logo
Paul Durcan, Irish poet who examined the Troubles and gave intense public readings

Paul Durcan, Irish poet who examined the Troubles and gave intense public readings

Yahoo19-05-2025

Paul Durcan, who has died aged 80, was a prolific and popular poet whose work was often marked by a reaction against authority and intolerance, which he found both in his relationship with his father and in his native Ireland.
Although his poetry reveals a profound love of both, he could be unsparing of his targets, which he could attack with scathing satire as well as affection.
A poem from Daddy, Daddy (1990), a collection that won the Whitbread Poetry Award, has both at once, as Durcan recalls 'the battle' to persuade his father to buy him a copy of Joyce's Ulysses when he was a teenager. John Durcan, the senior circuit court judge of County Mayo, declared (in the poem 'Ulysses', at least): 'I'll not be party to subsidising that blackguard / Bringing works of blasphemy into this house.'
Other poems respond in a direct, personal way to acts of terror and to the intransigence of the church. Durcan found himself enthralled by a sermon in 1986, but recoiled when it ended with a plea to vote against divorce in the forthcoming referendum. His own marriage had recently broken down, which led him to reflect: 'I have come into this temple today to pray / And be healed by, and joined with, the Spirit of Life, / Not to be invaded by ideology.'
Of self-styled liberators, he was directly damning. One poem, 'In Memory of Those Murdered in the Dublin Massacre, May 1974,' endsy evoking 'An explosion of petals, of aeons, and the waitresses too, flying breasts and limbs, / For a free Ireland.' He commemorated the victims of the 1998 Omagh bombing by reciting their names, then their ages, then their home towns, and concluding with a line addressed to the killers, 'I cannot forgive you.' He would broadcast these words later, aiming them straight at Gerry Adams of Sinn Fein.
But it was his confessional tone as much as his declamatory commentary on the Troubles that made him public property. He could use the rhythms of poems to pace his pieces as if they were short stories, some of which are outlandish fantasies, but others intimate, real and vivid.
His work appeared in rapid bursts – rather than emotion recollected in tranquillity, they can seem like notes on unfolding situations – and what his collections may at times lack in editing and polish, they gain in immediacy. In this he owed perhaps as much to Allen Ginsberg's hectoring use of repetition as he did to the refrains of Irish poems and melodies. It made his readings, during which he could appear to be meditating or delving into memory, especially intense.
Paul Durcan was born in Dublin on October 16 1944, the son of Justice John Durcan and his wife Sheila. Through his mother he was descended both from Maud Gonne, the muse of WB Yeats, and from John MacBride, who was executed for his part in the Easter Rising of 1916. Although Durcan would remember his father as an engaging raconteur, he would also recall being beaten from the age of 10 if he came lower than third in exams.
He began to study Law and Economics at University College, Dublin, but this effort to please his father was outweighed by Durcan's growing interest in poetry. The rift between them reached a crisis point when Durcan was 19 and a doctor persuaded his father that he should be institutionalised.
The family achieved this by ambushing Durcan in a pub on Merrion Street: two relatives entered, and a third caught him as he tried to escape by the back door. Taken home, he was given the first of many injections, and then sent to Harley Street. For the next three years, he was in and out of mental hospitals. He endured 27 rounds of electroconvulsive therapy, and later considered himself lucky to have been spared a lobotomy.
In 1966, he settled in London, where he worked for the Gas Board. He met his future wife, Nessa O'Neill, at the wedding of the poet Patrick Kavanagh; the two poets had become friends after Kavanagh wrote an enthusiastic review of Durcan's first published work, Endsville (1967, co-written with Brian Lynch). Durcan remembered finding in Kavanagh a merry wit on which few others had commented.
Durcan and Nessa O'Neill married in 1968. They settled in Cork in 1970, with their two daughters; Durcan resumed his studies, and gained a first-class degree in Archaeology and Medieval History. Nessa became a teacher in a prison in Cork, and Paul contributed a column to the Cork Examiner. The marriage broke down in 1984.
He was soon in demand internationally as a performer; trips to Russia and Brazil were particularly fruitful, not least because he could assess Ireland's relative place in the world. In the shadow of a statue of Stalin, he comments, 'We Irish have had our bellyful of blat / And blarney, more than our share / Of the nomenklatura of Church and Party…'
His outrage at authoritarian figures led him to praise strong women, and not only his mother, wife and daughters. He was an enthusiastic supporter of Mary Robinson's campaign to become President of Ireland, and wrote poems praising her.
Unlike the poets of the North, who would often find slanted ways to convey truths about the Troubles, Durcan addressed them with an open-eyed horror. Even when the island was at peace, though, he found aspects of it to ridicule. Poems from the early years of this century skewer the chattering classes, or the financiers who were responsible for the yo-yoing of the country's economy. Later collections mock Dubliners who find it easier to jet to Nice rather than drive to the south coast, or imagine a WB Yeats shopping centre.
He would explain in interviews that his traumatic experiences with doctors earlier in life left him with melancholia and depression, and much of his poetry can be seen as an expression of this. But time tempered it: he came to express an awareness of how horrible his ideas could be.
His responses to the world remained intimately bound up with his own private world: just as his relationship with his father was rooted in an Ireland in which Durcan found oppression and hypocrisy, he could see how his relationship with his mother, in her last years of dementia, could suggest parallels with an increasingly strange and frightening background.
In one poem, he sits with her as they watch news of the planes attacking the World Trade Centre: the poem reproduces the psalms and nursery rhymes that feel like a response that is at once natural and unnatural.
For a while, he found paintings a useful stimulus: he produced a volume of poems through which he imagined his way into the paintings of the National Gallery in London, Give Me Your Hand. Previously, he had curated an exhibition of paintings in Dublin, but still found opportunities to mock his commissioners: he has a guard muse about those around him, 'They scamper off for their coleslaw. / Punters scoff a lot of coleslaw in the National Gallery of Ireland.'
He is survived by two daughters and a son.
Paul Durcan, born October 16 1944, died May 17 2025
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alliance leader says abuse ‘unacceptable' as colleague targeted
Alliance leader says abuse ‘unacceptable' as colleague targeted

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Alliance leader says abuse ‘unacceptable' as colleague targeted

Alliance Party leader Naomi Long has described homophobic abuse that one of party colleagues was subjected to as 'despicable'. Earlier this week Stormont Agriculture Minister Andrew Muir said he had experienced 'vile homophobic comments' and spoke out about misogynistic remarks directed at some of his officials, as well as racism against workers in the agri-food sector recently on social media. It comes during heated opposition from the farming community to Mr Muir's proposed Nutrients Action Programme 2026-2029 which is currently out for consultation. Mr Muir has been urged to scrap the proposals which are aimed at improving water quality and the wider environment by reducing and preventing pollution caused or induced by nutrients from agricultural sources. Opponents say the proposals could devastate agriculture, reduce livestock numbers and undermine food security. Speaking to media in Belfast on Wednesday, Ms Long urged constructive engagement around policy. 'I think it's despicable that any politician in any role is subjected to the kind of abuse, threat, intimidation that we see commonplace now being directed at politicians, and what Andrew has been subjected to in particular is appalling and unacceptable,' she said. 'People have a right to disagree with Andrew's policy, they have a right to disagree with his direction of travel as minister, they do not have a right to harass, intimidate, threaten and abuse him, and there needs to be a clear line drawn between the two. 'A constructive engagement around policy, around practice, is entirely reasonable. Abuse is unacceptable.' Speaking in the Assembly on Tuesday, Mr Muir contended there is 'a lot of misinformation' around the proposals, adding that social media commentary has been 'disgraceful'. 'There's been misogynistic comments against officials in my department,' he said. 'There's been racist comments in relation to people that we are very, very fortunate to have working within our agri-food sector. 'And not for a very long time have I seen such vile homophobic comments about myself. 'I am a gay man, and I am proud to be a gay man, and it has no relevance whatsoever to the Nutrients Action Programme nor my ability to do this job.' Disappointment was expressed at the social media comments referred to across the chamber, including from Opposition leader Matthew O'Toole, Sinn Fein MLA Aoife Finnegan, UUP MLA Robbie Butler and DUP MLA Trevor Clarke, who said opposition to the programme 'should not be personalised against anyone'.

Gerry Adams criticised for ‘chilling' comments after libel win against BBC
Gerry Adams criticised for ‘chilling' comments after libel win against BBC

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Gerry Adams criticised for ‘chilling' comments after libel win against BBC

Gerry Adams has been criticised for 'chilling' comments made following his legal victory against the BBC. The corporation was ordered to pay the former Sinn Fein leader €100,000 (£84,000) by the High Court in Dublin after a jury ruled that it had libelled him. A 2016 episode of the BBC's Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, alleged that Adams sanctioned the killing of Denis Donaldson, a Sinn Fein official who was unmasked as a British spy. The jury also found the BBC's actions were not in good faith and it had not acted in a fair and reasonable way. Adams's legal team said the verdict was 'full vindication' for their client, while the BBC warned that the implications were 'profound'. Seamus Dooley, the Irish secretary of the National Union of Journalists (NUJ), said it would make journalists 'pause for reflection'. He told RTE's This Week programme: 'The first thing we should say is Gerry Adams was entitled to take his case. 'But it does have profound implications for the practice of journalism and I think it has implications both in terms of defamation law but also for me in terms of journalism in Northern Ireland and the relationship between Sinn Fein and journalists in Northern Ireland.' Speaking outside court on Friday, Adams said the case was 'about putting manners on the British Broadcasting Corporation'. He added that the BBC 'upholds the ethos of the British state in Ireland, and in my view, it's out of sync in many, many fronts with the Good Friday Agreement.' Mr Dooley said: 'I found that a chilling comment actually. He referred to putting manners on the BBC, to me that means putting them back in their box. 'The reality is that Spotlight has, for over 40 years, done some of the most amazing investigative journalism. 'Margaret Thatcher tried to ban Spotlight because of their coverage of [the] Gibraltar Three, they exposed Kincora at the heart of the British establishment, recently they did work on 'Stakeknife', and in fact the Sinn Fein mayor of Derry led the campaign to save BBC Radio Foyle news service. 'I found the attitude quite chilling but also unfair and unreasonable in the circumstances.' Mr Dooley said Adams was a figure of 'huge significance' to journalists, historians and academics, and had 'influenced the shape of history of Northern Ireland'. He added: 'On that basis, any journalist has a right, any academic, to question and probe.' Mr Dooley said the case underpinned the need for a review of defamation laws in Ireland. He added: 'First of all we need to look at the defence of honest opinion and how you square that circle in the context of journalists' right to protect sources, it is a real difficulty. 'For many years the NUJ was in favour of retaining juries. I have now reached the conclusion in defamation cases that juries are not appropriate. One of the reasons is we will never know why the jury reached this decision. 'If, as in Northern Ireland, had Adams taken his case in Northern Ireland, the case is heard before judges, you have the benefit of a written judgment, you have the benefit of a detailed explanation of the reason why a verdict is given. That provides an insight and a guide. Here, we don't know.' Mr Dooley also pointed out that proceedings in the case had been running since 2016. Mr Donaldson was shot dead in Co Donegal in 2006, months after admitting his role as a police and MI5 agent over 20 years. In the Spotlight programme, broadcast in September 2016, an anonymous source, given the pseudonym Martin, claimed the shooting was sanctioned by the political and military leadership of the IRA and that Adams gave 'the final say'. In 2009, the dissident republican group the Real IRA claimed responsibility for the killing and a Garda investigation into the matter remains ongoing. Adams had described the allegation as a 'grievous smear'.

Gerry Adams' ‘putting manners on BBC' remark ‘chilling', NUJ man says
Gerry Adams' ‘putting manners on BBC' remark ‘chilling', NUJ man says

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Gerry Adams' ‘putting manners on BBC' remark ‘chilling', NUJ man says

Gerry Adams' claim that his libel case against the BBC was about 'putting manners' on the broadcaster has been described as 'chilling' by a senior union figure. Seamus Dooley, the Irish secretary of the National Union of Journalists (NUJ), also said the high profile case showed the need for reform of Ireland's defamation laws, saying the public would never know why the jury made its decision. Former Sinn Fein leader Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement. A jury at the High Court in Dublin awarded him 100,000 euro (£84,000) when it found in his favour on Friday, after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. It also found the BBC's actions were not in good faith and the corporation had not acted in a fair and reasonable way. Mr Adams' legal team said the verdict of the jury was a 'full vindication' for their client while the BBC said it was 'disappointed' with the outcome. Mr Donaldson was shot dead in Co Donegal in 2006, months after admitting his role as a police and MI5 agent over 20 years. Mr Dooley told RTE's This Week programme that it was a verdict which would make journalists 'pause for reflection'. He said: 'The first thing we should say is Gerry Adams was entitled to take his case. 'But it does have profound implications for the practise of journalism and I think it has implications both in terms of defamation law but also for me in terms of journalism in Northern Ireland and the relationship between Sinn Fein and journalists in Northern Ireland.' Speaking outside court on Friday, Mr Adams said taking the case was 'about putting manners on the British Broadcasting Corporation'. He added: 'The British Broadcasting Corporation upholds the ethos of the British state in Ireland, and in my view it's out of sync in many, many fronts with the Good Friday Agreement.' Mr Dooley said: 'I found that a chilling comment actually. He referred to putting manners on the BBC, to me that means putting them back in their box. 'The reality is that Spotlight has, for over 40 years, done some of the most amazing investigative journalism. 'Margaret Thatcher tried to ban Spotlight because of their coverage of Gibraltar Three, they exposed Kincora at the heart of the British establishment, recently they did work on Stakeknife, and in fact the Sinn Fein mayor of Derry led the campaign to save BBC Radio Foyle news service. 'I found the attitude quite chilling but also unfair and unreasonable in the circumstances.' Mr Dooley said that Mr Adams was a figure of 'huge significance' to journalists, historians and academics and had 'influenced the shape of history of Northern Ireland'. He added: 'On that basis, any journalist has a right, any academic, to question and probe.' He said the case underpinned the need for a review of defamation laws in Ireland. He said: 'First of all we need to look at the defence of honest opinion and how you square that circle in the context of journalists' right to protect sources, it is a real difficulty. 'For many years the NUJ was in favour of retaining juries. I have now reached the conclusion in defamation cases that juries are not appropriate. 'One of the reasons is we will never know why the jury reached this decision. 'If, as in Northern Ireland, had Mr Adams taken his case in Northern Ireland, the case is heard before judges, you have the benefit of a written judgment, you have the benefit of a detailed explanation of the reason why a verdict is given. 'That provides an insight and a guide. 'Here we don't know.' Mr Dooley also pointed out that proceedings in the case had been running since 2016. Former Sinn Fein member Mr Donaldson was shot dead in Co Donegal in 2006, months after admitting his role as a police and MI5 agent over 20 years. In the Spotlight programme broadcast in September 2016, an anonymous source given the pseudonym Martin claimed the shooting was sanctioned by the political and military leadership of the IRA and that Mr Adams gave 'the final say'. In 2009, the dissident republican group the Real IRA claimed responsibility for the killing and a Garda investigation into the matter remains ongoing. Mr Adams had described the allegation as a 'grievous smear'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store