logo
UK will be FORCED to ramp up defence spending after Keir refused to commit to funding despite ‘battle ready' promise

UK will be FORCED to ramp up defence spending after Keir refused to commit to funding despite ‘battle ready' promise

The Sun4 days ago

BRITAIN will be steamrollered into ramping up defence spending when Nato allies agree to a target of 3.5 per cent of GDP at a summit later this month.
Labour's pledge to 'lead in Nato' would be blown to smithereens if Britain is left behind, a top defence insider said.
3
3
3
Top Brass have been baffled by Kier Starmer's refusal to say when he will hit Labour's target of spending 3 per cent.
The PM vowed to get Britain " battle ready" yesterday with new doomsday nukes and robotic fighter jets – but refused to say how he will fund it.
Donald Trump has demanded allies spend 5 per cent of GDP on defence – and he has threatened to abandon nations that fail to pay their way.
Nato's chief Mark Rutte has successfully lobbied allies to try and hit Trump's target by spending 3.5 per cent on core defence – including troops, tanks and ships – and 1.5 per cent on security and infrastructure, including spy agencies.
France 's President Macron has backed Rutte's demands.
And Germany is already on course to hit the target within the next few years.
A defence source said Britain's ministers have 'been in denial' about the looming Nato summit and pledges key allies will make.
Starmer is expected to discuss the Nato target in a crunch meeting this week.
A defence source said: 'Do we want to be lumped with Spain as the only allies that are complaining?'
At the launch a landmark Strategic Defence Review Defence Secretary John Healey said: 'Our defence policy is Nato First.
China & Russia will use drones 'the size of insects' to spy on UK & commit untraceable murders, ex-Google futurist warns
'We will end the hollowing out of our Armed Forces and lead
in a stronger, more lethal Nato.'
Labour has pledged to increase defence spending from 2.3 per cent of GDP to 2.5 per cent by 2027.
Starmer said: 'We have set the ambition to reach 3 per cent in the next Parliament, subject to economic and fiscal conditions.'
But pressed on what that meant, he said: 'I'm not going to indulge in the fantasy politics of simply plucking dates from the air.'
Strategic error
ON the face of it, there is good news in
Labour's Strategic Defence Review.
Up to 12 submarines to head off
threats from Russia at sea.
New weapons and munitions factories
to replace those stocks depleted by
donations to Ukraine.
But will the billions needed to pay for
all these new fighter jets, drones and
hi-tech weaponry actually be found?
Defence chiefs say it will take
investment of three per cent of GDP.
Yet Keir Starmer yesterday refused to
put a timeline on achieving that.
By 2027 it will still be only 2.5 per cent
— when experts say we need five per
cent to re-arm properly.
If the Prime Minister has doubts about
where to find the cash, he could try
diverting money from less pressing
areas — like binning Net Zero and free
hotels for migrants.
A pity, too, that his Government is
handing Mauritius £30billion on top of
surrendering the Chagos Islands.
At the very least, the PM's uncertainty
also throws the delivery time of new
projects into doubt.
New subs, for example, already won't
be serviceable until the late 2030s.
Sir Keir says the nation is on a war
footing as of now.
But it cannot take decades before we are
ready to actually fight one.
Defence Secretary Healey said the 3 per cent target was a "certainty
But he backtracked 24-hours later, insisting it was merely an "ambition".
Britain's three biggest weapons programmes – including the Trident 2 nuclear deterrent, the new sixth generation fighter jets and new hunter killer submarines – will cost at least 3 per cent of GDP, a former defence minister told The Sun.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia is already at war with Britain and we can no longer rely on Trump, defence adviser warns
Russia is already at war with Britain and we can no longer rely on Trump, defence adviser warns

The Independent

time39 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Russia is already at war with Britain and we can no longer rely on Trump, defence adviser warns

Britain is at war with Russia already, one of the authors of the government's strategic defence review has warned, while arguing that we can no longer depend on the US as a reliable ally. Dr Fiona Hill, who served as the White House's chief Russia adviser during Donald Trump 's first term in office, said the UK is in 'pretty big trouble', warning that the country is stuck between 'the rock' of Russia and the 'hard place' of an increasingly unreliable US under Mr Trump. 'Russia has hardened as an adversary in ways that we probably hadn't fully anticipated,' Dr Hill told the Guardian, concluding that 'Russia is at war with us'. Arguing that the Kremlin has been 'menacing the UK in various different ways' for years, she pointed to 'the poisonings, assassinations, sabotage operations, all kinds of cyber-attacks and influence operations. The sensors that we see that they're putting down around critical pipelines, efforts to butcher undersea cables.' Unveiling the SDR last week - authored by Dr Hill, Lord Robertson and General Sir Richard Barrons - defence secretary John Healey said Britain's army needed to become '10 times more lethal' in the face of the 'immediate and pressing threat" from Russia and the rise of China. 'We are in a new era of threat, which demands a new era for UK defence,' he told MPs. The review found that the armed forces are not ready to fight its opponents as a result of inadequate stockpiles of weapons, medical services that cannot cope with a mass-casualty conflict and a personnel 'crisis' that means only a small number of troops are ready to be deployed. Meanwhile, General Sir Richard Barrons, warned that a cruise missile was 'only 90 minutes away from the UK'. But Sir Keir Starmer vowed to make Britain "a battle-ready, armour-clad nation' as he unveiled the SDR at the Govan shipbuilding yard in Scotland, which included an army boosted to 100,000 personnel, 12 new submarines, drones and a rollout of Artificial Intelligence. But questions were raised over the government's big ambitions to make Britain 'safer and stronger' after Sir Keir refused to commit to spending 3 per cent of Britain's gross domestic product on defence by 2034 — which the review warned was essential to ensure the plans were affordable. Dr Hill, who was highly critical of the Trump administration, said Britain could no longer rely on the US's military umbrella as it did during the cold war, at least 'not in the way that we did before'. It comes after the SDR contained a similar warning, saying: 'The UK's longstanding assumptions about global power balances and structures are no longer certain.' The defence adviser argued that the US president 'really wants to have a separate relationship with Putin to do arms control agreements and also business that will probably enrich their entourages further, though Putin doesn't need any more enrichment'. Speaking about Mr Trump's White House, Dr Hill warned it is 'not an administration, it is a court', arguing that the president is driven primarily by his 'own desires and interests, and who listens often to the last person he talks to'. Speaking about the rise of the populist right in the US, she expressed concerns it could do well in British electoral politics if 'the same culture wars' are allowed to grow in influence. Warning of the impact of Reform UK, she said: 'When Nigel Farage says he wants to do a Doge against the local county council, he should come over here [to the US] and see what kind of impact that has. 'This is going to be the largest layoffs in US history happening all at once, much bigger than hits to steelworks and coalmines.' Doge (the Department of Government Efficiency) is an initiative by the second Trump administration, which aims to cut wasteful spending.

Tesla shares rebound slightly after $150bn wipe-out triggered by Musk's spat with Trump
Tesla shares rebound slightly after $150bn wipe-out triggered by Musk's spat with Trump

Daily Mail​

time42 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Tesla shares rebound slightly after $150bn wipe-out triggered by Musk's spat with Trump

Tesla shares were sent into freefall on Thursday after Elon Musk sounded off about Donald Trump and his policies on social media this week. The debacle saw roughly $150billion wiped from Tesla's market value in one of the worst days in months. While the electric car maker's share price tumbled 14 per cent on Thursday, it rebounded slightly on Friday following some indications tempers were cooling between the duo. Earlier this week, Trump threatened to cut off government contracts to Musk's businesses, including rocket firm SpaceX, which has contracts worth tens of billions of dollars with the US government. In response, Musk fired back and said: 'Go ahead, make my day.' The saga seemed to quieten somewhat on Friday as Musk broke his silence by agreeing with an X post that claimed he never attacked Trump personally. The initial feud was ignited over Musk's opposition to Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill', before he launched into a series of attacks on the president and alleged he was 'in the Epstein files. Trump quickly branded Musk 'crazy' and said he has 'lost his mind'. The president also moved to sell his Tesla that he bought from Musk when their relationship was rosier in March, in a parting insult after saying he ousted Musk from his White House. US subsidies and contracts at Federal and state level are worth billions to Tesla, which also currently benefits from a $7,500 tax credit available for electric vehicle purchases. Tesla shares closed at $295.14 this week, down around 14 per cent on less than a week ago and down nearly a quarter on where they were six months ago. But the shares are still around 66 higher than they were a year ago. Tesla shares rose more than 60 per cent between the start of November when Trump was elected to the end of 2024. But investor pressure over Musk's controversial role in the White House ultimately led to him to stepping down from his unofficial 'DOGE' department, which had sparked protests and vandalism directed at Tesla. Tesla shares were on a run more recently, however, after Musk confirmed the group would be testing an autonomous, driverless 'robotaxi' service in Austin, Texas, this month. Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said this week: 'Tesla shareholders are stuck in the middle of the battle zone as whatever happens to Musk will act as a proxy for the car company's share price. 'Trump has signalled he could terminate US government contracts with Musk's companies, causing Tesla's share price to crash 14 per cent in a day.' He added: 'Musk's outspokenness is becoming a liability for Tesla shareholders. 'He recently pledged to stay on as CEO for at least another five years, but if he cannot be restrained from stoking fires on the public stage, Tesla's board might have to think long and hard about his future with the business.' Neil Wilson, UK investor strategist at Saxo Markets, said on Friday: 'I spoke almost a year ago to Mark Spiegel of Stanphyl Capital in New York. 'He said it was just a matter of time before Musk and Trump fell out – the only question was who would shaft who first but his view was that sooner or later everyone "gets Musked". 'An ugly, name-calling, chest-thumping public brawl on Twitter between the richest guy in the world and the most powerful guy in the world – it's what the platform was made for. 'It's also whacked Tesla stock as bulls need to reassess their upside case for the carmaker. 'Both probably realise that this is doing each of them a lot of harm – Musk could lose billions of dollars in government contracts and tax credits, while Trump could see his 'big beautiful bill' fail to pass.'

‘He's a bad guy': Trump backs decision to bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia back to US to face charges
‘He's a bad guy': Trump backs decision to bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia back to US to face charges

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

‘He's a bad guy': Trump backs decision to bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia back to US to face charges

Donald Trump has called Kilmar Abrego Garcia a 'bad guy' and backed the decision to return him to the US to face criminal charges. Abrego Garcia was wrongly deported to El Salvador nearly three months ago under the Trump administration. He was returned to the US on Friday (6 June) and charged with trafficking migrants into the country. The charges relate to a 2022 traffic stop, during which the Tennessee Highway Patrol suspected him of human trafficking. Speaking to reporters on Saturday, Trump said: 'By bringing him back, you show how bad he is.' 'He's a bad guy,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store