biggest proportion of users (66.67 per cent) reserved it for everyday non-essential items like clothing and gifts. Nearly a quarter of respondents to Compare Club's survey said they owed between $1,000 to $5,000 to a BNPL service. A further 20 per cent of users admitted to paying late fees every few in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
New record in Australia's housing crisis
In a further sign of just how hard it is to break into the housing market, the value of Australia's 11.3 million homes has surpassed an insane figure. The ABS shows the national mean price of residential dwellings passed $1 million for the first time ever in the March quarter 2025 off the back of a 0.7 per cent increase in national dwelling prices. According to the Bureau of Statistics, the total value of Australian residential homes rose by $130.7bn to $11.4 trillion for the three months until March, with the average home now costing $1,002,500. At the same time, the number of houses in Australia rose by 53,400 to 11,338,500. ABS head of financial statistics Mish Tan said even though Australia's house prices surpassed the million dollar figure, there were signs the market was slowing down. 'Despite the quarterly rise in national dwelling value, annual growth in the March quarter slowed to 5.9 per cent. This was down from 9.5 per cent in March quarter 2024', Dr Tan said. Property values varied state to state, with the growth in national prices led by Western Australia, South Australia and Queensland. Queensland has now become the second most expensive state behind New South Wales. Separate research by PropTrack revealed Perth had surpassed Melbourne in terms of house prices for the first time in a decade. PropTrack senior economist Eleanor Creagh said the rise in Perth has come off the back of many years of strong performance. 'The shift reflects the turnaround in Western Australia's housing market since 2022, underpinned by a unique combination of affordability, population growth, investor demand and supply constraints,' she said. According to PropTrack, despite falling in the rankings, Melbourne had the strongest monthly rises up 0.79 per cent in May, but it is coming off a prolonged period of softer growth. 'Despite Melbourne leading monthly gains, Perth's median home value of $787,000 has overtaken Melbourne's at $782,000 for the first time in a decade,' she said. 'Just five years ago, Perth's home values were sitting at a deep discount relative to Melbourne's, with the median value of homes in Perth priced at nearly 40 per cent less.' Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data

Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
A second Australian IVF mix-up shakes clinic and industry
By Byron Kaye and Kumar Tanishk (Reuters) -One of Australia's top IVF providers mistakenly implanted a patient with her own embryo instead of her partner's in a second fertility clinic mix-up, heightening concerns about an industry that did not have much active government oversight until recently. Monash IVF said the error took place on June 5 at a clinic in Melbourne but did not provide further details such as how it learned of the bungle or what the couple planned to do next. The company said it was supporting the couple, who it did not identify. It said the patient's embryo was mistakenly implanted under a treatment plan which called for an embryo from the patient's partner to be transferred. The incident builds on a reputational maelstrom for Monash IVF which was already reeling from an April disclosure that an Australian woman had given birth to a stranger's baby after a fertility doctor accidentally implanted the wrong embryo to a patient in Brisbane in 2023. That mix-up sparked concerns about security protocols at IVF clinics and an industry which is only now in the process of being more regulated. Monash claimed the world's first IVF pregnancy five decades ago and is Australia's second-largest IVF provider, carrying out nearly a quarter of the country's 100,000 assisted reproductive cycles a year, according to industry data. "This mix-up, the second reported incident at Monash IVF, risks shaking confidence not just in one provider but across the entire fertility sector," Hilary Bowman-Smart, a researcher and bioethicist at the University of South Australia. Shares of Monash IVF were down 24% by midsession on Tuesday, against a rising broader market. The stock is just over half its value before the April announcement. "We had thought the Brisbane clinic embryo transfer error was an isolated incident," Craig Wong-Pan, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets, said in a client note. "We believe there is now risk of a greater impact of reputational damage and market share losses to MVF's operations." Monash IVF had already hired a lawyer to run an independent investigation after the Brisbane incident, and said on Tuesday it has extended the scope of that investigation. It added that it was installing interim extra verification safeguards to ensure patient confidence. "Whilst industry-leading electronic witness systems ... are being rolled out across Monash IVF, there remains instances and circumstances whereby manual witnessing is required," the company said. It said it had reported the Melbourne incident to state regulator the Victorian Department of Health and industry licencing body the Reproductive Technology Accreditation Committee (RTAC), part of industry group the Fertility Society of Australia. The health department and RTAC were not immediately available for comment. Reports of transferring a wrong embryo are rare, according to fertility experts, and Monash's Brisbane mix-up was widely reported as the first known case of its kind. ($1 = 1.5330 Australian dollars)