
How The New York Times Handles Photography and Visuals
Our photojournalism follows the same guidelines and rules as for text. As we state in our Ethical Journalism Handbook, 'any published images that readers or viewers will understand as depictions of real events or situations must be genuine in every way.'
That means we do not pose or rearrange subjects, or blur, retouch or digitally manipulate the image. We capture scenes as they are happening, without any intervention from the photographer.
Here's how Times photographer Ruth Fremson explains it:
I consider it a privilege when someone allows me into their life and trusts me enough to photograph them. In return I owe them the utmost respect in how I present them to our audience. As a photojournalist I am forbidden from altering a news situation, such as prompting people to do something or moving things around. In short, I don't interfere with the events I'm photographing. Portraits are the exception. They are a collaboration between the photographer and the subject. There, I will guide or coach the subject into specific poses and settings to create the final result.
We do crop photos and sometimes make minimal adjustments to color to ensure we are accurately reproducing the image.
Videography follows the same rules, and when we source photos or video from social media or other platforms we use extensive digital investigative methods to make sure they are real and accurate.
We do not use artificial intelligence to manipulate photos or videos or use the technology to generate images to represent real events or situations. When we publish images created by A.I., we note clearly how they are made.
(Here's more about how The Times uses A.I. technology in its journalism.)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
39 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Santa Clara, an Alumnus Would Like a Word
Four generations of Corrigans have been educated by the Jesuits at Santa Clara University. Naomi Epps Best's expose of her graduate class was gobsmacking, sordid and sad ('Santa Clara University's Crazy Idea of Human Sexuality,' op-ed, June 7). I applaud her for courageously revealing the profane underbelly of the 'critical theory' method of teaching. She has helpfully revealed what is happening behind the portieres in these classrooms. As William F. Buckley Jr. relayed in his seminal book 'God and Man at Yale' (1951), 'the alumni haven't the slightest idea what is going on' at these schools. That raises the question: What role do I have in what is taught on campus? Buckley again chimes in about alumni, writing that the school 'is glad to settle for their money and to eschew their counsel.' Here's the deal: No voice, no money.


News24
2 hours ago
- News24
‘Good news story': Unaids applauds South Africa's leadership amid US funding cuts
Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once. Show Comments ()


Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
IDF gives inside look at its strikes on Iran
All times eastern FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: Army showcases materiel ahead of 250th birthday celebration