‘A birth is more expensive than an abortion': CO Dems argue fiscal virtues of liberal health care bill
The speaker of the Colorado House of Representatives argued in a recent committee hearing on a new "pregnancy-related services" bill that "averted births" could lead to cost savings for the state and its Medicaid program.
Rep. Julie McCluskie, D-Dillon, seated as a bill-sponsor witness during a Health and Human Services Committee hearing in Denver last week, was pressed on her argument that the bill would "decrease costs for our health care policy and financing department [and] Medicaid expenditures."
"[T]he savings from averted births outweigh the cost of covering reproductive health care for all Coloradans," McCluskie said, adding the bill will require abortions to be state-funded so as to avoid "potential interference" from the feds.
McCluskie claimed the bill is a response to voters approving a 2024 ballot referendum that repealed a state constitutional amendment banning public funds for abortion procedures and instead recognized the operation as a right.
Rep. Brandi Bradley, R-Lone Tree, questioned McCluskie's cost argument from a pro-life perspective, and lamented the fact Colorado allows abortion up until the day of delivery.
Bradley countered that McCluskie's cost-centric position ignores the high price of third-trimester abortions, which she calculated to be as much as $25,000, and asked General Assembly nonpartisan fiscal analyst Bill Zepernick to weigh-in on official figures.
"So help me understand: From a fiscal point of view, you say there's a decrease of $1.7 million from federal funds — but if there are no federal funds, you would say there's no money coming from federal funds," Bradley asked McCluskie.
"Can you walk me through why it just says a decrease, and not that there's zero money coming from federal funds, because if there is, the Hyde Amendment covers that," she said, referring to the practice of adding such a rider to health care appropriations bills since the late Rep. Henry Hyde, R-Ill., first did in 1976 to prohibit abortion funding via federal dollars.
McCluskie responded that the savings she referenced comes from "averted births that will not occur because abortions happened instead."
"So, a birth is more expensive than an abortion," she said. "So, the savings comes in Medicaid births that will not occur — since both federal and state general funds are used through Medicaid for other health care services."
Meanwhile, Bradley pressed McCluskie on the mental health and substance abuse complications some women who undergo abortions may develop.
Bill co-sponsor Rep. Lorena Garcia, D-Westminster, chimed in, calling Bradley's concern one that "assumes misinformation" and instead claimed women denied abortions are at risk of suffering longer-term mental health complications.
Rep. Scott Bottoms, R-Cimarron Hills, rejected Garcia's claim.
"You know that that definitely isn't misinformation," he said.
"CDC and NIH both — I stated these statistics three weeks ago, but they were ignored. Those statistics are wrong. Suicide goes up drastically, specifically second and third trimester. As I mentioned, if they have an abortion, as mental health issues goes up quite a bit."
A pro-life obstetrician later told the committee it seemed proponents of the bill "are saying that if more babies die by abortion it will be cheaper for the state."
Fox News Digital reached out to McCluskie, Bradley and House Minority Leader Rose Pugliese, R-Colorado Springs, for comment.
The full audio was posted in a legislative hearing depository.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Arkansans getting government assistance ask senators to vote down ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – Arkansans receiving government assistance are asking Arkansas senators in Washington to vote against President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act.' Chanting 'The big ugly bill will kill,' about a dozen people spoke out against changes to Medicaid, SNAP, and HUD Housing in the 1,000-page bill while arguing that health, food and housing are human rights. Big, beautiful bill heads to the Senate Norma Huffman is a member of Arkansas Community Organizations, the group that organized a visit to the Washington D.C. and Little Rock offices of Senators Cotton and Boozman on Wednesday. 'We are here to try to convince the head honcho of this office to vote no,' Huffman stated. Huffman is a single parent and says she is permanently disabled. She is on Medicaid, SNAP, and housing assistance for her needs, and she fears what the future will hold if Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' becomes law. 'We have to fight for ourselves because we know for a fact nobody else is going to,' Huffman argued. The act proposes substantial cuts, restrictions, and added requirements for Medicaid and SNAP, shifting more costs to states, limiting eligibility, and repealing support programs. For HUD, the bill removes funding for cost-cutting green retrofitting. Hattie Temple says any change could be a triple blow to her and hundreds of thousands more. 'It makes our deficit higher. It doesn't make any sense. Everything that he (Trump) cuts is to keep the folks down that are already down,' Temple stated. Trump 'disappointed' by Musk criticism of 'big, beautiful bill' Senator John Boozman provided this statement when asked about the visit: 'Work requirements for able-bodied adults are a fair and effective way to ensure SNAP and Medicaid benefits are directed to those who truly need them. By implementing commonsense policies, we can strengthen the programs while eliminating waste, reducing federal spending and promoting accountability.' -Senator John Boozman At the time of this report, Senator Cotton's office has not replied to requests for comment. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Performative Austerity Vanishes As GOP Flees Town Before Trump's Dictator-Style Parade
Hardly any Republicans in the Senate want to be caught dead at President Trump's big boy parade this weekend. The two most powerful Republicans in Congress — House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) — are not going to come. Johnson's office claims he has other plans, Thune's office says he's engaged with constituents back home on Saturday. Reporters from HuffPost, Politico, the Wall Street Journal and others all tried to pin a handful of Republicans down on this issue in pieces published this week. Many said they weren't coming, offering shrugs of excuses for their absence. Most refused to even touch questions surrounding the price tag on the whole spectacle: $45 million in taxpayer funds for Trump to roll out a bunch of military tanks and show off America's lavishly unmatched spending on weaponry, all in honor of Trump's 79th birthday (and the 250th anniversary of the Army). It, of course, all comes on a week of growing public pushback, not just to Trump's mass deportation agenda but to his use of the military as a prop, escalating mostly peaceful protests and infringing on the power of politicians who lead cities he doesn't like. Bookending the week of overreach on state sovereignty with a garish military parade — which will involve rolling out 150 military vehicles and more than 50 aircraft into the streets of the capital — has at least one Republican comparing it to a scene out of North Korea. Most of the Republicans who spoke to the media about their planned absence suggested they had other plans, or indicated that their decision to not RSVP had nothing to do with the outlandish cost of the event designed specifically for Trump's ego. 'I don't like spending on anything, but if you're going to splurge on something, this is probably not a bad thing,' Johnson told WSJ this week, while avoiding questions about what he's doing on Saturday instead. Ironically, Johnson is the Republican in the Senate most vocally opposed to the sweeping reconciliation package that'll fund much of Trump's fiscal agenda if it passes the upper chamber in coming weeks — primarily due to his belief that it doesn't do enough to cut federal spending on social safety net programs like Medicaid, which are, as I get into below, already on the chopping block. For those observing at home for at least the past two decades, austerity matters most, to this group of politicians, when a Democrat is in the White House. And it matters the least when the wannabe dictator head of the Republican Party decides to throw himself a multi-million dollar bday bash. As they have for decades, Republicans in recent months have attempted to spin their devastating proposed cuts to Medicaid and supplemental nutrition programs like SNAP as necessary 'reforms' to cut out the amorphous 'waste, fraud and abuse' supposedly baked in to these programs. They've also championed the implementation of so-called common sense 'work requirements' in order to be eligible for the coverage (which conveniently ignores the fact that a significant number of those on Medicaid are either people with disabilities or children). This spin is, of course, spin, as TPM has reported, and all the changes listed as provisions in the House's reconciliation package will result in some 16 million Americans losing their health care. By other estimates (from researchers at Yale University and University of Pennsylvania) 51,000 people may die annually as a direct result of proposed cuts to the program. It's real and devastating stuff. Republicans have historically, famously spun their efforts to gut social safety net programs under the same guise of 'reforms' that House Republicans are using now. They promise to never touch Medicare or Social Security, while salivating for the very types of 'reforms' to the social safety net that may soon become law, that are stuffed into the House's latest reconciliation package. In one of his last truly eloquent moments as president, Biden was able to back Republicans into a corner during his 2023 State of the Union address, and got the Republican conference to agree, on live TV, to drop their at-the-time-latest effort to sunset Medicare and Social Security every five years. New polling from Quinnipiac University today shows that Republican efforts to obscure what exactly it is they're doing to Medicaid may not have been as successful as it has been in the past — or perhaps the opposition party's telegraphing of the horrors to voters actually broke through this time. Per Quinnipiac: As the Senate debates the GOP tax and spending bill titled One Big Beautiful Bill Act and President Donald Trump pushes for a July 4 deadline to sign it, voters 53 – 27 percent oppose the legislation, with 20 percent not offering an opinion, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll of registered voters released today. I mean, who among us doesn't do a little self deprecative soul searching at such an hour. According to some reports, Trump and the world's richest man actually spoke on the phone late on Monday night after their messy, public breakup last week. Musk posted the tweet early Wednesday. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) on Tuesday night succinctly articulated the longstanding punditry norms that have Democrats policing the largely organic Los Angeles protests: 'It is 100% carrying water for the opposition to participate in this collective delusion that Dems for some reason need to answer for every teen who throws a rock rather than hold the Trump admin accountable for intentionally creating chaos and breaking the law to stoke violence.' One of the most dependable formulations in political commentary is that Democrats are responsible for everyone vaguely, even just aesthetically, associated with the left, while Republican politicians can directly fraternize with neo-Nazis and still claim ideological distance. — Kate Riga How Some Very Bad Luck Has Made It Even Harder To Rein In Trump Passing Big Beautiful Bill Would Mean 'Effectively Dismantling' Obamacare, Gutting Inflation Reduction Act New episode of the Josh Marshall Podcast: Ep. 377: Protest Politics Stephen Miller Demanded ICE Target Home Depots Judge Bars Trump Administration From Detaining Mahmoud Khalil National Guard troops have temporarily detained civilians in LA protests, commander says Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to deploy National Guard across the state in response to protests
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Group protests Congressman Rulli's stance on issues and bill
AUSTINTOWN, Ohio (WKBN) – Protesters gathered at a Valley grocery store Wednesday, demonstrating about Congressman Michael Rulli's votes on some issues and President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill. It was one of many protests being held by constituents outside Rulli Brothers grocery stores. This time, the protest is in Austintown. About 40 people have been outside the store since about 3 p.m. They're calling for Congressman Rulli to hold a town hall meeting with constituents while he is in town, and are also concerned with his stance on some issues. Among their concerns are cuts being made in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, especially to Medicare and Medicaid. This protest comes on the same day that Congressman Rulli introduced the Gambler Act in Congress to address the border crisis, which seeks to allocate money from the US Treasury towards ICE operations. The money will specifically come from gambling tax revenue The act would receive a $300 million fund each year from the treasury. Rulli says the act will strengthen immigration enforcement without raising taxes on citizens. Rulli Brothers issued a statement about the protests: For 108 years Rulli Bros has proudly served the Mahoning Valley as a retailer of groceries and Italian specialties. During that history we have contributed to the local community and economy by providing customers with goods at competitive prices, creating countless jobs, procuring goods from local vendors, and generating local tax revenues that directly benefit the community. We greatly appreciate all our customers, vendors, and employees who represent the political diversity of the Valley. All are welcome at Rulli Bros., left, right, and center as we continue to serve the Valley to the best of our ability. Rulli Bros. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
