US issues travel warning for Italy fearing ‘terrorism' — here's what American tourists should know
Italy has long been a summer hotspot for globetrotters everywhere — but an updated travel advisory has just been issued for the beloved European vacation destination.
On May 23, the US State Department issued a Level 2 travel warning for Italy, urging travelers to 'exercise increased caution' due to terrorism.
The U.S. State Department issued a Level 2 travel warning for Italy.
Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto/Shutterstock
Advertisement
'There is risk of terrorist violence, including terrorist attacks and other activity in Italy,' the advisory summary reads.
Italy previously had the basic Level 1 advisory that most other European countries share, simply telling travelers to 'exercise normal precautions' when visiting.
However, due to the increased threat of terrorist-related violence, the State Department has bumped Italy up to Level 2.
Advertisement
There are four levels for international travel advisories: Level 1 ('exercise normal precautions'), Level 2 ('exercise increased caution'), Level 3 ('reconsider travel') and Level 4 ('do not travel').
The advisory warns that terrorists 'may attack with little or no warning' and encourages Americans to be wary of common targets, including tourist spots, transportation centers, shopping malls and markets, local government buildings, hotels, clubs, restaurants, religious sites, parks, sports and cultural events, schools, airports and public areas.
For those who decide to travel to Italy, the State Department recommends staying alert in tourist spots, checking local media for any breaking news and enrolling in the Smart Traveler Enrollment Program (STEP) to receive messages and alerts from the U.S. Embassy.
The State Department is urging travelers to 'exercise increased caution' due to terrorism.
REUTERS/Igor Petyx
Advertisement
It's also been recommended to be prepared to alter plans while abroad and set up a contingency plan for any potential emergency situations.
France, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom also currently have Level 2 advisories from the State Department.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is the end of the dreaded airport queue in sight? Not quite
Last week, British passengers arriving at Tenerife South Airport reported 'inhumane' conditions after queueing for more than two hours without access to water or loos. 'We couldn't move our arms, we could barely breathe, and people were sweating. Some parents lifted their children onto their shoulders to stop them from suffocating,' one passenger told local media. It's a frightening image, and one that has become more common at European airports since British air passengers became 'third-country nationals' after Brexit. This effectively gives us the same rights as arrivals from, say, Venezuela, banishing us to the often snail-paced 'All Passports' queue to get a stamp on arrival. When flying home we must also pass through border control to get a second exit stamp before proceeding to the gate. This can lead to scenarios where passengers are kettled at the gates with no access to refreshments if a flight is delayed, and no way to go back to the main terminal area. Change, it seems, is on the horizon. The Labour party has struck a deal with the EU to allow British passport holders to pass through e-gates, and the introduction of the Entry/Exit System (EES) in October will automate identity checks and remove the need for manual passport stamps. So will these images of British passengers snaking out of arrival halls at European airports soon be a thing of the past? Yes, but it may take a while. When it first rolls out, EES will require British (and all non-EU) travellers to provide fingerprints and facial images when entering or exiting the Schengen Area. This process has been much-delayed, not least because implementing it requires a continent-wide tech overhaul. And as we all know, airport IT systems, often operated by third-party firms and alongside multiple other systems, have a tendency to buckle at inopportune moments. If the new tech doesn't create hold-ups, the data capture process could. Pressing thumbs on sensors and having a photograph taken may sound like a simple process, but how many times have you seen somebody push their passport into the e-gate sensor the wrong way up? Such are the fears of hold-ups that airports are planning 'safety valve' procedures, where the requirement to capture everyone's data will be temporarily waived if a checkpoint gets too busy. On e-gates, I have found this new Labour/EU e-gates 'agreement' to be somewhat smoke and mirrors. The wording in the relevant document says that 'British passengers will be able to use more e-gates in Europe'. But this does not necessarily mean we will be able to use fast-track EU e-gates. Instead, it might be that we remain in the naughty ('All Passports') queue that happens to have an e-gate at the end of it. This will ultimately be up for individual countries and airports to decide. I will allow you to decide whether we are likely to receive sympathy on this matter, or not. Perhaps I'm being overly negative. Let's say that the EES roll-out isn't as clunky as feared, and that through some miracle the majority of European airports do kindly allow Britons to use their fast-track e-gates. Surely the airport queues will have simmered down by next summer? Maybe. But we will still face the additional border check when flying home (albeit with biometrics rather than a passport stamp). And hold-ups like those seen in Tenerife are as much to do with poor scheduling as anything else. I checked the arrivals board on Tuesday June 2, and at 10.40am there were scheduled flights from Manchester (Jet2), Liverpool (Jet2), East Midlands (Tui) and Bournemouth (Ryanair). Ten minutes later, flights from Birmingham and Leeds (both Jet2) were scheduled to land, plus another from Paris. That's seven 180-or-so capacity flights touching onto tarmac, one after the other, in the space of ten minutes, at a single-runway, single-terminal airport. Even the sleekest, AI-powered biometric arrivals system would struggle to process all those passengers without the formation of a queue. There are some changes to the airport process that we can feel optimistic about. Soon, we'll be able to take greater quantities of liquids through security at all UK airports. A shake-up of UK flight paths promises to reduce air traffic delays before the end of the decade. And yes, all this new tech will eventually reduce friction at borders. But when you are stuck in a packed arrivals hall with a child on your shoulders and no access to water, you will be praying for progress now – not at some ambiguous point in the future. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Reviewing Trump's second travel ban and national security concerns
President Donald Trump on Wednesday brought back a piece of his first administration, announcing a travel ban on citizens from 12 countries and restrictions on people from seven others. Trump signed a proclamation that banned individuals from those countries from entering the United States come Monday at 12:01 a.m. The ban will affect Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The seven restricted countries include Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. In his announcement, Trump cited national security concerns. He said in a video that the recent attack in Boulder, Colorado, underscored the 'extreme dangers' posed by people who overstay their visas. The suspect in Colorado is from Egypt, which is not one of the countries included in Trump's new travel ban. 'In the 21st Century, we've seen one terror attack after another carried out by foreign visa overstayers from dangerous places all over the world, and thanks to Biden's open door policies, today, there are millions and millions of these illegals who should not be in our country,' Trump said. 'In my first term, my powerful travel restrictions were one of our most successful policies and they were a key part of preventing major foreign terror attacks on American soil.' He said more countries could be added to the list if threats arise later on. Trump signed an executive order on Inauguration Day that signaled he had plans for a new travel ban. The order instructed the State Department to identify countries with inadequate vetting and screening processes. A draft list was reviewed by The New York Times in March, but it showed the administration was considering restrictions for many more countries than the ones included in Wednesday's proclamation. In his video, Trump said he directed Secretary of State Marco Rubio to review 'high-risk regions' and to make recommendations for restrictions. The State Department examined national security threats, countries that had a 'large-scale presence' of terrorists, a failure to cooperate for visa security, difficulty verifying traveler identity and countries that had high rates of visa overstays, Trump said. 'Very simply, we cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter the United States,' he said. This policy is similar to the previous travel ban under Trump's first administration, as it seeks to curb migration from a specific country. The original list included Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. This time, Trump is also likely to face less legal challenges, experts told the Times, likely due to the delay in the ban beginning and the variation of countries impacted. The original travel ban, often referred to as the 'Muslim ban,' was sharply criticized, but the Trump administration insisted it was in place for national security reasons and not on anti-Muslim grounds. In his proclamation Wednesday, Trump said he must protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its citizens. While Trump cited the recent attack in Boulder, deemed by authorities to be an antisemitic terror attack, Egypt, the suspect's home country, is not on the list. The current list of impacted countries could change in the future, if governments work with the U.S., the announcement said. He said he is committed to engaging with the impacted countries that are willing to cooperate and improve 'information-sharing and identify-management procedures,' as well as address terrorism and public safety risks. 'Some of the countries with inadequacies face significant challenges to reform efforts. Others have made important improvements to their protocols and procedures, and I commend them for these efforts,' the proclamation said. 'But until countries with identified inadequacies address them, members of my Cabinet have recommended certain conditional restrictions and limitations.' While Trump did not entirely outline his reasoning for all of the bans, citing 'serious damage to the national security' of the U.S. if he released it, he shared a bit about why the restrictions were going into effect. For example, Afghanistan's ban cited the Taliban as a designated global terrorist group and its lack of 'competent or cooperative central authority' for issuing passports and security screening. Burma is on the list because it has a high rate of visa overstays in the U.S., and Haiti poses national security concerns to the U.S. because of its visa overstay rate and criminal network establishment. The inclusion of Afghanistan on the banned list angered supporters who have worked to resettle people, the AP reported. However, the proclamation makes certain exceptions, including for Afghan Special Immigrant Visas, which are given to individuals who have worked closely with the U.S. during the war. Other exceptions include adoptions, visas for ethnic and religious minorities being persecuted in Iran, athletes or members of athletic teams traveling for the World Cup, Olympics or other major sporting events, and immediate family immigrant visas, among others.
Fast Company
36 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Trump's travel ban goes into effect on Monday. Here's what to know about entering the U.S. from the 12 countries on the list
Travelers from 12 countries in Asia, Africa, the Caribbean, and the Middle East woke up Thursday to news they were being barred from entering the U.S., while others, from 7 additional countries, including Venezuela, learned their visa programs were being cancelled. President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order that effectively bans travel from 'foreign nationals' in more than a dozen countries from entering the U.S. citing 'national security' concerns. Slated to go into effect on Monday, June 9, the restrictions revisit and expand a previous ban from Trump's first term. Like many of his executive orders, it is expected to be challenged in court, and comes as part of this administration's relentless anti-immigration agenda. Here's what to know about this latest travel ban. What countries are on the travel ban list? The ban fully restricts the entry of individuals from 12 countries: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also partially restricts the entry of travelers from an additional 7 nations: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Why were these countries targeted? The administration said the ban was needed to ensure these foreign governments would comply with Trump's immigration policies, and the president made his decision based on a State Department report, according to The Washington Post. The order said the restrictions were meant to 'encourage foreign governments to improve their information-sharing and identity-management protocols and practices.' According to the administration, the banned countries had high rates of people who had overstayed their visas, had poor passport security vetting procedures, and had country-specific risk factors. However, the ban does include exemptions: for law abiding permanent residents, existing visa holders and those from certain visa categories, and those who serve U.S interests, per the Post.
