DOGE Says US National Science Foundation Canceling Over $325 Million in DEI Research
The National Science Foundation (NSF) has canceled hundreds of millions of dollars in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) grants under the Trump administration, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) said in an April 26
'Great work by @NSF canceling 701 wasteful DEI grants ($203M in savings), including 'Building Racial Equity in Marine Science.' This brings the total to over $325M saved in the past 2 weeks.'
NSF terminated a $20,000 'management development' contract for training course materials related to 'understanding bias to unleash potential,' said another DOGE
The NSF is an independent federal agency supporting science and engineering that issues grants for research purposes. The foundation's investments account for roughly 25 percent of the federal support received by U.S. colleges and universities for basic research.
The agency
The foundation clarified its priorities in an April 18
Related Stories
4/25/2025
4/25/2025
NSF's Broader Impacts
In its statement, which was updated on April 25, NSF said that activities undertaken to fulfill the Broader Impacts criteria should aim to create opportunities for 'all Americans everywhere.'
'These efforts should not preference some groups at the expense of others, or directly/indirectly exclude individuals or groups,' it said. Research projects that are 'limited to subgroups of people based on protected class or characteristics do not effectuate NSF priorities.'
'Awards that are not aligned with NSF's priorities have been terminated, including but not limited to those on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and misinformation/disinformation.'
The DEI Purge
The NSF's decision to ditch DEI aligns with President Donald Trump's presidential order 'Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing,' signed on his
In the action statement, Trump ordered the termination of 'all discriminatory programs, including illegal DEI and 'diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility' (DEIA) mandates, policies, programs, preferences, and activities in the federal government, under whatever name they appear.'
Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) criticized NSF for terminating grants related to DEI and 'misinformation/disinformation,' according to an April 18
'The American people deserve a scientific enterprise free from political interference, where expert scientists and engineers participate in a merit-based review process to recommend the most innovative and promising research proposals,' she said.
'The American people do not want a system where politicians, be they in the Senate or in the White House, decide which scientific projects to fund or defund based on their biases.'
NSF's grant terminations come as its director Sethuraman Panchanathan
The agency is also currently undergoing an internal overhaul, including laying off staff members and imposing travel restrictions.
Republicans have accused NSF of leftist bias. In February, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) released a database of over 3,400 grants issued by the foundation during the Biden administration totaling over $2.05 billion in federal funding, according to a Feb. 11
The funding was used for 'questionable projects' that promoted DEI or pushed 'neo-Marxist class warfare propaganda,' said the statement.
Among the grants included a 2022 award of $401,744 to San Jose State University to train teachers and students as 'climate justice action researchers and change agents,' a grant of $99,791 to the Georgia Institute of Technology for a project to address 'racialized privilege in the STEM classroom,' and over a $1 million to Northwestern University in 2023 to reimagine STEM education through the framework of 'racial equity.'
'DEI initiatives have poisoned research efforts, eroded confidence in the scientific community, and fueled division among Americans,' Cruz said at the time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Raskin takes swipe at Trump over price of military parade, GOP megabill
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) slammed President Trump for his Saturday military parade, which is expected to cost millions of dollars. 'As tanks roll down PA. Ave and planes streak above, remember this is all courtesy of the taxpayers,' Raskin wrote in a post on the social media platform X. 'Maybe there will be goodie bags for 14 million people who used to have Medicaid,' he added, referencing Medicaid cuts in the president's spending bill. The celebratory event held in honor of the Army's 250th birthday also coincides with the president's 79th birthday. The parade plans, which feature the public display of tanks and weapons from World War II, are expected to cost between $25 million and $45 million, according to the Army. 'It's a surprise party! Most people's spouse or family pay for theirs, but—surprise!—you're paying for Donald Trump's $45 million 79th birthday military parade,' Raskin wrote on Saturday. For months, Raskin and other Democrats have rebuked the Trump administration for the House-approved GOP spending bill that would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt while locking out some Medicaid recipients with new work requirements. Republicans have lauded the bill for its extensions to Trump's 2017 tax cuts and $1,000-per-baby investment accounts . The president has suggested that tariffs will mitigate a significant rise in the national debt while encouraging patrons to honor the country's history of servicemembers in the Army during the military parade hosted on Flag Day. 'OUR GREAT MILITARY PARADE IS ON, RAIN OR SHINE. REMEMBER, A RAINY DAY PARADE BRINGS GOOD LUCK. I'LL SEE YOU ALL IN D.C.' Trump wrote in a Saturday Truth Social post. Sixty-four percent of Americans disapprove of the use of state funds for this weekend's military parade, according to results from a NBC Decision Desk Poll.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Former Minnesota House speaker and husband killed in politically motivated shooting, Gov. Walz says
CHAMPLIN, Minn. — Former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband were killed Saturday in a politically motivated shooting, Gov. Tim Walz said. A second state legislator and his wife were wounded in a separate attack. Both targeted lawmakers are Democrats. Officials say the suspect in the shootings was still at large. Mayor Ryan Sabas of the town of Champlin earlier announced that state Sen. John Hoffman and state Rep. Hortman had been shot, and that Hoffman's wife was also shot. Walz and other authorities said at a news conference that the assailant was posing as a law enforcement officer. Investigators were working to establish motive for the attacks, officials said. Walz said the shootings were targeted. Hortman was the top House Democratic leader in the state Legislature and a former House speaker. She was first elected in 2004. Hortman, a lawyer, was married with two children. Hoffman, also Democrat, was first elected in 2012. He runs Hoffman Strategic Advisors, a consulting firm. He previously served as vice chair of the Anoka Hennepin School Board, which manages the largest school district in Minnesota. Hoffman is married and has one daughter. Both Hoffman and Hortman represent districts located north of Minneapolis. The shootings happened at a time when political leaders nationwide have been attacked, harassed and intimidated during a time of deep political divisions. Former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, leader of Giffords, a national gun violence prevention group, said in a statement: 'I am horrified and heartbroken by last night's attack on two patriotic public servants. My family and I know the horror of a targeted shooting all too well. An attack against lawmakers is an attack on American democracy itself. Leaders must speak out and condemn the fomenting violent extremism that threatens everything this country stands for.' Giffords was shot in the head in 2011 by a gunman who killed six people and injured 12 others. She stepped down from Congress in January 2012 to focus on her recovery.
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Trump OKs Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel with security guarantees
President Donald Trump's Friday executive order inches Nippon Steel one step closer to a planned investment in U.S. Steel, with the caveat that the Japanese company must follow a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. The terms of the national security agreement weren't detailed in the order, but U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement lays out that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a 'golden share' — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected. Former President Joe Biden cited national security concerns in December when he denied the deal before leaving office. During their respective campaigns, Trump and former Vice President Kamala Harris both said they planned to block the acquisition of U.S. Steel. However, in February, Trump began to try to undo Biden's actions, saying Nippon would drop its $14.1 billion acquisition of U.S. Steel to make an 'investment, rather than a purchase,' according to Post-Tribune archives. The companies thanked the Trump Administration for supporting the partnership. 'This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come,' the statement said. 'We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' Gary Mayor Eddie Melton, who has been supportive of the deal from the beginning, called the investment 'a pivotal moment for Gary and steelworkers across Northwest Indiana.' 'This development brings hope to steelmaking communities around the country,' Melton said in an emailed statement. 'As the child of a steelworker, I understand firsthand what this means for families who depend on good-paying union jobs. 'This historic partnership with one of our nation's oldest allies delivers exactly what the American steel industry needs — $11 billion in new investments that will ensure the longevity of our facilities, drive environmental sustainability in the process, and protect careers for the next generation of steelworkers.' Melton said he's hopeful that as the details of this partnership emerge, they will provide even greater assurance to workers and their families. United Steelworkers leadership has remained skeptical of a potentiall deal between the two steel companies for months, and last week, the USW filed an information request about the partnership, saying in a statement that union leadership 'have seen nothing credible' about the deal, 'including whether it meaningfully differs from Nippon's initial proposal to acquire U.S. Steel and make it a wholly owned subsidiary.' 'Neither Nippon nor the White House has provided any details on where, exactly, proposed investments will be directed or what kind of accountability or oversight there will be to ensure Nippon makes good on its promises,' said a USW letter to its members. 'We also have seen nothing suggesting that Nippon has backed away from its demand that it would be permitted to pull out of promised investments if we exercise our legal rights during negotiations fighting for a fair contract.' Nippon Steel has never said it was backing off its bid to buy and control U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. In August, it was announced that Nippon Steel would invest $300 million into Gary Works. A Nippon executive later said the company would invest $1 billion into the local facility. The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, according to Trump's statement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States by the closing date of the transaction. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. Trump has promised that U.S. Steel will keep its headquarters in Pittsburgh, but the companies offered few details on how the golden share would work and what investments would be made. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment, then he said that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans.' Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.'
