OpenAI and DeepMind are losing engineers to Anthropic in a one-sided talent war
Anthropic is making gains in the AI talent war, poaching top engineers from OpenAI and DeepMind. Rival companies have been scrambling to retain elite AI researchers with sky-high pay and strict non-competes.
Anthropic is emerging as a leader in the AI talent wars, siphoning top talent from some of its biggest rivals.
That's according to Venture Capital firm SignalFire's recently released 2025 State of Talent report, which analyzed tech hiring and employment trends.
The report found that engineers from OpenAI and DeepMind were increasingly more likely to jump ship to Anthropic than the reverse.
Engineers at OpenAI were 8 times more likely to leave the company for Anthropic, while at DeepMind, that ratio was almost 11:1 in Anthropic's favor.
Anthropic also leads the AI industry in talent retention with an 80% retention rate for employees hired over the last 2 years. DeepMind follows closely behind with 78% while OpenAI's retention rate trails at 67%, more aligned with larger Big Tech companies such as Meta (64%).
Some of the enthusiasm around Anthropic is to be expected; the company is a buzzy, relatively new startup. It was founded just three years ago, in 2021, by a group of former OpenAI employees who were reportedly concerned about their former employer rapidly scaling its technology without sufficient safeguards.
Over the past few years, Anthropic has attempted to foster a culture that gives employees more autonomy, in part to combat some Big Tech companies' inflated salaries and brand cachet.
According to SignalFire's report, Anthropic employees say the company embraces intellectual discourse and researcher autonomy. It also offers other talent draws, including flexible work options and clear paths for career growth.
The company's flagship family of LLMs, Claude, has also emerged as a favorite with developers, which could influence some of the talent movement.
Anthropic's latest AI models outperformed OpenAI's and Google's top models on key software engineering benchmarks. The company labeled its recently released Opus 4 model 'the world's best coding model.'
The company's commitment to AI safety appears to have also attracted some top engineers.
Notable AI researcher, Jan Leike, defected to Anthropic from OpenAI last year, criticizing his former employer for focusing on 'shiny products' over AI safety on the way out. Ex-Google researchers like Niki Parmar and Neil Houlsby have also jumped ship to the startup.
The demand for leading researchers has massively outpaced the supply as AI labs vie to build more advanced models and outpace each other in a high-stakes AI arms race.
This has made the battle for top AI talent increasingly competitive and forced some tech companies to employ creative strategies to attract elite engineers. Google DeepMind, for example, is reportedly enforcing 6—to 12-month non-compete clauses that bar some AI researchers from joining rival firms. During this time, the engineers continue to receive their normal salaries despite having no active work.
Over at OpenAI, some top AI researchers can earn more than $10 million a year. The company's counteroffers to stop employees from joining OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever's SSI have also reportedly reached more than $2 million in retention bonuses, in addition to equity increases of $20 million or more, per Reuters.
OpenAI's former CTO, Mira Murati's departure from the company has caused further talent headaches.
Murati has quietly built a 60-person team to launch her rival startup, pulling in 20 staffers from OpenAI before even announcing the venture in February, according to sources who spoke to Reuters.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
33 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Amazon Vows to Tackle Fake Reviews After UK's CMA Probe
Inc. has vowed to improve its systems to tackle fake reviews on its online marketplace and act against sellers who 'hijack' good reviews following four years of the UK antitrust watchdog's investigation. The Competition and Markets Authority said Amazon gave undertakings for to make it easier to report fake reviews and sanction businesses that use good reviews for one product for an entirely different product. Alphabet Inc. 's Google gave similar commitments in January.
The Verge
an hour ago
- The Verge
AI Mode can now make interactive data visualizations.
Google's new feature in Labs will create the visualizations to 'help bring financial data to life for questions on stocks and mutual funds,' according to a blog post. You can ask Google a follow-up question, too, and 'AI Mode understands what to research for you.' Here's a video of the feature, from Google's post:
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
Do Not Use These Smart Devices At Home, Warn FBI And Google
Do not connect these devices at home. The FBI and major technology players — including Google — issued a new warning Thursday, as cybercriminals exploit smart devices connected to home networks. These bad actors 'gain unauthorized access to home networks,' it said, 'with malicious software' that is either preloaded or downloaded once connected at home. The malicious ecosystem at play is the BADBOX 2.0 botnet, and the risk is devices made in China from generic brand names. How many of the devices you bought online come from major OEMs? The FBI says it affects 'TV streaming devices, digital projectors, aftermarket vehicle infotainment systems, digital picture frames and other products.' Whether the device is bought with malicious software already onboard, or that software is downloaded during post-purchase configuration, setup or firmware update, the result is the same. Infected devices 'become part of the BADBOX 2.0 botnet and residential proxy services known to be used for malicious activity.' BADBOX 2.0 affects the types of devices running Android's generic smart device OS. As such, even devices that are safe themselves can be infected by downloading apps from unofficial marketplaces — just as with Android smartphones. 'The BADBOX 2.0 botnet consists of millions of infected devices and maintains numerous backdoors to proxy services that cyber criminal actors exploit by either selling or providing free access to compromised home networks to be used for various criminal activity.' The FBI, Google and a number of security vendors urge the public 'to evaluate IoT devices in their home for any indications of compromise and consider disconnecting suspicious devices from their networks.' This includes devices asking to disable Google Play Protect during setup or 'unexplained or suspicious internet traffic.' The new advisory suggests home owners with such no-name smart devices should monitor home internet usage just in case there is high-volume internet traffic that seems at odds with what they can see taking place, ensuring all devices are updated and not using third-party marketplaces. Home users should 'prioritize patching firewall vulnerabilities and known exploited vulnerabilities in internet-facing systems.' According to Human Security, one of the vendors party to the new warning, infected devices can also attack users on the homer network, with malware distribution, one-time password interception and creating fake accounts. Attacks 'center on low-cost, 'off-brand' and uncertified Android Open Source Project devices with a backdoor.' Take care how many such generic IoT devices you buy and connect at home — be mindful of the OEMs behind them and check reviews. Do not disable any security protections or install apps from unofficial stores. If you find a device behaving badly, stop using it. It's also worth taking stock of the number of such devices at home.
