‘I have to sell my house': Widow says ICBC death benefits left her in financial distress
A Surrey widow says she has gone into financial distress following a tragic incident in Boston Bar and must sell her house because ICBC's death benefits were so minimal.
On July 11, 2022, Kelly and Christine O'Reilly were enjoying a ride on their motorbike. Suddenly, a truck travelling in the opposite direction lost its load of bricks.
'The whole thing just collapsed almost on top of us,' she told Global News.
'I could feel my husband gearing down and trying to steer, and it was really bumpy … I guess I was going through the air, and then I hit the pavement and felt the air get knocked out of me.'
4:46
B.C. physiotherapists on the impact of ICBC policy changes
Christine survived with several broken bones. Her 63-year-old husband suffered catastrophic injuries and died at the scene.
Story continues below advertisement
Christine's death benefit was minimal, as Kelly was unemployed at the time of his death: about $69,000.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'We have provided the family with coverage for funeral expenses, grief counselling and death benefits as well, since the passing of Mr. O'Reilly,' ICBC Spokesperson Greg Harper said.
'Ms. O'Reilly suffered some injuries in that crash, and we've been working with her on that to help her recover.'
Christine said she's been left financially devastated.
'I've been living on a line of credit, and it just hit $90(000),' she said. 'I have to sell my house, and I am going to downsize.'
The fatality did not fall within any of the exceptions under B.C.'s no-fault system. And since no criminal charges were laid, she's unable to pursue legal action against the truck driver.
2:18
B.C. family's lawsuit against ICBC challenging the insurers no-fault system
The province has promised a five-year review of no-fault, which it calls 'enhanced care.'
Story continues below advertisement
'So what we're reviewing in basic terms is how well are we doing, which I should say is a constant process within the corporation,' B.C. Public Safety Minister Gary Begg said.
Lawyer Jesse Kendall with Rice Harbut Elliott LLP said the case shows where the system needs work.
'If this review is going to take place in the next year, this seems to be an area that is ripe for amendment and change to give people the right to pursue claims,' he said.
Christine said she believes change is needed now, so that others don't face financial hardship.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
4 hours ago
- Global News
‘We heard four rapid shots': Dartmouth neighbours react to city's latest homicide
Neighbours along True North Crescent in Dartmouth are still reeling from the shooting Thursday that claimed the life of a man. Although residents of the area believe it was targeted and don't feel in personal danger, they say violence is coming too close to home. 'My grandson and I were watching construction across the street and we heard four rapid shots, like bang, bang, bang, bang. And my grandson said, 'That's gunshots,'' said Sonja Vanderwal-Provo. 'It's sad because I mean he had a girlfriend and children. These stupid children are going around shooting each other or stabbing each other and I don't know how to stop that. I wish I could.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Halifax Regional Police are asking the public for tips one day after the brazen midday shooting, which is being investigated as a homicide. Story continues below advertisement Police say the motivating factor behind the killing hasn't been determined. 'Police were only on scene well after the fact. So we're really hoping that the general public will come forward and assist us with that sort of thing — any suspects and vehicles that may have been involved,' said Const. Paul DesRocher. Police say there are no suspects and no arrests have been made in the ongoing investigation. Meanwhile, residents are concerned about safety in the neighbourhood. 'It happened at 12 around lunchtime, so that's when kids are going to the gas station to get like something to eat, you know? So they're totally roaming,' said Ronald Medley. For more on this story, watch the video above.
CBC
11 hours ago
- CBC
New funding coming to address public safety
New funding has been announced to address public safety for local businesses across B.C. As Johna Baylon reports, the money will go towards police initiatives, including projects in partnership with local communities.
Global News
12 hours ago
- Global News
Council draws ire of Calgary developers after ‘housekeeping' land-use changes defeated
Two groups of developers are calling out Calgary city council after proposed 'housekeeping' changes to the city's land-use bylaw were defeated, and a move to reconsider the vote was also shot down. Global News has obtained two letters sent to city council on Thursday: one from the Calgary Inner City Builders Association (CICBA), and the other from a group of 18 high-rise developers. In its letter, CICBA noted its members are 'exceedingly disappointed and frustrated' with council's decision. 'The introduction of politics to administrative, housekeeping amendments is a dangerous exercise,' the letter read. 'It reduces our ability to deliver much-needed housing units and it erodes housing affordability across the city.' Earlier this month, city council was presented with 12 amendments to the city's land-use bylaw, which outlines the rules and regulations for development of land in Calgary within each zoning district. Story continues below advertisement The updates included updated language around rear setbacks, parcel coverage and garage rules, as well as the removal of requirements for mobility storage lockers, and the removal for rezoning and public hearing for child-care services in an existing building. The proposal also included a language change around the period for appeals, aligning it with the provincial rules. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy According to the city, the amendments 'streamline process, reduce timelines and costs for applicants, and focus on enabling housing and services for families,' and were done in consultation with the building industry. However, the changes were defeated in a tie vote with councillors Sean Chu, Sonya Sharp, Dan McLean, Jennifer Wyness, Andre Chabot, and Terry Wong voting against. 'My frustration is we have a bunch of people who talk about finding efficiencies, saving money, and creating partnerships with industry, and creating more affordable housing, but at every single turn they vote against that,' said Ward 11 Coun. Kourtney Penner. Earlier this week, council then debated a motion to reconsider the vote on the land-use bylaw amendments, which required a two-thirds majority. However, that reconsideration vote was also defeated with councillors Sharp, McLean, Wyness, Chabot, and Wong voting against. 'It was pointed out to me by several members of council that had they been able to break apart the various housekeeping changes, they felt it would've been a better decision so we prepared that,' Calgary mayor Jyoti Gondek told Global News. Story continues below advertisement 'Instead (of) letting that happen, enough members of council just turned it all down again.' In the other letter to councillors, the highrise developers noted they 'do not understand' why council would 'not at least support reconsideration through voting separately on each of the individual amendments,' asking councillors to once again reconsider. 'These types of amendments represent necessary and impactful incremental improvements to our shared planning and development system,' the letter read. 'These types of amendments result in reduced red tape and costs which can increase the supply and affordability of housing.' In an interview with Global News, McLean, who represents Ward 13, said he agreed with what he read in the letter, and does support some of the housekeeping amendments, but defended his decision to vote against the reconsideration. 'I think if we broke them apart one by one they would've all passed, and I didn't want them to all pass,' he said. 'Bring them back separate if you want them to pass.' Wong, the councillor for Ward 7, told Global News in a statement that he felt five of the updates were policy matters bundled into an omnibus vote, not housekeeping. 'I voted against the reconsideration as there was no official mechanism to 'straw vote' which amendments would be supported or rejected; thus I was not confident that an amended omnibus package could be achieved,' his statement read. Story continues below advertisement Wong said he is engaged in discussions to approve some of the 'less contentious amendments' during a council meeting in June.
