Colm Eastwood court case over pro-Palestine rally put back to July
Northern Ireland
SDLP
Derry
A case in which former SDLP leader Colum Eastwood is charged in relation to taking part in an unnotified parade in Northern Ireland has been put back until July.The charge relates to a pro-Palestinian rally that took place last February at Derry's War Memorial in the Diamond area of the city centre.After speeches, participants walked to Derry's Guildhall.
Under Northern Ireland's legislation governing parades and processions, the organisers of such events must apply in advance to the Parades Commission adjudication body for permission to march.Eastwood, 42, is one of five people facing prosecution in relation to the event on February 14 last year.The court heard that more time was needed to allow for representations being made in relation to a request made by two defendants to Northern Ireland's Public Prosecution Service (PPS) to review the basis for pursuing the case.The two defendants who have already requested the review are university lecturer Goretti Horgan, 69, from Westland Avenue in Derry, and fellow pro-Palestinian activist Davina Pulis, 36, from Knoxhill Avenue in the city.The court had heard previously that Eastwood is also set to challenge the basis for prosecuting him.Barrister Joe Brolly said in court on Tuesday that he represented 'well-known SDLP man' Mr Eastwood in the case and asked for the matter to be put back further.He said there was a 'substantial amount of law to get through' and they were in process of making a formal request for a review to the PPS.The matter was put back five weeks and will be heard again on July 8.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Education Department sends warning to Columbia's accreditor
The agency notified Columbia's accreditor, the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, that the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights had found the school to be "in violation of federal antidiscrimination laws," according to a press release. The university, therefore, "fails to meet the standards for accreditation," the Education Department said. There is no indication that Middle States intends to rescind Columbia's accreditation, which was granted in 1921. Accreditors are nonpartisan, independent organizations recognized by the Education Department to provide oversight of higher education institutions across the United States. The letter is the latest swipe from President Donald Trump's administration at an Ivy League school. Yet unlike Harvard University, Columbia agreed in March to reform elements of its teaching, hiring and admissions practices in response to a series of demands by the federal government. Still, the Trump administration has not restored $400 million in funding that it paused, halting research and prompting layoffs at the university. Read more: Columbia University promises swift crackdown on planned pro-Palestinian encampments In a statement on April 14, Columbia's recently installed acting president, Claire Shipman, said that although the university would "seek to continue constructive dialogue with the government," it would "reject any agreement that would require us to relinquish our independence and autonomy as an educational institution." Rawan Abbasi, a spokesperson for Middle States, confirmed that the accreditor received the Trump administration's letter about Columbia. Abbasi declined to comment further. Columbia University did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Boulder Colorado attack: How Jews feel amid antisemitism
Each attack happened in a different country. The perpetrators didn't know each other. And yet, every Jew I know understands how deeply they're connected. This is what Jewish anxiety looks like in 2025. Not just fear of a lone extremist - but fear of a global pattern no one wants to name. A time when violence against Jews isn't just ignored, but politically inconvenient to acknowledge. The attacker in Colorado wasn't reacting to silence. He was reacting to noise. To slogans. To lies. To the viral fabrication that 14,000 Palestinian babies would be starved in 48 hours - a claim with no evidence, pushed by some of the most trusted news outlets in the world. By the time fact-checkers caught up, the lie had triggered an already radicalized man, preparing firebombs in America. That's where the anxiety begins. Not with the fire - but with the match. Because we've seen this before. Words become slogans. Slogans become an ideology. And ideology, left unchecked, becomes violence. Not long ago, we were told to "believe all victims." But today, Jewish victims are asked to justify their pain. Were you wearing an Israeli flag? Were you near a protest? Are you a Zionist? Are you a European colonizer? As if our humanity is conditional. As if the firebomb wasn't about us - we just happened to be standing in the way. I come from the political left. My parents were Iraqi and North African Jewish refugees. My relatives were murdered, raped and tortured. From that pain, I learned not to hate, but to seek peace. I've stood for coexistence. I've criticized Israeli leaders when they fail our Jewish values. But today, that's not enough. Because if you are Jewish and visible, you are a target. And if you're attacked, you're met with silence - or worse, moral gymnastics. In case you missed it: Ye's antisemitic rant, that $20 swastika shirt and why we need to talk about it Mainstream media repeated Hamas' invented casualty statistics with barely a pause. Days later, the numbers were quietly revised. But those burned by the flamethrower will attest: It was a blood libel. Moreover, words matter. "Globalize the intifada." "End Zionists." "By any means necessary." These are not abstract ideas. They are instructions. They are adrenaline for the unstable. They justify horrific violence. What's most painful isn't just the attacks - it's the shrug. The way the Colorado firebomb wasn't covered until hours later. The way Jewish blood doesn't trend. The way those who claim to fight hate won't name this one. We're told: this isn't antisemitism; it's anti-Zionism. And yet, somehow, the flames always find the flesh of Jews. Why is it never OK to target people for a government's actions unless the people are Jewish? Does the 88-year-old Holocaust survivor lying in agony in a hospital bed deserve it? Does anyone? What world are we in where I have to explain that setting people on fire is evil and does no good? Deep dive: How a father of 5 morphed into a terror suspect with Boulder's Jews in his crosshairs The truth is, we are afraid. Not in a viral-post kind of way, but in the quiet way you hesitate before entering a synagogue. The way you scan a crowd before speaking Hebrew. The way you wonder if your accent or your name might be the thing that puts you in someone's crosshairs. And what we're asking is simple: to be seen. Fully. Not as a proxy. Not as a debate. But as human beings - hurting, vulnerable and real. The shooting in D.C., the firebomb in Colorado - these weren't the beginning. They were the result. And if we still can't name what led us here, we'll be even less prepared for what's coming next. Hen Mazzig is an Israeli-born writer, speaker, and digital influencer known for his powerful advocacy for Jewish identity and his fight against antisemitism. He is the co-founder of the Tel Aviv Institute, a nonprofit that launched in 2019 to counter online antisemitism through strategic, data-driven social media campaigns. In 2022, he published his debut book, The Wrong Kind of Jew. Hen Mazzig continues to inspire a new generation to embrace advocacy. Most recently he created his series "And They're Jewish" which celebrates Jewish diversity and builds bridges rooted in tolerance and peace.
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump bans Harvard from admitting new international students
In his new order, Trump listed a litany of grievances against the university, which he accuses of failing to protect Jewish students from pro-Palestinian protesters. He also noted that Harvard has long used race as a factor in admissions, which led the Supreme Court in 2023 to strike down race-based admissions policies nationwide. "It is not in the interest of the United States to further compound Harvard's discrimination against non-preferred races, national origins, shared ancestries, or religions by further reducing opportunities for American students through excessive foreign student enrollment," Trump said in his order. "Considering these facts, I have determined that it is necessary to restrict the entry of foreign nationals who seek to enter the United States solely or principally to participate in a course of study at Harvard University or in an exchange visitor program hosted by Harvard University." The White House has repeatedly clashed with Harvard over its refusal to accede to demands for information about student protesters and for an outside review of classes and instructors. More than 25% of Harvard's total student population are international students, with about 6,800 students from about 140 counties enrolled this academic year. Trump's order applies to new students who would be arriving to study at Harvard, and asks Secretary of State Marco Rubio to consider whether to also revoke the visas of current international students. "In my judgment, Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers," Trump said. There are about 1.2 million international students in the United States. The largest two home countries are India and China, according to federal records.
