logo
Could IEPs become more frustrating for parents of kids with disabilities?

Could IEPs become more frustrating for parents of kids with disabilities?

USA Today05-04-2025

Could IEPs become more frustrating for parents of kids with disabilities? The Trump administration recently slashed $900 million in education research contracts and more than $600 million in educator preparation grants.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
What we know now about Trump's executive order on Education Department
Now that President Trump has signed an executive order to dismantle the Education Department, what happens next? Here is what we know now.
California resident Katie Prather remembers thinking that her son, who has autism, could have mastered math skills if he had less work to complete on assignments in elementary school. By middle school, she thought he would fare better if he had more social pragmatic skills to navigate interactions with his teachers and students.
At the start of high school, she said, her son was "hanging out with the wrong crowd," hoping to fit in after years of being called a problem child by teachers and classmates. Often he was overstimulated, "spent by the end of the school day," and failing his classes at school even though he had an individualized education plan, which is guaranteed to students with disabilities under federal law.
That's when Prather started to fear that the services the school district was providing him weren't working. Even worse, she worried he wouldn't graduate on time.
"I felt like we kept bumping into this 'There's nothing we can really do to help him' attitude of the school," she said. "He was failing some classes even though he was super-smart. There was a huge gap in how he was performing and what he was capable of in that school district."
About 7.5 million students with disabilities in the U.S. are protected under the federal Individuals with Disabilities Act from being turned away at public schools. These kids are guaranteed the right to a "free and appropriate public education" and can access Individual Education Programs, or IEPs, to help them succeed.
The journey to obtaining and modifying an IEP that works for a student with disabilities is notoriously challenging for parents, said Carrie Gillispie, a senior policy analyst with the education policy program at the national liberal-leaning think tank New America.
Parents and educators often disagree on what a child needs to succeed, and often there's a lack of knowledge about what parents know their child has access to and reality, she said.
The plans are also expensive for school districts – costing up to tens of thousands of dollars per student – and the paperwork brings administrative burdens for teachers and staff at the nation's schools, Gillispie said. The workload of IEPs often drives teachers away from special education jobs, leaving heavier workloads for the teachers who are in the field, Gillispie said. The nation faces a shortage of special education teachers.
All these challenges often come at the expense of student achievement and well-being.
Trump wants to scrap the education department. What does that mean for IEPs?
Special education experts are now warning that families' paths to accessing a working IEP for their children could get worse with the Trump administration's attempts to dismantle the Education Department. That agency has enforced the Individuals with Disabilities Act, a federal law guaranteeing students with disabilities the right to a "free and appropriate public education" for decades.
The Trump administration recently slashed $900 million in education-related research contracts and more than $600 million in educator preparation grants. Both cuts will affect students with disabilities, experts say.
President Donald Trump has said federal protections for the millions of students with disabilities across the U.S. "will be fully preserved" and transferred to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
The federal education agency continues to oversee special education services, said Madi Biedermann, a spokesperson for the Education Department. Congress would ultimately decide whether the agency can be eliminated.
Does Project 2025 eliminate IEPs? Not explicitly, but experts are wary
Moving to a residential school after the local one couldn't help
School staff at the high school where Prather's son attended his freshman year ultimately recommended that the family try another school that specializes in educating students with disabilities.
The 10th grader is now enrolled at Hanna Academy, a state-funded residential private school for students who have severe disabilities or behavioral problems, in Sonoma, California.
Every child who attends the school has an IEP. So far it has worked for the Prathers – aside from exposure to violent outbursts on the school campus from time to time, Prather said.
"The smaller class setting and no homework has been a game-changer," she said. "He's really continued to learn and done credit recovery from classes he failed last year. There are reports from the school his behavior has improved."
Looking back, she doesn't blame the school district entirely for her son's struggles in schools. School staff tried to help her son, and he had an IEP for years, she said, but even the smaller class size options that were available wouldn't have worked for him.
"Unfortunately with smaller setting stuff, in most regular schools that usually means kids with autism are in classrooms with kids who have more intellectual disabilities and aren't at grade level," she said. "That's not him. We didn't find anywhere in a public school setting that worked for us."
'Kicked out of every school they've been in'
For Hanna Academy Principal Courtney Jackson, it has been a challenge to accommodate the IEPs of 48 students – especially since the school transitioned from a parochial private school to a school solely serving students with disabilities two years ago.
Family and educator involvement to figure out what works for each student is especially crucial for these kids, he said.
"These are parents typically dealing with kids who have had disability issues for so long," he said. "Their kids have been kicked out of every school they've been in, and they're looking for any sort of resources."
In Maryland, Rich Weinfeld and his team of consultants at The Weinfeld Education Group work with parents of families with IEPs to help them advocate for their kids at their schools. They often encourage parents to seek data from the Education Department's research arm.
The Institute of Education Sciences has historically researched and collected nationwide data on what interventions work for students with specific disabilities at specific ages and learning levels.
That could range from how a student with dyslexia should be taught to how much homework a student with autism should be assigned.
"In terms of medicine, that would be the dosage: What does evidence say about what kind of medicine should be given and how many per day?" he said. "When we attend IEP meetings with parents to advocate for their kids, we look at the data. We can all agree kids should have an intervention, but we don't know how often should it be provided."
The Trump administration recently laid off the entire staff at the Institute of Education Sciences, effectively gutting its ability to conduct further research on students with disabilities.
Weinfeld worries about what resources families nationwide will have moving forward.
Gillispie said she's also concerned about the research freeze. As a former school counselor, she has seen the agency's guidance help parents advocate for their children in the IEP process.
"The important part of the IEP is the individualized part," she said. "It's all about data monitoring and collection."
'You have to educate yourself.' Special education parents have rights. Here's what to know
Understaffed schools and deadlines to complete IEPs
In Sonoma, Jackson said he has struggled to fill special education staffing jobs.
Nearly three-quarters of public schools with special education teacher vacancies reported they'd "experienced difficulty" filling the positions for the 2024-25 school year, according to the Education Department's National Center for Education Statistics.
"The paperwork burden of IEPs often cause teachers and other school staffers stress, and it's part of the reason why it's hard to retain and hire these teachers," Gillispie said.
Special education staff often have to work more hours when there are huge workforce shortages because schools must meet deadlines throughout the IEP process, Gillispie said.
"Many times schools go over that timeline, and many times it's because they're understaffed and the paperwork is bureaucratically burdensome," she said.
The Trump administration has also eliminated special education teacher training programs at the federal level.
Disability advocates worry the cuts could affect an already staggering workforce shortage of special education teachers who are turned off by the administrative burden of IEPs.
"Without addressing the workforce issue, the rest of the of causes of frustration are not going any better," Gillispie said.
Schools are scrambling: To find special education teachers. 3 ways to address shortage.
Funding for special education is uncertain
The Education Department pays out funding appropriated by Congress for IEPs and other education services to states.
Jackson, from Hanna Academy, is worried about any future funding cuts or freezes at the federal level. The school is state-funded and could be affected by any financial deficits.
He's one of many school officials unsure about how much money they'll receive for special education services from the federal government for the upcoming school year. It has been difficult for him and others to lay out their budgets.
Trump has not indicated whether any federal funding cuts will specifically affect students with disabilities, but his administration has made clear it wants to cut excess spending in multiple ways.
On the other hand, Gillespie argues it will be much more expensive to get rid of the Education Department in the long run.
"It would just lead to huge legal costs and programming disputes," she said.
'That would be a huge concern'
Prather's son is now on track to graduate high school at Hanna Academy.
She says his individualized education plan there is exactly what he needed to succeed all along.
But she worries what's happening at the Education Department could sever that feeling of triumph, especially if his school loses funding or any of its services.
"If my son had to go back to a regular high school, that would be a huge concern."
Contact Kayla Jimenez at kjimenez@usatoday.com. Follow her on X at @kaylajjimenez.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump's Net Approval Positive on Only One Key Issue
Donald Trump's Net Approval Positive on Only One Key Issue

Newsweek

time27 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump's Net Approval Positive on Only One Key Issue

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's net approval rating is negative on a range of issues except immigration, a new poll shows. According to political analyst and statistician Nate Silver, writing in his Silver Bulletin Substack, Trump has a net negative approval rating on trade, the economy and inflation but a slightly positive rating on immigration. Why It Matters Taking the temperature of the nation, approval ratings are good measures of the public's response to Trump's policies and his actions as president. In the first few months of his second term, Trump's popularity has fluctuated, with some polls more favorable than others. Sustained backlash to his policies could persuade the president to change his approach. Trump, who made immigration a central part of his campaign, has vowed to crack down on border security, carry out mass deportations and end federal benefits for people residing in the country illegally. President Donald Trump speaking with reporters in the rain after arriving on Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on May 30. President Donald Trump speaking with reporters in the rain after arriving on Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on May 30. AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson What To Know Silver aggregated dozens of recent polls and found that Trump's approval rating on immigration was +2.5 percent. The president did not fare as well on other issues, with a -9.5 percent approval rating on trade, -11.3 percent on the economy and -17.5 percent on inflation. May polling conducted by Verasight U.S. for Strength in Numbers found similar results, with Americans disapproving of the president's handling of all the policy areas they were asked about except border security. That poll also found that 49 percent disapproved of his immigration policy, while 47 percent approved. Overall, Silver found that when analyzing the polls, Trump had a -5.4 net approval rating. An RMG Research/Napolitan News poll, conducted between May 14 and 21 among 3,000 registered voters, showed Trump's approval rating at 48 percent, with 50 percent disapproving. The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 1.8 percentage points. Other polls have found a more positive response to the president. According to a recent Rasmussen survey, 53 percent of respondents said they approved of Trump, while 46 percent said they disapproved. What People Are Saying Scott Lucas, a professor in international politics at University College Dublin, previously cautioned against reading too much into any one poll, telling Newsweek: "Opinion polls have their own biases." President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on April 20: "We are, together, going to make America bigger, better, stronger, wealthier, healthier, and more religious, than it has ever been before!!!" What Happens Next The midterm elections, scheduled for November 2026, may offer a clearer indication of voters' attitudes toward the president's policies.

Murphy launches ambitious anti-Trump PAC as 2028 rumors swirl
Murphy launches ambitious anti-Trump PAC as 2028 rumors swirl

Politico

time34 minutes ago

  • Politico

Murphy launches ambitious anti-Trump PAC as 2028 rumors swirl

Sen. Chris Murphy is launching a new PAC aimed at taking on President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress — the latest sign the Connecticut Democrat is eyeing higher office, according to plans that were first shared with POLITICO. Murphy will announce Monday that his group, American Mobilization Project, is doling out $400,000 to organizations that oppose cuts to Medicaid and register young people to vote. Two of the early recipients of his funds are based in battleground states. In an interview, Murphy said that his PAC is unique because it is not focused on funding campaigns and instead is looking to mobilize people against Trump's agenda. 'All of us have to realize that if we don't act aggressively right now to organize and mobilize, we may not have our democracy in 2026,' said Murphy. 'I'm a believer that the only thing that is ultimately going to stop Trump's corruption and his destruction of democracy is mass mobilization.' Murphy's PAC expects to spend upwards of $2 million in the 2026 midterm cycle, an aide to the senator said. In the wake of Trump's reelection, Murphy has worked to grow his profile and staked out ground as one of the Democratic Party's most outspoken critics of the president's efforts to bend institutions to his will. Murphy has appeared on numerous podcasts, held town halls across the country and churned out a steady stream of content on social media. In the run-up to presidential campaigns, would-be candidates often launch new PACs or outside groups, which can be used to expand their visibility, build their email lists and cultivate political relationships. But Murphy insists his recent moves are not designed to lay the groundwork for a future presidential bid. He has argued that it's no guarantee that there will even be a race for the White House in 2028, in fact. 'I don't think it's a foregone conclusion there's going to be an election in 2026 or 2028 for anybody to run in if we don't do the work right now,' he said, adding, 'I hope that this PAC is going to act very differently than everybody else's PAC because it's not about banking money or using money for a political campaign or for other people's political campaigns. It's about mobilization.' The first recipients of contributions from Murphy's PAC include Georgia Youth Justice and Project 26 Pennsylvania. His group is also backing the Committee to Protect Health Care's work organizing doctors and nurses to support Medicaid in Michigan, Louisiana and Utah. Murphy is far from the only Democrat who has positioned himself as a future leader of the party as it struggles to find its way back to power. Several potential 2028 candidates have traveled to critical battleground and early-voting states in recent weeks. Last week, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz both visited South Carolina to attend a key Democratic dinner.

Ukraine-Russia peace talks to resume in Istanbul after surprise drone attack

time37 minutes ago

Ukraine-Russia peace talks to resume in Istanbul after surprise drone attack

LONDON -- Ukrainian and Russian delegations are set to meet again in Istanbul, Turkey, on Monday to take part in the next round of U.S.-brokered peace talks intended to end Russia's 3-year-old invasion of its neighbor. Revived talks so far have failed to reach a peace deal, or even achieve a sustained ceasefire, despite pressure on both sides by President Donald Trump's administration. The last meeting between Russian and Ukrainian delegations in Istanbul in mid-May was the first direct contact between the two sides since spring 2022. Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Sunday, according to a readout published by the State Department -- which said the call took place "at Russia's request." "Secretary Rubio reiterated President Trump's call for continued direct talks between Russia and Ukraine to achieve a lasting peace," the State Department said. The Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement that the two men "exchanged views on various initiatives concerning the political settlement of the Ukrainian crisis." Ukraine is calling for a full 30-day ceasefire during which time peace negotiations can take place. Russia has refused the request, with President Vladimir Putin and his top officials retaining maximalist war goals dating back to the opening days of the Russian invasion. Among the Kremlin's demands are the annexation of four Ukrainian regions -- plus the retention of Crimea, which Russia seized in 2014 -- Ukrainian demilitarization and a permanent block on the country's accession to NATO. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in a Sunday social media post that Kyiv's delegation will be led by Defense Minister Rustem Umerov. The president set out Ukraine's goals for the meeting. "First -- a full and unconditional ceasefire," he wrote. "Second -- the release of prisoners. Third -- the return of abducted children. And in order to establish a reliable and lasting peace and ensure security, preparation of the meeting at the highest level." Zelenskyy and his government have repeatedly accused Putin of intentionally sabotaging peace talks since Trump returned to office in January, having promised on the campaign trail to end the war within 24 hours. Trump's threat of further sanctions on Russia do not appear to have softened the Kremlin's war goals. Zelenskyy and his European backers have pushed Trump to increase pressure on Putin by introducing new sanctions on Russia and providing Ukraine with more military support. Keith Kellogg, Trump's Ukraine-Russia envoy, hinted at the president's growing frustration with Moscow, telling ABC News last week that the president has "seen a level of unreasonableness that really frustrates him." In a phone conversation with Trump in May, Putin said Russia would provide a "peace memorandum" outlining a possible settlement. Moscow is yet to provide the document. Vladimir Medinsky -- a Putin aide and long-time member of Russia's negotiating team -- said Sunday that the Russian team had received Ukraine's version of the peace memorandum. Since the last round of talks in Istanbul, Trump has hit out at Putin -- calling him "absolutely crazy" -- and again criticized Zelenskyy, saying of the Ukrainian leader, "Everything out of his mouth causes problems, I don't like it, and it better stop." Oleksandr Merezhko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament representing Zelenskyy's party and the chair of the body's foreign affairs committee, told ABC News, "Russia's primary goal is to avoid sanctions by pretending that it negotiates." "Putin is not interested in negotiations and ceasefire, because he hopes to start an offensive during summer," Merezhko added. "On the one hand, he imitates negotiations to avoid Trump's sanctions and simultaneously to demonstrate that Russia is not politically isolated. Yet, on the other hand, Putin hopes that if Trump will decide to withdraw from the negotiations, he will leave Ukraine without military support, one-on-one with Russia." The talks come a day after Ukraine launched one of the most stunning attacks of the war. In what a source in the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) told ABC News was an operation one and a half years in the making, operatives used attack drones concealed in containers carried by trucks to attack strategic bomber bases deep inside Russian territory. Moscow has used long-range bombers and their cruise missile armaments to attack Ukrainian cities throughout the full-scale invasion. The SBU claimed to have hit more than 40 military aircraft in the attacks, which targeted multiple air bases thousands of miles from Ukrainian-controlled territory. Russia's Defense Ministry framed the operation as "a terrorist attack," claiming that the strikes were "repelled" in three regions, but noting that several aircraft caught fire at airfields during the attacks in Irkutsk and Murmansk -- videos of which the SBU published. Also on Sunday, Russian authorities reported the collapse of two railway bridges and derailment of two trains in regions bordering Ukraine, which they blamed on "explosions." At least seven people were killed, authorities said. In an address on Sunday, Zelenskyy called the Ukrainian drone attack a "brilliant operation" and said Russia "suffered truly significant losses." The president framed the attack as a defensive measure. "We will defend ourselves by all means available to us," Zelenskyy said. "Not for a single second did we want this war. We offered the Russians a ceasefire. Since March 11, the U.S. proposal for a full and unconditional ceasefire has been on the table. It was the Russians who chose to continue the war." "Pressure is truly needed -- pressure on Russia that should bring it back to reality," Zelenskyy added. "Pressure through sanctions. Pressure from our forces. Pressure through diplomacy. All of it must work together." Meanwhile, long-range drone and missile attacks continued overnight into Monday morning. Ukraine's air force said Russia launched 80 drones and four missiles into the country overnight, of which 52 were shot down or neutralized. The air force reported impacts in 12 locations. Russia's Defense Ministry said it shot down 162 Ukrainian drones over nine Russian regions overnight.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store