Mass. lawyer and his wife say they were handcuffed, detained for hours at Canada border: ‘It was a shock'
Advertisement
Jessica Fakhry, right, poses with her sister-in-law, immigration lawyer Celine Atallah. Fakhry and her husband, Bachir Atallah, were detained at the Canadian border on Sunday for more than five hours as they were returning home to Massachusetts.
Josh Reynolds for The Boston Globe
The couple said they were led from their car to the CBP station in handcuffs, and had no idea how long they'd be in custody. Officers answered their questions with vague statements about how 'the government' needed to search them, Atallah said.
While being led down a hallway, Fakhry saw a pile of mattresses and feared they'd have to spend the night in custody.
Atallah's sister, immigration lawyer Celine Atallah, criticized what she said was 'not normal protocol' from CBP in an interview Wednesday.
'I believe CBP thinks they are above the law, but they don't have a blank check at the border,' said Celine, who has a law office in Methuen, and lives in Salem, N.H.
CBP Assistant Commissioner Hilton Beckham said Bachir Atallah's account of the couple's detainment is not accurate.
Advertisement
'The traveler's accusations are blatantly false and sensationalized,' Beckham said in a statement. 'CBP officers acted in accordance with established protocols.'
Celine Atallah said that while international travelers can be subject to more thorough secondary searches, she maintains that what happened to her brother was not 'routine security.'
A CBP spokesperson said Friday the couple was detained for less than four hours. Officials did not immediately comment on the couple's other allegations about their detention.
What happened to Bachir Atallah?
Bachir Atallah, a lawyer who became an American citizen in October 2012, was driving back from Montreal with his wife when CBP officers at the Interstate 89 border crossing in Vermont told them to get out of their car, he said. Atallah gave the officers his keys, not knowing he and his wife were about to be handcuffed, he said.
The couple were confused, but otherwise compliant as officers placed them in separate cells. But they began to worry when officers would not answer questions about why they were being held, Fakhry said.
Atallah said he reluctantly signed a form giving officers permission to search his phone and email. That was concerning, he said, because information from his legal clients must remain private.
Beckham,
in a statement Friday, said CBP officers 'worked to ensure an attorney-client privilege was respected during the electronic media search.'
Lawyer Bachir Atallah said he has been in the US lawfully since he was 14 years old. He became a US citizen in 2012.
Bachir Atallah
Sunday's detainment at the border did not feel like an isolated incident to Atallah. He was stopped three days later at Boston's Logan Airport and subjected to a secondary search before he boarded a flight to Lebanon to visit his parents.
TSA agents inspected 'every credit card and every business card' in his wallet, as well as all his other belongings one by one, Atallah said.
Advertisement
TSA's New England spokesman confirmed Atallah was 'selected for Secondary Screening' at Logan, but did not provide further details. The spokesperson said the additional screening lasted 20 minutes.
Atallah's wife and sister said they worried for his safety on Tuesday and Wednesday, while he
flew first from Boston to Istanbul, on the way to Beirut. They're even more concerned about his flight back home to the U.S. this summer, they said.
'I'm pretty sure CBP will be waiting for me,' Atallah said.
Wife was 'freezing cold' in cell
Fakhry, who got her green card four years ago and applied for US citizenship in November, said she felt like she was in a dream when she heard the click of handcuffs placed on her wrists Sunday, shortly after 4:30 p.m.
'When they did that to me, I thought, 'Oh my god, I can't believe this is happening,'' she said. 'It was a shock. I was frustrated, I was shaking.'
Bachir Atallah and Jessica Fakhry took a photo in downtown Montreal on Sunday, April 13, hours before they were taken into CBP custody at the border on their way back to Massachusetts.
Jessica Fakhry
Once in the cell, she was 'freezing cold,' shaking, and felt light-headed. She said
CBP officers had taken her jacket and wouldn't give it back. When she asked for something to keep her warm, an officer gave her a yellow plastic tablecloth, she said.
The couple's detainment comes a month after New Hampshire resident and green card holder Fabian Schmidt was
Husband's blood pressure spiked while he was detained
Like Schmidt, who was
Advertisement
An emergency medical responder came to the CBP station, took Atallah's blood pressure, and gave him an EKG test, which reported an abnormality, Atallah said.
Because Atallah's blood pressure of 153/112 meant he was at risk for a stroke, CBP officers said he could go to a hospital, according to documents — but would be returned to their custody afterward.
'I said, 'No, I'm not going, I don't want to elongate the process,'' he said.
During the five and a half hours Atallah and his wife were in custody, CBP officers did not tell him what they were looking for, even as they searched his phone,
he said.
'I got the impression that if I don't give them access to what they wanted to look for, they'd hold me indefinitely,' he said.
Detainment was not 'normal,' sister says
Celine Atallah said the family plans to file a lawsuit to ensure what happened on Sunday at the border doesn't happen again, especially given her brother's busy travel schedule.
Celine said it is normal for CBP officers to conduct secondary, in-depth searches, but she says what happened to her brother and his wife went beyond that.
'There was no reason for them to treat him that way, have all these officers around him like he's some sort of criminal,' said Celine. She described CBP's actions as 'harassment.'
Bachir Atallah said he supports President Trump's goals to deport undocumented immigrants who have criminal records. Those policies make the US safer, Atallah said. Still, he believes the way he and Fakhry were treated violated their rights.
'You just took my freedom away for five and a half hours,' he said of his experience at the border.
Advertisement
'I am a Republican, I believe in family values,' Atallah said. 'When it comes to immigration, I think maybe the intent is right, but they're handling things completely wrong.'
Claire Thornton can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Anti-ICE protesters express anger, heartbreak at Trump immigration crackdown
Hundreds of protesters waving American and Mexican flags and carrying signs that ranged from heartfelt to profane marched through downtown Milwaukee streets June 10 to protest federal immigration operations and decry the crackdown on demonstrations in Los Angeles by President Donald Trump's administration. The crowd made their way to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement offices. Those in the crowd said it was important to speak out and express their opposition to large-scale ICE arrests. Alan Chavoya, a protester with the Milwaukee Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression, said earlier in the day he fielded phone calls June 10 from several people hearing about ICE arrests in the area. "It's devastating," he said. "It's important to be out here and support, and it's also important to be bold about this." In the crowd were two 22-year-old women who met at the protest, Natalia Murillo, who draped a Mexican flag around her shoulders, and Alejandra Martinez. Murillo held a sign that read, "You can't love the culture and not support the people." "It's been stressful. You don't know when they're going to come into your cities and neighborhoods," Martinez said. Murillo said she was concerned about people being arrested by ICE who have legal status. "It's scary to see what's going on. We come here for a better life, and this is how we're getting treated?" she said. An arrest of an immigrant June 10 by federal agents on Milwaukee's south side added to a sense of anxiety in the city's Latino community over immigration enforcement operations. A spokesperson for ICE said the agency could not share information about whether agents were operating in Milwaukee. That arrest came as massive protests against recent ICE raids erupted in Los Angeles over the weekend and have since spread to other cities. Trump ordered National Guard troops to the Los Angeles area. The march in Milwaukee spanned roughly two city blocks and included dozens of young Latino adults as well as people from a range of ages and backgrounds. Some marchers held handmade signs that read, "We speak for those who can't" and, "Immigrants are welcome here." Other popular slogans urged authorities to keep families together, to keep ICE out of Milwaukee and to abolish the agency altogether. "No justice, no peace, we want ICE off our streets," marchers chanted. Signs and chants alike reflected the depth of anger at Trump's immigration crackdown and at ICE. Some posters referred to Trump as a parasite, or a pig. Others said "Dump Trump," and many chose similar phrases with expletives, in both English and Spanish. Rose Walters, a retiree from South Milwaukee, said she was "just livid" at several Trump policies. She was concerned about her Social Security benefits as well as immigration arrests that, in her view, lacked due process. She began attending protests for the first time in February. "I simply am fed up," she said. "It's ridiculous." Daniel Rivera, 27, of Michigan, was visiting Milwaukee and was walking past Cathedral Square Park when he noticed people were gathering for a protest about immigration. He jumped in because he he said feels strongly about the issue. "Immigrants are the backbones of this nation," he said, adding that more "dialogue across the aisle" was needed. There was a sense from several marchers that the Latino community's contributions and culture were being cast aside, and that politicians and pundits were conflating the entire community with the criminal actions of a few. A 40-year-old Milwaukee mother named Angelica, who asked for her last name not to be used, brought her two daughters and her niece to the protest. She wanted to stand up for Mexican Americans like her family, she said. And speaking about recent ICE efforts to expand arrests, she said, "It's heartbreaking. It causes me to question, what am I proud of as an American?" Nayleth Sedano, 30, of Milwaukee, arrived in the U.S. at age 4, and her family got legal status. She understands how "scary" moments like this can be for immigrant families. She has been especially concerned about the effect of that fear on children, who may be worried about ICE showing up at their graduation ceremonies. "If you have a heart, that's traumatizing for anybody," she said. The organizing groups included the Party for Socialism and Liberation's Milwaukee chapter; Comité Sin Fronteras, or "Committee Without Borders" — the young adult arm of local immigrant rights group Voces de la Frontera — Codepink Milwaukee, and 50501 Milwaukee, part of a national anti-Trump protest movement called 50501. The 50501 group, short for "50 protests, 50 states, 1 movement," is the organizer of the so-called "No Kings" rallies taking place across the country. One is scheduled for noon June 14 in Cathedral Square Park as part of a nationwide day of protest. Several additional "No Kings" protests are scheduled for the same day across southern Wisconsin, including in Brookfield, Cedarburg, Racine, Kenosha, Watertown and Madison, according to the organizer's website. They were planned to coincide with Trump's military parade in Washington, D.C., which is being held to honor the Army's 250th birthday and coincides with Trump's 79th birthday. Brian Dunleavy, a protester from Milwaukee, said he hopes both protests show that Milwaukeeans are standing in solidarity with others protesting around the country. 'I hope people see this and see (that) we've got your back," Dunleavy said. "We do not think what's going on in Washington and other parts of the country is OK, and we're going to be here for you." Sophie Carson is a general assignment reporter who reports on religion and faith, immigrants and refugees and more. Contact her at scarson@ or 920-323-5758. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Anti-ICE protesters in Milwaukee decry Trump immigration crackdown
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The White House Is Delighted With Events in Los Angeles
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. The last time President Donald Trump tried to send military forces into American streets to put down civil unrest, in June 2020, Pete Hegseth was positioned outside the White House with a Kevlar helmet and riot shield. Major Hegseth's mobilization as part of a District of Columbia National Guard unit summoned to restore order in the nation's capital, where protests had erupted following the police murder of George Floyd, occurred as Pentagon leaders scrambled to avert what they feared could be a confrontation between active-duty U.S. forces and their fellow Americans. Today, Hegseth is second only to the president in directing the administration's use of the National Guard and active-duty Marines to respond to unrest over immigration raids in Los Angeles. And this time, the military's civilian leadership isn't acting as a brake on Trump's impulse to escalate the confrontation. The Hegseth-led Pentagon is an accelerant. The administration's decision to federalize 4,000 California National Guard forces, contrary to Governor Gavin Newsom's wishes, and to dispatch 700 active-duty Marines to the Los Angeles area, marks a break with decades of tradition under which presidents have limited their use of the military on American soil. If there are any internal misgivings about busting through yet another democratic norm, they haven't surfaced publicly. Indeed, officials at the White House told us they are satisfied with the way the L.A. confrontation has unfolded. They believe that it highlights their focus on immigration and law and order, and places Democrats on the wrong side of both. One widely circulated photo—showing a masked protester standing in front of a burning car, waving a Mexican flag—has been embraced by Trump supporters as a distillation of the conflict: a president unafraid to use force to defend an American city from those he deems foreign invaders. 'We couldn't have scripted this better,' said a senior White House aide granted anonymity to discuss internal conversations. 'It's like the 2024 election never ended: Trump is strong while Democrats are weak and defending the indefensible.' Democrats, of course, take a different view, and say the administration's actions have only risked triggering further violence. Retired officers who study how the armed forces have been used in democracies told us they share those concerns. They point to the damage that Trump's orders could do to the military's relationship with the citizens it serves. 'We should be very careful, cautious, and even reluctant to use the military inside our country,' Bradley Bowman, a former Army officer who heads the defense program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracy, told us. Conor Friedersdorf: Averting a worst-case scenario in Los Angeles State and local authorities typically use law-enforcement personnel as a first response to civil disturbances or riots, followed by National Guard forces if needed. Retired Major General Randy Manner, who served as acting vice chief of the National Guard Bureau during the Obama administration, said the federalizing of California Guard forces—putting them under presidential rather than state control, a move allowed with certain limits—pulls those service members away from their civilian jobs and makes it harder to complete planned training or exercises. 'Basically, the risk does not justify the investment of these forces, and it will negatively impact on readiness,' Manner told us. Retired officers we spoke with also drew a distinction between the involvement of National Guard and active-duty forces. Whereas National Guard troops assist citizens after natural disasters and have the advantage of knowing the communities they serve, active-duty forces are primarily trained to 'see the enemy and neutralize the enemy,' said Mark Cancian, a retired Marine colonel now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'When you're dealing with U.S. citizens, no matter what they're doing, that's not the right mindset.' 'This is not Fallujah,' Bowman added. 'This is Los Angeles.' Juliette Kayyem: Trump's gross misuse of the National Guard This morning, Hegseth made his first congressional appearance since his bruising confirmation process, appearing before a House committee. His tone with Democrats was at times combative. When Representative Betty McCollum, a Minnesota Democrat, asked the defense secretary what the cost of the California deployment would be, he declined to provide a figure and instead pivoted to criticism of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz for the state's response to the violence that followed Floyd's killing in 2020. (Military officials said later they expected the Los Angeles deployment, as envisioned, to cost roughly $134 million.) 'If you've got millions of illegals, you don't know where they're coming from, they're waving flags from foreign countries and assaulting police officers, that's a problem,' Hegseth told lawmakers. Trump, for his part, told reporters that anyone who tries to protest at the Saturday parade celebrating the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army will 'be met with very big force.' He also said that he wouldn't hesitate to invoke the Insurrection Act, which would permit him to employ the military for law enforcement or to suppress a rebellion, if he believed that circumstances required. Speaking to troops at Fort Bragg in North Carolina later in the day, the president promised to stop the 'anarchy' in California. 'We will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean, and safe again,' he said. 'We will not allow an American city to be invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy.' Some Republicans have privately expressed worry that Trump may overplay a winning hand. Even in the West Wing, two people we spoke with tried to downplay the incendiary rhetoric from Trump and Hegseth. They stressed that, to this point, National Guard forces have been in a defensive posture, protecting federal buildings. Although they believe that Trump has the political advantage at the moment, they acknowledged there would be real risks if U.S. troops got involved in violence. 'We don't know who would get blamed but no one wins if that happens,' one senior aide told us. 'No one wants to see that.' Hegseth's support for using active-duty troops in Los Angeles stands in contrast to what his predecessor did in 2020. At that time, Defense Secretary Mark Esper, along with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Mark Milley, scrambled to block Trump's desire to employ active-duty forces against the demonstrators protesting racial violence. The president had mused about shooting protesters in the legs, Esper wrote later. To satisfy his boss while also avoiding a dangerous confrontation, the defense chief called active-duty forces from Fort Bragg to Northern Virginia but sought to keep them out of the fray. Tom Nichols: Trump is using the National Guard as bait In his 2024 book The War on Warriors, Hegseth described how his experience as a D.C. Guardsman in 2020 crystallized his views about the divide between military personnel and what he saw as the degenerate protesters who were lobbing bricks and bottles of urine at the citizen soldiers. When the D.C. Guard was again summoned seven months later, to help secure the 2021 inauguration following the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, Hegseth was told to stand down because fellow Guardsmen suspected that one of his tattoos was a sign of extremism. (Hegseth has maintained it is part of his Christian faith.) Hegseth was angered by his exclusion and resigned from the Guard. That experience remains with him as he attempts to reshape the military, and its role in society, in line with Trump's worldview. As he has written: 'My trust for this Army is irrevocably broken.' Article originally published at The Atlantic
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump calls LA protests a 'foreign invasion' as over 100 arrested
More than 100 people have been arrested in Los Angeles since Monday evening during protests against US President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, the local police department said on Tuesday. Some 96 people were taken into custody on Monday evening in the city centre of the Californian metropolis for failing to disperse from a prohibited gathering, the police said. According to reports, 14 others were arrested for looting, and three were taken into custody for resisting arrest, assault with a deadly weapon, or property damage. Two police officers were taken to hospital for medical treatment, but have since been released, the reports said. People have been protesting in Los Angeles for days against attempts by security forces to carry out immigration raids. US President Donald Trump has sent thousands of National Guard troops and 700 Marines to the city, claiming the situation is out of control. LA mayor declares curfew for downtown area In response to the protests, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass announced a curfew in downtown Los Angeles from 8 pm on Tuesday (0300 GMT Wednesday) until 6 am on Wednesday. "I have declared a local emergency and issued a curfew for downtown Los Angeles to stop the vandalism, to stop the looting," Bass told reporters at an evening news conference, noting significant damage to businesses and properties. "Law enforcement will arrest individuals who break the curfew, and you will be prosecuted," she added. Trump says LA is being invaded by a 'foreign enemy' Trump on Tuesday described the unrest in Los Angeles as an invasion by a "foreign enemy" during a speech at Fort Bragg military base in North Carolina. Addressing the ongoing protests in the city, he said demonstrators were "rioters bearing foreign flags with the aim of continuing a foreign invasion of our country." "What you're witnessing in California is a full-blown assault on peace, on public order, and on national sovereignty," Trump said. "We will not allow an American city to be invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy." He went on to describe the protesters as "animals" who "proudly carry the flags of other countries," but do not carry the US flag. Trump says he's open to using Insurrection Act Earlier on Tuesday, Trump said he is considering whether to invoke a 200-year-old law to deploy additional military forces in Los Angeles. Responding to journalists at the White House, Trump said he would consider invoking the Insurrection Act, an 1807 law that allows presidents to send troops to restore public order in certain emergency situations. "If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it," he stated. The protests appeared to cool off on Monday night, although Los Angeles police reported that "as demonstrators were being disbursed, agitators and miscreants within the crowd looted businesses and vandalized property." Critics including California Governor Gavin Newsom have accused Trump of inflaming the situation by sending troops. The costs of financing the existing deployment for 60 days have been estimated at $134 million by the Department of Defense. Without providing evidence, Trump also blamed "paid insurrectionists" for the violence in Los Angeles. "These are paid insurrectionists. These are paid troublemakers. They get money," he said. Trump further argued that the city "would be burning right now" if not for the troops he sent, comparing the situation to the fires that caused unprecedented damage earlier this year.
