logo
Idaho legislators set aside $9.6M more for ITD Boise campus repairs, but more funding will be needed

Idaho legislators set aside $9.6M more for ITD Boise campus repairs, but more funding will be needed

Yahoo19-03-2025

Extensive damage is visible during a Dec. 19, 2024 visit to the Idaho Transportation Department's former Boise headquarters. (Clark Corbin/Idaho Capital Sun)
The Idaho Legislature's powerful budget committee set aside another $9.6 million in state funding Tuesday to renovate the Idaho Transportation Department's flood-damaged and mold-infested former Boise headquarters.
The $9.6 million from Tuesday is on top of the $32.5 million Idaho legislators set aside last year to renovate the property located at 3311 W. State St. in Boise. That brings the total to $42.1 million.
However, that funding level still falls more than $22 million short of the state's $64 million to $69.4 million estimates to renovate the damaged building.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Rep. Soñia Galaviz, a Boise Democrat, made the motion to approve the Idaho Transportation Department's fiscal year 2026 budget enhancements that included the new funding for renovations.
The decision came during the Idaho Legislature's Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee, or JFAC, meeting at the Idaho State Capitol in Boise. JFAC is a powerful committee that sets every budget for every state agency and department.
The $9.6 million for renovating ITD's former Boise headquarters came from zeroing out a $9.6 million request for the Idaho Transportation Department to relocate its District 4 headquarters from Shoshone to Twin Falls.
In an interview Tuesday, Galaviz said the new funding can pay to clean up some contamination that will need to be addressed before the real renovations can begin.
'We had heard that there were some abatement issues, some asbestos and other hazardous materials, that if they had this money they could get started on them because that has to happen before any of the remodels can,' Galaviz said. 'So we were hoping that this would allow them to get moving.'
Galaviz and Rep. Rod Furniss, R-Rigby, told the Sun that funding and renovating the State Street property will require a multiyear effort. They expect to come back next year and consider a request for additional funding.
'This gets them started, then when they get into it they will know what to ask for,' Furniss said.
The Idaho Transportation Department's former Boise headquarters was built in 1961.
On Jan. 2, 2022, the building flooded and was contaminated with asbestos. It has been vacant since 2022.
During a tour of the damaged building in December, state employees pointed out mold to a reporter with the Idaho Capital Sun. The elevators and fire suppression systems do not work. Electrical systems and wiring dangle from ceilings. Walls and ceilings show visible signs of water damage, including dozens of holes that crews drilled into walls in an attempt to let water escape. The interior of the building is filled with tangled wire and ruble. The heat and power only work in parts of the building.
The summer after the flood, in August 2022, the Idaho Transportation Department's board declared the former Boise headquarters and the 44-acre campus it sits on 'surplus property.' That opened the door for the state to sell the property after other state agencies did not express an interest in the property.
The state put the State Street campus up for auction, and a group of buyers including Hawkins Companies, FJ Management and Pacific West Communities submitted the high bid of $51.7 million, according to documents provided to the Sun by the would-be buyers.
CONTACT US
During a tour of the campus in November 2023, Idaho Department of Administration Director Steve Bailey told the Joint FInance-Appropriations Committee that the state sold the property to Hawkins and its partners for $51.7 million, the Sun reported at the time.
But on March 1, 2024, JFAC blocked the $51.7 million sale of the property, told the state to keep the property and set aside $32.5 million to renovate it.
At the time, legislators said they thought it was more financially responsible to keep the building and renovate it.
'…(E)verything I have heard is any time the state has sold some property, two or three years later they go, 'well, we shouldn't have done that' and they've actually tried to buy some of it back,' Sen. Kevin Cook, R-Idaho Falls, said at the time.
The $32.5 million JFAC set aside last year for renovations was a rudimentary, sight unseen estimate prepared by the Idaho Division of Public Works that did not take into account the extent of the flood damage and HVAC repairs, the Sun previously reported.
Then, in December 2024, the Idaho Department of Transportation released a 207-page report that estimated it would cost between $64 million and $69.4 million to repair the former Boise headquarters.
On Tuesday, Galaviz said she knew the new funding isn't enough to repair the building, but she hopes the new funding at least gets the project moving.
'Because they have to do the abatement first before they can do anything else with the remodel,' Galaviz said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cory Booker Says He Won't Take Money From Elon Musk
Cory Booker Says He Won't Take Money From Elon Musk

Newsweek

time4 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Cory Booker Says He Won't Take Money From Elon Musk

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Senator Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat, said during an appearance on NBC News on Sunday that he would not accept campaign donations from billionaire Elon Musk, but added that he would "welcome" the Tesla CEO getting involved in politics "in a more substantive way." Newsweek has reached out to Booker for comment via email on Sunday. Why It Matters Musk led the cost-cutting task force known as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) until the end of May. He served as a close adviser and key ally to President Donald Trump, and helped bankroll his 2024 campaign with more than $250 million in donations. On Tuesday, he turned against the administration, speaking out against the One Big Beautiful Bill spending proposal, calling it a "disgusting abomination." Musk's public rebuke marked a notable and apparent departure from the Trump administration's legislative agenda. The Trump-backed reconciliation package passed the House last month following weeks of negotiations in which House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, wrangled votes from the ultraconservative and more centrist factions of the GOP. While Trump praised the measure in its current form, Senate Republicans have made it clear they plan to make significant changes to it before it passes the upper chamber. What to Know NBC News' Meet the Press host Kristen Welker asked Booker, an opponent of Trump's spending bill, if he would accept money from Musk for a potential reelection campaign. He is up for reelection next year. Booker replied: "I will partner with anyone like I did in the last Congress," arguing that the bill is "an American issue. And I welcome Elon Musk, not to my campaign, I welcome him right now, not to sit back and just fire off tweets, to get involved right now in a more substantive way and putting pressure on Congress people and senators to not do this." Welker asked again if Booker would ever accept campaign funding from Musk, Booker said, "I would not accept money from Elon Musk for my campaign, but I would be supportive of anybody, including Elon Musk, putting resources forward right now to let more Americans know" about the bill. Following Musk posts on his social media platform X, formerly Twitter, calling the bill a "massive, outrageous, pork-filled" piece of legislation that is a "disgusting abomination," Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, told Politico that the party should try to welcome Musk. "We should ultimately be trying to convince him that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with," the congressman said. On Saturday, Trump told NBC News that Musk will face "very serious consequences" if he starts to fund Democrats. He did not specify what actions he could take against Musk. When asked if he has any desire to repair the relationship between the pair, Trump simply said "No," adding that he "would assume" their relationship is over after the very public dispute. Musk posted a series of messages criticizing the bill, Trump and the Republican Party and some of its leaders. At one point, he posted a poll asking followers whether they support the creation of a new political party, dubbed "The America Party." Of the more than 5.6 million users who responded, 80 percent said yes. Senator Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat, is seen on May 14 in Washington, D.C. Inset: Elon Musk attends a news conference in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington,... Senator Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat, is seen on May 14 in Washington, D.C. Inset: Elon Musk attends a news conference in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington, D.C. More AP Photo/Evan Vuccifor Student Borrower Protection Center What People Are Saying Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, wrote on Wednesday on X: "The Big Beautiful Bill is a debt bomb ticking. It's also the biggest missed opportunity conservatives have ever had to put our country back on a track of fiscal sanity. If we defeat this bill, a better one can be offered that won't bankrupt our country." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Newsweek on Thursday: "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted. The president is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, told reporters on Tuesday: "I have to agree with [Musk] on one hand. I always love it when Americans are angry at the federal government and express it. I think that should've been happening for years now. I mean, we're $36 trillion in debt for a reason." President Donald Trump posted to Truth Social on Thursday: "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, wrote in a X post on June 3: "Musk is right: this bill IS a 'disgusting abomination.' We shouldn't give $664 billion in tax breaks to the 1%. We shouldn't throw 13.7 million people off of Medicaid. We shouldn't cut $290 billion from programs to feed the hungry. Let's defeat this disgusting abomination." Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, told reporters on Tuesday: "We obviously respect everything that Elon did with DOGE. On this particular issue, we have a difference of entitled to that opinion. We're going to proceed full speed ahead." What Happens Next Trump gave Senate Republicans a July 4 deadline to pass the bill and get it to his desk.

Capitol View: Columnist John Brummett, ATA president Shannon Newton
Capitol View: Columnist John Brummett, ATA president Shannon Newton

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Capitol View: Columnist John Brummett, ATA president Shannon Newton

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – Late last week, there was a dustup between President Donald Trump and billionaire businessman Elon Musk as a war of words divided the two. Capitol View host Roby Brock met with Arkansas Democrat-Gazette columnist John Brummett to discuss how the separation in the political relationship could play out. Roby then met with Arkansas Trucking Association president Shannon Newton to talk about the impact that the legislative session had on the industry. Capitol View airs on Sundays at 8:30 a.m. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Clarence Page: Big, beautiful bromance breaks up — live on social media
Clarence Page: Big, beautiful bromance breaks up — live on social media

Chicago Tribune

time12 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Clarence Page: Big, beautiful bromance breaks up — live on social media

For those who think government should be run like a business, the messy social media spat that played out last week between President Donald Trump and billionaire CEO Elon Musk suggested that business could be doing a lot better. That may help to explain why shares of Musk's company Tesla dropped 14% Thursday, falling for the second straight day as the spat between the richest man in the world and the most powerful man in the world oozed into a meltdown. Ironically, the fight played out on the social media platforms Truth Social, majority-owned by the president, and X, formerly Twitter, which Musk bought and renamed in 2023 and subsequently turned into a megaphone for far-right politics and Trumpism. To many observers, the breakup of this bromance seemed inevitable, less because of the bros' differences than the great deal they share in common. 'Like 'Alien v. Predator' for political nerds,' The Guardian ballyhooed — and, as a dedicated political nerd, I agree. What else can we expect from two megalomaniacs dedicated to fame, money and far-right politics and experienced with messy divorces? 'I suppose it was in the stars,' Rep. Jamie Raskin, of Maryland and top Democrat on the House judiciary committee, told reporters on Capitol Hill. 'Everybody was predicting it when it first began. You've got two gentlemen with gargantuan egos and both appearing to suffer from malignant narcissistic personality disorder.' Ah, how far the oligarchic dream team has tumbled since Trump and Musk joined forces to wage war against what Musk branded 'the woke mind virus' — and of course to pursue riches through tribute (Trump) and government contracts (Musk). The table for the breakup was set in late May when the U.S. House of Representatives narrowly passed Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a domestic policy spending bill, which among other things would eliminate subsidies for electric vehicles such as those Tesla makes. Musk began grousing about the bill early last week, but he mostly confined his criticism to the amount by which the bill would increase the deficit. Trouble began in earnest Thursday, while Trump was meeting in the Oval Office with Chancellor Friedrich Merz of Germany. A reporter asked Trump about Musk's criticism of the bill. Trump pointedly referred to the relationship in the past tense and cast doubts on its happy future. Musk later slipped in a jab, suggesting that Trump and the Republicans could never have prevailed in last year's elections without the $288 million that Musk spent to put them over the top. 'Such ingratitude,' he huffed. The exchange became more heated as Musk lashed the legislation as a 'disgusting abomination' that would bankrupt the country. He then rallied his online followers to 'Kill the Bill' and things only got nastier. Among the highlights — and lowlights — Musk accused Trump of keeping the company of a pedophile. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Musk tweeted. '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That's the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' The reference is to the late registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who can be seen in widely circulated video partying with Trump. Musk later replied 'Yes' to a post that suggested Trump should be impeached and replaced with Vice President JD Vance. By Thursday afternoon, White House staff were calling the fracas 'the one big, beautiful breakup,' a reference to the legislation that ignited Musk's fury. That led to more speculation and debate as to where the feud would go next. Would it disrupt serious legislation? Who was winning the public relations battle on an ever-shifting playing field? A poll taken by YouGov asked respondents whose side they were on in the feud and found 52% said, perhaps sensibly, neither one. Only 28% picked Trump and a meager 8%, perhaps tech bros, picked Musk. Frankly, in a country loaded with people who have serious concerns about government and feel weary over such shenanigans, I hear a message in the polls: Make it stop! What happened to all the people who say government should be run like a business? The answer I hear is another question: Whose business?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store