logo
US revokes nearly 1,500 student visas: Who are the targets?

US revokes nearly 1,500 student visas: Who are the targets?

Al Jazeera18-04-2025

Hundreds of students and recent graduates have seen their visas revoked by immigration officials since United States President Donald Trump took office for a second time on January 20, 2025, with several also arrested.
Many of the targets of the visa revocations and arrests are students who participated in pro-Palestine protests which erupted on campuses across the country in 2024 amid Israel's brutal war on Gaza. Others are individuals with more indirect links to Palestine – or those who have shown support for Gaza on social media.
The Trump administration alleges that these students spread anti-Semitism and pro-Hamas sentiment on campus – a claim students, lawyers and activists have all rebutted. Jewish activists and groups have been at the forefront of many of the most prominent protests in the US against the Gaza war.
Others have had visas removed after minor legal infractions – a speeding ticket or other traffic violations, for instance.
Here's what we know about the scale of visa revocations, the number of universities they span and some of the students who have been targeted:In late March, US Secretary of State March Rubio said the administration had revoked an estimated 300 student visas.
But the real number is higher – much higher.
Estimates vary. At the higher end is the American Immigration Lawyers Association's count, according to which more than 4,700 students have been removed from the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement-maintained database known as the Student and Exchange Visitor Information Systems (SEVIS).
Yet even more conservative tabulations point to a number comfortably more than 1,000. The National Association of Foreign Student Advisers (NAFSA) estimates that as of April 17, there are reports of about 1,400 students who now face deportation.
According to Inside Higher Ed, the US-based higher education publication, 1,489 students had lost their visas as of April 17.
According to Inside Higher Ed's count, more than 240 universities and colleges across the US have had student visas revoked.
Colleges affected include private universities such as Harvard and Stanford, large public colleges and institutions such as Ohio State University and the University of Maryland, as well as some small arts colleges.
The Trump administration claims it is trying to stop activists from taking over campuses.
'We are not going to be importing activists into the United States. They're here to study. They're here to go to class. They're not here to lead activist movements that are disruptive and undermine the – our universities,' Rubio said on March 28.
But many students have reported that they have had their legal status in the US terminated without any notice.
Several among them, like Mahmoud Khalil, Mohsen Mahdawi and Momodou Taal, were active on social media in pro-Palestine protests on campuses.
However, according to Mohammad Ali Syed, who leads an immigration practice group in Washington, DC, others have had visas revoked for past traffic violations or, in some cases, with no clear explanation.
'This widespread action has led to legal challenges and raised concerns about due process and the impact on US higher education institutions,' said Syed, who emphasised that international students ought to consult with immigration lawyers promptly to explore legal remedies and protect their rights.
'Students can file lawsuits in federal courts, asserting violations of due process and seeking to restore their legal status. For instance, students at Michigan universities have initiated legal actions against the Department of Homeland Security, alleging that their F-1 statuses were terminated without sufficient notice or explanation,' he said.
In urgent situations, he added, students may request temporary restraining orders (TROs) to prevent deportation and reinstate their status while legal proceedings are ongoing. Federal judges in states like Montana have granted such orders to protect students from immediate removal, he said.
'Many universities are actively assisting affected students by providing legal resources, liaising with federal authorities, and offering academic accommodations,' Syed said. 'For example, George Mason University has engaged with federal officials to understand the rationale behind visa terminations and is exploring legal options to support its international students.'
Hafsa Kanjwal, an associate professor at Lafayette College, a liberal arts college in Pennsylvania, says there is a large amount of fear and uncertainty on college campuses for both students and faculty. People are having to rethink travel plans in case they are not allowed back into the country.
'Some students and faculty don't have a place to 'go back' to, given the political turmoil in their respective places of origin,' she told Al Jazeera. 'While some colleges and universities are taking a more proactive approach, they are in the minority. It seems most campuses have not really provided reassurances to international students and faculty to address their concerns, especially around what kinds of accommodations will be made for them to address these changing developments.'
Another faculty member, a naturalised citizen at a state college who wished to remain anonymous due to any issues that may arise from him speaking freely, said international students are afraid.
Many of them – even those who have not staked out political positions publicly – are deleting their social media profiles and are terrified that some small mistake, anything they posted or said, might get them abducted and deported, ruining their education, he said.
'I remember being a green card holder and engaging in politics. We understood that as long as we remained within the bounds of the law, we had the right to express our opinions and engage in politics,' he recalled.
'I actively took part in [protests against] both the Afghanistan and Iraq wars and spoke openly against War on Terror policies like drone strikes,' he said. 'What the Trump administration wants to do is communicate to immigrants and international students that their rights here are in fact privileges and contingent on them staying in line, and more broadly they want to shut down pathways to immigration by targeting green card holders.
'At the same time, they see universities and colleges as bastions of liberal and left-wing politics and they want to leverage the politics around Palestine to discipline universities and force them to crack down on liberal and left content in classrooms,' he added.• Date of arrest: March 8
• Nationality: Algerian Palestinian
• Institution: Columbia University graduate
• Legal status in the US: Green card holder
• How was he arrested? Last month, ICE agents arrested Mahmoud Khalil, a recent Columbia University graduate who was the lead negotiator for Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD) during the campus protests last year. He was taken from his university-owned New York City apartment while his US citizen wife, Noor Abdalla, who is pregnant, recorded the arrest on her phone. This marked the first publicly known student deportation effort of its kind under the Trump administration.
A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, Tricia McLaughlin, alleged Khalil 'led activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organisation', but no evidence for this was provided. Abdalla said the agents did not show a warrant while making the arrest. Khalil was transferred to an ICE processing facility in Jena, Louisiana.
At the time of arrest, Khalil was a permanent resident with a green card. When the ICE agents were told that Khalil had a green card, they said this would be revoked.
• Charges: He is not known to have been charged with any crime.
However, Rubio posted the link to a news article about Khalil's arrest, captioning it: 'We will be revoking the visas and/or green cards of Hamas supporters in America so they can be deported.' Khalil's case has drawn widespread scrutiny as rights advocates accuse President Donald Trump's administration of cracking down on free speech and pro-Palestine activism under the guise of fighting anti-Semitism.
The administration is trying to deport Khalil under a rarely used provision of an immigration law that gives the secretary of state the power to remove any non-citizen whose presence in the US is deemed to have 'adverse foreign policy consequences'.
Khalil is being held at LaSalle Detention Center in Jena, Louisiana.
• Date of arrest: March 26
• Nationality: Turkish
• Institution: Tufts University
• Legal status in the US: Student visa
• How was she arrested? Security camera footage shows six individuals in plainclothes taking Ozturk into custody in late March near her apartment in Somerville, Massachusetts. Some of these officers were partially covering their faces. Ozturk had headed out alone to meet her friends for Iftar, the evening meal to break her Ramadan fast.
• Charges: She is not known to have been charged with any crime.
On March 26, 2024, Ozturk co-wrote an opinion piece for her university's student news website, the Tufts Daily, with four other students. In this piece, the authors criticised the institute's president, Sunil Kumar, who sent an email dismissing resolutions passed by the Tufts Community Union Senate, which called for the university to divest from companies linked to Israel and 'acknowledge the Palestinian genocide'.
Ozturk's lawyer, Mahsa Khanbabai, filed a petition in a Boston federal court, arguing that Ozturk had been unlawfully detained. As a result, US District Judge Indira Talwani ordered US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) not to move Ozturk out of Massachusetts without 48 hours' notice.
Despite this, Ozturk was moved to Louisiana within a day, according to her lawyer.
US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin wrote in an X post on March 26: 'DHS + ICE investigations found Ozturk engaged in activities in support of Hamas, a foreign terrorist organization that relishes the killing of Americans.' McLaughlin did not specify what these activities were.
As of April 18, Ozturk is in the ICE portal as a detainee in the South Louisiana ICE Processing Center.
• Date of arrest: March 17
• Nationality: Indian
• Institution: Georgetown University
• Legal status in the US: Student visa
• How was he arrested? He was arrested in the evening at his home in northern Virginia.
• Charges: He is not known to have been charged with any crime.
Department of Homeland Security Spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin attributed Suri's arrest to his 'spreading Hamas propaganda and promoting anti-Semitism'. She wrote on X: 'Suri has close connections to a known or suspected terrorist, who is a senior advisor to Hamas.'
Suri's wife, Mapheze Saleh, is a US citizen, she confirmed to Al Jazeera. In a post on X on February 13, the Israeli embassy in the US said that Saleh was the daughter of a senior Hamas adviser. Ahmed Yousef, a former adviser to assassinated Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh, confirmed to The New York Times that he is Suri's father-in-law.
On March 20, Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles of the Eastern District of Virginia Court halted Suri's deportation.
According to the ICE website, Suri is currently being held in the Prairieland Detention Center in Alvarado, Texas.
• Date of arrest: March 5
• Nationality: South Korean
• Institution: Barnard, a Columbia-affiliated undergraduate college
• Legal status in the US: Permanent resident
• How was she arrested? Chung was one of several students arrested by police officers for participating in a pro-Palestine protest.
• Charges: She is not known to have been charged with any crime.
She has sued the Trump administration in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York to avoid being deported. Her deportation was halted by US district judge Naomi Reice Buchwald.
• Nationality: Dual citizen of the United Kingdom and The Gambia
• Institution: Was a doctoral candidate in Africana Studies at Cornell University
• Legal status in the US: Student visa
• Charges: He is not known to have been charged with any crime.
He participated in pro-Palestine protests last year, during which he called on Cornell to divest from companies that sell weapons to Israel. Taal was suspended from Cornell twice last year for his participation in protest activities and encampment. He has not been arrested but believes the US government had attempted to arrest him.
Taal told Al Jazeera that he filed a lawsuit on March 8 alongside two other plaintiffs – a doctoral candidate and a Cornell professor who are both US citizens – after Khalil was arrested, against two Trump executive orders, including the one focused on university campuses.
On the morning of March 19, a day after a federal judge scheduled a hearing for Taal's lawsuit, Taal posted a written statement on X that 'unidentified law enforcement' had come to his home in Ithaca, New York. He added that later in the day, Cornell students saw additional law enforcement cars positioned at different spots near his residence, including on campus.
Taal left the US once his visa was revoked on March 14.
• Date of arrest: March 25, 2025
• Nationality: Iranian
• Institution: University of Alabama
• Legal status in the US: Student visa
• How was he arrested? Taken into custody from his home
• Charges: He is not known to have been charged with any crime.
The Department of Homeland Security stated the student visa was revoked and he was then arrested because he 'posed significant national security concerns'.
• Nationality: Indian
• Institution: Columbia University
• Legal status in the US: Student visa which has been revoked
• Charges: She is not known to have been charged with any crime.
On March 7, individuals claiming to be immigration agents came knocking on Srinivasan's university residential housing flat that she had lived in since 2021. The individuals said they planned to put Srinivasan through proceedings to remove her from the US, before eventually leaving.
On March 9, Columbia unenrolled Srinivasan as a student.
By March 11, Srinivasan had flown out of New York to Canada on a visitor visa to stay with her family and friends. Her lawyers informed ICE that Srinivasan had departed from the US.
• Date of arrest: March 13, 2025
• Nationality: Palestinian
• Institution: unknown
• Legal status in the US: Overstayed a student visa
• Charges: The DHS stated Kordia had overstayed her student visa, which had been terminated in 2022 'for lack of attendance'. In April 2024 she was arrested for her involvement in protests for Gaza at Columbia University.
• Nationality: Chinese
• Institution: Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
• Legal status in the US: Student visa which was revoked
• Charges: No known charges have been made.
On April 3, Liu's college ran a routine check on his legal status and discovered that his student visa had been revoked without notice.
The next day, the university informed him he could not continue with his computer science doctorate.
Liu says he has not been charged with any crime and did not take part in any protests.
He sued the US government along with the American Civil Liberties Union of New Hampshire, alleging his visa had been revoked 'without any notice and sufficient explanation'.
On April 9, a federal judge in New Hampshire halted the decision temporarily, saying she would block the Trump administration's apparent revocation of Liu's status.
• Date of arrest: April 14, 2025
• Nationality: Palestinian
• Institution: Columbia University
• Legal status in the US: Green card holder
• How was he arrested: Mohsen Mahdawi was detained on Monday as he attended an interview at an immigration office regarding his application for citizenship, according to his lawyers.
• Charges: He is not known to have been charged with any crime.
Shortly after Mahdawi's detention, District Judge William Sessions ordered that he must not be taken from the state of Vermont or the US. Mahdawi is the co-founder of a Palestinian student group at Columbia University, alongside Khalil.
It is unclear where he is being held.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump-deployed National Guard arrives in LA to crush immigration protests
Trump-deployed National Guard arrives in LA to crush immigration protests

Al Jazeera

time4 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Trump-deployed National Guard arrives in LA to crush immigration protests

US National Guard soldiers have begun deploying on Los Angeles streets after United States President Donald Trump sent in 2,000 troops in a bid to suppress protests against a wave of federal immigration raids in the region, sparking a sharp rebuke from California's Democratic leadership. Troops were seen early Sunday at the federal complex in downtown Los Angeles, including around the Metropolitan Detention Center, which has been a flashpoint over the past two days. The deployment follows intense confrontations between demonstrators and federal agents near a Department of Homeland Security facility in Paramount, a city south of Los Angeles with a large Latino population. The clashes erupted after federal authorities carried out mass arrests in several locations, including the city's fashion district and a Home Depot store. More than 100 people have been detained over the past week, according to immigration officials. During Saturday's confrontation, agents fired tear gas, stun grenades, and pepper balls, while protesters responded with rocks and debris. Fires burned in the streets as tensions spiralled. 'This deployment of National Guard troops was done in a very unusual manner,' said Rob Reynolds, Al Jazeera's senior correspondent reporting from Los Angeles. 'Usually, the National Guard presence is requested by the governor of a state. In this case, Trump went around [California Governor Gavin] Newsom using a different provision of the law that allows him to nationalise the State National Guard and call it out in cases of insurrection against the United States government,' said Reynolds. Newsom, who has long been at odds with Trump, condemned the move as 'inflammatory' and warned it would only make the situation more combustible. 'They want a spectacle. Don't give them one,' Newsom posted on X. He accused the administration of using heavy-handed tactics to provoke unrest and distract from its controversial immigration agenda. Trump has denounced the protests as 'a form of rebellion'. 'There has long been a sense of antagonism between Trump and the state of California in general and also particularly against Newsom, who Trump refers to on social media by the somewhat juvenile nickname of Gavin New Scum. He was brandishing that nickname on social media earlier today,' Reynolds noted. The White House defended the decision, saying the Guard was being sent to 'address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester.' The last deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles was in 1992, during the rioting triggered by the brutal police beating by white officers of Black motorist Rodney King, which was caught on video. Robert Patillo, a civil and human rights attorney, called the president's move to bypass the governor and call in troops as 'unprecedented' in recent history. 'Normally, if federal troops are going to be used inside of states, it's going to be at the invitation of the governor of that state. For example, in 1992, the California governor invited federal troops in to put down the LA riots. But if the governor, such as Gavin Newsom, has not asked for federal troops to come in, and these troops are coming in against his will, then there will be challenges,' he said. In Compton, another site of protest, a vehicle was set alight, while in Paramount, hundreds of demonstrators rallied near a doughnut shop as police erected barriers of barbed wire. The protests extended into the night, with crowds also returning to federal buildings in central Los Angeles. Police later declared an unlawful assembly and began making arrests. In a further escalation, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth warned that active-duty Marines based at Camp Pendleton were on high alert and could be mobilised if unrest continues. Progressive Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders said the Trump order captured 'a president moving this country rapidly into authoritarianism' and 'usurping the powers of the United States Congress'. Several Republican leaders voiced their support for the involvement of the National Guard.

The real reason why Israel is arming gangs in Gaza
The real reason why Israel is arming gangs in Gaza

Al Jazeera

time7 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

The real reason why Israel is arming gangs in Gaza

For months, Israel and its defenders have insisted that Hamas is stealing humanitarian aid. They used that claim to justify the starvation of two million people in Gaza – to bomb bakeries, block food convoys and shoot desperate Palestinians waiting in bread lines. We were told this was a war on Hamas and ordinary Palestinians were just caught in the middle. Now we know the truth: Israel has been arming and protecting criminal gangs in Gaza that engage in stealing humanitarian aid and terrorising civilians. One group led by Yasser Abu Shabab, which is reportedly linked to extremist networks and has engaged in a variety of criminal activities, is directly receiving weapons from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government. And Netanyahu is proudly admitting to it. 'What's wrong with that?' he said when confronted. 'It saves the lives of [Israeli] soldiers.' What's wrong? Everything. This isn't just a tactical decision – it's an admission of true intent. Israel never wanted to protect Palestinian civilians. It wants to break them. Starve them. Turn them against each other. Then blame them for the resulting chaos and suffering. This strategy isn't new. It's colonialism 101: create anarchy, and then use it as proof that the colonised cannot govern themselves. In Gaza, Israel isn't just trying to defeat Hamas. It's trying to destroy any future in which Palestinians might govern their own society. For months, Western media repeated the unverified claim that Hamas was stealing aid. No evidence was shown. The United Nations repeatedly said there was no proof. But it didn't matter. The story served its purpose – it justified the blockade. It made starvation look like a security tactic. It made collective punishment look like policy. Now the truth is out. The gangs terrorising aid routes were the ones Israel supported. The myth has collapsed. And yet where is the outrage? Where are the stern statements from the governments of the United States and United Kingdom – the same ones who claimed to care about humanitarian delivery? Instead, we are getting silence. Or worse – a shrug. Netanyahu's open admission isn't just arrogance. It's confidence. He knows he can say the quiet part out loud. He knows Israel can violate international law, arm criminal gangs, bomb schools, starve civilians – and still be welcomed on the world stage. Still receive weapons. Still be praised as an 'ally'. This is what total impunity looks like. And this is the cost of believing Israel's PR machine – of letting it pose as a reluctant occupier, a humane military, a victim of circumstance. In truth, it's a regime that doesn't just tolerate war crimes – it engineers them, funds them and then uses them as propaganda. It's not just a war on Palestinian bodies, homes or even survival. It's a war on the Palestinian dream – the dream of ever having a state, of building a future with dignity and self-determination. For decades, Israel has systematically worked to prevent any form of cohesive Palestinian leadership. In the 1980s, it quietly encouraged the rise of Hamas as a religious and social counterweight to the secular Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO). The idea was simple: divide Palestinian politics, weaken the national movement and fragment any push for statehood. Israeli officials believed that supporting Islamist organisations in the occupied West Bank and Gaza would create internal conflict among Palestinians – and it did. Tensions between Islamist and secular groups grew and resulted in clashes on university campuses and in the political arena. Israel's policy wasn't driven by a misunderstanding. It was strategic. It knew that empowering rivals to the PLO would fracture Palestinian unity. The goal wasn't peace – it was paralysis. That same strategy continues today – not just in Gaza but in the occupied West Bank too. The Israeli government is actively dismantling the Palestinian Authority's (PA's) ability to function. It withholds tax revenues that make up the majority of the PA's budget, bringing it to the brink of collapse. It protects settler militias attacking Palestinian villages. It conducts daily military raids in PA-administered cities, humiliating its forces and making them look powerless. It blocks international diplomatic efforts by the PA while mocking its legitimacy. And this policy doesn't stop at the boundaries of the occupied territory. Inside Israel, Palestinian citizens face a similar tactic: intentional neglect, impoverishment and engineered chaos. Crime is left to spiral out of control in their communities while infrastructure and services are underfunded. Their economic potential is stifled – not by accident, but by design. It's a quiet war on Palestinian identity itself: a strategy of erasure that aims to turn Palestinians into a silent, faceless minority stripped of rights, recognition and nationhood. By engineering instability and then pointing to that instability as proof of failure, Israel writes the script and blames us for living it. This is not just military policy – it's narrative warfare. It's about ensuring that the Palestinian people are forever seen not as a nation striving for freedom but as a threat to be contained. Israel thrives on chaos because chaos discredits Palestinian agency. It allows Israel to say, 'Look, they can't govern themselves. They only understand violence. They need us.' It's not just brutal. It's deeply calculated. But Gaza and the West Bank are not a failed state. They are places that have been systematically denied the chance to become one. Gaza is my home. It's where I grew up. It's where my family still clings to life. They deserve better – better than a colonial regime that bombs them, starves them and funds the very people stealing their food. The world must stop treating Gaza and the West Bank as testing grounds for military doctrine, propaganda and geopolitical indifference. The people of Palestine are not a failed experiment. They are a besieged people, relentlessly denied sovereignty. And still, they try – to feed their children, bury their dead and remain human in the face of dehumanisation. If Netanyahu's government can admit to arming criminal gangs and still face no consequences, then the problem is not just Israel. It is us – the so-called international community that rewards cruelty and punishes survival. What's needed – urgently – are concrete actions to protect Palestinian lives and safeguard the right to Palestinian statehood before it is erased entirely. Threats to recognise a Palestinian state just won't do. If the world continues to look away, it's not only Palestine that will be destroyed – it's the very credibility of international law, human rights and every moral principle we claim to stand for. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store