US House Republicans propose fees on immigrants to fund Trump's crackdown
Congressional Republicans are proposing an array of new fees on immigrants seeking to remain in the United States in a move that advocates warn will create insurmountable financial barriers.
Legislation moving through the GOP-controlled House of Representatives could require immigrants to pay potentially hundreds or thousands of dollars to seek asylum, care for a minor in the government's custody, or apply for humanitarian parole.
Republican lawmakers have described the fees as necessary to offset the costs of Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. But experts who work with immigrants say putting more economic pressure on people attempting to navigate US immigration laws could drain what little money they have, force them into exploitative work arrangements, or push them to leave the country altogether.
'These are essentially a mask for targeted attacks towards some of the most vulnerable immigrants that we currently have going through our legal system right now: asylum seekers, children, survivors of crimes,' said Victoria Maqueda Feldman, director of legal programs at Ayuda, which assists low-income immigrants in Washington DC, Virginia and Maryland.
Trump has made it a priority of his administration to not only rid the country of undocumented immigrants, but also to stop many new immigrants from entering the country. The GOP-controlled Congress is negotiating what he has dubbed 'one big, beautiful bill', a huge spending and taxation package that includes provisions to turn his hardline immigration proposals into reality.
Republicans are limited in what they can accomplish in Congress due to the Senate's filibuster, which the Democratic minority can use to block legislation it does not support. The GOP is seeking to enact Trump's legislative agenda through the budget reconciliation procedure, under which bills can pass with simple majorities in both chambers but must affect only spending and revenues – like fees.
'This system has left these agencies with funding shortfalls paid for by American taxpayers,' said Jim Jordan, the Republican chair of the House judiciary committee. 'The fees included in this bill will … allow us to make the necessary investments in immigration enforcement in a fiscally responsible manner.'
Heidi Altman, vice-president of policy at the National Immigration Law Center, said the new fees appeared targeted at the sorts of immigrants that the Trump administration has prioritized keeping out, such as asylum seekers, who arrived in large numbers during Joe Biden's term.
'It's part of the administration's assault on humanitarian protections for immigrant communities,' Altman said. 'This is an entire new way of thinking about fees as a penalty, essentially, for an immigrant status.'
Under the bill, immigrants would have to pay $1,000 to apply for asylum, $100 to keep an application active each year as it makes it through the overburdened immigration system, and $550 for a work permit. People requesting humanitarian parole to enter the United States would have to pay $1,000, and abused or neglected children who qualify for a program called Special Immigrant Juvenile Status would have to pay $500. Immigration cases can take a long time to resolve in court, but if a defendant asks a judge for a continuance, they would have to pay $100 each time.
These fees do not exist under current law, and the bill specifies they cannot be waived in almost all circumstances.
The new fees are targeted at people, often relatives, who seek to sponsor children who crossed the border without a parent or guardian and wind up in the government's care. In order to take custody of an unaccompanied minor, adults would have to pay $3,500 to partially pay back the government for the minor's care, along with another $5,000 to ensure the child attends their court hearings, though that money can be reimbursed if they do.
'In some cases, that would be placing $3,500 between a mother or a father being able to get their child out of government custody and back into their own home,' Altman said.
The fees were proposed as the Trump administration looks for novel ways to push immigrants out, including by offering them cash to leave. The bill gives a preview of what more will come, should the president receive the tens of billions of dollars he has requested from Congress.
Related: Supreme court blocks Trump bid to resume deportations under 1798 law
More than $50bn is allocated in the legislation to construct a wall along the border with Mexico, as well as fortifications elsewhere. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) will receive $45bn for detention facilities, $14bn for its deportation operations and billions of dollars more to hire 10,000 new agents by 2029.
For the low-income clients Ayuda serves, Feldman predicted that the fees 'could amount to a complete barrier to forms of relief'.
Some might be able to pull together the money, but 'through means that could put them in greater danger. So, having to work under the table, putting them at risk for labor trafficking. They might have to take out loans that have very high interest rates, putting them at risk for having to pay off something that is very expensive.'
The bill is a top priority of congressional Republicans, but its pathway to enactment is unclear. On Friday, rightwing Republican lawmakers blocked its progress through a key House committee, arguing it did not cut government spending deeply enough.
Last month, when the judiciary committee met to approve the portion of the bill that included the fee increases, GOP lawmakers approved it quickly, with little signs of dissent.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock Market News for Jun 5, 2025
U.S. stocks ended mostly lower on Wednesday after data showed private sector payrolls hit a two-year low, suggesting that a lack of clarity over President Donald Trump's trade policies could weigh on the nation's economy. The S&P ended nearly flat, while the Dow slipped. However, the Nasdaq ended in positive territory. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJI) slid 0.2% or 91.90 points, to close at 42,427.74 points. The S&P 500 added 0.01% or 0.44 points to finish at 5,970.81 points. Utilities and energy stocks were the worst performers. The Utilities Select Sector SPDR (XLU) fell 1.8%, while the Energy Select Sector SPDR (XLE) declined 2%. The Financials Select Sector SPDR (XLF) lost 0.6%. Six of the 11 sectors of the benchmark index ended in positive territory. The tech-heavy Nasdaq rose 0.3%, or 61.53 points, to end at 19,460.49 points. The fear-gauge CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) was down 0.45% to 17.61. Advancers outnumbered decliners on the NYSE by a 1.3-to-1 ratio. On Nasdaq, a 1.18-to-1 ratio favored advancing issues. A total of 14.5 billion shares were traded on Wednesday, lower than the last 20-session average of 17.8 billion. The Dow snapped its four-day winning streak, while the S&P 500 struggled on Wednesday as disappointing jobs data raised concerns over the economy's health. According to a report from payrolls processing company Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP), the economy added only 37,000 private jobs in May, less than the downwardly revised 60,000 jobs in April and sharply lower than the consensus estimate of 110,000. Trump slammed Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell moments after the figures were out, saying, 'Too Late, Powell,' as he called for immediate interest rate cuts. Investors also focused on trade negotiations between the United States and its trading partners. Trump and the Chinese President are scheduled to talk sometime this week as tensions cease to ease between the world's two biggest economies. The lack of clarity over Trump's upcoming tariff policies has raised concerns among investors. Stocks have rebounded over the past month, and investors are still confident that there will be a positive outcome from the ongoing trade negotiations between the United States and its trading partners. Meanwhile, shares of Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) declined 3.6% after the electric carmaker's sales fell for the fifth straight month in European markets. Also, shares of Dollar Tree, Inc. (DLTR) tumbled 8.4% after the retailer said that its second-quarter adjusted profit could plummet as much as 50% owing to the tariff-fueled volatility. Dollar Tree has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. In other economic data released on Wednesday, the Institute for Supply Management's (ISM) Services Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) fell to 49.9 in May from April's reading of 51.6. This is the first time the services sector has declined in nearly a year. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) : Free Stock Analysis Report Dollar Tree, Inc. (DLTR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data


CNN
30 minutes ago
- CNN
Kilmar Abrego Garcia Returned To U.S. & Facing Criminal Charges - Anderson Cooper 360 - Podcast on CNN Audio
Kilmar Abrego Garcia Returned To U.S. & Facing Criminal Charges Anderson Cooper 360 47 mins The man mistakenly deported to an El Salvadorian prison has been returned to the United States and indicted. We are now learning the prosecutor in charge has resigned over it. Plus, what Elon Musk and Donald Trump are saying now about their breakup. Also, a look at how Musk's insinuation about the President and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein is landing with the MAGA faithful.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump-backed bill could block Tennessee's AI laws, threaten deepfake protections
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' could change the way Tennessee regulates artificial intelligence. New language added to the legislation would block states from regulating AI or risk losing federal broadband funding. That means state laws like the Elvis Act, which protects artists from having their voices or images stolen by AI, would be put on pause. 'We are just hoping that we're not taking a couple steps backward since there's no federal regulation currently in place,' Kaley Bonett, a Nashville entertainment lawyer at Hall Booth Smith, said. MAY: House Republicans include a 10-year ban on US states regulating AI in 'big, beautiful' bill 'The songwriters — all — are entitled to revenue generated from the performances and distribution of that particular sound recording of their song, so if there's a deepfake imposing and competing with the authentic, then it's going to affect where the revenue share goes,' a Nashville managing partner and shareholder for Hall Booth Smith, Karl Braun, explained. 'It's going to be very difficult for, let's say, a songwriter to protect themselves legally from this evolving kind of internet Wild, wild west.' 'The big beautiful bill that the president is advancing does not replace those regulations with anything, which is almost unprecedented,' Plaintiffs Attorney at Spragens Law, David Kieley, said. Also at risk is the 'Preventing Deep Fakes Images Act,' which makes it a felony to post fake AI images designed to harm someone's reputation. Nashville-based meteorologist Bree Smith was targeted by AI imagery herself, explaining that someone used AI to take her face and put it on someone else's semi-naked body. '[This bill] just means that we are saying for 10 years we are going to let people potentially be victimized in this way, and that can't happen,' Smith said. 'It's not going to be any more okay for something like that to happen 10 years from now than it is for it to happen today.' 'Even looking prospectively at things we haven't really encountered yet, but this would stop the state from being able to regulate things like driverless cars in your town, driverless 18-wheelers on Tennessee highways,' Kieley added. 'We don't know really how this technology could affect public safety things like 9-1-1, dispatch.' A law signed just last week by Governor Lee banning AI-generated child sexual abuse material could also be blocked. ⏩ 'It would put child sex predators and big tech over the safety of our families,' Sen. Heidi Campbell (D-Nashville) said. 'This is really antithetical to the values that people across the aisle in Tennessee have been communicating with our legislation.' The president's bill passed in the House of Representatives. It's now in the Senate, where supporters hope to finalize it by July. Senator Marsha Blackburn has previously stated that Tennessee needs AI safeguards, saying, 'Until we pass something that is federally preemptive, we can't call for a moratorium on those things.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.