Trump administration appeals federal judge's order to unfreeze federal funds
The Trump administration is appealing a federal judge's order to unfreeze federal funding in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
The motion comes hours after a federal judge from Rhode Island ordered President Donald Trump's administration to unfreeze federal funds once again, claiming the administration did not adhere to his previous order to do so.
U.S. District Judge John McConnell filed a new motion Monday ordering the Trump administration to comply with a restraining order issued Jan. 31, temporarily blocking the administration's efforts to pause federal grants and loans.
McConnell's original restraining order came after 22 states and the District of Columbia challenged the Trump administration's actions to hold up funds for grants such as the Climate Pollution Reduction Grant and other Environmental Protection Agency programs. But the states said Friday that the administration isn't following through and funds are still tied up.
"Each executive order will hold up in court because every action of the Trump-Vance administration is completely lawful," Harrison Fields, a White House spokesperson, said in a statement to Fox News. "Any legal challenge against it is nothing more than an attempt to undermine the will of the American people.
The Office of Management and Budget released a memo Jan. 27 announcing plans to issue a temporary pause on federal grants and loans. While the White House later rescinded the memo on Jan. 29, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that the move didn't equate a "recission of the federal funding freeze."
Read On The Fox News App
Specifically, McConnell's motion calls for the Trump administration to restore withheld funds appropriated in the Infrastructure Improvement and Jobs Act and the Inflation Reduction Act that passed during the Biden administration in 2021 and 2022, respectively. The motion also calls on the Trump administration to restore funding for institutes like the National Institutes of Health.
'Constitutional Crisis': The Impoundment Act Takes Center Stage After Russel Vought's Confirmation
The motion filed Monday asserts that states have provided evidence that there are still instances where the federal government has "improperly" frozen funds and failed to distribute appropriated federal funds.
While the motion says the Trump administration claims these actions were done to "root out" fraud, McConnell said that the "freezes in effect now were a result of the broad categorical order, not a specific finding of possible fraud."
"The broad categorical and sweeping freeze of federal funds is, as the Court found, likely unconstitutional and has caused and continues to cause irreparable harm to a vast portion of this country," the judge wrote on Monday.
Leavitt Pushes Back On Media's 'Uncertainty' About Federal Funding Freeze
McConnell said in his original order that evidence suggested the White House's rescission of the OMB memo may have been done in "name-only" in order to "defeat the jurisdiction of the court."
As a result, McConnell said Monday that the Trump administration must "immediately restore frozen funding" until the court hears and decides the preliminary injunction request.
Click To Get The Fox News App
Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha praised McConnell's ruling and said the order "confirmed what we have been saying from the beginning."
"It is now time for the Administration to come into full compliance," Neronha said in a statement Monday. "This is a country of laws. We expect the Administration to follow the law. Our Office and attorneys general across the country stand ready to keep careful watch on the actions of this Administration that follow, and we will not hesitate to go back to Court if they don't comply."
Fox News' Jacqui Heinrich contributed to this report. Original article source: Trump administration appeals federal judge's order to unfreeze federal funds
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
10 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Live updates: Israel and Iran trade heavy strikes for a fourth day, with attacks expanding
Israel and Iran exchanged bloody strikes for a fourth day Monday as casualties mounted on both sides and international pleas for diplomacy went unheeded. Iran launched missiles at Israel early in the day, killing at least eight and injuring dozens more, according to the prime minister's office. The attack came after the Israel Defense Forces said it was striking surface-to-surface missile sites in central Iran. In one attack, Israel said, it hit command centers for Iran's Quds Force, the branch of the Revolutionary Guard that coordinates support for proxy forces across the region. The claim could not be immediately verified but would be the latest blow to Iran's military prowess. In Iran, at least 224 people have been killed, local media reported, quoting Health Ministry spokesman Hossein Kermanpour. The Israeli prime minister's office has reported 24 deaths in total. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday that regime change in Iran 'could certainly be the result' of Israel's military campaign. Netanyahu made the remarks on 'Fox News Sunday' after anchor Bret Baier asked if 'regime change' was one of Israel's objectives. 'Clearly, some of these strikes have targeted Iranian leadership, military, nuclear scientists. … So, is regime change part of the effort here?' Baier said. A month ago, President Donald Trump went to the Saudi capital and spoke grandiosely of peace. Before a gathering of Arab leaders, he heralded the 'dawn of a bright new day for the great people of the Middle East.' Fractious conflicts would end, broken fences would mend. Trump decried the past generation of failed U.S. interventions and nation-building projects in the region. He offered 'a new path' to the theocratic regime in Tehran and said he would be 'happy' to forge a deal with Iran to make 'the world a safer place.'
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Trump administration is offering 3 different scenarios for how 'Liberation Day 2.0' may play out
A key deadline in President Trump's trade war is getting closer, with a 90-day pause on his "Liberation Day" tariffs set to expire on July 9. But what will actually happen when the clock strikes midnight on what some are calling "Liberation Day 2.0" is anyone's guess. A series of comments from Trump and his officials this week — even within a 12-hour span on Wednesday — were notable for the variety of scenarios they have on the table. It could be a nonevent with additional deadline extensions in the offing. It might be a day of celebration of long-promised trade deals that have yet to materialize. And it could also be a day when the hammer comes down and tariffs are simply dictated. Trump himself has indicated he is open to all three, telling reporters Wednesday evening that he will be sending letters to tell nations, "This is the deal, you can take it or leave it," but also acknowledging that some deadlines could be extended, and on other fronts, "We're rocking in terms of deals." The scenarios laid out this week by the president, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick aren't necessarily mutually exclusive, but which countries get which outcome will be closely watched by investors, as some outcomes are decidedly more market-friendly than others. As for what will actually happen, Henrietta Treyz of Veda Partners offered a prediction in a Thursday morning note to Yahoo Finance suggesting a combination of all three. "I think this is going to be like a potluck: There's going to be a little bit of everything," she said. On the menu for about 130 nations will be letters, she suggested, "and I'm optimistic their rate will be in the 10-25% range." Other nations may be able to secure limited deals — such as a recent pact with the UK — but with plenty of tariffs staying on or being added. Others may get an extension for now. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet The uncertainty facing markets revolves around which scenario takes center stage in the coming weeks. The divergences were in stark relief Wednesday as the day unfolded. In the morning, during a CNBC appearance, Lutnick suggested the centerpiece would be a flood of new deals. He said that with China tensions on the back burner for the moment, negotiators will able to find areas of agreement on other fronts. "You're going to see deal after deal," he said. "This is going to start coming next week and the week after and the week after." But observers have grown increasingly unmoved by these promises after the administration has been suggesting imminent deals for months now, with only a limited pact with the UK materializing so far. By midday, Bessent was testifying before Congress and offered a somewhat different portrait of the weeks ahead. He indirectly acknowledged the slower pace of deals and said Trump is "highly likely" to push back his deadline for at least some top trading partners. He said the administration is prepared to "roll the date forward" for the 18 major partners that are negotiating in what the administration views as good faith. "If someone is not negotiating, then we will not," Bessent added. During his testimony, the Treasury secretary also floated the notion of regional trade deals, where a group of countries may get similar terms. By the evening, Trump offered a third focus, announcing that he is going to send letters to trading partners in the next one to two weeks to simply set new unilateral tariff rates. The letters are "telling them what the deal is," Trump told reporters Wednesday during a stop at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C. But the president's comments also offered a mix of his aides' other messages from the day. The president said he would be willing to extend the deadline for certain nations, "but I don't think we're going to have that necessity." He also suggested that deals could be imminent on at least a few fronts, noting that "we're dealing with Japan, we're dealing with South Korea. We're dealing with a lot of them." Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
G-7 Summit, Fed Rate Decision, Retail Sales: What to Watch This Week
The Federal Reserve headlines the central banks slated to weigh in on interest rates in the coming days. President Trump has turned up the pressure on Fed Chair Jerome Powell to lower rates, so far unsuccessfully. Last week saw several economic readings that seemed to support the president's view, though Israel's attacks against Iran have caused a surge in oil prices that could convince the Fed to refrain from cuts for a longer period.
