logo
Kepler Capital Keeps Their Buy Rating on Ferretti S.p.A. (9638)

Kepler Capital Keeps Their Buy Rating on Ferretti S.p.A. (9638)

In a report released on May 30, Niccolo Guido Storer from Kepler Capital maintained a Buy rating on Ferretti S.p.A. (9638 – Research Report), with a price target of €3.80.
Confident Investing Starts Here:
Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions
Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter
Guido Storer covers the Consumer Cyclical sector, focusing on stocks such as De'Longhi S.p.A., EssilorLuxottica SA, and Safilo Group SpA. According to TipRanks, Guido Storer has an average return of 15.2% and a 54.61% success rate on recommended stocks.
The word on The Street in general, suggests a Moderate Buy analyst consensus rating for Ferretti S.p.A. with a HK$37.81 average price target.
The company has a one-year high of HK$26.70 and a one-year low of HK$17.70. Currently, Ferretti S.p.A. has an average volume of 49.06K.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wells Fargo faces another scandal (along with other big banks)
Wells Fargo faces another scandal (along with other big banks)

Miami Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Wells Fargo faces another scandal (along with other big banks)

Big banks seem to get away with everything short of murder. Considering how regulated they supposedly are, you'd think they'd be a little more careful about how they do business. But that's not the case. Just look at some of the transgressions banks have been busted for in the last couple of years. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Take overdraft fees. Did you know that even if an overdraft occurs due to the bank's own processing error, they will sometimes charge the customer a fee? Banks have also been able to charge multiple fees for a single overdraft transaction - in other words, if you make one mistake, you can be charged multiple times. Banks have also been busted for using customers' personal information to conduct unauthorized credit checks and even open new, aka fraudulent, accounts without the customer's permission. Sometimes they get a proverbial wrist slap - usually in the form of a lawsuit - but too often even after they're forced to pay huge settlements they carry on, bad business as usual. Related: 'Rich Dad Poor Dad' author makes dire prediction, warns on 401(k)s Among the latest troubling practice banks are getting busted for is alleged unlawful harassment related to debt collection. If you happen to live in California, Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, or Texas, you might have the right to fight back against your bank for debt-collection harassment and even get compensated for it. Enter the lawyers. So when was the last time you ignored a call from an unknown number? Probably within the last hour. But what happens when those calls come repeatedly and they happen to be from a debt collector, including a bank or credit card company? And what if the calls are about debt that isn't even yours but belongs to a relative? From student loans to credit cards, banks and debt collections have ramped up their "outreach" in recent years. But there is a difference between collecting on a debt and hassling someone over the phone, especially considering sometimes the debt doesn't even belong to the person getting the calls, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). In some cases, people report getting calls about debt owed by people they don't even know. Related: Credit cards are about to get more expensive Part of the problem is that the calls often come from robocall systems that don't give you a way to opt out of receiving the call. Here's the bottom line: If debt collectors won't leave you alone, even after you've told them to stop, you might be able to do something about it. Under federal law, debt collectors can't harass you. But the states listed above go further, offering additional protections and giving consumers the right to sue for damages. That means you don't have to keep explaining that "the person you're looking for doesn't live here." You don't have to keep hitting "decline." You don't have to just live with it. More on credit cards: Chase revokes a major privilege customers love in 'calculated' moveHow much credit card debt does Americans have on average Dave Ramsey shares important advice about your credit card If you think a debt collector has violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), you can sue them for damages. And if you prove a violation occurred, you may be awarded $1,000 in damages, plus additional compensation for any actual harm they caused. If you win, the collector may also be responsible for paying your lawyer fees and costs. There are lawyers who specialize in this type of lawsuit, but you can also go to court without a lawyer, according to the CFPB. Banks have been sued over these kinds of practices in the past, and lost. Capital One and Wells Fargo have both reached multimillion-dollar settlements after being accused of making robocalls without consent. Navient has faced legal action from both states and borrowers over aggressive tactics tied to student loan debt. In fact, class action lawsuits have become one of the most powerful tools consumers have to hold companies accountable, especially when it comes to abusive or misleading debt collection practices. These lawsuits often end in payouts for eligible consumers, and force companies to change how they operate - at least temporarity. Individuals who have received harassing, abusive or otherwise unlawful debt collection calls may be eligible to join ongoing investigations into these alleged practices if they have come from the following: American ExpressChase BankComenityCredit OneSynchronyWells FargoNavient (student loans)Bank of AmericaCapital OneCitibankDiscoverGoldman Sachs Related: Legendary diner featured in Visa commercial closes after 40 years The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

After bankruptcy, beloved retailer gives key update on its future
After bankruptcy, beloved retailer gives key update on its future

Miami Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

After bankruptcy, beloved retailer gives key update on its future

Tears streamed down many girls' eyes upon discovering that their beloved retailer's legacy would most likely not live on to allow future generations to experience the same joy they once did. This retailer rose to fame among girls and young women due to its wide range of trendy clothing at incredibly affordable prices. From a simple weekend brunch outfit to many memorable homecoming dresses, it became the go-to shopping spot for all fashion necessities. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Unfortunately, Forever 21 filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2019, which led it to close multiple stores. It was later acquired by Sparc Group, a joint venture between Authentic Brands Group, Simon Property Group (SPG) , Brookfield Asset Management, and Shein. Related: When you'll see empty retail store shelves due to tariffs However, this relief didn't last long since the retailer filed for bankruptcy for the second time in March this year, citing growing competition from e-tail giants, rising costs, and economic challenges as the main reasons. As a result, the retailer liquidated all its U.S. stores to prepare for closures but kept its e-commerce platform and international locations open while it finds a new buyer. Image source: Bloomberg/Getty This second filing may have led many to believe Forever 21 was forever gone. However, the retailer shocked fans across the globe over the weekend by posting an unexpected update about the future of its business on its Instagram account. "Forever 21 isn't going anywhere and we are still committed to bringing you the styles you love. Right now, we're evolving refreshing and building what's next," the company shared in the post. Related: Aldi acquires multiple locations from bankrupt retail chain The retailer ended the statement with a hopeful message to all shoppers. "We get that change can feel unexpected, but we're excited for what's ahead, and we'll be sharing more with you soon. Thanks for sticking with us, you're the heart of everything we do." Loyal fans and users quickly bombarded Forever 21's Instagram comments section to express their reactions to the shocking update. A loyal fan commented, "Thank God!! Tell me why I teared up when I thought you guys were gone. Your store was the epitome of my childhood. So many important events were spent at your store... from looking for high school dance dresses, to college formals, even dates and outings!" Another user commented, "I love this brand. Please bring it back. You were the best." More Retail News: Popular fast-food burger chain to open first store in new marketWalmart makes deal to open popular food chain in storesAfter 58 years, beloved Italian restaurant closing, no bankruptcy However, some netizens weren't as happy about the news, with many commenting on losing their jobs after the mass store closures. A user commented, "Give me my job back then, or since you're clearly making money, you can afford to pay us severance." One called out the retailer, commenting, "If you aren't going anywhere, where did you go when you fired and let go a bunch of employees and closed stores? Are you coming back? No you aren't." Another netizen proposed a lawsuit, commenting, "I think all ex-employees should file a class act. Maybe they'll understand the 'buzz' then." A user had an opposing thought, commenting, "I know we put blame on companies... but how many times are we actually going into stores to make purchases? I do the same, but we gotta start shopping in stores so both employees can have jobs and stores stay open." Related: Amazon's prime customers face price hikes, product shortages The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Ripple's $1.5 billion escrow stands out as XRP turns 13​​
Ripple's $1.5 billion escrow stands out as XRP turns 13​​

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Ripple's $1.5 billion escrow stands out as XRP turns 13​​

Ripple's $1.5 billion escrow stands out as XRP turns 13​​ originally appeared on TheStreet. As part of its monthly practice, Ripple has recently escrowed nearly 680 million XRPs (approximately $1.5 billion) into escrow wallets, as monitored by Whale Alert's on-chain activity tracking. The two notable transactions on June 1 consisted of a $1.03 billion XRP transfer (470 million XRPs) and a $437 XRP transaction (200 million XRPs); both token transactions have amounted to Ripple's traditional way they restricting supply. Interestingly, XRP Ledger's native token, XRP, has just turned thirteen years old as of June 2, 2025. The purpose of these escrows is to provide predictability and transparency for the XRP circulating supply. Ripple utilizes approximately 1 billion XRP each month from a portion of the escrow to meet operational needs, such as institutional partnerships, and returns the remainder to escrow. However, analysts typically consider large re-escrow events as neutral to bearish in the short term, as they inadvertently create recent fear and selling pressure when analyzing a gigantic transfer of escrowed tokens. According to reports, XRP's last one billion escrow transaction resulted in a significant price drop of approximately 24% in XRP price. At press time, XRP is trading at $2.14, down by over 7% in the last 24 hours, as per Kraken's price page. This aligns with the bearish sentiment following escrow transfers. According to XRPScan, Ripple holds a sizable portion of the total XRP supply. Ripple holds control (whether through escrow or direct access) over at least 36–39% of XRP, which is consistent with earlier estimates of 45–55% ownership (including both accessible but unescrowed Ripple holdings). This has also included a series of doubts among XRP holders. As per a Reddit discussion in r/Cryptocurrency, one user wrote, "Now, they claim that the XRP they get from these wallets, they sell to fund operations and the rest goes back into escrow,' the user added. 'What stops them from not doing that? How do we know that they are actually using the sold tokens to fund operations? They answer is we don't. It relies on Trust and not Code." However, Ripple Labs has defended itself in 2024, saying, 'Ripple has consistently returned the majority of XRP released each month back into new escrow contracts' in their market report. Ripple's $1.5 billion escrow stands out as XRP turns 13​​ first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 2, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 2, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store