Parking fee hikes in effect for non-residents at Gloucester beaches
To visit Gloucester public beaches from Memorial Day through Labor Day, non-residents are now paying $10 more for a daily parking pass, according to the City of Gloucester's website.
The current rate is $45 for non-residents on weekends and holidays; $40 for the week.
This change stems from a decision made by Gloucester City Council members back in January. It applies to Good Harbor and Wingaersheek beaches, as well as Stage Fort Park that each provide 500 parking spaces for non-residents.
'I was thinking like $20, maybe… but I mean parking like we're going to a Red Sox game in Boston in the middle of summer,' said Boden Belanger of Londonderry New Hampshire.
Then, there were beachgoers who came from ever farther away, like the Moran family of Westfield. 'I think it's a lot of money to spend the day at the beach,' said Kim, who drove roughly 2.5 hours with her husband and daughter to visit Good Harbor Beach.
The Moran family also encountered some difficulty navigating the city's online reservation system that was implemented a few years ago. According to the city, the reservations are non-refundable and can only be paid for with a credit or debit card. Signs can be seen posted near the beach to remind people of the changes. Gloucester's Permits
'We showed up to come in here, and they told us we had to leave and reserve online,' said Brendan Moran. 'We left and came back two minutes later.'
While there may be some confusion and aggravation for some, others have seen improvements in traffic around their neighborhoods now that the reservation system is in place.
'It spreads out the traffic much, much better for us as residents,' explained Bob Maresca, who has a home in Gloucester. 'Before we couldn't get out of our house, out of our driveway.'
To learn more about the changes to parking for non-residents and residents, as well as frequently asked questions, click here. Beach Information | Gloucester, MA - Official Website
Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.
Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Airline passenger shocked when agent rejects checked bag for 'bizarre' reason
A flight passenger shared frustrations about a surprising issue involving a checked bag — garnering plenty of comments from other users. Posting in the "r/delta" Reddit forum with the title, "My checked bag was rejected for being underweight," the user wrote that large souvenirs from a trip would not fit in any of the person's existing bags. So "I stuffed them into the secret duffel bag that I always bring for such contingencies and tried to check it," the post said. "Imagine my surprise when the agent said I couldn't check my fluffy bag because it didn't weigh enough," read the post. "Is this the bizarro luggage counter?" the user asked. "The agent said I should go ahead and take it as a third carry-on, but I didn't want to get hassled by the gate agent,'" continued the post. The person did not want to be forced to check a backpack at the gate and ended up finding a few "heavy things" from the carry-on to add more weight. "Has this happened to anyone else?" asked the Reddit user. "What do you think is the reasoning behind this?" Users took to the comments section to discuss whether they'd ever heard of a checked bag rejected for being "underweight" and speculated about possible reasons for the rejection. "Might have been too lightweight and flexible to make it through the sorting machines and various belts to get from the bag check conveyor to the plane," suggested one user. Another Redditor wrote, "Could easily be blown from the belt or from the cart." Said another person, "I would've just checked my carry-on and taken souvenirs with me." Another user said, "Gate agents lately are super strict … Trying to get three obvious bags past them would most likely not work." "You checking helium balloons?" joked one user. Another Redditor said, "Gate checking usually results in the bag getting damaged less. It's the unknown airport bag mazes that cause trouble." Most airlines list the maximum weight of a checked bag on their website, but they do not state whether there is a minimum weight limit. Delta's website lists its price for the first and second "standard checked bag under 50 lbs." Bags on Frontier "must weigh 40 lbs or less," according to that company's website.


CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Venezuelans in Florida react to Trump's new travel ban
President Donald Trump signed a proclamation to ban travel from several countries to the US, citing security risks, with one of the countries being Venezuela. Venezuelans in Florida reacted to the ban, with one worrying about their visa.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration bans travel from 19 countries as San Diego prepares for peak tourism season
SAN DIEGO, Calif. (FOX 5/KUSI) — The Trump administration announced a travel ban against a dozen countries on Wednesday and restrictions on seven others, citing national security concerns as a major reason for the restrictions. 'We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm,' President Donald Trump said in a video posted to social media. The proclamation signed Wednesday bans people from the following countries: Afghanistan Myanmar Chad Republic of Congo Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Haiti Iran Libya Somalia Sudan Yemen It also restricts travel to the United States from these countries: Burundi Cuba Laos Sierra Leone Togo Turkmenistan Venezuela That makes traveling to San Diego potentially more difficult or impossible for visitors from these nations. 'In order for this ban, this travel restriction to stand up in court, it has to be tied to legitimate reasons, and the president is tying it to issues of national security,' said Wendy Patrick, FOX 5 and KUSI legal analyst. This isn't the first time Trump imposed a controversial travel ban. In 2017, during his first term in office, he also restricted travel from seven predominantly Muslim countries. 'It can't be tied to demographics that are impermissible such as religion, race, national origin,' Patrick said. 'It has to be tied to an issue for which these powers exist.' Advocacy groups like the Partnership for the Advancement of New Americans criticize the ban, saying, 'At a time when immigration enforcement agents are abducting immigrants and tearing families apart, this ban only magnifies the inhumane treatment of people under this administration.' Sen. Alex Padilla echoes these concerns, saying in a statement, 'This senseless, prejudicial policy is an abuse of power that also threatens U.S. citizen relatives from the targeted countries.' The administration cites a report from the Department of Homeland Security that tracks the number of visa overstays, singling out nations with the highest overstay rates and countries with what the administration calls a significant terrorist presence. 'In the 21st century, we've seen one terror attack after another carried out by foreign visa overstayers,' Trump said. Patrick says that clarity could make upholding the ban in court more successful, but not foolproof. 'The first ban had a time limit on it — 90 days, 120 days. This one doesn't. It's open-ended, and that in and of itself could form the basis for a lawsuit,' Patrick said. The San Diego Tourism Authority says it's too early to predict the impact, adding, 'It's worth noting that international visitors comprise a relatively small portion of San Diego's overall tourism economy — only about 10 percent of overnight visitors. This gives us more stability than other gateway cities.' 'Lawyers and citizens from all over the world who are seeking to enter the U.S. are going to try to get clarity and try to get court action between now and the next term,' Patrick said. This travel ban is set to take effect on Monday, giving airports time to prepare, but that also leaves plenty of time for lawyers to file lawsuits against the proclamation. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.