logo
Indiana Republicans promise utility bill relief, but fail to deliver

Indiana Republicans promise utility bill relief, but fail to deliver

Hoosiers deserve a legislature that works for them, not against them.
In an economy riddled with day-to-day uncertainty, utility prices in our state soar at rates that outpace both wages and inflation, burdening families with a weight that is often too much to bear.
The devastating reality of more than 174,000 of Indiana's underserved households losing access to power — sometimes during the most dangerously hot days of the year — forced Statehouse Republicans to enter the last session pledging that relief is on the way.
Words are one thing, action is another.
The utility legislation prioritized this session doesn't just continue the supermajority's pattern of promising financial relief and failing to deliver — it also unravels years of progress toward reducing coal dependence, forces ratepayers to fund projects that may never materialize and locks Indiana's natural environment even deeper into a dead-last national ranking.
Furthermore, my efforts to assist Hoosiers by creating an option to expand the income-driven utility assistance program were shot down. It is a moral failure that we ask Hoosiers to fund nuclear research for large corporations. This failure is only amplified when we refuse to support families facing shutoff in a world where the summer's hottest days only get hotter every year.
Briggs: Fishers, Carmel don't think renters deserve single-family homes
With the threat of bill increases from Senate Bill 424, we are doing a disservice to every ratepayer in our state. Whether it is the family struggling to keep the lights on, our hospitals, the schools that are already facing budget cuts from legislative fallout or the municipalities weighing reduction in service or higher taxes, we can, and must, better serve them.
This means our leaders have to commit to putting working Hoosiers first: not state sanctioned monopolies, not major corporations and not allegiances to Washington, D.C.
And when our state's executive has shown that he is willing to be lockstep in the national endeavor to gut the mechanisms that protect lives from the fossil fuel industry, that cannot be ignored.
Just weeks after the Trump administration vowed to drive 'a dagger through the heart of climate-change religion,' in response to overhauling the social cost of carbon, Gov. Mike Braun signed Executive Order 25-49, 'rejecting social cost of Greenhouse gases and climate action plans.'
And just three days after the White House issued executive orders under the umbrella of the 'beautiful, clean coal' misnomer, Indiana followed suit with Executive Order 25-50, which potentially stalls the retirement plans of coal plants throughout Indiana.
By disregarding the social cost of carbon while doubling down on coal to appease national political interests, Braun is not only defying decades of science — he is knowingly putting Hoosier families in harm's way and pretending not to see the damage.
The social cost of carbon is more than just a number: It is the children growing up in already impoverished areas destined for worse health outcomes because of fossil fuel combustion, the increased risk of cancer from Indiana having more coal ash dumpsites than anywhere in the country, the 460,000 premature deaths caused by coal in the U.S. between 1999 and 2020 and all of the Hoosiers who will face that same outcome on our current path.
We are vested with the responsibility to be the stewards of this land, to truly represent those we have been elected to serve and to deliver a future that is better than our present. It is past time that more leaders of our state live up to that obligation. Hoosiers do not have the time to wait.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans urge Donald Trump and Elon Musk to end their feud

time16 minutes ago

Republicans urge Donald Trump and Elon Musk to end their feud

WASHINGTON -- As the Republican Party braces for aftershocks from President Donald Trump's spectacular clash with Elon Musk, lawmakers and conservative figures are urging détente, fearful of the potential consequences from a prolonged feud. At a minimum, the explosion of animosity between the two powerful men could complicate the path forward for Republicans' massive tax and border spending legislation that has been promoted by Trump but assailed by Musk. 'I hope it doesn't distract us from getting the job done that we need to,' said Rep. Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington state. "I think that it will boil over and they'll mend fences' Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, was similarly optimistic. 'I hope that both of them come back together because when the two of them are working together, we'll get a lot more done for America than when they're at cross purposes,' he told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Thursday night. Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, sounded almost pained on social media as Trump and Musk volleyed insults at each other, sharing a photo composite of the two men and writing, "But … I really like both of them.' 'Who else really wants @elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump to reconcile?' Lee posted, later adding: 'Repost if you agree that the world is a better place with the Trump-Musk bromance fully intact.' So far, the feud between Trump and Musk is probably best described as a moving target, with plenty of opportunities for escalation or detente. One person familiar with the president's thinking said Musk wants to speak with Trump, but that the president doesn't want to do it – or at least do it on Friday. The person requested anonymity to disclose private matters. In a series of conversations with television anchors Friday morning, Trump showed no interest in burying the hatchet. Asked on ABC News about reports of a potential call between him and Musk, the president responded: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump added in the ABC interview that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk at the moment. Still, others remained hopeful that it all would blow over. 'I grew up playing hockey and there wasn't a single day that we played hockey or basketball or football or baseball, whatever we were playing, where we didn't fight. And then we'd fight, then we'd become friends again,' Hannity said on his show Thursday night. Acknowledging that it 'got personal very quick,' Hannity nonetheless added that the rift was 'just a major policy difference.' House Speaker Mike Johnson projected confidence that the dispute would not affect prospects for the tax and border bill. 'Members are not shaken at all,' the Louisiana Republican said. 'We're going to pass this legislation on our deadline.' He added that he hopes Musk and Trump reconcile, saying 'I believe in redemption' and 'it's good for the party and the country if all that's worked out.' But he also had something of a warning for the billionaire entrepreneur. 'I'll tell you what, do not doubt and do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. "He is the leader of the party. He's the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era.'

Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump
Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is keeping his distance from Elon Musk even after the billionaire's extraordinary public rebuke of President Trump and the GOP's domestic agenda. Asked Friday if Musk's bitter break from Trump presents Democrats with an opportunity to form a strange-bedfellows alliance with the tech titan, Jeffries shifted the conversation immediately to the Democrats' efforts to kill Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'The opportunity that exists right now is to kill the GOP tax scam,' Jeffries told reporters in the Capitol. 'It's legislation that we have been strongly opposed to, and uniformly opposed to, from the very beginning. … It rips health care away from millions of people. It snatches food out of the mouths of hungry children. And it rewards billionaires and [GOP] donors in ways that are fiscally irresponsible.' Pressed on whether Musk should be 'welcomed back' to the Democratic Party after the high-profile split from Trump, Jeffries punted again. 'Same answer,' he said. Jeffries's cautious remarks demonstrate the limits of the old adage that the enemy of one's enemy is one's friend. They also highlight the potential difficulties Democrats would face if they embraced a polarizing and nationally unpopular figure in Musk — one they've spent most of the last year bashing for heavy spending on Trump's campaign and, more recently, for his role in heading Trump's efforts to gut the federal government. Still, some Democrats say Musk's influence is significant enough that Democrats should make the effort to try to court him to their side amid the Trump feud. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who represents parts of Silicon Valley, is leading the charge. 'If Biden had a big supporter criticize him, Trump would have hugged him the next day,' Khanna posted Thursday on social platform X, which is owned by Musk. 'When we refused to meet with @RobertKennedyJr, Trump embraced him & won. We can be the party of sanctimonious lectures, or the party of FDR that knows how to win & build a progressive majority,' referring to former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Jeffries isn't going nearly so far. But he has welcomed Musk's attacks on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' and the Republicans who voted for it. And he aligned Democrats with Musk's sentiments that the package piles too much money onto the federal debt, a figure the Congressional Budget Office estimated to be $2.4 trillion. 'To the extent that Elon Musk has made the same point that everyone who has voted for this bill up until this moment should be ashamed of themselves, we agree,' Jeffries said. 'And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the point that the bill is a 'disgusting abomination,' we agree. And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the observation about the GOP tax scam — that it is reckless and irresponsible to explode the deficit by more than $3 trillion, and that potentially could set our country on a path toward bankruptcy — we agree.' 'These are arguments that Democrats have been making now for months.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Vance Sucks Up to Trump to Deny He's Part of Musk Coup Plot
Vance Sucks Up to Trump to Deny He's Part of Musk Coup Plot

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Vance Sucks Up to Trump to Deny He's Part of Musk Coup Plot

J.D. Vance was forced to reaffirm his allegiance to President Trump after Elon Musk backed a call for the vice president to replace his boss. A spat between Musk and Trump over the president's 'big beautiful bill,' which the Tesla CEO denounced as a 'disgusting abomination,' has blown up into an all-out MAGA civil war, with Musk and Trump dramatically trading blows in public. On Thursday, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO replied 'Yes' to a post by an X user who asked: 'President vs Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon. Trump should be impeached and Vance should replace him.' Musk publicly mused about starting a political party, and told his followers in a bombshell allegation that Trump was named in the Epstein files, signing off by saying: 'Have a nice day, DJT!' He added in a follow-up post, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' Vance also features in a conspiracy theory called 'Dark Enlightenment' or Dark MAGA" that suggests a secretive cabal of tech titans is plotting to blow up the government and rule as a giant corporation with a CEO instead of a president. The Silicon Valley plotters, including Musk, chose Vance as the person who would take over when Trump is toppled, according to the theory. Trump has yet to address the latest allegations personally. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt issued a statement saying: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because it does not include the policies he wanted.' As the drama escalated, Vance posted a picture teasing a Friday appearance on the podcast of Trump-friendly comedian Theo Von. 'Slow news day, what are we even going to talk about?' Vance joked. In a follow-up post, the vice president added: 'President Trump has done more than any person in my lifetime to earn the trust of the movement he leads. I'm proud to stand beside him.' Musk and Trump's alliance began to unravel after the GOP-controlled House of Representatives narrowly passed Trump's flagship budget proposal last month. Before that, Musk had pushed Trump's agenda by leading his so-called Department of Government Efficiency, an initiative within the administration tasked with cutting government spending and jobs. Musk publicly attacked Trump's bill on the grounds that it would undermine his work with DOGE by adding trillions to the U.S. budget deficit. But on Thursday, Trump claimed that Musk was really upset about the effect the bill will have on his electric vehicle company, Tesla. 'I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' the president added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store