
IND vs ENG: How the game ebbed and flowed towards an England stroll
During the 78th over of the England innings, skipper Shubman Gill and his trump card, Jasprit Bumrah, were having a long chat at mid-on. Bowler Shardul Thakur and batsman Joe Root were waiting for their conversation to get over. With the new ball due in a couple of overs, England on 341/5, needed only 29 to win. It didn't seem Bumrah, who had already bowled about 45 overs in the game, would take the red cherry. India seemed to have given up after a long intense game.
Mohammed Siraj took the new ball and conceded 6 runs. Spinner Ravindra Jadeja bowled the second and gave away 18. Wicket-keeper Jamie Smith hit a six over wide long-on to take England past 371. It was expected to be a steep chase and a tight finish but England's modern-day batting buccaneers, with methodical plans, ensured it was neither.
Ben Duckett (149) and Zak Crawley (64) who had an imposing opening stand of 188-1, under very difficult conditions in the first session, had set the stage. Later Joe Root (53 not out) and Ben Stokes (33) offered the finishing touches. That wasn't how it looked at tea.
Those winning celebrations, as seen from the Western Terrace 😍🏴 pic.twitter.com/TkIgeI5TXQ
— Sky Sports Cricket (@SkyCricket) June 24, 2025
Before the final session, finally after seven batsmen had hit centuries, five bowlers had conceded more than hundred runs, close to 10 catches were dropped, with one five-wicket haul and several rain stoppages, England needed 102 runs in about 37 overs to win the opening Test of the series against India at Headingley.
At the crease were the present and former England skippers – Stokes and Root – veterans of many impossible chases, the brain trust of England's famous aggressive Bazball brand of cricket. Stopping the home chase to 371 in the fourth inning was a young Indian captain Shubman Gill keen to make an early impression. There were characters, a riveting plot and context too. But still there was no drama.
The suspense saga ended about a couple of hours later. England recorded a five wicket win. As they celebrated, India would be ruing the missed chances, thinking of going back to the drawing board and mulling over ways to bounce back. The fight for the inaugural Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, two greats known for their battles of fine margins, had seen a game that went into the last session on Day 5. The home team's win coming from a steep chase meant ticket sales for the rest of the rounds at Birmingham, Lord's, Manchester and The Oval have picked up. That's what the suits were discussing loudly.
From the start of the day, from the pundits to the casual fans, everyone knew that the result of the Test would be determined by the way in which the English batsmen negotiated Jasprit Bumrah when the ball was new and countered fourth-innings destroyer Ravindra Jadeja when it got old. Both are among the most challenging cricketing puzzles. On a largely overcast day, Bumrah was to be the tougher task but the England openers were measured in their chase.
At 11 am when the game started, England, 21/0 overnight, needed 350 to win. They didn't go for a flying start or got bogged down by playing through Bumrah and went for the slog later. They didn't just look to survive, even when Bumrah bowled, but scored when needed.
Indian bowling, except Bumrah, didn't seem to have learnt from their mistakes in the first innings. Siraj did have energy early in the first session, when he troubled the batsmen with seam movement. But he wasn't consistent with this length. The performance of the other two pacers, Prasidh Krishna and Shardul Thakur, was also mediocre. They did take wickets, two apiece, but it was too late in the innings.
In the first session, they bowled too short and seam position wasn't ideal to get swing in these conditions. India missed a bowler of Mohammad Shami's skills. Thakur, under gloomy conditions, said to be ideal to move the ball in air, bowled with two men on the fence on the square. Duckett and Crawley got away easy as they were fed the length they preferred. Thakur was supposed to bowl up and bait the batsmen to drive and get the edge. He did not perform the role on a consistent basis. Ironically, towards the end of play, when Smith, a lower order batsmen, came to crease, the short-ball plan was not used either.
Jadeja, on a brownish track with cracks, has a reputation for taking wickets but England's collective ploy to use reverse sweep against him scrambled the all-rounder's mind. Duckett started; Stokes and Root continued.
Before the game, India's bowling coach Morne Morkel had said that they need to bowl on the stumps and keep the ball about 7 meters from the stumps. That just remained the coach's wish.
All through the innings, Shubman was proactive in the field. He talked to his bowlers, consulted the seniors, change fielders, and switched ends of bowlers. But nothing worked. To be fair, no captain can set fields when they aren't consistent with their line or length, or not understanding the conditions to exploit them.
What had started as a day of great possibility ended in disappointment. If India lose a Test after scoring 471 and 364 with Bumrah in the team, they need a rethink about the playing XI and tactics.
When the Indian players stepped out of the team bus, Jadeja, among the first to de-board, looked for the sun that was hidden by the dark clouds. After a few steps, he tapped the shoulder of Gill. The skipper partially removed his headphones and listened to the senior-most player of his side and nodded his head.
Among the last to leave the coach was India's highest run-getter and vice-captain Rishabh Pant. He had a stroller in one hand and a cylindrical wifi speaker, blaring Punjab song, in the other. That speaker would have been on full blast in the dressing room had India won. But at Headingley, it was the Barmy Army's trumpet that was echoing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'India's batting line-up is like a dobermann dog': Dinesh Karthik highlights viral description as England win
Shubman Gill-led India stumbled to a five-wicket loss in the first Test of the five-match series against England at Headingley, Leeds on Tuesday. The hosts chased down 371 owing to a 149-run knock by opening batter Ben Duckett. It is fair to say that India have only themselves to blame as twice in the contest, the lower-middle order let England come back. In the first innings, India lost their final seven wickets for 41 runs on the board, while in the second innings, the final six wickets fell for 31 runs. Here's what Dinesh Karthik had to say about India's batting lineup, considering Shubman Gill and co lost the Headingley Test.(AP) In both innings, India had the chance to shut the door on England, but a dismal lower-order performance helped England come back. In the end, this mistake proved costly as England ended up gaining a 1-0 lead in the five-match series. In the first innings, India looked set to reach the 550-600-run mark but a horrendous collapse resulted in Gill and co getting bowled out for 471. Similarly in the second innings, India would have planned to set a target of more than 420 to England, but a loss of wickets in a cluster resulted in the hosts chasing just 371. Much of the internet chatter has been about India's non-existent tail and how the lower order never scores runs when the team needs it the most. During Day 5 of the first Test, former India wicketkeeper-batter Dinesh Karthik also addressed the viral description of India's batting, leaving Ian Ward and Michael Atherton in splits. Also Read: Shubman Gill minces no words after India fail to defend 371 vs England in his 1st Test as captain Speaking about the same on Sky Sports Cricket, Dinesh Karthik said, 'I just saw on Twitter with someone saying the Indian batting is like a dobermann dog.' 'The head is good, the middle portion is okay, but there is no tail at all,' he added. Jasprit Bumrah has a rare off day at the office Jasprit Bumrah, who returned with five wickets in the first innings, had a rare bad day at the office as he failed to take a single wicket in the second innings. Prasidh Krishna and Shardul Thakur returned with two wickets each, while Ravindra Jadeja took one. After the loss, Shubman Gill was once again asked about Bumrah's role in the series. It has already been made clear that the speedster would just be playing three Tests in the series against England. Speaking about the same, Gill said. 'It's definitely more game by game, you know there's a good break after the Test match, so once we're close to the match we'll see,' said Gill. India and England will now square off in the second Test, beginning July 2 at Edgbaston, Birmingham.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
30 minutes ago
- First Post
Where India went wrong in 1st Test at Headingley and why they lost
India suffered a heartbreaking loss in the first Test against England at Headingley, despite scoring five centuries. England chased down 371 in the fourth innings to win by five wickets on the final day. We analyse where India went wrong and the key reasons behind their defeat. read more India lost the first Test of the five-match series against England at Headingley, Leeds on Tuesday. The contest turned out to be a dramatic and historic game. England chased down 371 runs in the final innings to win by five wickets. This is the second-highest run chase ever in England and the highest in Headingley. England opener Ben Duckett played a brilliant knock of 149 runs in the final innings to help his team chase down the target. He was well supported by his opening partner Zak Crawley, who scored a crucial 65 runs. Joe Root finished things off with an unbeaten half-century batting alongside Ben Stokes (33) and Jamie Smith (44 not out). STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While India had many moments of dominance in the match, several mistakes across all five days ended up costing them the game. Two big batting collapses cost India dearly India were in brilliant positions in both innings but threw it all away with sudden collapses . In the first innings, India were 430/3 with centuries from Yashasvi Jaiswal, Shubman Gill, and Rishabh Pant. A total close to 600 looked possible. But instead, India collapsed to 471 all out, losing 7 wickets for just 41 runs. The lower order failed to contribute as always. On the other hand, the England tail made some valuable contributions with the bat as they added 71 runs in their first innings to help their side cancel out India's massive score. They basically put the middle and Indian lower order to shame. The second innings was no different for this Indian side. Rishabh Pant scored another century and KL Rahul got a ton as well. India were 333/5 at one point and seemed on track for a lead of 400-plus. But they lost their last 5 wickets for just 31 runs and were bowled out for 364. This meant India didn't have enough runs on the board to challenge England on the final day. Bowlers failed to deliver when it mattered Indian ace Jasprit Bumrah took five wickets in the first innings and bowled with great control. He didn't receive much support from the other bowlers until at least Day 3. In the second innings, he went wicketless as England's openers played him out carefully, and once again, the other bowlers didn't step up until lunch on the final day. Prasidh Krishna and Shardul Thakur took two wickets each after the rain delay during the second session on Day 5, but the damage was already done. England openers Ben Duckett and Zak Crawley had put on a 188-run stand, laying a strong foundation for the chase. India's bowling attack lacked energy on the final day and failed to create pressure. During the first session, it didn't even look like they were bowling to take wickets. Bumrah's limited availability for the series has already been confirmed by both the pacer and the team management. If India's bowling is struggling with him in the side, the challenge will be even bigger without him. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Poor fielding and dropped catches India were very poor in the field. They dropped as many as seven catches in the match, including five in England's first innings alone. This is their worst fielding performance since 2019. Yashasvi Jaiswal dropped the most number of catches in this game. At one point, it almost looked like the ball was deliberately going towards Jaiswal because it knew he would drop it. Even Rishabh Pant, Sai Sudharsan, and Ravindra Jadeja, of all people, were guilty of dropping catches. They all dropped one catch each, while four were missed by Jaiswal, of which three came off Bumrah's bowling. Questions over Shubman Gill's captaincy Shubman Gill's leadership in his first Test as captain is also under the scanner. Despite being the leader, field changes were being made by other players like Rishabh Pant and KL Rahul. He looked under pressure on the field, especially when England batters were scoring all around the park. Gill had said before the start of the first Test that his primary focus would be on batting, as it is his main role in the team. He backed that up with a fine century in the first innings. However, he missed a trick with his captaincy at Headingley, and that turned out to be one of the reasons behind India's loss. Having said that, this Gill-led young India side still has a chance to make a comeback in the series. They have an eight-day break before the next Test at Edgbaston, Birmingham, starting from 2 July onwards. If they make some adjustments to their lineup and playing style, they have the ability to upset any team on any given day, glimpses of which were clearly visible in Leeds. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD


Hindustan Times
30 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Virat Kohli would have said, 'I'll get England all out before Tea': Shubman Gill's defensive captaincy under fire
Shubman Gill's defensive captaincy on Day 5 of the India vs England first Test came under the scanner as England pulled off their second-highest run chase to get off to a winning start in the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy. Gill, in his first match as India's Test captain, was blamed for being too defensive and following the ball as England chased down 371 with five wickets in the bank. India's Virat Kohli (L) and Shubman Gill(AFP) "Most people felt Shubman Gill went too defensive. But I think he was trying to trap England by cutting off boundaries, hoping the wickets would come eventually," said former India cricketer Sanjay Manjrekar on JioHotstar. Gill started Day 5 under overcast conditions with too many boundary riders, which Manjrekar believed someone like Virat Kohli would never have done. That allows a team to get away without much pressure from close-in fielders. "I hate to bring Virat Kohli as a comparison as Shubman Gill is a young captain but he would not have put such a defensive field. That's different from someone like Virat Kohli, who might say: We have enough runs, I'll get you all out before Tea. Whether he would have gotten wickets with an attacking field is guaranteed ut he would have been at it," Manjrekar said. The former India batter agreed that Gill did not have the same bowling attack at his disposal as Kohli did with the likes of Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammed Shami, Ishant Sharma firing in cylinders. "Gill doesn't have the same seam attack as England—though they don't have Bumrah but English team has more all-round options. Even with Jadeja, I felt India should've started with a standard field rather than pre-empting reverse sweeps. You want to start with attacking intent—even if only for a few overs—before going defensive. That said, I don't want to be overly critical of Shubman. He's a new captain, and we should be understanding of that," he added. Ben Duckett takes advantage of India's toothless attack Anchored by a sublime 188-run opening stand between Ben Duckett and Zak Crawley, the home side displayed a more mature version of their famed "Bazball" approach, blending aggression with discipline. Resuming on 21-0 on a gloomy morning, England were up against the odds, needing 350 more. But Duckett (149) and Crawley (65) calmly blunted India's attack, reaching lunch unscathed at 117-0. The pair's stand was the fifth-highest opening partnership in a fourth innings in Test history and the first time an England opening duo surpassed 2,000 career runs together since Cook and Strauss. Despite a brief post-lunch wobble—India striking thrice in quick succession through Prasidh Krishna and Shardul Thakur—England remained composed. After Ravindra Jadeja dismissed Ben Stokes with 69 runs still needed, nerves briefly crept in. But Joe Root (53*) and Jamie Smith (44*) saw the hosts home in style, the latter finishing with a towering six over long-on. India had chances: Duckett was dropped on 97 by Yashasvi Jaiswal, and Crawley survived a return chance to Bumrah. But England capitalised on every mistake. Root's calmness and Smith's confident strokeplay extinguished any late Indian hopes. This was England's 12th successful chase in 18 Tests under coach Brendon McCullum, showcasing not recklessness but refined aggression. The match, only the third in Test history where all four innings topped 350, thrilled throughout.