Libertyville group racing to save piece of pre-Civil War history; ‘Something from … an organization that made a difference'
Hanging in a shaded hallway of the Ansel B. Cook Home in Libertyville is a six-foot-tall artifact from the prelude to one of America's darkest chapters.
It's a dark silk banner, hand-painted in 1860, emblazoned in gold with the name of a group that is only just being recognized again — The Wide Awakes, a national grassroots organization known for their strong support of the Republican Party and opposition to slavery during the election that would put Abraham Lincoln into the White House.
The Libertyville Historical Society is racing to save the rapidly deteriorating 165-year-old banner by fundraising $30,000 to have it expertly restored and placed in a museum-grade display case, with $24,000 in funding already secured.
Jenny Barry, president of the historical society, said the banner's painted image of a torchlight parade, an iconic sight for the Wide Awakes, is dried and cracked, and there is some paint loss. Seams are coming apart and the silk, known to be delicate, will need to be stabilized, she said.
Restoration will also reveal the banner's long-unseen reverse side, solving a century-old mystery about the possibility of a 'Liberty and Union' inscription on the back, a release said.
The banner offers a peek into a relatively obscure group during a critical moment in American history. Barry said it's also one of the few pieces of evidence of the Libertyville community's participation in the Wide Awakes movement, and an example of the level of activism in a community much smaller than it is today.
'We know very little about Libertyville Wide Awakes. There's not a roster or anything that exists,' Barry said.
Only a handful of members have been identified through newspaper references, and historical society members have been conducting long-term research to discover others.
The Wide Awakes were known for their marches and torchlight parades, Barry said, where they would move in different formations wearing oilcloth capes and carrying torches. A reproduction of the outfit and a pair of original torches sit by the banner.
'It was quite a spectacle, as we understand it,' she said.
The banner was awarded to the Libertyville branch during a grand rally in conjunction with a stump speech for Lincoln's campaign, according to Barry. The winning team was whichever brought the most marchers compared to the number of Republican voters in the town in the prior election.
Libertyville, which had 63 Republican votes in 1858, brought 73 people, she said, and won the banner.
It was of some importance to the community, Barry said, appearing on display several times decades later. It's been in its current case since around 1927, she said, and while she wasn't certain how long it's been displayed at the house, it's been decades.
With restoration, the unique banner can be saved for another 165 years, and continue to offer a window into a 'divisive' time in the nation's history, Barry said.
'I think history is often difficult, especially national events,' she said. 'It's very hard to feel a connection to. This is actually a physical representation of something from that time and an organization that made a difference.'
She expects the banner will be moved in the fall, and restoration is anticipated to take six to seven months before it's returned home. She encourages people to see it before it's restored, as well as look at their exhibit of Civil War-era ladies' attire displayed on the house's first floor.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
9 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump's EPA targets environmental rules projected to save billions — and many thousands of lives
When the head of the Environmental Protection Agency announced a wide-ranging rollback of environmental regulations, he said it would put a 'dagger through the heart of climate-change religion' and introduce a 'Golden Age' for the American economy. What Lee Zeldin didn't mention: how ending the rules could have devastating consequences to human health.
San Francisco Chronicle
12 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's EPA targets environmental rules projected to save billions — and many thousands of lives
When the head of the Environmental Protection Agency announced a wide-ranging rollback of environmental regulations, he said it would put a 'dagger through the heart of climate-change religion' and introduce a 'Golden Age' for the American economy. What Lee Zeldin didn't mention: how ending the rules could have devastating consequences to human health. The EPA-targeted rules could prevent an estimated 30,000 deaths and save $275 billion each year they are in effect, according to an Associated Press examination that included the agency's own prior assessments as well as a wide range of other research. It's by no means guaranteed that the rules will be entirely eliminated; they can't be changed without going through a federal rulemaking process that can take years and requires public comment and scientific justification. But experts say the numbers are conservative and that even a partial dismantling of the rules would mean more pollutants such as smog, mercury and lead — and especially more tiny airborne particles that can lodge in lungs and cause health problems. It would also mean higher emissions of the greenhouse gases driving Earth's warming to deadlier levels. 'More people will die,' said Cory Zigler, a professor of biostatistics at Brown University who has studied air pollution deaths from coal-fired power plants. 'More of this type of pollution that we know kills people will be in the air.' What went into AP's examination of the pollution rules The AP set out to look at what could happen if all the rules were eliminated, by first examining exhaustive assessments the EPA was required to produce before the rules were approved. Though the agency's priorities can change as presidential administrations change, the methods for the assessments have been largely standard since Ronald Reagan's presidency and are deeply rooted in peer-reviewed scientific research. The AP used those and eight different government and private group databases for its estimate of financial costs, some death estimates and analysis of pollution trends. AP performed additional analysis of potential deaths by drawing on peer-reviewed formulas and scientific research on the impacts of increased heat and pollution. And AP vetted its work with multiple outside health experts, who said it is scientifically justified, but likely an undercount. Multiple experts say the science behind the rules is strong, and they pointed to the rigorous process that must be followed to change them, including requirements for public comment. Zeldin acknowledged as much last month. 'I'm not going to prejudge outcomes with what will be a lot of rulemaking,' Zeldin said in April. Virtually all the benefits from the rules come from restricting the burning of coal, oil and natural gas. The fossil fuel industry was a heavy contributor to President Donald Trump's 2024 presidential campaign and Republicans overall. In announcing the proposed changes, the EPA repeatedly cited the costs of the rules and omitted the benefits in all but one instance. Calculating costs and benefits is contentious Asked for comment on the AP findings, an EPA spokesperson said the agency's plans would 'roll back trillions in regulatory costs and hidden 'taxes' on U.S. families.' 'Unlike the Biden EPA attempts to regulate whole sectors of our economy out of existence, the Trump EPA understands that we do not have to choose between protecting our precious environment and growing our economy,' spokesperson Molly Vaseliou said. Scott Segal, an attorney at Bracewell LLP who represents energy and manufacturing interests, suggested that EPA analyses under the Biden administration emphasized worst-case scenarios, inflated health benefit claims and missed the big-picture economic benefits of booming industry. 'If you only count lives saved by regulation, not lives harmed by regulation, the math will always favor more regulation,' Segal said. 'This framing misses the larger point: public health isn't just about air quality -- it's also about job security, housing, access to medical care, and heating in the winter." The EPA regulatory analyses are immense documents that numerous health and environment researchers and former officials say are grounded in science, not politics. For example, in January 2024, the EPA produced a 445-page analysis of tightening standards on dangerous particle pollution that cited more than 90 different scientific publications, along with scores of other documents. The Biden EPA presented four different regulatory scenarios and ultimately chose one of the middle options. Two experts who reviewed AP's work said the EPA documents that underpinned the analysis were themselves conservative in their estimates. University of Washington health and environment professors Kristi Ebi and Howard Frumkin said that's because EPA looked at added heat deaths and air pollution mortality, but did not include climate change's expected deaths from increased infectious disease, flooding and other disaster factors. 'This is a rigorous, compelling and much-needed analysis,'' said Frumkin, who was appointed director of the CDC's National Center for Environmental Health during George W. Bush's administration. 'It makes clear that regulatory rollbacks by the Trump administration will have major, direct consequences for health and well-being. Because of these regulatory rollbacks and funding cuts, Americans will die needlessly." That's a sentiment echoed by two former Republican EPA administrators, William Reilly and Christine Todd Whitman, who served in the George Bush and George W. Bush administrations respectively. 'This administration is endangering all of our lives — ours, our children, our grandchildren,' said Whitman, who led EPA under George W. Bush. How regulations helped clear the air A visit to Evansville, Indiana, helps show how EPA regulations have made a difference. The city of about 115,000 lies where the state's southwest tip meets Kentucky at the curving Ohio River. Industry lines the banks and coal barges float past carrying loads destined to fuel power plants. Kirt Ethridge, 30, grew up in Evansville and still lives there. As a child, he recalls looking down from high ground into the bowl-shaped valley where the heart of the city lies and seeing a haze of pollution atop it. He thought that was normal. He didn't think much of the looming smokestacks of the coal-fired power plants and factories that ringed the city, nor the line of inhalers waiting on a bench before he and his classmates ran the mile. He suffered asthma attacks in class, sometimes more than once a week, that sent him to the nurse's office. Once, he was rushed to the hospital in an ambulance. 'It's a very scary feeling, particularly as a kid, to not be able to get enough air in your lungs,' he said, describing it as like 'breathing through a straw.' In southwestern Indiana, coal-fired power plants were to blame for between 19,000 and nearly 23,000 deaths from 1999 to 2020, according to work by Zigler published in the journal Science that examined death rates among Medicare recipients and modeled where plants' pollution would spread. Nationally, he and his team found a sharp decline in air pollution deaths from coal-fired power plants after the mid-2000s, from an average of 43,000 a year to just 1,600 a year in 2020, with a similar cut in particle pollution. That's when two different forces came into play: Cheaper and less polluting natural gas pushed aside dirtier and costlier coal, while at the same time stricter regulations required more pollution control devices such as scrubbers. Duke Energy operates its biggest power plant near Evansville — Gibson Station, which can power about 2.5 million homes. Emissions have declined significantly as the company installed scrubbers that pull unwanted chemicals out of smokestacks, along with other pollution control technology. Duke Energy spokeswoman Angeline Protegere said the scrubbers were a response to 'regulations over the years as well as market factors.' Put simply, the air got cleaner around places like Evansville. Vanderburgh County and neighboring counties violated national annual air standards for fine particles from 2005 to 2010, but no longer do, even as standards have tightened. The same is true across the United States. The amount of tiny airborne particles in the last 10 years nationwide is one-third lower than 2000-2009, EPA statistics show. Smog pollution is down nearly 15% and sulfur dioxide has plunged 80%. 'The Clean Air Act, the EPA's founding legislation, has been a powerful engine for improving public health as our air has grown visibly clearer and cleaner,' said Gina McCarthy, who headed the EPA under President Barack Obama and served as Biden's White House climate adviser. 'Millions of Americans have avoided illnesses, hospital visits, and premature deaths thanks to EPA's cleaner car and truck standards in concert with rules that limit industrial pollution.' Five rules saving more than $200 billion a year Five rules together were estimated to have more than $200 billion a year in net benefits, based on EPA documents that estimated reduced illnesses and deaths and the costs for companies to comply. Three rules dealt with cars and trucks. The 'clean car rule' is a tightening of EPA emission standards for vehicles that was supposed to take effect for 2027 model years and eventually have annual net benefits of more than $100 billion a year, according to the agency's 884-page regulatory analysis. The EPA estimated that over the next three decades this rule alone would prevent 7.9 billion tons of heat-trapping carbon dioxide, 8,700 tons of particulate matter and 36,000 tons of nitrogen oxides. Two other proposed rules — one that deals with car models from 2023 to 2027 and another aimed at heavy trucks and buses — are estimated to save nearly $38 billion a year combined through reduced health problems from air pollution, according to EPA's own detailed calculations. EPA plays up costs, plays down benefits of targeted rules Almost none of those benefits are to be found in 10 fact sheets the EPA produced in conjunction with Zeldin's announcement. Nine make no mention of benefits from the rules, while eight mention the costs. In 17 of the 20 rules with explicit cost-benefit analyses, AP found that estimated benefits are larger than the costs — and sometimes far larger. For example, Biden's proposed power plant rule was designed to save more than $24 billion a year, prevent about 3,700 annual premature deaths and 3 million asthma incidents from fossil fuel-powered plants, according to EPA documents last year and work by the Environmental Protection Network. Under Trump, the EPA's fact sheet on that rule notes nearly $1 billion in costs but nothing about the far higher estimated benefits. Another rule the EPA updated last year sets standards for pollution permitted in the air, called National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The update, required by the Clean Air Act, cuts allowable soot particles by 25% to reflect new science on the harms from such pollution. The EPA in Biden's time calculated the change would annually save as much as $46 billion, 4,500 premature deaths and 800,000 asthma incidents. But the new EPA fact sheet only mentions the estimated costs of the change — about $614 million — and not benefits estimated at 76 times that amount. 'The human body count and human health toll of particulate matter alone is just absolutely massive,' said K. Sabeel Rahman, a Cornell law professor who was a top federal regulatory officer from 2021 to 2023. 'Literally tens of thousands of people will lose their lives" if the standard is rolled back, he said. A penguin-shaped nebulizer In southwest Indiana, many people have noticed a positive difference from the EPA regulations. And they're concerned about changes. In Bloomfield, Jessica Blazier's 11-year-old son Julian has multiple health conditions that make him more sensitive to air quality, including nonallergic rhinitis, which inflames his nasal passage and makes breathing 'feel like a knife sometimes," in his words. Jessica Blazier said the proposed EPA rule rollbacks are 'almost adding insult to injury in our particular circumstance.' In Evansville, Ethridge is now raising kids of his own, including a 5-year-old daughter who was born early and doesn't tolerate respiratory illnesses well. Whenever Eliza gets sick, she uses a children's nebulizer that is shaped like a penguin and stored in an igloo-shaped case. 'I want to raise my kids in Evansville,' he said. 'I don't want to raise my kids in a bowl of pollution.' ___ Borenstein and Daly reported from Washington, Walling and Bickel from Evansville, Indiana, and Wildeman from Hartford, Connecticut. ___
San Francisco Chronicle
12 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Emperor's visit to Okinawa reflects imperial family's close ties to the island. Here is why he cares
TOKYO (AP) — Japan's Emperor Naruhito and his family have visited Okinawa to honor the dead ahead of the 80th anniversary of one of the harshest battles of World War II. On what was his seventh visit to Okinawa, Naruhito was joined this week by his wife and daughter for a tour of the southern island and its history. Naruhito's father, the 91-year-old former Emperor Akihito, especially cared about Okinawa. On June 23, the island will mark the 80th anniversary of the end of the Battle of Okinawa, which led to heavy American troop presence on the island, even after the nearly 30 years of U.S. occupation ended in 1972. Here is what to know about Okinawa's history. Fierce battle U.S. troops landed on the main Okinawa island on April 1, 1945, beginning a battle in their push toward mainland Japan. The Battle of Okinawa lasted until late June, killing some 200,000 people — about 12,000 Americans and more than 188,000 Japanese, half of them Okinawan civilians. In all, the island lost about one quarter of its population. In Itoman town, where the battle ended, the remains of most of the war dead reside in an ossuary at the National War Dead Peace Mausoleum. It was the first place Naruhito and his wife Empress Masako and their 23-year-old daughter, Princess Aiko, visited on Wednesday where they laid a bouquet of white flowers each. Post-war years Okinawa remained under U.S. occupation from 1945 until the 1972 reversion to Japan. The U.S. military maintains a presence there due to Okinawa's strategic importance for security in the Pacific. Private properties were confiscated to build U.S. bases, and the base-dependent economy hampered the growth of local industry. Emperors tried to make a mends Many Okinawans feel they have been sacrificed for the mainland in the war fought in the name of Hirohito, the grandfather of Emperor Naruhito. Bitter feelings were fresh in Okinawa in the 1970s, when many people said the emperor should take responsibility. Akihito, who was almost hit by a Molotov cocktail thrown during his visit to Okinawa as crown prince in 1975, has been a regular visitor. Every year on June 23, Akihito and his family observe a moment of silence for the victims of the battle. It's one of the four key dates he said should never forget, along with the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on Aug. 6 and Aug. 9, as well as the Aug. 15 end of the war. Naruhito's empathy for Okinawa Naruhito has pledged to follow in his father's footsteps and repeatedly expressed the importance to reflect on and remember the wartime history. In February, Naruhito stressed the importance of telling the tragedy of World War II to younger generations, promising to help promoting the understanding of history and the determination for peace. He and his family on Wednesday visited the Cornerstone of Peace Memorial, which is engraved with the names of about 250,000 war dead on Itoman's Mabuni Hill. They also visited a permanent war exhibit at the town's Okinawa Prefectural Peace Memorial Museum, where they met the survivors and bereaved families. On Thursday they laid flowers at a monument commemorating about 1,500 people including hundreds of school children killed in a U.S. torpedo attack on their evacuation ship Tsushima Maru on Aug. 1944. They visited a museum dedicated to the tragedy and met with a number of survivors. Naruhito and Masako, in a message released to Japanese media, renewed their pledge to peace and said their daughter deeply took to her heart Okinawan people's history of hardship. Modern problems Okinawa remains home to the majority of about 50,000 U.S. troops stationed in Japan under a bilateral security pact. The island, which accounts for only 0.6% of Japanese land, hosts 70% of U.S. military facilities. Resentment and frustration run deep in Okinawa because of the heavy U.S. presence. The island faces noise, pollution, aircraft accidents and crime related to American troops, Denny Tanmaki, the governor of Okinawa, has said. Following a series of alleged sexual assault cases against local women, the U.S. military and local government held a forum in May to discuss ways to improve safety and communication and agreed to regularize their meeting.
