Sheilas' Wheels owner bought by Belgian insurer in £1.3bn deal
Belgian insurance giant Ageas has agreed to buy Esure, the UK-based owner of the Sheilas' Wheels brand, for £1.295 billion, it said on Monday.
Ageas said it had agreed a deal with Esure's owners, investment group Bain Capital, which will create the third-largest platform in the UK for personal lines such as motor and home insurance.
Hans De Cuyper, Ageas' chief executive, said the deal comes after several years of 'significant growth' in the UK market for the Belgian company.
Esure has undergone a turnaround in recent years, and made a trading profit of £127 million in 2024 compared to a loss the year before, while turnover grew by one-sixth to £1.1 billion.
It offers car and home insurance and has about two million customers, with Sheilas' Wheels and First Alternative as its leading brands.
The company went public in 2013, with a listing on the London Stock Exchange, before Bain bought it for £1.2 billion five years later.
The deal with Ageas is the latest in a period of consolidation in the UK insurance market, after Aviva agreed to buy Direct Line last year.
Ageas had also made two bids to buy Direct Line, which represented a similar opportunity to grow its exposure to the UK's personal lines insurance sector, but ultimately abandoned the effort in 2024.
The deal to buy Esure is expected to complete in the second half of this year, subject to regulatory approval.
Ant Middle, Ageas' UK boss, added: 'As demand for motor and home insurance grows, Ageas will be perfectly positioned to gain market share and become the insurer of choice for our existing and new customers.'
'We want to continue to grow our broker and partnerships personal lines business in the UK, and Esure will help us to rapidly expand our direct distribution, our customer reach, and our scale overall.
'Esure's technical capabilities will match Ageas UK's and will enable us to develop our well-balanced business at greater pace and serve a wider range of customers. We're really excited for the potential this brings our UK business and wider group.'
David McMillan, Esure chief, said the companies are 'two highly complementary businesses and creates an even stronger platform for continued innovation, growth and excellent delivery for our customers'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
32 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
We will do everything we can to save Alexander Dennis jobs, vows Swinney
The company announced on Wednesday it is proposing to consolidate its UK operations at a single site in Scarborough, North Yorkshire. The decision puts 400 jobs at risk at its facility in Falkirk in another blow to the Forth Valley, which has already seen more than 400 jobs go at the Grangemouth refinery this year. Speaking at First Minister's Questions on Thursday, John Swinney said he is 'deeply concerned'. John Swinney said the Scottish Government will support jobs at Alexander Dennis (Andrew Milligan/PA) He told the chamber: 'This issue has been occupying a great deal of the focus and the attention of the Deputy First Minister and I and the UK Government ministers since we became aware of the situation over the last few weeks, and then ultimately to the decision that was announced yesterday.' He said his Government has 'supported' the manufacturer. But Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar accused Holyrood ministers of overlooking Scottish industry in favour of ordering buses from China, while pointing to the order from Alexander Dennis of around 160 vehicles by the publicly-owned network in Greater Manchester. In Scotland, public service buses are procured by private operators, who then run them on routes across the country. Labour leader Anas Sarwar said the Government has not supported Scottish industry (PA) Mr Swinney said state aid regulations – in the form of the UK-wide Subsidy Control Act – prevent the Government from directly procuring from a single supplier like Alexander Dennis. He quoted a joint letter from the UK and Scottish governments, which pledged to 'work closely with Alexander Dennis at this challenging time'. He added: 'That's us indicating that we're keen to do everything we can to find a way through the Subsidy Control Act provisions, so the Government can continue to operate within the law, which we must do, but also, we can support manufacturing in Scotland, which is my priority.' Responding, Mr Sarwar said: 'If John Swinney can't figure out a way to order buses in Scotland, I suggest he picks up the phone to (Greater Manchester Mayor) Andy Burnham and see how he managed to do it. Greater Manchester's Bee Network buses were made at Alexander Dennis (PA) 'Almost five times as many bus orders from Manchester.' Mr Sarwar's claim stems from the second phase of the Scottish Government's green bus initiative ScotZEB, which ordered 44 buses from Alexander Dennis. However, according to a press release from the time, 137 buses were ordered from the firm in the first phase, amounting to a total of 181. In a statement, Mr Burnham – who has visited the Falkirk site – said: 'Our iconic Bee Network buses are a bit of Scotland right here in Greater Manchester. 'We have over 160 Alexander Dennis buses criss-crossing our city-region every day – connecting our communities to opportunity. 'If Greater Manchester can invest in world-class Scottish bus manufacturing, then why can't the SNP Scottish Government?'
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Tax hikes ‘almost certainly' to come if economy worsens, IFS says
The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) warned that further negative economic news will 'almost certainly' lead to more tax increases, putting pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves. Council tax is projected to rise at its fastest rate in 20 years, with potential annual increases of up to 5 per cent as local governments struggle to close funding gaps. The IFS suggested more people may be forced to pay higher income tax rates due to 'fiscal drag,' potentially generating an additional £10bn a year by 2029. Government sources did not deny the possibility of extending the freeze on tax thresholds, stating that future tax decisions will be made at the Budget. IFS director Paul Johnson criticised the Treasury for 'making up the numbers' and described Chancellor Reeves' recent speech as 'baffling,' while also expressing concerns about the cost of Labour's childcare promises.
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ben Wallace accuses Labour of ‘conning' public over defence spending boost claim
Former defence secretary Ben Wallace has branded Labour's claims that it has boosted military spending 'a con' after concerns were raised over how the figures are being calculated. The row has exploded following Rachel Reeves' spending review on Wednesday where she boasted that defence spending would be 2.6 per cent of GDP. But this included wrapping in security and intelligence spending for the first time. Earlier this year prime minister Sir Keir Starmer controversially slashed international aid to boost defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027, two years ahead of schedule. At the time he also promised it would rise to 3 per cent by 2034. However, since then the 3 per cent pledge has been qualified to 'if economic circumstances allow', while the new calculation on defence spending has left questions over whether the boost is as big as first claimed. According to the spending review, in 2027/28, Defence is £71bn and the security and intelligence is £5.1bn, making a combined total of 76.1bn, which was cited as '2.6 per cent of GDP.' However, the Tories noted that security and intelligence element equated to 0.186 per cent of that total GDP number as opposed to 0.1 per cent suggesting defence spending would below 2.5 per cent. Added to that there was nothing in the spending review about spending for the Chagos deal could cost as much as £30bn over 99 years, according to some estimates. Sir Ben Wallace, respected former Tory defence secretary who criticised his own government for not investing in the military enough, posted: 'As Rachel Reeves tries to con us all with her Defence GDP definition it is worth reading NATO's guidelines on what can count. 'If you claim other forces/police or intelligence you can only do so if, 'In such cases, expenditure is included only in proportion to the forces that are trained in military tactics, are equipped as a military force, can operate under direct military authority in deployed operations.'' He added: 'I'd like to be in the room when someone tells the workforce of MI6, GCHQ and MI5 they are about to be conscripted and go through military training .' Ms Reeves was challenged on LBC over whether her new calculations were 'trying to pull the wool over people's eyes.' She responded: 'No. Our commitment is to get to 2.5 per cent. We have not included all intelligence spending. We have [included some] under the Nato definition because obviously intelligence is an important part of our defence.' However, it was pointed out that according to its guidelines NATO defines defence spending as 'expenditure as payments made by a national government specifically to meet the needs of its armed forces, those of Allies or of the Alliance.' The explanation was not accepted by political opponents. Tory shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said: 'Labour promised to spend 2.5 per cent of GDP on Defence- but it already looks like they won't even deliver that- and that's before factoring in the potential cost of the Chagos settlement, which could strip hundreds of millions from the Defence budget in this spending review.'
