Man bids to overturn conviction for rape of girl (7)
A man who raped and sexually assaulted a seven-year-old girl who lived in his shared rented house has launched a bid to overturn his conviction on the grounds that the trial judge declined to warn the jury about the dangers of convicting on uncorroborated evidence.
The trial heard that the now 55-year-old man, who cannot be named to protect the identity of his victim, offered the little girl treats such as Kinder Eggs and proceeded to sexually assault her, and on one occasion he bent her over the bed and raped her.
Advertisement
Following a Central Criminal Court trial in May 2023, a jury convicted him on one count of rape and 12 counts of sexual assault between September 21st, 2012 and September 6th, 2013.
The complainant would have been around seven or eight years old at the time of offending.
The man had pleaded not guilty to all charges. He was convicted on May 9th, 2023 and was sentenced to 10 years and six months for the count of rape and a period of seven years and six months on the 12 counts of sexual assault, to run concurrently.
At the Court of Appeal on Thursday, Maurice Coffey SC, defence counsel for the man, brought a single ground of appeal before the three-judge court.
Advertisement
He argued that the trial judge erred in law by declining to give a corroboration warning to the jury and that the judge had predetermined this decision prior to hearing the application by the defence.
Such a warning can be given by a judge to a jury to highlight the dangers of convicting a defendant on the basis of uncorroborated evidence.
The original trial heard that the complainant's parents had separated and she would stay with her father from Friday to Sunday. The appellant was known to the complainant's father and arranged to move into the shared rental property with him, along with the appellant's ex-wife and her son.
In a specialist interview with gardai on December 5th, 2020, when the complainant was 15-years-old, she said that the offending started when she was around seven years old. She stated that the appellant would 'whenever he got the chance' stroke the back of her head and touch her.
Advertisement
She said this progressed to him offering her treats like Kinder Eggs saying words to the effect of 'if I give you this, would you let me do that'.
She said that she always said no but he did it anyway. She said that she had no clue what was going on as she was only six or seven years old.
The complainant described that the appellant would 'feel me, lick me, finger me, everything, on my neck, face, hands, boobs, fanny, bum, everywhere - and this was more than one time'.
She alleged that the incidents would occur when she was left alone in the house with him or when people were downstairs.
Advertisement
She said that he would touch her in a sexual way and on one occasion he licked her genitals.
The complainant also alleged occasions where the appellant stripped her naked and got her to lie on the bed, where on one occasion he bent her over the bed and he raped her. She said the abuse happened 'whenever he got the chance - nearly every weekend'.
An application for a corroboration warning was made during the trial, when the accused man's counsel argued there was an absence of any witness to the offending.
They also asserted the generality of the complainant's evidence and that there were conflicting accounts of other witnesses as regards when the complainant would be in the house.
Advertisement
Prosecuting counsel had counter-argued at the time that none of these factors are unusual in the case of sexual offending generally, and certainly not in the case of offending perpetrated against a child.
Ireland
Man jailed for 'outrageous' daylight attack in Cor...
Read More
On Thursday, Mr Coffey said that the judge erred in law and in fact by declining to give a corroboration warning. He said that considering the specific evidence in this case and how it was presented, together with 'the absence of any corroborative evidence whatsoever', on balance such a warning was warranted.
Counsel for the Director of Public Prosecutions, Anne-Marie Lawlor SC, said it was "manifestly clear" there was nothing 'special and peculiar' in the case that mandated the issuing of a corroboration warning. She argued there is no basis to assert that the trial judge exercised her discretion in error.
Mr Justice John Edwards said the three-judge court would reserve judgement in the case.
If you have been affected by any of the issues raised in this article, you can call the national 24-hour Rape Crisis Helpline at 1800-77 8888, access text service and webchat options at drcc.ie/services/helpline/ or visit Rape Crisis Help
.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
5 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Mum of serial killer nurse hopes 'nightmare' is ending
Glaswegian Colin Campbell, formerly known as Colin Norris, was convicted in 2008 of murdering four elderly women and attempting to murder a fifth while working as a nurse at hospitals in Leeds. But the Court of Appeal has heard that new expert knowledge may mean the former nurse's conviction is unsafe. READ MORE: Two people rushed to hospital after bus mounted the pavement He was accused of injecting the patients with insulin, causing sudden and severe hypoglycaemia. The victims—Doris Ludlam, Bridget Bourke, Irene Crookes, and Ethel Hall—were all patients in orthopaedic wards at Leeds General Infirmary and St James' Hospital in 2002. Vera Wilby, who survived, was the subject of the attempted murder charge. Despite the conviction and a minimum 30-year life sentence handed down after a five-month trial involving 20 expert witnesses, new evidence has prompted the Court of Appeal to re-examine the safety of the verdict. Speaking to STV News, Campbell's mother, June Morrison, reiterated her belief in her son's innocence. She said: 'We have never believed that he is guilty of any of this,' she said. 'We have always believed these women were not murdered. There were other things going on with their health. They had a lot of underlying conditions. 'Whatever decision is made about Colin, it affects the whole of our family. It affects the rest of our lives. If it does not go the way we want it to, we are going to have to start thinking about another campaign because we cannot just stop there. 'We need to keep fighting. I think we can appeal against this appeal, but again, you have to go through the process of having new evidence or new arguments. 'I have not been able to sleep because of the stress. I am not eating properly. He is on my mind constantly. When I do sleep, I wake up thinking about Colin.' The judges – Lady Justice Macur, Sir Stephen Irwin and Mr Justice Picken – will now retire to consider their verdict on whether the evidence that led to Colin's conviction was unsafe. June said: 'It still doesn't feel as if it's real. It is a scary time. We are hopeful as well, but it has been quite frightening at times. You are left feeling, is this finally it? 'Is this nightmare that we have been going through for over 17 years finally ending? It has been going on for longer than that, but Colin has been in prison for 17 years." Colin has been serving life imprisonment at HMP Frankland in County Durham since an investigation concluded that the women in his care developed unexplained severe hypoglycaemia while in hospital. June added: 'A lot of these families they believed that their loved ones died naturally, and then they were told there was a nurse who had murdered them. 'Me as a mother, I know my son is not capable of anything at that. It breaks my heart to think of these families and what they are going through. 'There are no winners. Because at the end of the day, if and when my son gets released, they are going to have to go through the process again, of if my mother wasn't murdered, what are they to believe? I can't think for other families but for myself; no one wins.' 'I do think nurses need better protection in court. Some kind of expert who can represent them in court because they don't have anything at the moment. 'They do have professional bodies, but practising nurses on wards need something more to help, to ensure that no other nurse or family has to go through this again.' READ MORE: Teen charged with 'attempted murder' after boy rushed to hospital While the court was off, June went down to Durham to see Colin in prison. She said: 'I think he is just taking things day by day and hoping. 'What is it they say? Prepare for the worst and hope for the best. This is what we're hoping for. 'I know the trial and a hearing are totally different, but being down in London, sitting on the court benches, it brings it all back. Colin is not there. He is on a TV screen, so it is just a small picture that I can see. 'During the trial, I couldn't see Colin either because there was a screen between us. If I looked up, I could just see him. When you hear from the prosecution experts and they start saying 'my opinion is', it does take you right back. 'I have allowed myself to have thoughts of 'when he gets out, what we could do?' That is all a challenge. I have also had thoughts of 'what if he doesn't get out?' How do we start campaigning again? Who do we get on board? What happens with the legal team? 'All that goes through your mind, but at the moment, I just get through the day. Coming into this, as a family, we had never been in trouble with the police. 'We never had any dealings with courts or anything like that, so it was hard to accept this was what was going to be happening for the next few years.' Campbell has consistently denied any wrongdoing and maintains he never administered insulin to any patient. His first appeal in 2009 was unsuccessful, and he applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) in 2011. In February 2021, the CCRC referred his conviction to the Court of Appeal, citing new medical evidence that presents a "real possibility" that the verdicts are unsafe. The review concluded that natural causes could explain the hypoglycaemia in all four deceased patients, with the possible exception of Ethel Hall. READ MORE: Urgent search launched for missing teen who may have travelled to Birmingham In written submissions, James Curtis KC said the jury in Campbell's trial had the 'exceptional assistance of a meticulous, systematic and detailed summing up' from the judge. He added: 'They were provided with the necessary relevant facts and issues, from a plethora of highly qualified and clinically experienced witnesses. 'The judge carefully summarised and explained these, and accurately directed the jury as to how to approach them.' Michael Mansfield KC told the court on Thursday that Campbell's appeal is a 'straightforward case', and that judges 'must conclude that these convictions are unsafe."
Belfast Telegraph
2 days ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Reviews opened into Tina Satchwell and Michael Gaine investigations
Garda Commissioner Drew Harris said that 'in hindsight' it may have been 'very obvious' where Mrs Satchwell's remains were secretly buried. Mr Harris said a report would be compiled and given to the Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan on Mrs Satchwell's disappearance, while the case of Mr Gaine is undergoing a peer review. Earlier this week, Richard Satchwell was given a life sentence for the murder of his wife Tina at their home in Co Cork. The British truck driver, 58, had denied murdering his wife between March 19 and March 20 2017. The jury at the Central Criminal Court in Dublin reached the unanimous verdict last Friday after nine hours and 28 minutes of deliberations. Mrs Satchwell's skeletal remain were found in a clandestine grave under the stairs of the couple's home in Co Cork in October 2023, more than six years after her husband reported her missing. The house was subject to a search in 2017, however nothing was discovered. In a separate case, the remains of Mr Gaine, a farmer from Co Kerry, were discovered in a slurry tank on his farmland in May, two months after he was reported missing by his wife. The farmyard had been previously searched as part of the probe. Speaking about the investigation into the disappearance of Mrs Satchwell, Mr Harris said the 2017 search did 'harvest' a 'huge information', which was useful in the re-examination of the case. Speaking at the Garda College in Templemore, Co Tipperary, Mr Harris said: 'All of those were crucial. So I would say the initial investigation was hamstrung because of the lack of information in comparison to the later re-examination of this matter. 'There's far more information to hand which gave us real grounds then for actual suspicion and then inquiries that we could lead. 'When you look at hindsight, some of these things can seem very obvious, but in the moment, what was known, what was being said in terms of sighting, what was being said in terms of the victim by her husband, and one has to recognise the victimology that was being applied here. 'His suppression of her, the coercive control that obviously she was subject to for many years, her isolation in that particular community, that meant that there was very few other people that we could speak to her… what Tina Satchwell's life was like. 'It was a complex investigation. Yes, the house was searched in 2017, forensic scientists also accompanied that search, it was subject to thorough examination and looked for blood splatter, none was found.' He said the initial investigation will be subject to a review. 'We have the expertise within the organisation, and obviously, then we report to the minister and to the Policing and Community Safety Authority, as is our responsibility. 'But I do think there are definitely lessons that we wish to learn from all of these homicides, where it's missing persons and then converts some time later to a homicide investigation.' He added: 'What I can say is, we've already reviewed all our missing person reports nationally. That was done last year. We found no other suspected homicide cases. 'Then following the Michael Gaine investigation, we're subjecting that to peer review, as I do think there's learning for us around those who would commit crime and then attempt to dispose of the body, and often are successful in disposing of the body.'
STV News
2 days ago
- STV News
'I believe my son is innocent, is our 17-year nightmare finally over?'
The mum of a serial killer nurse says she hopes her '17-year nightmare' is finally ending after an appeal into her son's murder conviction drew to a close on Friday. Glaswegian Colin Campbell – formerly known as Colin Norris – was convicted in 2008 of murdering four women, and attempting to murder another, by injecting them with insulin at a hospital in Leeds, West Yorkshire. But the Court of Appeal has heard that new expert knowledge may mean the former nurse's conviction is unsafe. June Morrison, Colin's mum, told STV News that she has always believed in her son's innocence. 'We have never believed that he is guilty of any of this,' she said. 'We have always believed these women were not murdered. There were other things going on with their health. They had a lot of underlying conditions. 'Whatever decision is made about Colin, it affects the whole of our family. It affects the rest of our lives. If it does not go the way we want it to, we are going to have to start thinking about another campaign because we cannot just stop there. STV News June Morrison. 'We need to keep fighting. I think we can appeal against this appeal, but again, you have got to go through the process of having new evidence or new arguments. 'I have not been able to sleep because of the stress. I am not eating properly. He is on my mind constantly. When I do sleep, I wake up thinking about Colin.' Norris was convicted of killing Doris Ludlam, 80, Bridget Bourke, 88, Irene Crookes, 79, and 86-year-old Ethel Hall at Leeds General Infirmary and the city's St James' Hospital in 2002. He was also found guilty of attempting to murder 90-year-old Vera Wilby. All the women were elderly inpatients in 2002 on orthopaedic wards where Campbell worked and each developed severe, unexplained hypoglycemia. STV News (Left to right) Ethel Hall, Bridget Bourke, Irene Crookes and Doris Ludlam. Campbell was alleged to have been present when or shortly before each of the patients suffered hypoglycemia and, because of the rarity of such a cluster of cases happening within a short space of time, prosecutors said the nurse must have been responsible. A total of 20 experts gave evidence during a five-month trial at Newcastle Crown Court after which Campbell was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 30 years. The judges – Lady Justice Macur, Sir Stephen Irwin and Mr Justice Picken – will now retire to consider their verdict on whether the evidence that led to Colin's conviction was unsafe. June said: 'It still doesn't feel as if it's real. It is a scary time. We are hopeful as well, but it has been quite frightening at times. You are left feeling is this finally it? 'Is this nightmare that we have been going through for over 17 years finally ending? It has been going on for longer than that, but Colin has been in prison for 17 years. Norris has been serving life imprisonment at HMP Frankland in County Durham since an investigation concluded that the women in his care developed unexplained severe hypoglycaemia while in hospital. 'A lot of these families, they believed that their loved ones died naturally and then they were told there was a nurse that had murdered them,' said June. 'Me as a mother, I know my son is not capable of anything at that. It breaks my heart to think of these families and what they are going through. 'There are no winners. Because at the end of the day, if and when my son gets released, they are going to have to go through the process again of if my mother wasn't murdered, what are they to believe? I can't think for other families but for myself, no one wins.' 'I do think nurses need better protection in court. Some kind of expert that can represent them at a court because they don't have anything at the moment. 'They do have professional bodies but practicing nurses on wards need something more to help, to ensure that no other nurse or family has to go through this again.' While the court was off, June went down to Durham to see Colin in prison. 'I think he is just taking things day by day and hoping,' she said. 'What is it they say? Prepare for the worst and hope for the best. This is what we're hoping for. STV News 'I know the trial and a hearing are totally different, but being down in London, sitting on the court benches, it brings it all back. Colin is not there. He is on a TV screen so it is just a small picture that I can see. 'During the trial, I couldn't see Colin either because there was a screen between us. If I looked up, I could just see him. When you hear from the prosecution experts and they start saying 'my opinion is', it does take you right back. 'I have allowed myself to have thoughts of 'when he gets out, what we could do?' That is all a challenge. I have also had thoughts of 'what if he doesn't get out?' How do we start campaigning again? Who do we get on board? What happens with the legal team? 'All that goes through your mind, but at the moment I just get through the day. Coming into this, as a family, we had never been in trouble with the police. 'We never had any dealings with courts or anything like that, so it was hard to accept this was what was going to be happening for the next few years.' On the final day of Campbell's appeal in London on Friday, judges heard closing submissions from barristers representing the Crown Prosecution Service, who are opposing the appeal. In written submissions, James Curtis KC said the jury in Campbell's trial had the 'exceptional assistance of a meticulous, systematic and detailed summing up' from the judge. He added: 'They were provided with the necessary relevant facts and issues, from a plethora of highly qualified and clinically experienced witnesses. 'The judge carefully summarised and explained these, and accurately directed the jury as to how to approach them.' Michael Mansfield KC told the court on Thursday that Campbell's appeal is a 'straightforward case', and that judges 'must conclude that these convictions are unsafe'. Campbell has denied any wrongdoing and says he did nothing to cause hypoglycemia in any of the patients. He unsuccessfully appealed against his conviction in 2009 and applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission in 2011. His appeal was heard after a review from the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) said new evidence created a 'real possibility' his conviction was unsafe. The CCRC referred his conviction to the Court of Appeal on the basis of new medical evidence in February 2021. It was agreed the new evidence could prove that natural causes may account for the hypoglycaemia in the four patients other than Mrs Hall. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
