JD Vance Doubles Down on Lecturing Germany: ‘This Is Orwellian'
JD Vance brought his lecturing of Germans into a second week Monday by slamming laws in the country meant to curb hate speech and the prosecutors who carry them out.
The vice president claimed Germany is 'criminalizing speech' and warned that its restrictions on citizens might put 'real strain' on the U.S. ally's relations with the White House.
Vance, 40, shared his reaction on X after a clip from CBS News' 60 Minutes went viral highlighting how strict Germany's anti-hate crime laws are, including the possibility of prison for those who merely reshare a post that includes false or hateful speech.
'Insulting someone is not a crime, and criminalizing speech is going to put real strain on European-US relationships,' Vance posted on X. 'This is Orwellian, and everyone in Europe and the US must reject this lunacy.'
Vance's latest lashing comes just after he drew the ire of many Europeans with a speech at the Munich Security Conference. There, he scolded continental leaders for allegedly stifling dissent and free speech. He also claimed the NATO nations' enemies were not Russia or China, but rather were the 'enemy within.'
Critics slammed Vance for being so brazen in what was his first major speech on the international stage as VP. That outrage drummed up media attention stateside that brought new attention to what 'free speech' looks like across the pond.
The German prosecutor Svenja Meininghaus defended his country's laws on 60 Minutes when he was pressed by CBS' Sharyn Alfonsi.
'Is it a crime to insult somebody in public?' Alfonsi asked, which received a simultaneous 'yes' from the panel of prosecutors.
Alfonsi followed up by asking if the resharing of another's illegal statement on social media—like hitting 'share' on Facebook, retweeting on X, or 'ReTruthing' on Donald Trump's platform—would be a crime, too.
'In the case of reposting, it is a crime as well, because the reader can't distinguish whether you just invented this or just reposted this,' Meininghaus explained. 'That's the same for us.'
Vance's outrage with that interaction came a day after he snapped at the CBS News anchor Margaret Brennan for claiming—during an interview with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, where she discussed Vance's Munich speech—that Nazis 'weaponized' free speech to perpetrate the Holocaust.
'He was standing in a country where free speech was weaponized to conduct a genocide, and he met with the head of a political party that has far-right views and some historic ties to extreme groups,' she said of Vance on Face The Nation.
Rubio refuted her comment immediately. Once the clip made its rounds online, other Republicans, including Vance, chimed in to do the same.
'This is a crazy exchange,' he said. 'Does the media really think the holocaust was caused by free speech?'
Vance critics, like the ex-MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan, pointed out that Vance was grilling NATO allies for supposedly suppressing free speech while his administration is actively denying White House access to Associated Press reporters because the wire service refuses to refer to the newly-renamed 'Gulf of America' as such in its copy.
'Hey @JDVance, I know you're busy lecturing the Europeans on free speech, but have you seen this?' Hasan posted, quoting an article about the AP's freeze out.
Vance responded Monday: 'Yes dummy. I think there's a difference between not giving a reporter a seat in the WH press briefing room and jailing people for dissenting views. The latter is a threat to free speech, the former is not. Hope that helps!'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Seann William Scott's Estranged Wife Claims He's Only Selling House Because of Her New Relationship
American Pie star Seann William Scott's plans to sell his house allegedly 'blindsided' his estranged wife, Olivia Korenberg, according to new court documents. Korenberg, 35, filed to modify the pair's custody and child support arrangement of daughter Frankie, 4, on Tuesday, June 3. She argued that Scott's previous motions in their divorce case contained 'numerous false statements,' including one regarding his attempts to sell their family home in California. 'When Seann emailed me on December 1, 2024, regarding his intent to sell the S. Drive home, I was completely blindsided,' Korenberg claimed in her court filing, obtained by Us Weekly. 'In the same email, he provided me with less than a month's notice to apply to private schools during a period of major instability where I had no idea where we would relocate or what I could afford.' Korenberg further alleged that Scott, 48, did not advise that he 'intended on selling his Malibu home and relocating to Venice.' Seann William Scott's Ex Claims He Wants to Evict Her, Daughter From Malibu Home 'Further, Seann states that his move was motivated by a desire to improve his commute, not by any consideration for Frankie's well-being — which speaks volumes regarding Seann's priorities,' she claimed. 'Seann, through his counsel, repeatedly emphasized that Frankie and I could remain in the S. Drive home until Frankie was 18 years old, yet our sudden eviction completely ignores Frankie's well-being and stability.' Korenberg believes that Scott's sudden desire to move and sell their Malibu house was 'wholly motivated by [her] new romantic relationship.' Scott filed for divorce in February 2024, with Korenberg alleging that he was still 'making romantic advances' toward her until October 2024. (Scott has not publicly addressed any of Korenberg's recent claims. Us has reached out for comment.) Celebrity Exes Who Lived Together Post-Split, Because Tom Sandoval and Ariana Madix Aren't the Only Ones Scott and Korenberg currently alternate custody of Frankie every two days, which the interior designer claims 'lacks stability and structure.' 'As Frankie grows, she will require a consistent educational routine and secure home base. His claim that he should be the primary custodian is not credible given his limited involvement in Frankie's daily life and unpredictable work schedule,' Korenberg's docs state. 'Most importantly, it would cause tremendous trauma to Frankie, who has a strong attachment to me and a clear preference for me, particularly when she is sick or in distress.' While Korenberg doesn't question Scott's 'affection' for their daughter, she maintains that she should be the primary parent. 'Furthermore, I have made consistent efforts to facilitate positive coparenting, in contrast to Seann's lack of reciprocal efforts,' she argues. '[It] demonstrates my greater inclination and ability to maintain a healthy coparenting relationship with Seann if I were permitted to move a further distance from Seann.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Taliban urges Afghans to ‘come home' after Trump travel ban
The Taliban has urged Afghans hoping to emigrate to the US to return home after Donald Trump banned its citizens from entering the country. This week, the US president signed a sweeping travel ban targeting citizens from 12 countries, including Afghanistan, to stop 'foreign terrorists'. Responding to the ban on Saturday, Mohammad Hassan Akhund, the Afghan prime minister, urged citizens to return to their country, saying they would be protected even if they worked with US-led forces in the two-decade fight against the Taliban insurgency. 'For those who are worried that America has closed its doors to Afghans... I want to tell them, 'return to your country, even if you have served the Americans for 20 or 30 years for their ends, and ruined the Islamic system',' he said in a speech broadcast by state media. 'Come back to your ancestral land and live in an atmosphere of peace,' he added. The Taliban returned to power in 2021 after the withdrawal of US and UK troops. It led to a chaotic evacuation effort and forced millions to flee amid fears of reprisal for working with Washington. Although Taliban authorities declared a 'general amnesty' for those who worked with the Western-backed forces, the UN has since recorded hundreds of reports of extrajudicial killings, detentions and abuses. An investigation by the international body last year found that authorities were responsible for 218 extrajudicial killings of former government officials and Afghan forces, 14 enforced disappearances, over 144 instances of torture and ill treatment, and 424 arbitrary arrests and detentions between Aug 15 2021 and June 30 2023. Over the past four years, the Taliban government has also imposed harsh restrictions on women and girls which the UN says amount to 'gender apartheid'. In most provinces, women have been banned from travelling or leaving their houses without a man, prohibited from working, while girls are no longer allowed to attend secondary school or higher education. The US has not had a working embassy in Afghanistan since 2021 and Afghans must apply for visas in third countries, principally Pakistan, which has recently ramped up campaigns to expel Afghans. The Trump administration said the measure was meant to protect US citizens from 'aliens who intend to commit terrorist attacks, threaten our national security, espouse hateful ideology, or otherwise exploit the immigration laws for malevolent purposes'. The move, which comes into effect on Monday, follows a terror attack in Colorado that authorities blamed on a man they said was in the country illegally. 'The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted,' Mr Trump said in a video message from the Oval Office posted on X. 'We don't want them.' Credit: The White House His administration added that Afghanistan lacks a competent central authority for issuing passports or civil documents, lacks appropriate screening and vetting measures, and claimed that Afghans who visit the US have a high visa-overstay rate. In January, Mr Trump also suspended a core refugee programme, all but ending support for Afghans who had allied with the US and leaving tens of thousands of them stranded. On Saturday, Hibatullah Akhundzada, a leading Taliban figure, also weighed in, calling Mr Trump an 'oppressor'. He blamed the US for the deaths of Palestinian women and children in Gaza and linked this allegation to the travel ban. 'You are committing acts that are beyond tolerance,' he said. The US president also barred nationals of Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen from entering the country. The ban is the latest move in Mr Trump's crackdown on immigration after he ended access to asylum at the US's southern border, ordered extensive immigration raids across the country and banned foreign students from Harvard. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Britain's debt is a threat to national security
Our sky high debt is a threat to our national security. This year, the cost of servicing our debt will be almost double what we are spending on defence. And in today's turbulent world, the fiscal buffer to cushion us from shocks is paper thin. The smallest tap could shatter our economic credibility. The Prime Minister has made defence and security the organising principle of his government. Given that, putting our debt on a downward path should be his government's priority. It isn't. Debt will be higher at the end of the Parliament than today. And with global government debt already around $100 trillion, and Donald Trump about to increase that by a further $2.4 trillion, who will buy our debt – and at what price? Last year, the cross-party House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee raised a red flag that UK debt risks becoming unsustainable unless tough decisions are taken in this Parliament. We set out a choice: taxes would have to rise, or the state would have to do less. Being cross-party, we did not opine on which option was best. The Government has taken tough decisions – but in my mind the wrong ones. Taxes are rising to record highs. The Chancellor said last year that her strategy would deliver growth, and that she would not come back for more tax. But the growth forecast has been halved, and further tax hikes are on the cards. Meanwhile, pressure to spend more on defence is going to increase. At the upcoming Nato summit, nations are likely to be asked to commit to spending 5 per cent of GDP on defence – double Labour's current commitment. So what is to be done? We need to confront the other option: the state should do less. The Government rightly says that the relentless rise in welfare spending is 'unsustainable'. Spending on disability and incapacity benefits alone is more than on defence. But having announced that action would be taken to curb the growth in the welfare budget, the Prime Minister is now blinking in the face of opposition. The Government – and the nation – cannot afford ministers losing their nerve to keep a lid on spending. The bond vigilantes have saddled up and are on the prowl. Nor can the Chancellor tax her way out of the debt quagmire: to do so would risk us entering into a doom loop of ever lower growth and ever higher debt. If defence and security is the organising principle of government, the Chancellor must set out a credible plan to stop debt's relentless rise and bring it down from today's giddying heights. Not doing so risks economic catastrophe – and our national security. Lord Bridges of Headley is a former Government minister; he was Chairman of the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee between January 2022 and January 2025 Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
