Australian accused in mushroom murders trial disputes accounts of fatal lunch
An
Australian
woman
accused of the murder of three elderly relatives of her estranged husband
by feeding them poisonous mushrooms has disputed accounts of the fatal lunch given by other witnesses, a court heard.
Erin Patterson (50), is charged with the July 2023 murders of her mother-in-law Gail Patterson, father-in-law Donald Patterson and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, along with the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson, Heather's husband.
The prosecution accuses her of knowingly serving the guests death cap mushrooms as part of a Beef Wellington at her home in Leongatha, a town of about 6,000 people some 135km from Melbourne.
She
denies the charges,
which carry a life sentence, with her defence calling the deaths a 'terrible accident'.
READ MORE
On Ms Patterson's third day of cross-examination, prosecution lawyer Nanette Rogers asked whether she had lied about serving herself on a plate of a different colour from those of her guests, which the prosecution says she did to avoid the poison.
'I suggest that this description that you gave to the jury of the plates you used at the lunch is a lie. Correct or incorrect?' Ms Rogers said.
'Incorrect,' the accused replied.
In his evidence, Ian Wilkinson, the sole surviving guest from the lunch, whose recovery took months in hospital, had said Ms Patterson served herself on a plate of a different colour.
Ms Patterson's estranged husband, Simon Patterson, previously testified that Heather Wilkinson had remarked on the different coloured plates before she died.
Erin Patterson also disputed an account by her son, who said in his evidence he had not seen her repeatedly visit the bathroom as a result of also becoming sick after the meal.
The defence's decision to call Erin Patterson as a witness has re-ignited interest in the trial that began in late April.
Media have descended on the town of Morwell where the trial is being held, about two hours east of Melbourne.
State broadcaster ABC's daily podcast on the trial is currently Australia's most popular, while many domestic newspapers have run live blogs.
Ms Patterson is currently in her sixth day of giving evidence and her third day of cross-examination by Ms Rogers.
The prosecution rested its case on June 2nd after a month of evidence from relatives and medical, forensic and mushroom experts.
The trial, expected to conclude this month, continues.
(c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
10 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Woman accused of poisoning in-laws denies using different coloured plate to avoid deadly mushrooms
Alasdair Pal An Australian woman accused of the murder of three elderly relatives of her estranged husband by feeding them poisonous mushrooms, yesterday disputed accounts of the fatal lunch given by other witnesses, a court heard. Erin Patterson (50) is charged with the July 2023 murders of her mother-in-law Gail Patterson, father-in-law Donald Patterson and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, along with the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson, Heather's husband.
Irish Times
17 hours ago
- Irish Times
Jozef Puska's sisters-in-law could not have known about murder when they burned clothes, court hears
Jozef Puska's sisters-in-law could not have known and did not believe he murdered Ashling Murphy when they burned the clothes he was wearing at the time he murdered the schoolteacher, defence lawyers have told the Central Criminal Court . Lawyers for Jozefina Grundzova (32) and Viera Gaziova (40) delivered their closing speeches to a jury on Tuesday afternoon. The two women are on trial with their husbands, Marek Puska (36) and Lubomir Puska jnr (38). Jozef Puska, a brother of Marek and Lubomir jnr, murdered Ms Murphy (23) on January 12th, 2022 by stabbing her on the canal towpath outside Tullamore, Co Offaly. Marek and Lubomir jnr are on trial accused of withholding information relating to the murder while Ms Grundzova and Ms Gaziova are accused of impeding Puska's apprehension or prosecution by burning his clothes. READ MORE All accused have pleaded not guilty to all charges. They were all living with Puska, his partner Lucia, and 14 children at Lynally Grove, Mucklagh, Co Offaly when the offences are alleged to have occurred. The trial heard that in a statement to gardaí, Ms Gaziova said that on the night of the murder, Lubomir jnr and Marek spoke to Puska in his bedroom and afterwards, Lubomir jnr told her that Puska had 'confessed that he killed a girl'. Paul Murray SC, for Ms Grundzova, on Tuesday told the jury that for his client to be guilty, the jury must be satisfied that she knew what Puska had done when she helped Ms Gaziova to burn the clothes. Counsel told the jury that 'hindsight is a wonderful thing' but they must look at the circumstances in the Puska household in the immediate aftermath of the murder. When his client burned Puska's clothes, she did not have any of the evidence that would later prove his guilt, Mr Murray said. The nub of the prosecution case, counsel said, is that Ms Grundzova knew or believed Puska to be guilty of the murder at a time when gardaí had arrested a different person. Mr Murray asked the jury to return a verdict of not guilty. Prosecutor Anne Marie Lawlor SC previously told the jury that all the accused knew what Puska had done shortly after 9.30pm on the night of the murder. She said Jozef told Lubomir jnr and Marek, who then relayed it to the others in the house. Ms Lawlor said the only reason for the withholding of evidence or burning of clothes was that they didn't want Puska to be apprehended or prosecuted for murder. Damien Colgan SC, for Ms Gaziova, told the jury that the 'crux of the case' is whether his client knew that Puska had stabbed Ms Murphy. Her view at that time, Mr Colgan said, was that Puska had been the victim of an assault. When she was told what Puska had said he did, she didn't believe it because she 'didn't believe Jozef was capable of killing anybody'. Kathleen Leader SC, for Lubomir jnr, said her client delayed but did not withhold information. She said he had a reasonable excuse for the delay and asked the jury to consider the 'natural sense of protection for his younger brother'. She said it is understandable he was reluctant to accept his brother had 'committed a truly horrific murder'. Ms Leader said that by January 18th, Lubomir jnr was 'squarely supporting the prosecution', telling them everything he knew. Ms Leader said the law does not require people to be 'superhuman' as she asked the jury to acquit her client. Ms Justice Caroline Biggs has begun her charge to the jury and will continue tomorrow.
Irish Times
17 hours ago
- Irish Times
US woman awoke in Boston hotel to ‘somebody on top' raping her, jury in Dublin firefighter trial told
The Boston woman who claims she was raped by a Dublin firefighter told a US court she woke up in a hotel room to find 'somebody on top of her' raping her. The 29-year-old attorney testified for a second day in the trial of Terence Crosbie (39) in Suffolk superior courthouse in Boston on Tuesday. She claimed she was raped by Mr Crosbie, who was visiting the US city with the Dublin Fire Brigade, while his colleague slept in a shared hotel room. Mr Crosbie (39) was arrested on rape charges over St Patrick's Day weekend last year. He denies the charges and has pleaded not guilty. READ MORE His accuser previously testified to meeting Liam O'Brien at The Black Rose bar on March 14th, 2024. Mr O'Brien and Mr Crosbie had flown into Boston with their fire brigade colleagues to march in Boston's St Patrick's Day parade. The complainant testified on Tuesday that she didn't know Mr O'Brien was sharing a room when she returned with him from the bar to the Omni Parker House hotel after an evening of dancing. She testified that she and Mr O'Brien had consensual sex and then she went to the bathroom. When she came back from the bathroom, she said Mr O'Brien was asleep 'taking up the majority of the bed' and was snoring loudly, so she slept in the other bed, getting under the covers naked with the bathroom light still on. She told the court in tears that she 'woke up to somebody on top of me' and they were raping her. 'This person was taller than Liam and was not bald and I could hear Liam snoring,' she said. The trial had previously heard that Mr O'Brien, unlike Mr Crosbie, was bald. She testified that Mr O'Brien snored 'continuously' throughout the alleged assault. She testified that the man, later identified as Mr Crosbie, also disparaged Mr O'Brien while assaulting her. She claimed that while Mr Crosbie was having sex with her, he said: 'I know you want this; [Mr O'Brien] can't even do this for you – what a loser.' 'What are you doing?' she said she asked Mr Crosbie when she realised what was happening. 'I also did say: 'Stop!'' she told the court. She said she felt Mr Crosbie's weight on top of her and tried to get away, eventually managing to manoeuvre her legs off the side of the bed and break free. She testified that Mr Crosbie continued to follow her around the hotel room, trying to kiss her. She said she was able to collect her clothes and went to the bathroom. Mr Crosbie tried to get in and 'was jiggling the handle' after she locked the door, she told the court. She then left the hotel and texted a friend at 2:18am about the alleged assault , according to testimony. 'I hate everyone,' she wrote. 'What the f**k is wrong with people.' She told her friend that she woke up and a guy was having sex with her, 'telling me I wanted it and telling me how pathetic it was that his friend couldn't give that', the court heard. She then walked home and took an Uber taxi to a hospital. On cross-examination by Mr Crosbie's defence team, she was asked about her level of intoxication, psychiatric medication and alleged discrepancies in her accounts to medical staff, law enforcement and the grand jury. Defence attorney Daniel C Reilly asserted that she walked rather than ran out of the hotel, as stated previously. The woman replied that this was a 'figure of speech'. Mr Reilly questioned the complainant repeatedly about her accounts of the lighting in the hotel room and noted that her testimony did not include details about the defendant's birthmarks or tattoos. 'But again, you didn't notice any body marks or tattoos,' Mr Reilly said. 'I was trying not to look,' the complainant said. The trial continues in Boston.
