The Youngest Generation Will Bear The Highest Brunt Of Climate Extremes: Study
In a 1.5 degrees Celsius warming scenario, 52% of people born in 2020 will be exposed to climate-change-induced extreme weather events throughout their lifetime, such as heatwaves and droughts, compared to only 16% of individuals born in 1960, according to a recent study.
'People born in 1960 and spending their life in Brussels are projected to experience three heatwaves in their lifetime. In the 1.5 °C pathway, the 2020 birth cohort is projected to experience nearly 11 heatwaves, yet this increases to 18 and 26 heatwaves in pathways reaching 2.5 °C and 3.5 °C, respectively, by the end of the century,' the researchers explained.
'More ambitious policies are needed to achieve the goal of the Paris Agreement of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C by 2100 relative to the 2.7 °C warming expected under current policies, especially as the most vulnerable groups have more members projected to face unprecedented exposure to heatwaves. Children would reap the direct benefits of this increased ambition: a total of 613 million children born between 2003 and 2020 would then avoid unprecedented lifetime exposure to heatwaves,' the researchers added.
Unprecedented lifetime exposure refers to less than one in 10,000 chance of being exposed to extreme weather events in a world that was not experiencing man-made climate change.
Greenhouse gas emissions caused by burning fossil fuels like coal, oil, and gas are the main cause of this man-made climate crisis. The researchers warn that if this harmful status quo of high levels of greenhouse gases continues, it might result in 111 million children from 177 countries born in 2020 being exposed to 'unprecedented heatwave exposure in a world that warms to 3.5 °C compared with 62 million in a 1.5 °C pathway.'
"Socioeconomically vulnerable people have a consistently higher chance of facing unprecedented lifetime heatwave exposure compared with the least vulnerable members of their generation," they further highlighted. "Socioeconomically vulnerable groups have lower adaptive capacity and face more constraints when it comes to implementing effective adaptation measures. Our results highlight that precisely these groups with the highest socioeconomic vulnerability and lowest adaptation potential face the highest chance for unprecedented heatwave exposure."
In the event that global warming increases by 3.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels instead of 1.5 degrees Celsius by 2100, the percentage of lifetime exposure to heatwaves will shoot up to 92% from 52% of people born in 2020.
"Climate extremes also affect society through economic impacts, including the rising cost of living due to supply chain disruptions and taxation to recover public infrastructure. For instance, climate change endangers staple crop production in the main breadbasket countries that supply most of our caloric intake globally, forcing market instabilities that only the wealthiest can cope with. These missing non-local impacts make our estimates conservative," the researchers further warned. The study was published in the journal Nature on May 7, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
19 minutes ago
- CNET
Your Apple Watch Might Not Be as Accurate as You Think, New Study Finds
The first thing that always crosses my mind when testing fitness wearables is how accurate the data is. Smartwatches and fitness trackers aren't cheap, and if you're using them to monitor something as crucial as your health, then accuracy matters. Everyone and their brother wear some sort of fitness tracker, whether it be an Apple Watch, Google Pixel Watch, Oura Ring or Whoop. It's estimated that one in three Americans uses a wearable device for health and fitness tracking features. That brings me back to whether these things can be trusted. If they're not accurate… What's the point? Should we all go back to analog? Researchers from the University of Mississippi conducted a meta-analysis of 56 studies that compared the Apple Watch with reference tools when measuring factors like heart rate, step count and energy burned. While there's always some expected error, we have a more definitive answer for how much stock you should put in the numbers you see on your watch. Apple Watches are good at measuring steps and heart rate The meta-analysis findings show that the Apple Watch accurately measures your heart rate and step count. We know this based on the mean absolute percentage error measurement (the standard way to measure accuracy) reported for each health metric. Heart rate had a percentage error of 4.43%, while step count had an error of 8.17%. Anything below 10% is considered excellent, so you should feel pretty confident in what your Apple Watch says your heart rate and step count are for the day. However, you shouldn't rely on the energy expenditure metric The same can't be said for energy expenditure or calories burned. The percentage error for this metric was 27.96%. That's a significant jump in inaccuracy. Researchers found energy expenditure inaccurate across all activities tested, including walking, running, mixed-intensity workouts and cycling. This isn't a new problem. Several studies have found that smartwatches and trackers don't do a great job of calculating calorie burn. They can be off by 40% to 80%. A different study revealed that the Apple Watch Series 9 can vary in energy expenditure and heart rate measures across skin pigmentation. While this study was specific to Apple Watches, I expect similar trends across other devices because they often measure similarly. One study found that the Fitbit Surge had a mean error of 27% when measuring calories burned. Smartwatches calculate how many calories you burn throughout the day, using factors such as your movements, heart rate and data from the sensors inside the watch. Other factors, such as your age, weight and gender, are also included in this calculation. None of them will be 100% accurate. Where does this leave you and your data? This news doesn't scare me as a smartwatch wearer who uses my daily data to track my workouts and sleep. I still think the data smartwatches give us is a great way to stay motivated. I've used the Google Pixel 3 watch to monitor my heart health thanks to the cardio load metric. When it comes to sleep, I've noticed some inaccuracy when it comes to when I fall asleep and wake up, though it's not a huge difference. Most trackers use your heart rate and movement to track your sleep, so it's unsurprising to see some degree of error. There's always some error, and for my use, that's OK. I use my data for trends of my progress, rather than extremely granular data. Though if you're a serious athlete who tracks down to the calorie, it's essential not to rely on your smartwatch for this number. Your smartwatch is a tool to guide you through your wellness journey. Use it to build habits and make meaningful changes, not diagnose medical conditions. That said, I wouldn't count out smartwatch features like Apple's Vital app, fall detection or the loss-of-pulse detection feature that Google Pixel watches are getting. Apple and other brands continuously release updates to improve their tech over time. And if you're wondering which smartwatch you should get for the best accuracy, it's hard to say. They all have their own tracking methods, even if they often overlap. None of them are perfect, so it's best to choose which one fits your budget and vibe best.
Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Planet Labs CEO Says Europe Demand Beating Outset of Ukraine War
Earth imaging company Planet Labs PBC 's profit beat expectations as Europe hikes defense spending in response to the United States pulling back from the continent. Earnings excluding some items were $1.2 million in its first quarter, according to a statement Wednesday, its second profitable quarter in a row and better than analysts' average expectation of a $3 million loss.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Poland Ponders Its Future Under Nawrocki
Warsaw - The mood here on Monday was subdued. Political signs supporting Warsaws progressive mayor, Rafal Trzaskowski, for president of Poland still littered the capital city, hanging from apartment balconies and highway overpasses. But Trzaskowski had lost Sundays runoff election to Karol Nawrocki, a conservative historian backed by Trump. With a Trumpian flair for political invincibility, Nawrocki overcame a bundle of scandals (including reports he had hired sex workers and defrauded an elderly pensioner), eventually outperforming opinion polls and even exit polls to win the presidency. The first exit poll - published immediately after voting ended at 9:00 p.m. local time on Sunday - showed Trzaskowski winning by just over half a point. He declared an early victory. "We won, although the phrase 'razor's edge will forever enter the Polish language and politics," Trzaskowski told his supporters in Warsaw. Meanwhile, Nawrocki told his supporters to remain hopeful. "I believe that we will wake up tomorrow with President Karol Nawrocki." Sure enough, by the time votes were officially tallied, Nawrocki had won by nearly two points, ending Trzaskowskis second presidential bid in failure. The result will affect European politics at a time when security concerns grip the continent. Donald Tusk, Polands center-right prime minister and the former president of the European Council, backed Trzaskowskis campaign in hopes that the mayors pro-Europe inclinations would lead to expanded influence for Poland in Brussels. But Nawrocki, who is backed by the Law and Justice (PiS) party, can stymie Tusks domestic and foreign policy agendas through veto power. Nawrocki opposes EU ambitions to further integrate, share the burdens of immigration, and address climate change collectively. Though Tusk will continue to represent Poland at EU summits, Nawrocki and PiS can challenge the prime ministers legitimacy abroad by tactfully fracturing his coalition at home. Nawrocki may also work to alter the generally pro-Ukraine stance of both Poland and PiS. Since Russias 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Poland has received nearly 1 million Ukrainian refugees and given the equivalent of over $5 billion in aid (in the form of cash and military equipment) to Ukraines war effort. But some Poles are growing weary of all the refugees and the spending. And theyre giving voice to that frustration with their vote. Slawomir Mentzen, a far-right activist from the Confederation party who finished third on the first presidential ballot with nearly 15% of the vote, has been critical of Ukraine. Before the runoff between Trzaskowski and Nawrocki, Mentzen asked both candidates to sign a declaration that included a pledge to, among other things, resist the EU and oppose Ukraines accession to NATO. Nawrocki signed the declaration despite broad support for Ukraine among PiS leaders and supporters. Though Mentzen never formally endorsed Nawrocki, an analysis of Sundays vote found that nearly 90% of Mentzens first-round voters backed Nawrocki in the presidential runoff. Progressive unity proved much more elusive. Multiple voters told me of friends and colleagues who had voted for some of the most liberal candidates in round one only to vote for Nawrocki in the runoff as a way of sticking it to Prime Minister Tusk, whom they believe has neglected his 2023 campaign promise to expand abortion rights. Nawrocki, by contrast, garnered overwhelming support in rural areas by focusing on conservative Catholic values and anti-abortion policies. PiS has also cultivated support in farming communities by championing government subsidies for farmers and parents. A major question moving forward is whether these voters simply care more about issues like abortion than foreign policy or are willfully shifting their support away from Ukraine. In Warsaw, Polands second tallest building is easily spotted from almost anywhere in the city. The Palace of Culture and Science, built in 1952 above the rubble caused by Nazi bombs, was commissioned by Joseph Stalin as "a gift of the Soviet people for the Poles." Its socialist-realist architectural style hovers above the city as a persistent reminder of former stifling Soviet occupation. Since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1989, Poland has experienced steady economic growth, especially recently. The nation now boasts the sixth largest economy in Europe, and the government spent more on defense as a percent of GDP in 2024 than any other EU country. But some Poles fear their countrymen dont fully recognize Putins ambitions to rehang the iron curtain. "I have hope for Polands future," said Patryk Andrysiak in front of Polands presidential palace on Monday. "I moved back here from England recently because the economy is getting really good. But the election worries me. I dont think Nawrocki will be able to affect Ukraine a lot through his position. But the fact that so many voters chose Nawrocki means that people in Poland are not as worried about Russia attacking Ukraine as they should be. Thats a problem." Addison Graham is global affairs correspondent for RealClearPolitics.
