Labour has launched a galling attack on nature
During the last Conservative government, it was common to hear the refrain that the prime minister of the day was waging a 'war on nature'. As someone who played a role in advising a string of environment ministers, I always thought that to be somewhat hyperbolic. I always admire the passion of campaigners, and I share with them a longing for our government to go further and do more for nature; but, at least until the last couple of years of Conservative government, I didn't think many of the criticisms were fair.
I'm starting to worry now, though, that we're living in an altogether different world. The new Labour government was elected on a promise to protect and restore nature. And yet here we are a year later wistfully contemplating those halcyon days when No. 10 was criticised for 'lacking ambition' on nature recovery. Seemingly every environmental protection in the statute book is under threat.
Nature is not voiceless in today's government.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Davy Russell dodges question 11 times in STV interview
Davy Russell, who snubbed a debate organised by STV's Scotland Tonight programme on Monday evening, instead took part in an individual interview with the broadcaster. The debate, which will air on STV on Monday evening, will only be attended by the SNP's Katy Loudon and Reform UK's Ross Lambie. READ MORE: Seven Scottish Tory councillors quit party as group 'collapses' Russell previously said he would not be attending the debate because he would rather be "knocking on doors" - despite the fact that the event is scheduled for 10.40pm. In an individual interview with STV journalist Colin Mackay ahead of the debate, Russell struggled to answer when asked about the failings of the current Labour Government. 🗳️Tonight we hear from five candidates in the Hamilton, Larkhall & Stonehouse Holyrood by-election. In recent Scottish opinion polls, there are six parties enjoying significant support. We invited their candidates to debate. Only two agreed to debate, and three took up the… — ScotlandTonight (@ScotlandTonight) June 2, 2025 Mackay asked Russell a total of 11 times whether the UK Government was right to scrap the Winter Fuel Payment. The Scottish Labour candidate did not answer and instead insisted that he wasn't involved in the decision and that he was running for a Holyrood election rather than Westminster. In a clip shared on social media, Mackay asked: "You're probably speaking to quite a lot of older people. Are you getting any anger from them that Labour have scrapped the Winter Fuel Allowance?" READ MORE: What to expect from The National as we cover Hamilton by-election this week Russell responded: "Yes, there is some concern, and Scottish Labour have said from day one that we will reinstate the Winter Fuel Allowance." Mackay then said: "But at Westminster you've scrapped it, so again, you'd have to mitigate what your Government did at Westminster." Russell replied: "But there were hard decisions to be made when the Labour Government came into power in Westminster." Mackay then asked Russell four times whether the Labour Government was right to scrap the Winter Fuel Payment. "They're hard decisions to take," Russell started to reply. Mackay then asked again: "Do you think they were right?" Russell responded: "Well, they were very hard decisions." Mackay asked: "Do you think they were right to do it? It was a hard decision, do you think they made the right decision?" Russell said: "Well, they took it based on the decisions, the circumstances they'd inherited." READ MORE: Nigel Farage hides from public and press in shambolic by-election campaign visit Mackay replied: "So you backed them? You backed the Chancellor, you back the Prime Minister on it?" Russell repeated: "They're very hard decisions." Mackay asked again: "And you back them?" Russell then paused for several seconds before saying: "I totally think that the decisions they had to make were based on the previous government's mismanagement of the country–" "And you backed them on it." Russell then paused again, before he started: "On the doorsteps here, people are–" "But you backed the Government. You backed the Prime Minister and the Chancellor. You can just tell me yes or no." "Well, I wasn't involved in the decision, and this is a Scottish Parliament election, right? "If I was a member of parliament then, I would have based it on the facts I had in front of me at the time." The interview comes as Prime Minister Keir Starmer was in Scotland for a defence announcement in Govan, although he did not take part in the by-election campaign in nearby Hamilton. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage was also in Scotland, visiting Aberdeen and Hamilton – where he avoided the public and the press after protesters tracked down where he was supposed to appear.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
How Harold Wilson helped shape modern Britain
Harold Wilson was prime minister from 1964 until 1970 and from 1974 until 1976. Picture:. | Getty Images He won more elections than Margaret Thatcher or Tony Blair, held his fractious party together in turbulent times and helped to reform and civilise Britain. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Harold Wilson - who died 30 years ago, on May 23, 1995 - was not always appreciated and sometimes maligned as a wily operator ..... But political leaders as diverse as Keir Starmer, Ed Miliband and Alex Salmond are said to have recognised him as a politician whose example they could learn from. Harold Wilson was prime minister from 1964 until 1970 and from 1974 until 1976. Picture:. | Getty Images Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad After working as an economist and statistician in the civil service, Wilson became an MP in the 1945 Labour landslide at the end of the Second World War. And two years later, at 31, he became the youngest Cabinet minister in the 20th century. He led Labour to a narrow victory in 1964 after 13 years of Tory rule, which ended in a mire of sleaze and scandal, and secured a much bigger majority two years later. With his trademark pipe and Gannex raincoat and his eagerness to harness the "white heat of technology", Wilson was seen as a man of the people for the modern age. And his government did indeed help to shape an updated Britain. In the 1960s, racial discrimination was rife, not least when it came to housing or employment. Wilson's government passed two Race Relations Acts to outlaw such practices. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Women were typically paid less than men and the government passed equal pay legislation to tackle the injustice. Wilson took a personal interest in setting up the Open University to make higher education accessible for all. And Labour moved the education system in England away from dividing children between grammar and secondary modern schools based on the 11-plus exam towards comprehensive schools. There was legislation to increase tenants' protection from eviction and appoint officials to assess fair rents. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Safety measures taken for granted nowadays were brought in under Wilson - namely, the breathalyser and the requirement for cars to be fitted with seatbelts. And the government also passed or helped to pass legislation to legalise abortion, abolish hanging, liberalise divorce laws and decriminalise homosexual acts between two consenting adults in private. And Wilson kept Britain out of the Vietnam war despite American pressure for UK troops to join the conflict. After losing in 1970, he went on to win two elections in 1974 and stepped down in 1976. Three decades after his death, Harold Wilson deserves to be remembered as a skilled and successful prime minister who made a positive and lasting difference.
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Scots would pay price for Nigel Farage's proposed funding shakeup
Nigel Farage wants to unleash economic chaos on Scotland. The Reform UK leader made it clear yesterday he does not agree with how public services north of the Border are currently funded. While the Clacton MP insisted he's committed to devolution, he said it was time the Scottish Government raised more of its own revenues. When pressed by the Record on whether he wanted to scrap the Barnett Formula, he admitted he thought it was out of date. The existing system determines the level of public spending in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Under it, extra funding – or cuts – from Westminster are allocated according to the population size of each nation and which powers are devolved to them. But there is a very simple reason why the Barnett Formula has survived for more than four decades. Providing basic public services such as schools and hospitals costs a lot more in rural areas than it does in cities. Scotland's Highland and island communities are relatively sparsely populated compared to the south-east of England, where population density is at its highest. Even the Conservative governments of David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson never dared to rip it up. Scrapping it could cost Scotland billions in funding and lead to brutal cuts to our treasured public services. Farage, yet again, showed why Scots should run a mile from his party. Not Putin up with it Keir Starmer's 'war readiness' defence review was good news for Scotland, the UK and the Western world. Vladimir Putin has shown he has never got over the break up of the USSR. Russia's invasion of Ukraine should have surprised nobody. Defence analysts fear Russia could seek to invade other countries and the West must be prepared. The Labour Government's spending review should be welcomed on a number of fronts. How Starmer plans to foot the bill is less obvious. When the public finances are as tight as they are, every decision has a cost – and pumping billions of pounds into defence will mean other areas lose out. Extra attack submarines, £15billion on nuclear warheads and thousands of long-range weapons will all make the UK safer. Increasing defence spending to 2.5 per cent of gross domestic should also set an example to other countries in NATO. Starmer's decision to launch the review at BAE Systems' shipyard in Govan in the shadow of Type 26 frigates being built there was symbolic. Scotland is central to meeting the UK's defence needs and the announcement should safeguard thousands of jobs.
