logo
'Underconsumption Core' Is Going Viral On TikTok. Here's Why Gen Z Can't Get Enough.

'Underconsumption Core' Is Going Viral On TikTok. Here's Why Gen Z Can't Get Enough.

Yahoo25-05-2025

On TikTok, most people's feeds are flooded with product reviews that encourage impulse buying: 'This Amazon bodysuit on sale is a must-buy.' 'This cult-favorite travel pillow is worth the hype!' 'Yes, it's $600 but this Dyson blow-dryer will change your life.'
Then there's 'underconsumption core,' the viral trend on TikTok that encourages consumers to be a little less spend-happy and more conscientious about what they bring into their homes.
It's garnered plenty of attention off-platform, too: Google searches for 'underconsumption core' have surged by 1,150% in just few weeks last year, according to the digital marketing firm Webbee.
April Silva, a TikTok user and lifelong thrift store fan, is a big proponent of underconsumption core. She defines it as a more minimal approach to shopping: You don't need five winter coats when you have one perfectly good one. You don't need every color of Stanley cup or 'massive Shein hauls just for content,' she said.
'Most of the clothing you see in people's clothing haul are just trend pieces and it won't hold up in your closet over time, and I say this as someone who likes fashion,' Silva told HuffPost. 'What I choose to spend my hard-earned money on matters and I try to be smarter about it every day, and that's what this trend is about for me.'
Instead of pressing 'buy now' on hyped products, underconsumption-core adherents lean into capsule wardrobes (basically, buying pieces of clothing and accessories that are easy to mix and match), using makeup until it's 'down to pan' (finishing the entirety of the product until you hit the pan of the compact), and shopping secondhand whenever possible.
In many ways, underconsumption core is the spiritual sister of another recent trend: deinfluencing, where social media influencers try to dissuade followers from buying cult-favorite products they've had lackluster experiences with.
Both fall into what might be called 'recession-core influencing': When money is tight and the costs of living and rent are going up, who can stomach buying a $42 highlighter? (As one person joked on TikTok: 'Underconsumption core but it's actually the reality of living under the poverty line.')
Shelby Orme, a sustainable living influencer from Austin, Texas, thinks the trend is '100%' a direct response to our current economic situation.
'I think it's that and a response to the constant exposure to perfectly curated homes and wardrobes all over our For You pages,' she said. 'I would also add that the insidious introduction of TikTok Shop [which lets brands and sellers sell directly on the platform] has added to the frustration.'
Trends like these tend to be cyclical, said Jessie Kosak, an instructor at Arizona State University's Fashion Institute of Design and Merchandising. (Remember a few years ago, when everyone was into Marie Kondo and trashing items that didn't 'spark joy'?)
Kosak, a millennial, remembers a version of underconsumption core that was simply called 'minimalism.'
'That was admittedly was flawed from the start, because it implies a specific aesthetic that becomes more and more difficult to adhere to,' she said. 'With trends like this, people sometimes swap one form of consumption for another.'
Kosak isn't surprised that Gen Z, a demographic whose members grew up inundated with ads for stuff they didn't need, is embracing a 'consume only what you need' mindset.
'They're constantly targeted by advertising and conditioned to want more stuff, but I think as each generation grows, they realize they just don't need all of it,' Kosak said.
Gen Z is also keenly aware of environmental issues that fast fashion plays a direct role in, like greenhouse gas emissions and garment manufacturing processes that harm wildlife, degrade land and pollute soil and water. That's a huge deal for Gen Zers: A recent Pew study shows that 76% of Gen Zers are worried about climate change, with 37% saying it's their biggest concern of all.
Jennifer Bertling, who runs a TikTok account about her Chihuahua mix Milly, also thinks Gen Z is leading the charge. That said, she told HuffPost that her boomer parents practiced what might now be called underconsumption core, moving their family to a self-sustaining off-grid farm run entirely on wind and solar power on Canada's Prince Edward Island when Bertling was a teenager.
Now, living in Los Angeles with Milly, Bertling said she tries to live simply, and takes satisfaction in giving things a second life.
'Especially here in L.A., which is a transient city that people are constantly moving into and out of places, there's very little need to buy new,' Bertling said, adding that she's part of several local 'Buy Nothing' groups on Facebook.
'Another example is, my elderly neighbor was moving out and he told me his biggest fear was for his things to end up discarded on the sidewalk in a pile,' she said. 'I took a leather couch off his hands, and it brings me great joy to have given this couch another life.'
Bertling also tries to limit her food waste as much as possible, using leftover scraps to make vegetable or bone broth and freezing anything that's about to expire for a later meal. Even Milly still has the same blanket she got when she was first brought home.
'It's not aesthetic, but it's hers,' Bertling said in an 'Underconsumption Core: Dog Mom edition' video on TikTok.
Christina Mychaskiw, a content creator and co-host of the 'Sustain This!' podcast, said she appreciates the latest 'less is more' trend because she knows the toll that addictive shopping can take on young people.
Online, Mychaskiw is open about how difficult it was to get out from under her student debt because of her emotional spending habits. On her YouTube channel, she chronicled her 'no buy' year, a period when she only bought essentials: food and certain items of clothing when necessary.
In that year, she learned that, like many people, she was consuming more than she really needed, spending emotionally to relieve things like boredom, and shopping for an idealized 'fantasy' version of herself, rather than for who she was in the moment.
'I think this trend speaks to that,' Mychaskiw said. 'What you should be doing is curating your life with the things you love, buying things with intention and being mindful of what you bring in next.'
As underconsumption core has taken off, Mychaskiw thinks this aspect of the trend has gotten away from people. Some TikTok users are making it a competition about who can live the most bare-bones life.
'I've seen some videos of things where I'm like, 'Hm, maybe that's a fire hazard to not replace that thing,'' she said. 'There's a video of a woman sharing her sustainable life, and people were like, 'Well, your fridge is so full so you're not underconsumption core,' and 'You have kids so you're not underconsumption core.''
'We all have our version of how to be a better consumer,' Mychaskiw said. 'It's not about getting rid of everything for the sake of getting rid of things.'
Kosak agrees that just chucking all your stuff into a donation bin isn't the goal. Instead, she hopes people use the underconsumption core trend as a catalyst to examine their needs and gravitate toward pieces that are emotionally durable ― purchases that are meant to be cherished and kept, thus reducing consumption and waste of natural resources.
It's not necessarily easy to make that kind of shift in your relationship with shopping. But Kosak said it's worth it.
'We are constantly conditioned to compare ourselves to others, and on some level it's easier than looking inward for self-actualization,' she said. 'Whether it's a sweater that we see on an influencer or a new trend on TikTok, rather than jumping all in, I think it's always better to step back and ask yourself: 'What part of this is appealing to me, and why?''
Deinfluencing: The TikTok Trend Taking Influencers Down A Slippery Slope
This Insidious Spending Trend Is Probably Making You Lose A Lot Of Money
'It Doesn't Save Me Any Money': People Are Sharing The Frugal Lifestyle Tweaks That Simply Don't Work For Them

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What we know so far: Trump and Musk's spectacular public blowup rocks Washington
What we know so far: Trump and Musk's spectacular public blowup rocks Washington

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What we know so far: Trump and Musk's spectacular public blowup rocks Washington

President Trump's signature 'Big Beautiful Bill' has precipitated an epic fallout between the US president and one of his closest allies, billionaire Elon Musk. The blowup played out publicly on social media, with both men using their respective platforms, X and Truth Social, to exchange criticisms. Related: Eyes on Senate Republicans as Trump and Musk feud over tax and spend bill Here is a summary of how the rift unfolded, and what we know so far: Donald Trump kicked off the fight during an Oval Office meeting with German chancellor Friedrich Merz. Asked about Elon Musk's criticism of his 'Big, Beautiful Bill', the US president told reporters: 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more.' Trump told reporters he was 'very disappointed in Elon', telling them: 'He knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left. … He said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next, but I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Soon after Musk posted on X denying Trump's statement, beginning a flurry of posts that stepped up his feud with the president. Musk wrote: 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' He went on to claim that without him Trump would have 'lost the election' before bemoaning what he called 'such ingratitude'. The president followed up by , prompting a return threat from the SpaceX boss to decommission the Dragon spacecraft (which brought home astronauts stuck on the ISS for months), potentially throwing US space programmes into turmoil. Hours later Musk rescinded the threat. Musk also suggested Trump should be impeached and that JD Vance should replace Trump, warning that Trump's global tariffs would 'cause a recession in the second half of this year'. Musk went on to say on X the reason the had not released the files into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was because they implicated the president. The White House called the assertions an 'unfortunate episode'. Meanwhile, Steve Bannon, a longtime ally and Elon Musk critic, suggested there were grounds to deport the tech billionaire, who has US citizenship. Bannon told the New York Times: 'They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately.' The spectacular blowout between Trump and Musk sent Tesla shares into free fall. They The decline in Tesla's share price on Thursday knocked about $8.73bn off Musk's total net worth, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The reported $152bn drop also decreased the value of the company to roughly $900bn.

Musk backs down on threat to retire SpaceX Dragon spacecraft amid Trump dispute
Musk backs down on threat to retire SpaceX Dragon spacecraft amid Trump dispute

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk backs down on threat to retire SpaceX Dragon spacecraft amid Trump dispute

Elon Musk, the world's richest person, on Thursday said his company SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft after he engaged in an extraordinary public fallout with Donald Trump who had threatened to cancel government contracts with Musk's businesses. He later appeared to back down. 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,' Musk posted on the social media platform X, which he owns. A few minutes earlier Trump had posted on Truth Social – the media platform that he owns – that he might cancel huge lucrative contracts with Musk's businesses, which include the SpaceX company that is building a fleet of rockets. Related: Trump and Musk's very public feud is like Alien v Predator for political nerds 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Trump said. Nasa relies on SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft to ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS). Hours after issuing his threat, Musk appeared to take pleas from users on his social media platform X to 'cool down' and he posted: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' Since 2008, SpaceX has received more than $20bn in government contracts, largely from Nasa and the Department of Defense. In March, two Nasa astronauts returned to Earth in a Dragon capsule after being stranded on the ISS for nearly nine months, after their Boeing Starliner capsule faced technical issues and returned to Earth without them. The next SpaceX Dragon launch is scheduled to take place on 10 June. The Dragon is expected to carry four people to and from the ISS on Axiom Mission 4. Nasa's press secretary, Bethany Stevens, in a statement on X after Musk's announcement, said the agency 'will continue to execute upon the president's vision for the future of space'. Related: Trump v Musk: 10 ways they can further hurt each other 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met,' she added. Musk's announcement came amid an escalating dispute with Trump that began after he denounced the president's tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination'. Musk later accused Trump of 'ingratitude' for the millions he spent to get him elected. Trump, in turn, said he was 'very disappointed' in Musk. The president wrote earlier on Thursday that Musk was 'wearing thin' and that the tech billionaire 'went crazy' after he was asked to depart the White House last week as head of Trump's 'department of government efficiency' .

Trump and Musk's very public feud is like Alien v Predator for political nerds
Trump and Musk's very public feud is like Alien v Predator for political nerds

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump and Musk's very public feud is like Alien v Predator for political nerds

'Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy,' Donald Trump observed in the Oval Office on Thursday. 'They hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart. They don't want to be pulled. Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart.' The US president was referring to the war between Russia and Ukraine but could just as easily have been talking about himself. On Thursday, to the surprise of no one, Trump's bromance with the billionaire tech entrepreneur Elon Musk exploded in a very public feud. While the president urged his supporters to 'fight, fight, fight' last summer after he survived an assassination attempt, now that mantra is evocative of children on a school playground urging Trump and Musk to go at each other. For political nerds this is like Alien v Predator, Batman v Superman and King Kong v Godzilla rolled into one. It was always going to end this way for two megalomaniacs devoted to fame, money and the far right, neither of whom is unaccustomed to a messy divorce. Related: What we know so far: Trump and Musk's spectacular public blowup rocks Washington Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House of Representatives' judiciary committee, told reporters on Capitol Hill: 'I suppose it was in the stars. Everybody was predicting it when it first began. You've got two gentlemen with gargantuan egos and both appearing to suffer from malignant narcissistic personality disorder.' Trump-Musk had begun as the ultimate political marriage of convenience. Their interests converged last year when Musk saw in Trump a hammer against wokeness who could also benefit his businesses and help him reach Mars. The Tesla and SpaceX supremo leaped on stage with Trump, flooded the zone with Maga propaganda on his X social media platform and threw a record $277m behind his election campaign. The reward came with a seat among the oligarchs at Trump's inauguration, a seemingly permanent residency at Mar-a-Lago and a chainsaw in the form of the so-called 'department of government efficiency', or Doge. 'I love @realDonaldTrump as much as a straight man can love another man,' proclaimed Musk, who lorded it over cabinet meetings and in the Oval Office. Trump returned the compliment by turning the White House south lawn into a showroom for Teslas. The pair were as inseparable – and destructive – as Laurel and Hardy pushing a piano up a flight of stairs. Then came last Friday's amicable but peculiar parting, where Musk sported a black eye, brushed off reports of rampant drug taking, praised Trump's tacky gold decor in the Oval Office and was presented with a commemorative gold key. Comedian Jon Stewart quipped: 'Doge has finally rooted out one of America's least efficient government workers and marked him for dismissal.' On Tuesday, Musk waited until the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, was at the podium before unleashing an X barrage. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' he wrote, describing a Trump-based tax and spending bill in Congress as 'a disgusting abomination'. He followed up with three days of nonstop posts eviscerating the bill and urging Republicans to reject it. It was the point of no return. The transactional Trump-Musk relationship was on its way to turning septic, sour and rancorous. There are multiple theories as to why. The trouble began in March when it emerged that Musk arranged private Pentagon briefings on China policy without White House knowledge, a significant conflict of interest due to Musk's business ties in China. Trump was especially annoyed to learn about the briefings through the media, and about the perceived notion that Musk was using his position for personal advantage. Second, when Trump travelled to the Middle East, Musk was reportedly piqued that his arch-rival, Sam Altman of OpenAI, won a deal to build one of the world's biggest artificial intelligence data centres in Abu Dhabi. Musk worked behind the scenes to try to derail the deal if it did not include his own AI startup, according to the Wall Street Journal. Third, Musk was working at the White House as a 'special government employee', which is limited by law to 130 days; when Musk sought an extension, officials said no, perhaps because he had put so many backs up. Fourth, last Saturday Trump suddenly announced that he was cancelling the nomination of the Musk ally Jared Isaacman to be the administrator of Nasa. And fifth, there was the 'big, beautiful bill', currently navigating Republicans in the Senate. Musk said in social media posts that it would increase the already massive budget deficit to $2.5tn, undermining his work at Doge. Notably, it would also cut the electric vehicle tax credit that helps carmakers including Tesla. On Thursday, after days of uncharacteristic self-restraint, Trump struck back. He told reporters he was 'surprised' and 'very disappointed' by Musk's critiques of the bill, adding wistfully: 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more.' Musk returned fire on social media, writing: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51–49 in the Senate. Such ingratitude.' He also agreed with a social media post that called for Trump to be impeached and removed from office. The president replied on his own platform, Truth Social, that he in effect fired Musk. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' The mad men went nuclear. Trump threatened to cancel Musk's billions of dollars in government contracts, describing it as the easiest way to save money. Musk responded by linking Trump to the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' The economic burden of Musk's government contracts and the Epstein files allegations both existed before the breakup, but neither man spoke up. Now they seem to have taken a truth serum and discovered a conscience. Raskin observed: 'They basically converged around a common platform of plunder and pillage of the American people and now both of them are telling the truth about the other. It's a happy moment for America that we can finally get to the bottom of things like the Jeffrey Epstein files and all of the billions of dollars of government contracts that Elon Musk has.' Mutually assured destruction? Musk could try to use X to mobilise opinion against Trump and his 'big, beautiful bill'. He could also try to exploit the government's dependence on him. His threat, which he later retracted, to cut off Nasa's use of SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft would be a huge blow to the space programme. The Pentagon and intelligence agencies have also become reliant on SpaceX. Related: Trump news at a glance: President's union with Musk up in flames as feud publicly spirals Trump could follow through on his threat to cancel Musk's lucrative government contracts. He could reopen investigations into Musk's companies that were paused when Trump took office. The Trump ally Steve Bannon, whose extremist ideas have a habit of entering the Maga mainstream, called for the South African-born Musk to be deported and SpaceX to be nationalised. Even as Tesla shares lost $150bn in market value, Musk seems to be betting that he has gathered enough dirt on Trump to survive the information war. Trump, now making plenty of his own money from deals in the Gulf and elsewhere, seems to have decided that Musk has outlived his political usefulness. There is no threat to his command of the Republican party, where Musk is seen as something of an interloper. But what of the Democrats? For now they only have to get out of the way and gleefully watch the spectacle unfold. Some suggest an 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend' approach to Musk, whose money could swing elections in their favor. Others say a man who gave a Nazi-style salute on inauguration day, and whose Doge cuts have already caused deaths in the world's poorest countries, is beyond redemption. From this perspective, a nihilistic war between the world's most powerful man and the world's wealthiest man brings to mind former secretary of state Henry Kissinger's remark about the Iran-Iraq war: 'It's a pity they can't both lose.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store